The Red Hen Is a Canary in the Coal Mine

 

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave the Red Hen Restaurant in Virginia along with her seven guests. They already ordered, but a snowflake waiter decided he didn’t like her because she worked for President Donald Trump.

The owner came in and asked the employees what “they wanted her to do.” They said expel Sanders, so she was asked to leave, and she did. Why did this remind me of the 1960s lunch counters where blacks were refused service based on skin color?

Sanders was belittled by a vulgar woman masquerading as a comedian at the White House Correspondents Dinner, even calling her the “Uncle Tom of white women,” who got a laugh at her expense. The double standard of what is acceptable has become absurd.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary, Kirstjen Nielson, was recently bombarded by protestors chanting “no borders” inside a Mexican restaurant while she was dining. The harassment was allowed by the manager and it forced her to leave.

Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was harassed at a recent screening of a new Mr. Rogers documentary. The protestors approached her asking her questions, became very aggressive, and police were called to escort Ms. Bondi from the Tampa Bay theatre. A local paper reported,

“The video they are choosing to share is of the least aggressive portion of the attack that transpired after police arrived to control the scene. What they are not sharing publicly are several previous encounters involving large men getting in the Attorney General’s face, spitting and blocking her exit,” the spokesman, Whitney Ray, said in an emailed statement. “The Attorney General tried to have a conversation with these individuals, however, when it became abundantly clear that they were not interested in a constructive dialog but were only there to cause a scene, the attorney general tried to leave the volatile scene.”

Vulgar threats were recently made against First Lady Melania Trump and her son by former actor Peter Fonda, to the point where the Secret Service was contacted.

The level of vitriol and vulgarity in the public square, in the entertainment world, on college campuses, in social media, even at a movie or restaurant, has increased to a startling level, where people, especially women, feel frightened for their safety. The recent harassment over political differences has overstepped the boundaries of “the right to protest” in our free society.

Further, the media is oddly silent on the recent IG Report showing the vulgarity and level of corruption and manipulation at the highest levels of our government and law enforcement during the last election. Not only was Trump and anyone associated with his campaign a target, but so was Bernie Sanders. The tolerant, progressive, and so-called politically-correct Left have created a new low in civility and decency, by words and example.

Heated issues such as immigration, healthcare, foreign policy, and more (problems that did not begin with the 2016 election) are worked through and solved through debate, votes, and democratic means. There can be no tolerance of violence or violating the rights of citizens, whether public or private, to where they feel unsafe in their public or private lives. 

These incidents are our wake-up call, and we must ask ourselves if we should be accepting it as normal. Our freedoms as law-abiding citizens are being threatened; there are no more boundaries between having differences of opinion and actual hate. What should be done in this case and others?

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 164 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    The right doesnt riot.  The right does this.

     

    Image result for siege of venice 1848

     

    From the siege of Venice 1848

     

    • #91
  2. katievs Inactive
    katievs
    @katievs

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Abortion and contraception are basic goods and services too. I will support the right of Catholic doctors and pharmacist to refuse to provide them.

    Valiuth, I cannot believe you honestly think this is a just comparison. (Weren’t you just arguing for nuance?)

    No one should be legally compelled to perform an act that violates his conscience.

    I think it’s beyond absurd to suggest that serving food to a Trump official violates anyone’s conscience. But if someone wants to pretend it does, fine. Be a fool.

    Again, I’m not proposing restaurants be legally compelled to serve anyone. I’m proposing that refusing to serve someone based on their political viewpoint and/or work for the political opposition is grossly uncivil and should be denounced as such.

    There is nothing uncivil about declining to perform abortions or to sell contraception or to sell pork.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • #92
  3. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    Front Seat Cat: The manager came in and asked the employees what “they wanted her to do.” They said expel her, so she was asked to leave, and she did.

    The manager should have told the employees “shut up and serve your customers.” If this is true, I’m shocked the manager of a retail business would cave in to employees who demanded this action. If the “manager” is not also the “owner,” then the manager should have instantly been fired.

    I corrected that in the story – it was indeed, the owner, not the manager, according to the news, that was called and made the decision to ask her to leave – which is even worse.

    • #93
  4. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    Sash (View Comment):

    I’ve been asking myself will this get worse or better if we keep the House and increase in the Senate?

    A few months ago I thought it was a done deal that we would lose the House and possibly the Senate… but I think it’s 70/30 we keep both… things could change, but looking at polling since the latest nonsensical accusations about the immorality of enforcing the law at the border… it looks like that’s going to be a wash, or come down on our side… combine that with these unjust kinds of things, fake news magazine covers and so forth… I think it helps us win in the fall…

    Then what? Do they back off and just hate in private, or do they get actually violent?

    It makes me sick to see them threaten kids. I can’t imagine that is well accepted by most Americans.

    I believe you asked what is to be done? Other than get the word out what could possibly be done? They hate, America needs to see their evil, but we can’t turn evil ourselves… so just make sure the tale is told I guess.

    Great point – how many children were in the Red Hen or even with Sanders and what kind of lessons were they being taught witnessing this absurdity? So wrong in so many ways.  No wonder kids don’t feel safe these days.

    • #94
  5. TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder Inactive
    TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder
    @Kaladin

    I was heartened and more than a little surprised to find this in my news feed this morning.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary-the-message-86-ing-sarah-sanders-sent-to-conservatives/

    • #95
  6. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder (View Comment):

    I was heartened and more than a little surprised to find this in my news feed this morning.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary-the-message-86-ing-sarah-sanders-sent-to-conservatives/

    Michael Graham quoted Ari Fleischer:

    “I guess we’re heading into an America with Democrat-only restaurants, which will lead to Republican-only restaurants. Do the fools who threw Sarah out, and the people who cheer them on, really want us to be that kind of country?”

    Mostly they do.

    • #96
  7. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Al Sparks (View Comment):

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    Mrs. Sanders (I believe she is married) got kicked out because of her chosn employment, not an imutable physical trait.

    So it’s OK to refuse to serve Muslims?

    I think you’re asking if it’s ok to not serve Muslims. The answer is it’s not ok to not serve Muslims, even if they’re proselytizing.

    It’s ok to not serve Christians though, especially if they’re proselytizing.

    • #97
  8. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    I might have said to the staff how much I appreciated their informing me of their narrow minded intolerance, because the last thing I would want is to financially support such a disgustingly, preening and morally self righteous idiocy of thought. I also might have added that my position , which they found so objectionable in the Trump administration, just might give me the opportunity to make their stupidity famous…very famous.

    • #98
  9. Mate De Inactive
    Mate De
    @MateDe

    Ontheleftcoast (View Comment):

    TJSnapp, Multi Pass holder (View Comment):

    I was heartened and more than a little surprised to find this in my news feed this morning.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary-the-message-86-ing-sarah-sanders-sent-to-conservatives/

    Michael Graham quoted Ari Fleischer:

    “I guess we’re heading into an America with Democrat-only restaurants, which will lead to Republican-only restaurants. Do the fools who threw Sarah out, and the people who cheer them on, really want us to be that kind of country?”

    Mostly they do.

    The right would never do this. This ideological segregation is entirely a leftist thing. I hate when people try to couch that, it goes both ways. NO IT DOESN’T. You would never hear about this happening the other way around.

    I know that wasn’t the point that was being made in the comment but I saw the quote from the article and just wanted to note the this is kind of behavior is entirely on the left.

    • #99
  10. Mate De Inactive
    Mate De
    @MateDe

    Looks like the place’s Yelp rating is taking a beating.

    https://www.yelp.com/biz/the-red-hen-lexington-3

     

    • #100
  11. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    It continues.

    NPR: Trump Staffers Are Hypocrites for Eating at Mexican Restaurants

    • #101
  12. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Mate De (View Comment):

    Looks like the place’s Yelp rating is taking a beating.

    https://www.yelp.com/biz/the-red-hen-lexington-3

     

    The ‘free market’ is like “Mother Nature” … storms can be sudden and with extreme prejudice.

    • #102
  13. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    It continues.

    NPR: Trump Staffers Are Hypocrites for Eating at Mexican Restaurants

    Expect “Trump Staffers Should be Forced to Eat at Chipotle” any day now.

    • #103
  14. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    From the #95 comment article about 86-Sanders

    On CBS News’ “Face the Nation” Sunday, Congressman Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, concurred: “As far as the restaurant incident, I think the restaurant owner should have served her. I really do.”

    I saw this yesterday, and I thought, “When our oppents do good things, behave justly, they should be applauded.”  I don’t know the man, or his record, but Kudos to Elijah Cummings. 

     

    • #104
  15. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    From the #95 comment article about 86-Sanders

    On CBS News’ “Face the Nation” Sunday, Congressman Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, concurred: “As far as the restaurant incident, I think the restaurant owner should have served her. I really do.”

    I saw this yesterday, and I thought, “When our oppents do good things, behave justly, they should be applauded.” I don’t know the man, or his record, but Kudos to Elijah Cummings.

    He ran cover for Hillary on Benghazi.

    But isn’t it weird that we’ve gotten to the point where normal, civil behavior is an outlier of some kind, and therefore to be applauded?

    • #105
  16. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    It continues.

    NPR: Trump Staffers Are Hypocrites for Eating at Mexican Restaurants

     O.M.G. not even going to read it. Headline says it all. 

    Because one wants to control borders and manage immigration according to legitimate laws does not transfer to cultural rejection of those who might enter, most especially our neighbors to the south. 

    Unbelievable. 

    • #106
  17. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    It continues.

    NPR: Trump Staffers Are Hypocrites for Eating at Mexican Restaurants

    O.M.G. not even going to read it. Headline says it all.

    Because one wants to control borders and manage immigration according to legitimate laws does not transfer to cultural rejection of those who might enter, most especially our neighbors to the south.

    Unbelievable.

    It’s time to fight back by drinking lots of margaritas!

    • #107
  18. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    It continues.

    NPR: Trump Staffers Are Hypocrites for Eating at Mexican Restaurants

    O.M.G. not even going to read it. Headline says it all.

    Because one wants to control borders and manage immigration according to legitimate laws does not transfer to cultural rejection of those who might enter, most especially our neighbors to the south.

    Unbelievable.

    It’s time to fight back by drinking lots of margaritas!

    Cultural appropriation!

    • #108
  19. Mate De Inactive
    Mate De
    @MateDe

    The bigotry of low expectations is strong on the left. This quote from the CBS article is telling

     Matt Yglesias, of liberal website Vox.com, replied, “Who is going to cook the food at Republican-only restaurants,” a reference to Republican support for border security.

    So, only illegal immigrants can work in restaurant kitchens? Huh?

    • #109
  20. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Mate De (View Comment):

    The bigotry of low expectations is strong on the left. This quote from the CBS article is telling

    Matt Yglesias, of liberal website Vox.com, replied, “Who is going to cook the food at Republican-only restaurants,” a reference to Republican support for border security.

    So, only illegal immigrants can work in restaurant kitchens? Huh?

    My thoughts exactly. I’ve seen similar comments to the effect of “Who’s gonna clean your houses and your pools and do your gardening?”

    Er . . . I am? (Well, not the pool, because I haven’t got one of those.

    • #110
  21. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    Mate De (View Comment):

    The bigotry of low expectations is strong on the left. This quote from the CBS article is telling

    Matt Yglesias, of liberal website Vox.com, replied, “Who is going to cook the food at Republican-only restaurants,” a reference to Republican support for border security.

    So, only illegal immigrants can work in restaurant kitchens? Huh?

    My thoughts exactly. I’ve seen similar comments to the effect of “Who’s gonna clean your houses and your pools and do your gardening?”

    Er . . . I am? (Well, not the pool, because I haven’t got one of those.

    Yglesias should not quit his day job.  I actually wish Michael Graham hadn’t supplied the “explanatory” phrase at the end and allowed the nonsensical attempt at humor (?) to stand on its own.   

     

    • #111
  22. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Mate De (View Comment):

    The bigotry of low expectations is strong on the left. This quote from the CBS article is telling

    Matt Yglesias, of liberal website Vox.com, replied, “Who is going to cook the food at Republican-only restaurants,” a reference to Republican support for border security.

    So, only illegal immigrants can work in restaurant kitchens? Huh?

    • #112
  23. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Ekosj (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    WI Con (View Comment):
    There’s not much difference between the treatment Ms. Saunders got and an African American at the lunch counters in the Jim Crow Days. I don’t believe this should be ‘politely shrugged off’.

    Mrs. Sanders (I believe she is married) got kicked out because of her chosn employment, not an imutable physical trait. It’s nothing like Jim Crow segregation, anymore than Trump’s make shift detention facilities are like Nazi Concentration camps.

    So, when someone puts up the No Democrats Allowed sign, you think everyone at the DNC and WaPo and NYT will be Ok with that?

    Can I screen patients  and refuse service to Communists, Socialists and Democrats? Maybe hand out a questionnaire? 

    • #113
  24. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    It continues.

    NPR: Trump Staffers Are Hypocrites for Eating at Mexican Restaurants

    O.M.G. not even going to read it. Headline says it all.

    Because one wants to control borders and manage immigration according to legitimate laws does not transfer to cultural rejection of those who might enter, most especially our neighbors to the south.

    Unbelievable.

    Apparently we are all hypocrites because we eat, period. Since apparently it would be impossible to harvest food in America without a constant invasion of illegals.

    • #114
  25. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Mate De (View Comment):

    The bigotry of low expectations is strong on the left. This quote from the CBS article is telling

    Matt Yglesias, of liberal website Vox.com, replied, “Who is going to cook the food at Republican-only restaurants,” a reference to Republican support for border security.

    So, only illegal immigrants can work in restaurant kitchens? Huh?

    And only illegals can harvest food, pluck chickens and milk cows too.

    • #115
  26. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):
    My thoughts exactly. I’ve seen similar comments to the effect of “Who’s gonna clean your our houses and your our pools and do your our  gardening?”

    FIFY

     

    • #116
  27. Whistle Pig Member
    Whistle Pig
    @

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    We’ve already had to segregate our news and information sources because of left-wing polarization and hate.

    Many of us have had to change churches because of left-wing polarization and hate.

    Apparently we now have to vet our eating establishments because of left-wing polarization and hate. Maybe the staff will merely demand that I leave. But what if instead they decide to poison or otherwise adulterate my food? If the restaurant has a policy of hating on those who disagree with certain staff or owners, I’d appreciate it if the restaurant would conspicuously post its hate policy so that we can properly segregate ourselves. Then we can continue to live while the left continues its program of fomenting hate.

    This.  Several restaurants in town have decided to hang out pride flags this month.  Short of a posted “hate policy” that works for me.  As does a BLM sign in the window, or visible support for any progressive position.

    • #117
  28. Whistle Pig Member
    Whistle Pig
    @

    CarolJoy (View Comment):

    If only there had been a kid of hispanic ethnicity with a runny nose seated at their table, then the restaurant personnel would not have been brave enough to do this!

    unless he was a white Hispanic.

    • #118
  29. Whistle Pig Member
    Whistle Pig
    @

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    katievs (View Comment):
    Are you okay with restaurants refusing to serve people based on their political views?

    Well at least in the case of the Red Hen the owner said she only felt she had to ask her to leave because she worked for Trump. So specifically it wasn’t her views that were the deciding factor. None of the other guests who didn’t work for Trump were asked to leave. Can you deny someone service because of their chosen public political affiliations?

    I don’t think we can at once be on the side of conscientious objections to provide services for bakers, doctors, florists, and pizza shop owners and then call what happened at the Red Hen out of bounds. What happened to the Secretary of Homeland Security is I think another matter all together, as that was other customers clearly harassing her, and protesting at people’s homes is also harassment as well (or too darn close to it for my comfort). Mrs. Sanders was politely asked to leave in a reasonably discrete manner. It isn’t what I would have done were I the owner of the Red Hen, but then again I would also have have baked a cake for a gay wedding. You may think the owner of the Red Hen was wrong to do what she did, but were we not just arguing that people should have a right to be wrong just weeks ago about the cake baking case and similar cases.

    If we conflate all of these things together we undermine our own argument for nuance in the future too.

    I agree with this, though if I lived in Virginia the Red Hen would be off my list of places to eat.  They should have the right to choose who to serve, I should have the right to choose where to eat.

    • #119
  30. Whistle Pig Member
    Whistle Pig
    @

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):

    I mean, the left is saying “Yay for Red Hen for denying service to Literally Eva Braun!” while at the same time saying “Bake the damn cake!”

    They can’t have it both ways.

    Maybe they shouldn’t, but they actually can.  Political viewpoint is not a protected class.

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.