50 Shades of Trump

 

President-Elect Donald Trump likes to be forced into a leather cat-suit, have a blow-up gag inserted into his mouth, be bound from head to toe, and get stuffed into a sleeping bag, which is then filled with strawberry jam and zipped closed. Still in the bag, he is rolled down a rocky hill into a pool of medium-rare Trump steaks. Extricated from the bag, he then likes to have Meryl Streep throw Trump Grill Taco Bowls at him while Rosie O’Donnell reads aloud select excerpts from 50 Shades of Grey and Mein Kampf.

Or not.

This, basically, is the reporting from BuzzFeed and CNN, which claims to have access to a report that Russia has a file on Trump that includes embarrassing information which can be used to blackmail him. According to the sites, Trump was made aware of the file during a briefing with intelligence agencies about Russia’s possible involvement in the election. To date, there is no evidence that Russia hacked the election.

And, to date, there is no evidence that the report from BuzzFeed has validity. (Evidence that CNN is a news organization is also disappearing quickly.) Trump denies all of it, accusing CNN of engaging in fake news:

He continued on Twitter:

It would not surprise me if Moscow had a file on Trump. Or on Hillary Clinton. Or President Obama or Charlie Sheen or anyone. Everyone has a file. It’s just, for most Americans, that file is held by the NSA.

Blackmail can always be an issue. A President, or any elected official, being compromised is always a risk. But to purposefully print a report of unverified claims is to willfully undermine that elected official. BuzzFeed isn’t a whistleblower here, they’re propagandists. Publishing this unverified report in this manner makes Bradley Manning look honorable by comparison.

Reince Priebus, who will serve as Chief of Staff in the Trump White House, told “Fox and Friends” that he was in the briefing Trump had with intel officials, and these allegations never came up:

Complete garbage. I was in the (intelligence) briefing too. And this salacious stuff, the first I heard of any of these things was when someone printed it off of BuzzFeed. The New York Times announced overnight they couldn’t even publish this stuff, because they couldn’t verify it and they don’t believe in it. This stuff is total garbage, and it’s not true.

He went on to say that this was not an intelligence document, but was “apparently produced by a retired agent somewhere in the world, (who) gets paid by people to put these reports together. It certainly isn’t true.” Even CNN admitted they can’t confirm the contents of the memo were discussed in the meeting.

While many focus on the sordid details, others question have emerged about how a memo like this came to exist. Who did it come from? Are intelligence agency heads, all out of jobs on January 20, sending a parting shot before they go? Is this just another attempt to delegitimize Trump? Is this the work of the Vast Left Wing Conspiracy? Michael Moore? The Joos?

What if the whole thing is a hoax? Message board 4Chan says the rumor came from them, including the most incendiary sections about Trump and a liking of urination. Some are stating, with detailed proof, that this is actually fan fiction:

….a post on 4Chan now claims that the infamous “golden showers” scene in the unverified 35-page dossier, allegedly compiled by a British intelligence officer, was a hoax and fabricated by a member of the chatboard as “fanfiction”, then sent to Rick Wilson, who proceeded to send it to the CIA, which then put it in their official classified intelligence report on the election.

Less than 24 hours after it began, the story is seemingly falling apart. But the story never mattered; the narrative did. The purpose was to denigrate Trump, and further erode his reputation. It was reported, without proof, to continue the desired meme of Trump as some kind of Russian agent or operative or flunky or Manchurian candidate or add your delulded fantasy here.

And now that the lie has been exposed, Trump can get back to the things that matter. Someone grill up the steaks, and where’s Rosie?


Reposted from WIBC.com.

Published in Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 44 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. She Member
    She
    @She

    cdor (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):

    cdor (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):

    TKC1101 (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):

    Why, as a moderator, do you find it necessary to pick a fight with a member? Just doesn’t seem necessary to me.

    Thanks.

    In addition, I can’t find the contract I signed in which I agreed to forfeit my right to converse with any fellow member, moderator, editor, administrator or founder at the same time as I assumed a moderator role.

    Thanks for your input.

    Anytime. My advice…moderate or participate…or did you not ask for my advice? Oh well.

    Sometimes, it is a very fine line.

    I have been on Ricochet for more than six years.  When I started, the member feed had just been instituted.  There was no such thing as private messaging.  Many nice features members take for granted today did not exist.

    At some point in the timeline, moderators came to be.  And I was a member subject to their advice and intervention, just like you.

    I’ve seen many moderator comments over the years that start out with the words “cut it out,” or the words “knock it off,” and since I’ve been a moderator for only about two months, I can be very sure that most of them weren’t written by me.

    “Cut it out?”  “Knock it off?”

    Moderation?  Or participation?

    You tell me.

    • #31
  2. skipsul Inactive
    skipsul
    @skipsul

    TKC1101 (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    Hm. I have to say, I did not take Tony Katz literally, or even seriously, at all here.

    Neither did I. You could save a lot of words if you stopped treating every comment I make as the voice of doom, also..

    I think the leather fetish mouth gag contingent should be a fine target demo for new membership. Since they can’t talk, I’ll bet they have a lot to write. It might make for a tough podcast, though.

    Leaves more room for sponsor spots.

    • #32
  3. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    For what it’s worth, the BBC claims it has a second source backing up Buzzfeed’s claims:

    http://theweek.com/speedreads/672669/bbc-claims-second-source-backs-trump-dossier

    Personally, I think it would be a good thing if proof got out that the Russians were scrutinizing Trump at least as hard as they were scrutinizing Hillary.

    The problem of course is that it raises the question, “so why didn’t they release it to Wikileaks during the election?”

    But then, there are various possible answers to that question:

    • They were trying to help Trump get elected.
    • The information they have on him isn’t actually that good.
    • They never thought Trump could possibly win, and they were trying to hurt Obama by making Hillary look bad.
    • Their goal was never to help Trump but rather to sow instability, and now that he’s been elected it actually creates more instability to simply hint at the existence of dirty secrets rather than releasing them to the public.
    • Their goal isn’t to bring down the US government, but rather to bring down the US news media.
    • They don’t actually know what they’re doing, and are instead just throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks.
    • #33
  4. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    The claim is that they have a tape where Trump says things that could embarrass him.

    You mean, more embarrassing that the stuff he’s already said in public?

    Considering the qualify of language that Trump’s voters have already been willing to forgive so far, how could such a tape possibly be worse?

    Remember when Dean Kamen built up an avalanche of PR buzz that he was about to release a new technology that was going to revolutionize humanity and change everything as we know it, and then when the big day finally came it turned out to be … the Segway.

    This “damning tape” story smells a lot like that. If it was really so damning, it would be public by now.

    (And if it’s a sex tape, I think at this point people would be surprised if Trump hadn’t made a sex tape at some point in his life.)

    • #34
  5. Isaac Smith Member
    Isaac Smith
    @

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Cato Rand (View Comment):
    I just don’t ever want to hear another sanctimonious word about “fake news” from some leftist.

    Well, I want an Unicorn.

    It’s good to have wants.

    • #35
  6. TheRoyalFamily Member
    TheRoyalFamily
    @TheRoyalFamily

    So it turns out the 35 page report was merely part of an even longer document! Some highlights:

    • #36
  7. Isaac Smith Member
    Isaac Smith
    @

    Douglas (View Comment):

    Tony Katz: President-Elect Donald Trump likes to be forced into a leather cat-suit, have a blow-up gag inserted into his mouth, be bound from head to toe, and get stuffed into a sleeping bag, which is then filled with strawberry jam and zipped closed. Still in the bag, he is rolled down a rocky hill into a pool of medium-rare Trump steaks. Extricated from the bag, he then likes to have Meryl Streep throw Trump Grill Taco Bowls at him while Rosie O’Donnell reads aloud select excerpts from 50 Shades of Grey and Mein Kampf.

    Are these services available to other people? Asking for a friend…

    Anyone who can fill a pool with medium rare Trump steaks.

    • #37
  8. Trinity Waters Member
    Trinity Waters
    @

    She (View Comment):

    cdor (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):

    TKC1101 (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    Hm. I have to say, I did not take Tony Katz literally, or even seriously, at all here.

    Neither did I. You could save a lot of words if you stopped treating every comment I make as the voice of doom, also..

    That is not my perception of your every comment. (I daresay you have made a great many comments over the past few weeks that I have paid absolutely no attention to at all. And I’m not going to go back and look now, so they will just have to stand on their own merits.)

    However, you obviously think you know better than I do what I am thinking about your every comment, so please explain what you are talking about.

    On another note, I have as much right as anyone here to use as many words as I am entitled to, so I would appreciate it if you would stop trying to “save the words” from my depredations upon them. Last I knew, words were a renewable resource, and no matter how many I use, there are just as many left over for everyone else.

    Why, as a moderator, do you find it necessary to pick a fight with a member? Just doesn’t seem necessary to me.

    Thanks.

    Please read the member’s comment which was made directly to me, and which, according to the generally accepted terms of what constitutes a “conversation” is deserving of a response.

    I provided a response in which I asked the member to provide a further explanation of his comment (reasonable, I think), and pointed out that words are not a commodity whose supply is restricted around here (it’s common practice, for example, for those at the Coolidge, and even the Thatcher levels, on occasion to “continue” their comments as long as they like. I’m not sure that any of us should get into the business of telling other members, even those of us who are moderators, that they do not have a right to use their words in the furtherance of a civil and productive conversation.

    In addition, I can’t find the contract I signed in which I agreed to forfeit my right to converse with any fellow member, moderator, editor, administrator or founder at the same time as I assumed a moderator role.

    Thanks for your input.

    Wow!  Well done, She!  This fits right in with Tony’s cat suit.  Better disconnect the sensor in the tail, though.

    • #38
  9. Damocles Inactive
    Damocles
    @Damocles

    TKC1101 (View Comment):
    You could save a lot of words if you stopped treating every comment I make as the voice of doom

    That’s the main reason I read your posts!

    • #39
  10. Dean Murphy Member
    Dean Murphy
    @DeanMurphy

    TKC1101 (View Comment):

    Jon Gabriel, Ed. (View Comment):

    TKC1101 (View Comment):
    Good to know the opening paragraph is the new Ricochet. I guess they decided the membership drive needed a new demographic to attract.

    I agree. We love Trump voters with a sense of humor.

    Well, then you should appreciate the humor in the comment. I did think we were short on the leather cat suit contingent , at least those who admit it. Maybe if you can get them out of the Pit for a while.

    I practically live in the PIT and I have never owned nor worn a cat suit.

    • #40
  11. Chuck Enfield Inactive
    Chuck Enfield
    @ChuckEnfield

    Dean Murphy (View Comment):
    I practically live in the PIT and I have never owned nor worn a cat suit.

    I, too, prefer to go au naturale.

    • #41
  12. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    Dean Murphy (View Comment):

    TKC1101 (View Comment):

    Jon Gabriel, Ed. (View Comment):

    TKC1101 (View Comment):
    Good to know the opening paragraph is the new Ricochet. I guess they decided the membership drive needed a new demographic to attract.

    I agree. We love Trump voters with a sense of humor.

    Well, then you should appreciate the humor in the comment. I did think we were short on the leather cat suit contingent , at least those who admit it. Maybe if you can get them out of the Pit for a while.

    I practically live in the PIT and I have never owned nor worn a cat suit.

    I wish I could say the same thing. When I was very young (like 5 or 6) I loved my kitty-cat Halloween costume.

    It wasn’t leather tho’…

    • #42
  13. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    TKC1101 (View Comment):
    Good to know the opening paragraph is the new Ricochet. I guess they decided the membership drive needed a new demographic to attract.

    In partial defense of She, the deadpan here went entirely over my head.  My thought was that you were trying to defend Trump as opposed to snarking on the opening paragraph.

    Obviously Katz got it wrong – it is Christie who gets the strawberry roll treatment.

    • #43
  14. TKC1101 Member
    TKC1101
    @

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):
    In partial defense of She, the deadpan here went entirely over my head. My thought was that you were trying to defend Trump as opposed to snarking on the opening paragraph.

    If what you say is true, then I would expect a question on intent, and not a lecture and correction based on personality clash .

    The comment, however one reads it, is within the CoC. No member was attacked in any way.  It contained no offensive language. But , being a Rabble type, what do I know of the complexities of the CoC?.

    • #44
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.