Trump’s Nominees: The Final List

 

With so many names floating around, it’s been hard to keep track of Donald Trump’s cabinet and cabinet-level nominees. I created a table with all of the President-elect’s choices.

Cabinet

Agriculture Sonny Perdue
Attorney General Sen. Jeff Sessions jeff_sessions
Central Intelligence Rep. Mike Pompeo mike_pompeo
Commerce Wilbur Ross wilbur_ross
Defense Gen. James Mattis james_mattis
Education Betsy DeVos betsy_devos
Energy Gov. Rick Perry rick perry
Health and Human Services Rep. Tom Price tom_price
Homeland Security Gen. John Kelly john_kelly
Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson ben_carson
Interior Rep. Ryan Zinke
Labor Andrew Puzder andy_puzder
State Rex Tillerson rex_tillerson
Transportation Elaine Chao elaine_chao
Treasury Steven Mnuchin steven_mnunchin
Veterans Affairs David Shulkin

Cabinet-level officials

Ambassador to the United Nations Gov. Nikki Haley nikki_haley
Chief of Staff Reince Priebus reince-priebus
Chief Strategist Steve Bannon steve_bannon
Director, National Economic Council Gary Cohn Gary_Cohn
Director, National Intelligence Dan Coats
Environmental Protection Agency Okla. AG Scott Pruitt scott_pruitt
National Security Advisor Gen. Michael Flynn michael_flynn
Office of Management and Budget Rep. Mick Mulvaney
Press Secretary Sean Spicer
Small Business Administration Linda McMahon linda_mcmahon
Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer
White House Counsel Donald McGahn II
Published in Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 96 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Trumpus Maximus Meridius Decimus Abacus Inactive
    Trumpus Maximus Meridius Decimus Abacus
    @Pseudodionysius

    She:

    cdor:

    She:

    The King Prawn:

    cdor:

    The King Prawn:The rumor mill has Perry for energy.

    Gee KP, it looks as if you are almost as enamored with these excellent choices as am I. You ability to disguise your joy is remarkable,

    Why are you being a jackass? This was a simple statement of what the news headlines currently contain.

    Please, both of you, cut it out. @cdor, don’t try to invent a reason for having an argument where there clearly is none. TKP, please don’t fall for the bait. Stick to the subject of the post, both of you, and don’t let this drag on.

    I think this was a misunderstanding and is over.

    Great!

    Every time that word gets used, Trump Tower gets a little brighter.

    • #31
  2. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    My take:

    Good: Sessions, Mattis, DeVos, Price, Haley, Pruitt

    Bad: Mnuchin, Bannon

    Everyone else is wait-and-see, though I’m tempted to list McMahon as good for sheer chutzpah/entertainment value. :)

    • #32
  3. V the K Member
    V the K
    @VtheK

    Was really hoping there was a spot for ‘Chainsaw’ Al Dunlop.

    • #33
  4. She Member
    She
    @She

    Trumpus Maximus Meridius Decimus Abacus:

    She:

    cdor:

    She:

    The King Prawn:

    cdor:

    The King Prawn:The rumor mill has Perry for energy.

    Gee KP, it looks as if you are almost as enamored with these excellent choices as am I. You ability to disguise your joy is remarkable,

    Why are you being a jackass? This was a simple statement of what the news headlines currently contain.

    Please, both of you, cut it out. @cdor, don’t try to invent a reason for having an argument where there clearly is none. TKP, please don’t fall for the bait. Stick to the subject of the post, both of you, and don’t let this drag on.

    I think this was a misunderstanding and is over.

    Great!

    Every time that word gets used, Trump Tower gets a little brighter.

    Bigly Great!

    • #34
  5. Nathanael Ferguson Contributor
    Nathanael Ferguson
    @NathanaelFerguson

    Not sure if this has already been covered in the comments but I am fairly certain the EPA Administrator is among the positions that must be confirmed by the Senate.

    • #35
  6. Nathanael Ferguson Contributor
    Nathanael Ferguson
    @NathanaelFerguson

    @exjon I mentioned a moment ago that the EPA Administrator requires Senate confirmation but it looks as though that position is not the only one marked as not needing Senate confirmation which actually does. I just did a spot check and National Security Adviser and SBA Administrator both require Senate confirmation. I suspect most or all of the positions you list do need confirmation.

    • #36
  7. Nathanael Ferguson Contributor
    Nathanael Ferguson
    @NathanaelFerguson

    A comprehensive list from the Congressional Research Service can be found here for all of the Senate-confirmed positions.

    • #37
  8. The Cloaked Gaijin Member
    The Cloaked Gaijin
    @TheCloakedGaijin

    Umbra Fractus:

    Manny:But I have to say I find Rex Tillerson at State to be baffling. What experience does he have? Who the hell is he? I know, CEO of Exxonmobile. But for Secretary of State?

    What worries me about some of these picks (which are, on the whole, more good than bad, it must be said) is that it kind of reveals a pattern where the Trump administration seems to care only about economics and doesn’t seem to be paying attention to America’s other interests. Tillerson might make sense if you see diplomacy as a fundamentally economic issue, but there’s a whole lot more to State’s mission than just making trade deals.

    Yeah, the United States should speak up about human rights frequently, especially when it is…

    1. in the national interest
    2. to annoy certain countries that always wish to confront and pester the United States
    3. not annoying certain countries that have other valuable strategic, especially geographic, assets

    Did the Obama administration ever speak up about human rights other that gay rights and that sort of thing?  The United States should speak up for certain Christians (and Jews) who have been ignored for so long in certain dictatorships.

    • #38
  9. Jon Gabriel, Ed. Contributor
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.
    @jon

    The Cloaked Gaijin:Ambassador to the United Nations requires Senate confirmation. Otherwise, John Bolton would not have been blocked and appointed through a recess appointment. I think all ambassadors have to be approved such as the time when Jesse Helms blocked and prevented Bill Weld from becoming Ambassador to Mexico during the Clinton administration.

    Some others like Trade Representative and Environmental Protection Agency might need to be confirmed too.

    Ambassador to China has been named, if you want to add the ambassadors too.

    You are correct. I have edited the piece to reflect this.

    • #39
  10. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    The Cloaked Gaijin: Did the Obama administration ever speak up about human rights other that gay rights and that sort of thing?

    They didn’t even do that. The worst offenders on that front were Muslim countries whom political correctness made untouchable.

    • #40
  11. Publius Inactive
    Publius
    @Publius

    Manny:

    The King Prawn:

    Manny: But I have to say I find Rex Tillerson at State to be baffling. What experience does he have? Who the hell is he? I know, CEO of Exxonmobile. But for Secretary of State?

    According to the left (and even some on the right) because Russia is calling the shots.

    Yes, i heard that, but that’s ridiculous.

    Russia isn’t calling the shots, but it’s being run by a vicious dictator who has already literally invaded two countries with very little consequence and is strong supporter of some of the most anti-American bad actors in the Middle East.  It’s more than reasonable to be concerned about how the Trump administration is shaping up in regards to how they are going to handle this national security threat.

    It feels like we might be seeing a bit of a role reversal where we have elements of the American right who are supportive of the Russian dictatorship and/or downplay the threat.  During the Cold War, it was the Left that was doing that.

    • #41
  12. rebark Inactive
    rebark
    @rebark

    Publius: It feels like we might be seeing a bit of a role reversal where we have elements of the American right who are supportive of the Russian dictatorship and/or downplay the threat. During the Cold War, it was the Left that was doing that.

    Oh. Goooooooooooood.

    • #42
  13. rebark Inactive
    rebark
    @rebark

    cdor: I am sure by now you have been able to find out who Tillerson is and I hope you are warming to him. Remember, McCain and Graham are objecting (along with Rubio). That is kind of a plus for me.

    I would hope that State picks are based on more than whose cornflakes get [expletived] in. I still think it’s weird that somebody who has had a lot of experience in foreign policy like Bolton would get passed over because some other guy had made business deals with Russian interests. Russian petroleum interests that our growing national fuel production will hopefully pound into irrelevance.

    I don’t get why this guy in particular. He’s not awful, but there were some really good picks on the menu

    • #43
  14. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    rebark:

    cdor: I am sure by now you have been able to find out who Tillerson is and I hope you are warming to him. Remember, McCain and Graham are objecting (along with Rubio). That is kind of a plus for me.

    I would hope that State picks are based on more than whose cornflakes get [expletived] in. I still think it’s weird that somebody who has had a lot of experience in foreign policy like Bolton would get passed over because some other guy had made business deals with Russian interests. Russian petroleum interests that our growing national fuel production will hopefully pound into irrelevance.

    I don’t get why this guy in particular. He’s not awful, but there were some really good picks on the menu

    I guess my question is, “Who honestly thinks that among those being discussed Tillerson is the best possible pick?”

    I’m sure if he gets the nod certain people will call it the most brilliant move since the last cabinet pick, but does anybody really think he’s the best man for the job right now?

    • #44
  15. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    rebark:

    Publius: It feels like we might be seeing a bit of a role reversal where we have elements of the American right who are supportive of the Russian dictatorship and/or downplay the threat. During the Cold War, it was the Left that was doing that.

    Oh. Goooooooooooood.

    Or maybe the Right would like to downplay this issue at the moment since the Left has lost their mind and will use this issue to overturn the election.  Personally I am skeptical of all this Trump is a Russian stooge gambit until I actually see Trump’s administration do something that looks like they are favoring Russia as opposed of a bunch of accusations with no bases.  So far the Left / NeverTrump is painting Trump as a traitor and he has yet to be sworn into office.

    • #45
  16. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    rebark:

    cdor: I am sure by now you have been able to find out who Tillerson is and I hope you are warming to him. Remember, McCain and Graham are objecting (along with Rubio). That is kind of a plus for me.

    I would hope that State picks are based on more than whose cornflakes get [expletived] in. I still think it’s weird that somebody who has had a lot of experience in foreign policy like Bolton would get passed over because some other guy had made business deals with Russian interests. Russian petroleum interests that our growing national fuel production will hopefully pound into irrelevance.

    I don’t get why this guy in particular. He’s not awful, but there were some really good picks on the menu

    I agree on Bolton. He was always my first choice. Hopefully he is still in the picture and will be the second at State. Tillerson is an out of the box pick, no doubt. But to say he has no foreign policy experience is to totally ignore that Exxon is bigger than most countries and is doing business all over the world. I have heard people diss Trump for not “draining the swamp” because some of his picks have been in government. Well this one is certainly new blood, but very well connected. We are all just speculating anyway. More needs to be known about him for sure.

    • #46
  17. Publius Inactive
    Publius
    @Publius

    cdor:

    rebark:

    cdor: I am sure by now you have been able to find out who Tillerson is and I hope you are warming to him. Remember, McCain and Graham are objecting (along with Rubio). That is kind of a plus for me.

    I would hope that State picks are based on more than whose cornflakes get [expletived] in. I still think it’s weird that somebody who has had a lot of experience in foreign policy like Bolton would get passed over because some other guy had made business deals with Russian interests. Russian petroleum interests that our growing national fuel production will hopefully pound into irrelevance.

    I don’t get why this guy in particular. He’s not awful, but there were some really good picks on the menu

    I agree on Bolton. He was always my first choice. Hopefully he is still in the picture and will be the second at State. Tillerson is an out of the box pick, no doubt. But to say he has no foreign policy experience is to totally ignore that Exxon is bigger than most countries and is doing business all over the world. I have heard people diss Trump for not “draining the swamp” because some of his picks have been in government. Well this one is certainly new blood, but very well connected. We are all just speculating anyway. More needs to be known about him for sure.

    It’s why you have Senate confirmation hearings.  We’ll know more soon enough. He could end up being an inspired choice or something….less.

    • #47
  18. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    cdor: I have heard people diss Trump for not “draining the swamp” because some of his picks have been in government.

    I think the opposite. His government picks (Sessions, Haley, Price, etc.) have been really good. It’s when he goes outside the box that I start to worry. One Goldman Sachs guy I can live with, but three?

    “Drain the swamp,” doesn’t just refer to the bureaucracy; it also means addressing crony capitalism. That his non-government picks all come directly from Wall Street is cause for concern on this front.

    • #48
  19. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Umbra Fractus:

    cdor: I have heard people diss Trump for not “draining the swamp” because some of his picks have been in government.

    I think the opposite. His government picks (Sessions, Haley, Price, etc.) have been really good. It’s when he goes outside the box that I start to worry. One Goldman Sachs guy I can live with, but three?

    “Drain the swamp,” doesn’t just refer to the bureaucracy; it also means addressing crony capitalism. That his non-government picks all come directly from Wall Street is cause for concern on this front.

    Who are the 3 Goldman Sachs guys?

    • #49
  20. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    cdor:

    Umbra Fractus:

    cdor: I have heard people diss Trump for not “draining the swamp” because some of his picks have been in government.

    I think the opposite. His government picks (Sessions, Haley, Price, etc.) have been really good. It’s when he goes outside the box that I start to worry. One Goldman Sachs guy I can live with, but three?

    “Drain the swamp,” doesn’t just refer to the bureaucracy; it also means addressing crony capitalism. That his non-government picks all come directly from Wall Street is cause for concern on this front.

    Who are the 3 Goldman Sachs guys?

    Cohn, Mnuchin, and Bannon.

    • #50
  21. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Umbra Fractus:

    cdor:

    Umbra Fractus:

    cdor: I have heard people diss Trump for not “draining the swamp” because some of his picks have been in government.

    I think the opposite. His government picks (Sessions, Haley, Price, etc.) have been really good. It’s when he goes outside the box that I start to worry. One Goldman Sachs guy I can live with, but three?

    “Drain the swamp,” doesn’t just refer to the bureaucracy; it also means addressing crony capitalism. That his non-government picks all come directly from Wall Street is cause for concern on this front.

    Who are the 3 Goldman Sachs guys?

    Cohn, Mnuchin, and Bannon.

    Oh…Bannon. Yes, he last worked at Goldman Sachs in 1986, correct? And Mnuchin has been away for a while also. Cohn is the only one with current status at GS, isn’t that correct? Or do you not think that makes any difference…once Goldman Sachs, always Goldman Sachs. I really don’t know. You may be right

    • #51
  22. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    cdor:

    Oh…Bannon. Yes, he last worked at Goldman Sachs in 1986, correct? And Mnuchin has been away for a while also. Cohn is the only one with current status at GS, isn’t that correct? Or do you not think that makes any difference…once Goldman Sachs, always Goldman Sachs. I really don’t know. You may be right

    I don’t know either, and I hope I’m wrong.

    • #52
  23. rebark Inactive
    rebark
    @rebark

    Fake John/Jane Galt:

    rebark:

    Publius: It feels like we might be seeing a bit of a role reversal where we have elements of the American right who are supportive of the Russian dictatorship and/or downplay the threat. During the Cold War, it was the Left that was doing that.

    Oh. Goooooooooooood.

    Or maybe the Right would like to downplay this issue at the moment since the Left has lost their mind and will use this issue to overturn the election. Personally I am skeptical of all this Trump is a Russian stooge gambit until I actually see Trump’s administration do something that looks like they are favoring Russia as opposed of a bunch of accusations with no bases. So far the Left / NeverTrump is painting Trump as a traitor and he has yet to be sworn into office.

    I don’t want to seem like I’m painting Trump as a traitor. I’m not exasperated with the man himself here, more the idea that people would start ignoring or downplaying Russia’s flaws in order to protect Trump’s political capital.

    • #53
  24. Joe P Member
    Joe P
    @JoeP

    PubliusIt feels like we might be seeing a bit of a role reversal where we have elements of the American right who are supportive of the Russian dictatorship and/or downplay the threat. During the Cold War, it was the Left that was doing that.

    What’s hilarious about the role reversal is that it’s taken place so quickly and for purely domestic partisan reasons.

    At least the split in America on the Cold War was ideological, and was not directly on party lines (if anything, most of the US architects of the Cold War were Democrats initially). Now the Democrats are scambling to pick up any cudgel to beat Trump over the head with and are using Russia like this because they’ve got no other clue what to do.

    • #54
  25. MichaelHenry Member
    MichaelHenry
    @MichaelHenry

    Thanks for the list, Mr. Ed. I like all the nominees. But frankly, I am sick of the stupid noise on the airways about Tillerson’s Russian connections and about Russian interference in the election. Never one to sit on my hands because it is so uncomfortable, I did my own investigation. Here is my report:

    http://ricochet.com/396494/sheriff-boris-badenov/

    I will not be having a press conference on this, because I need to get some rest. MH

    • #55
  26. ctlaw Coolidge
    ctlaw
    @ctlaw

    I believe this puts Rick Perry in charge of nuclear weapon production.

    • #56
  27. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    Here’s an interesting comparison of the average years of academic/government experience for presidential cabinets:

    Reagan – 6.9 years

    Obama – 17 years

    Trump – 6.8 years

    Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-administration/310103-a-tale-of-two-cabinets-obamas-cronies-vs-trumps

    • #57
  28. TKC1101 Member
    TKC1101
    @

    V the K: Was really hoping there was a spot for ‘Chainsaw’ Al Dunlop.

    I do hope that is a joke.

    • #58
  29. Jan Bear Inactive
    Jan Bear
    @JanBear

    Thanks for putting that together. It’s a good reference.

    • #59
  30. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    I thought Carly Fiorina was getting one. Has that not been announced officially?

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.