Healing the Wounds

 

Today I was moved by Arahant’s most recent post, written in his usual gifted, thoughtful way. The other day I wrote a post about reconciliation, on the Ricochet site and in all our relationships, as the elections loom ahead. As Barkah commented in that post, people may need to vent for a while before reconciling. I agreed. In my hurry to patch up relationships, I forgot one very important factor. Wounds need time to heal, and it can be a very, very slow process.

So how does one heal?

First, a person needs to decide that he or she wants to heal, as opposed to brandishing their wounds for all to see. Some of us like to remind people of our suffering, of our hurt, and we want them somehow to pay for it; we think that someone else has the key to our well-being. Some of us have been injured so deeply that we can’t imagine moving past our wounds.

Second, people who are wounded need to be patient with others who are wounded. Some of the wounds go very deep, having touched into scars that never quite healed, that they seem impossible to mend. We can also become so pre-occupied with our injuries that we become insular to others’ pain and don’t want anyone to notice the damage we’ve suffered. But we know it’s there.

Next, our wounds may have festered for so long that we decided to move on to a place where we think we can’t be hurt, that feels much safer. But life is filled with uncertainty, with “dangerous” places, and we can unexpectedly become caught in a storm of anger and violence. Before we know it, we have suffered another new wound and in some ways it may hurt worse than the others, because we thought we were protected. As much as I love life, I hate to admit that there is no safe place.

Finally, wounds need tender, loving care. We need to recognize them, own them, and work to heal them for our own well-being. We may consider making amends with others, even though we may be rejected, to begin our healing and allow for theirs. We may need to go through a “letting go” process, which is difficult but very powerful.

We may realize that there simply are malevolent people everywhere, who carry that burden with them all their lives. That means we must choose our friends carefully, honor them, appreciate them, and comfort them when they need it.

A path to healing is a transformative process. I hope you will join me in pursuing it.

Published in Culture
Tags:

Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 64 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Henry Castaigne: Strangely, he did flirt with anti-semitism before Lincoln squashed it.

    Dealing with the sordid actions of profiteers, Grant made the common association of the day of Jews with crooked business practices. Historian Jonathan Sarna wrote a book about it a few years back. From a review by Jeff Jacoby:

    … for the rest of his life, Grant was ashamed of having attempted to evict “Jews as a class” for offenses most of them had never committed. “What his wife, Julia, called ‘that obnoxious order’ continued to haunt Grant up to his death,” Sarna writes. “The sense that in expelling them he had failed to live up to his own high standards of behavior, and to the Constitution that he had sworn to uphold, gnawed at him. He apologized for the order publicly and repented of it privately.”

    Not surprisingly, Grant’s order got a good deal of attention in the 1868 presidential campaign — the first time a “Jewish issue” played a role in presidential politics. Grant didn’t deny that General Orders No. 11 had grossly violated core American values. “I do not sustain that order,” he wrote humbly. “It would never have been issued if it had not been telegraphed the moment it was penned, and without reflection.”

    But it was as president that the full extent of Grant’s regret became clear. He opposed a movement to make the United States an explicitly Christian state through a constitutional amendment designating Jesus as “ruler among the nations.”

    • #61
  2. She Member
    She
    @She

    Susan Quinn:

    Henry Castaigne: Actually, I think we should stick to our principles. We ought to say, “The left wants to give you free poor quality stuff and keep you poor. We want to enable you to not be poor. Our deal is a lot harder but it leads to human happiness.”

    Beautifully said. I vote yes!

    Me too.  I think we also need to show them how this works, though.  Saying isn’t enough.

    • #62
  3. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    She: Me too. I think we also need to show them how this works, though. Saying isn’t enough.

    I think we tried to do that with Welfare to Work, when people were expected to get off the rolls. My friends on the Left said that it didn’t work, because those poor single mothers had to leave their children home. I heard that it worked well. Certainly the numbers dropped–until the states decided to make it so easy to collect welfare and stay on welfare. Just another example of your tax dollars being taken.

    • #63
  4. She Member
    She
    @She

    Susan Quinn:

    She: Me too. I think we also need to show them how this works, though. Saying isn’t enough.

    I think we tried to do that with Welfare to Work, when people were expected to get off the rolls. My friends on the Left said that it didn’t work, because those poor single mothers had to leave their children home. I heard that it worked well. Certainly the numbers dropped–until the states decided to make it so easy to collect welfare and stay on welfare. Just another example of your tax dollars being taken.

    Yeah.  I don’t know how to do it.  I was thinking more of a grass roots, get your hands dirty, community organizing, in the trenches sort of thing, rather than a “policy” initiative or government program (after all, if we’re not in power, we won’t be able to do that anyway).

    You know, steal a page out of the Lefty book?   Get subversive? Find some Republican billionaires willing to cough up some dough, and start some private seed programs and initiative zones somewhere?

    • #64
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.