Does Starbucks Really Want an Honest Conversation?

 

starbucks-race-together-3Starbucks is hoping to lead a national conversation about race. According to a video released by founder Howard Schultz, Starbucks barristas are encouraged to scrawl “race together” on coffee cups before placing them in the hands of customers. This hollow bit of moral exhibitionism is supposed to encourage “compassion,” “honesty,” “empathy,” and “love.” Does Starbucks sell caffeine-free compassion?

Each and every time we’re hectored to engage in an “honest conversation” about race, it’s a sham. What’s wanted is not honesty, but confession of sin by white people and expressions of pain from blacks and others. Decade after decade, despite vastly diminishing levels of white racism (and the rapid growth of non-white populations), we are told that the old stain of racism continues to poison the lives of minorities. By encouraging that fiction, Starbucks is subtracting from racial understanding.

For what it’s worth, here’s my little contribution to the “honest conversation.”

I spent preschool through third grade in mostly black Newark, New Jersey. My friends and my enemies were black. There were only three white students in my third-grade class. I remember deciding with one of my black friends that we were all “colored” – some black, some white. We grinned at our brilliance in solving a vexed national question. Little did we anticipate that Starbucks would one day adopt this as a keen insight.

Our next-door neighbors were black, and their two little sons were about the cutest things you can imagine.

By the time I was 9, I had been beaten up on the way to school, nearly had my bicycle stolen out from under me by a much older girl (some punches were thrown), and been chased through the park by a gang of boys. All of these assailants were black. So was my much-adored second grade teacher.

I have always thought that my intimate experience of growing up in a mixed neighborhood in my early youth (we moved to a suburb when I was in fourth grade) inoculated me from thinking in stereotypes. Unlike many white people, I told myself, I had lived among blacks and accordingly saw them as individuals — not heroes or villains, and not symbols.

But that’s not complete. Want the truth? Despite my knowledge that blacks are just people – good and bad, interesting and dull, trustworthy and deceptive – I have nevertheless spent my whole life being nicer to blacks than to whites. If a black person makes a joke, I laugh harder than I would for a white person’s joke. I hold open doors a fraction longer for blacks than whites. I’m more likely to use the honorific “sir” with a black store clerk than with a white.

I know a woman who adopted two children, one black and one white. Guess what? White strangers fuss and coo over the black child noticeably more than over the white one.

The same impulse that caused me to spend decades being particularly solicitous towards black people (and I very much doubt I’m the only one) has caused this country to move heaven and earth to try to repair the damage done by slavery, Jim Crow, and racism. Our entire system of quotas and set asides, our trillions of dollars in social programs, our “diversity” industry, our carefully designed entertainment, and yes, the election of Barack Hussein Obama all testify to how badly America yearns to prove its racial bona fides.

But for the race racketeers, the enormous racial recompense machine that is American life is as nothing. When an old-fashioned racist is discovered (of course they still exist), the press gaggle shouts choruses of “I told you so’s.” The exceptions are seized upon as the thinly veiled norm. They ache to believe that black problems, like higher rates of crime, poverty, and joblessness, can be laid entirely at white people’s feet. If coffee buyers can only transcend their unloving thoughts, the poor will thrive and peace will descend.

If Howard Schultz truly wanted to alleviate the problems of black Americans – and everyone else as well – he would do better to highlight the key role played by family structure. Only 2 percent of black children raised by their married parents are poor. Most young men who commit crimes are from fatherless homes. In fact, family structure is a far better predictor of poverty, criminality, and a host of other troubles, than race. More than 70 percent of black children are from single parent homes.

Fifty years ago, Daniel Patrick Moynihan tried to have an honest conversation about the black family. He was shouted down.

We haven’t had an honest conversation about race since.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 37 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. A-plus-plus Inactive
    A-plus-plus
    @Aplusplus

    Outstanding, Mona..

    • #31
  2. Mona Charen Member
    Mona Charen
    @MonaCharen

    A-plus-plus:Outstanding, Mona..

    Thank you so much.

    • #32
  3. J Flei Inactive
    J Flei
    @Solon

    CuriousKevmo:I stopped patronizing Starbucks long ago when any attempt to order a simple black coffee became a chore.

    Not using small/medium/large is also ridiculous.

    • #33
  4. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    kylez:

    EJHill:Question

    Great! But if it was a black mermaid they would complain that it was a racist caricature.

    Great answer!

    • #34
  5. Tommy De Seno Member
    Tommy De Seno
    @TommyDeSeno

    Mona I’ve admired your work for years and never realized we have similar backgrounds.

    I also grew up white in a black neighborhood, complete with race riots (you being a Jersey girl might know of Asbury Park).

    Many books have been written about my hometown and the riots and I’m always amazed how folks like you and I are never mentioned in it.

    Historians seem to want to draw strict lines when it comes to race with certain parameters.    They want angry victimized blacks rebelling against evil at worst or indifferent at best white people.

    A happy white kid in the middle of the black neighborhood is not supposed to exist, nor is the black family who hung out on our front porch during the riots because they were worried about us.  We never make it into the historical accounts.

    History doesn’t sell as well as histrionics.

    I’ve often thought a book about growing up as a white minority in a black neighborhood would be interesting.   Like you I think it has informed my beliefs on politics and sociology.

    • #35
  6. Mona Charen Member
    Mona Charen
    @MonaCharen

    Really interesting, and very well expressed. The stereotype of the “indifferent” white person is one they’ll never part with, apparently. But it’s a calumny.

    • #36
  7. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Whenever the Left says it wants “an honest discussion”,

    what they really mean is “shut up and listen”…..

    If you are rude enough to bring facts and logic to their discussion, they invariably start calling you a bigot or racist. Enough. I’m done talking about it.

    • #37
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.