‘God Cannot Be Mocked’

 

As a teenager, I was easily offended. Any perceived slight would earn an immediate “That’s not fair!” to which adults within earshot would either roll their eyes or ignore. (I didn’t think that was fair either, nor do my tween daughters today.) At 15, I became an evangelical Christian and appended this teenage whininess to my faith. When evil sinners denigrated my God or my inchoate beliefs, I would angrily condemn their blasphemies. After all the Good Book states, “God cannot be mocked.” The Big Guy upstairs needs an uptight high schooler to defend His honor!

Wednesday we had a vastly more violent reaction to religious offense. As is all too common, Islamist radicals murdered individuals who mocked not their God, but a flawed human whom they claim as a prophet. Jihadists never seem as defensive about Islam’s other prophets, be they Jesus, Moses or Jonah. No, only the scimitar-swinging Mohammed is so fragile that he cannot even be illustrated without a bloodbath of vengeance.

In the Navy and in college, I was surrounded by petulant atheists who took joy in denigrating traditional religious beliefs. By then I’d learned that God was fully equipped to protect His reputation from their silly insults.

“Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked.” It doesn’t say we shouldn’t mock Him (though we probably shouldn’t) or that we will be punished if we do (though we might be). No, it states that He cannot be mocked — any more than we can be mocked by flies crashing into our windshield.

The staff of Charlie Hebdo not only ridiculed Islam, but furiously lampooned Judaism, Christianity and other religious beliefs. They wasted barrels of ink, intellect and artistry trying to mock their Creator. In that they failed.

But the team succeeded in their pursuit of free speech and all-too-rare classical liberalism. Their murderers may have punished them for their art, but ensured that Charlie Hebdo’s defiant message receives more exposure than ever. Several media outlets will cower while others take up the pens of Charbonnier, Cabu, Wolinski, and Verlhac to draw thousands of new blasphemies against this fragile prophet.

I’ve never claimed theological expertise in any religion. However, the terror attack on Charlie Hebdo reveals the deep insecurity and faithlessness of zealots who boast of being the world’s most pious. How pathetic is a god who needs a bumbling cloud of flies to defend him? How weak is one’s faith that he doesn’t trust this allegedly omnipotent deity to avenge himself?

They claim to follow Allah, but believe only in their lord of the flies.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 35 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. user_5186 Inactive
    user_5186
    @LarryKoler

    Larry Koler: His commandments and rules and recommendations don’t tell what He feels.

    iWc: Even when the Torah talks about G-d’s anger and love and commitment and jealousy?

    I don’t believe in personifying God so I have a little trouble with your conclusions on this whole topic — and so I have to say I don’t know. Anger, love and other emotions are human things and part of our experience. These things might be reflections of things like this in God’s nature but I’m skeptical.

    But, let me be clear on this related thing: I believe that we humans have a special relationship with God (in comparison to animals and the material world) and that God experiences His creation through us. So, I actually like how you are describing things. I simply don’t believe we can speak with confidence about what God feels.

    • #31
  2. iWc Coolidge
    iWc
    @iWe

    Larry Koler: I don’t believe in personifying God

    Actually, I do as well. Describing G-d in finite terms is, to my mind, denying His existence.

    Larry Koler: I simply don’t believe we can speak with confidence about what God feels.

    Let me try this another way: in order to live our lives and act boldly for the sake of what we believe is right, I think we must act as if we are confident – even though there is much to be unsure of. I am reminded, for example, of all the religious doubts of Mother Theresa. She had them, for sure – but that did not stop her from her Good Works.

    • #32
  3. user_5186 Inactive
    user_5186
    @LarryKoler

    iWc: I think we must act as if we are confident – even though there is much to be unsure of.

    Yes, of course this is correct. This is the bolster in us that our faith gives us — that tells us to step out in faith “as if we are confident.”

    That’s very nice.

    • #33
  4. Jon Gabriel, Ed. Contributor
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.
    @jon

    I understood this “cannot be mocked” principle better when I took care of kids. Occasionally a grumpy preschooler would get mad and call me “stupid” or “jerk.” There’s no offense, because of his age. A three-year-old can’t mock me; he can be rude or crabby or even poorly raised, but I’m not harmed by his little barb.

    How much greater is G-d compared to the silly humans who try to kick His shins? Can the finite offend the infinite?

    • #34
  5. user_5186 Inactive
    user_5186
    @LarryKoler

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.:I understood this “cannot be mocked” principle better when I took care of kids. Occasionally a grumpy preschooler would get mad and call me “stupid” or “jerk.” There’s no offense, because of his age. A three-year-old can’t mock me; he can be rude or crabby or even poorly raised, but I’m not harmed by his little barb.

    How much greater is G-d compared to the silly humans who try to kick His shins? Can the finite offend the infinite?

    That’s a great analogy.

    • #35
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.