Worship or American Idol-atry? — Jon Gabriel

 

My wife and I have dragged our daughters to many churches over the past several years. We’ve enjoyed most of the sermons, congregations, programs and pastors, and my wife has liked most of the music. As for me, I’ve pretty much given up on finding any worship music that doesn’t drive me a bit batty.

For background, I’m a plain-old Christian, sans denomination, though I have enjoyed Lutheran, Baptist, Anglican, Reformed and other congregations over the years. Most of the churches I’ve attended are evangelical, with several that would fit into the “megachurch” category. Most have offered inspiring teaching with solid, if not terribly deep, theology. But the music… oh heavens, the music.

My family tires of my weekly critique of modern church music and architecture, so I figured it was time to inflict it upon a larger audience. (You’re welcome, readers.)

My experience is in the pew not the pulpit, but church music (“worship music” in evangelical parlance) should direct the congregation’s focus to God, not the performers. Too often, I can think of nothing but the guitarist’s hair, the drummer’s kit or the singer’s oversouling.

This weekend, I (shockingly) was enjoying the second song at the Easter service. Sure, it was far too loud, but I was ignoring the band, singing along with the steady meter and focusing on God. All of a sudden I was singing by myself — the leader had veered into some spontaneous arrangement that showcased her unique vocal stylings. The song’s lyrics were still on the screen, but the congregation was lost. Since I could no longer follow along, I just quietly watched her performance, which was followed by extended applause.

This seems less like worship and more like an audition for American Idol. And I hate that show. (Besides, God’s not down with the whole idolatry thing.)

I won’t mention the specific church since this is standard among evangelical megachurches. I assume that most of the musicians have the best of intentions and are probably fine Christians. But week after week, these mini rock concerts grind at my soul. Am I the only one?

This modern version of “worship” also is reflected in church architecture. Many older churches placed a choir loft and an organ way in the back. This genius design prevents the congregation from being distracted by the musicians at the same time it prevents showboating performers. Instead, everyone in attendance has their eyes fixed forward and above, right where they belong.

Consider the opposite end of a traditional church: you have an altar, pulpit, maybe a baptismal, but the eye is directed upwards via the steep ceiling to the towering cross and the heavens above. Contemporary church architecture is wide and low, directing everyone’s attention to the speakers and performers on the main stage.

What once was vertical is now horizontal. Instead of looking to God, we’re staring at his ministers along with their elaborate Power Points. That works for a TED talk, but not for worship.

“Get off my lawn!” he cried. My complaints are not mere curmudgeonry. I love strange, loud music that scares my cat and austere modernist architecture that scares my wife. But when I want to celebrate musicians I go to a concert. At church, I don’t want to applaud singers, celebrate a pastor or focus on myself; I want to worship God. Is that too much to ask?

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 115 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Chris Lang:

    The last Christmas service I went to, I felt left out of the whole thing because the songs were terrible, hard to follow, and ‘new’ so not only did I not know them, but it seemed that no one other than the worship band (and that is debatable as well) did.

    I get the feeling that I am not alone in this sentiment.

     You are not alone!

    There’s a tension between trying to find something new and fresh and choosing something everyone knows so that everyone can join together in worship (which is the point anyway).

    I find it slightly ironic that the worship band at our “modern” service tends to do more familiar songs than the worship team at our “less modern” service.

    • #91
  2. Cornelius Julius Sebastian Inactive
    Cornelius Julius Sebastian
    @CorneliusJuliusSebastian

    Hope for the future of US Catholic liturgical worship music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFU2zrPrCO4&feature=player_embedded

    • #92
  3. user_473455 Inactive
    user_473455
    @BenjaminGlaser

    I just caught this thread and it would take hours for me to interact with the theology behind what is wrong with so much of the ethos behind the “good intentions” of what goes on in most evangelical (and even liberal churches) when it comes to just worship music, let alone worship in general.

    So let me just get my curmudgeonly thoughts out of the way. 

    The two verses which inform my musically selections and my whole doctrine of worship:

    Deuteronomy 12:32 and John 4:24. 

    I should also preface any further comment by saying that I come from a Presbyterian tradition that eschews musical instruments entirely (a cappella worship) and only sings metered selections of the Book of Psalms and that I happen to agree with that older tradition as being biblical and theologically correct.

    • #93
  4. Songwriter Inactive
    Songwriter
    @user_19450

    Midget Faded Rattlesnake:

    Songwriter:

    Madeleine L’Engle (“A Wrinkle in Time”) offers that most religious art is bad art, and thus bad religion. Sadly, I don’t disagree.

    These days, maybe.

    But what about Bach, Palestrina, Victoria… all those beautiful illuminated manuscripts, all those stunning Renaissance paintings of Madonna and Child, or the Crucifixion? What about those glorious cathedrals?

    MFR:  I summed up L’Engle and should be clear she was not saying there was no good religious art.  The opposite is true.  Her point that bad art in the name of religion makes for bad religion, no matter when it’s done or who did it.

    I recommend L’engle’s book “Walking on Water.”  That’s where the quote came from.

    You are correct about Mozart & company. In fact, there was a time when the church was responsible for most of the great art being created.  Not so much any more.  Though I personally am experiencing something of a return to the “patronage” system, as churches with large visions commission music for their specific purposes because they can no longer find what they want via the old music publishers.

    • #94
  5. Funeral Guy Inactive
    Funeral Guy
    @FuneralGuy

    I go to an Evangelical Christian church and I love everything about it but the music.  Most contemporary Christian music, with a few exceptional songs, is just not very good.  I agree with some of their other complaints on this thread.  The volume, the look-at-me over vocalizing and the concert style applause and behavior.  Truth be told, my favorite style of praise music is a soul/gospel choir like the Reverend James Cleveland.

    • #95
  6. Midget Faded Rattlesnake Inactive
    Midget Faded Rattlesnake
    @Midge

    Songwriter:

    Her point that bad art in the name of religion makes for bad religion, no matter when it’s done or who did it.

    Definitely agree!

    • #96
  7. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    I remember singing the Pange Lingua at church when I was in grade school. It’s not something you get over.

    • #97
  8. user_473455 Inactive
    user_473455
    @BenjaminGlaser

    My grammar is pretty awful in my post above, not sure what I was doing at the time and why I didn’t fix it before posting. (Though I do wonder why I cannot edit it now).

    • #98
  9. Rocket City Dave Inactive
    Rocket City Dave
    @RocketCityDave

    I think the choir loft is a tremendous tool for keeping music more substantial in theme and theology. Adopting the architecture of a concert hall can leave the music more like entertainment than worship.

    The choir loft leaves the congregation staring forward (either at stained glass, an altar or a pulpit). In the absence of seeing the singers perform, our thoughts aren’t as easily filled with images or shallow absurdities.

    The choir loft also tends to create an atmosphere of the congregation singing together about God. The stage creates an atmosphere like any other secular performance. The performers seem to be singing TO the audience.

    • #99
  10. Suspira Member
    Suspira
    @Suspira

    The time isn’t always right for “shouting with joy.” So-called “worship music” is spiritually monotonal. There’s awe, reflection, sadness, wonder, penitence, gratitude, and many more moods of worship. There is a vast literature of church music that hits these other notes. What a shame megachurches have rejected it for banal choruses and top-40 wannabes.

    • #100
  11. user_473455 Inactive
    user_473455
    @BenjaminGlaser

    RCD, makes an excellent point about church architecture.

    • #101
  12. user_536506 Member
    user_536506
    @ScottWilmot

    Cornelius Julius Sebastian:

    Hope for the future of US Catholic liturgical worship music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFU2zrPrCO4&feature=player_embedded

     Thanks for the reference CJS

    • #102
  13. Julia PA Inactive
    Julia PA
    @JulesPA

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.: This modern version of “worship” also is reflected in church architecture. Many older churches placed a choir loft and an organ way in the back. This genius design prevents the congregation from being distracted by the musicians at the same time it prevents showboating performers. Instead, everyone in attendance has their eyes fixed forward and above, right where they belong.

     Before I read this in your post, I thought this very same thing: long gone are the days when the music from a worship service emanated from the choir loft, out of sight, in the rear of the church. 

    • #103
  14. Syzygy Inactive
    Syzygy
    @TzviKilov

    Christians have nothing to complain about; at least their worship music has led to great things like soul and gospel. The majority of synagogue music (which is a cappela, at least in Orthodox services on the Sabbath and Holidays) is absolutely dreadful; the rule is that any Jew passionate about G-d must be utterly tone deaf, and anyone who can sing has no interest in the religion.

    Don’t get me started on Jewish pop music, the great scourge of our age…

    • #104
  15. Carey J. Inactive
    Carey J.
    @CareyJ

    Mama Toad:

    Scott Wilmot:

    At our Easter Vigil service here in Jakarta the priest sang the Exultet in Spanish, the readings were proclaimed in English, Spanish, Italian, and Bahasa Indonesia, the psalms were sung by the Javanese choir in English, and the Gloria, Sanctus, Pater Noster, and Agnus Dei were chanted by the choir in Latin. We had a communion hymn but it was so unobtrusive as to be almost a period of sacred silence. Now that was a beautiful mass – perhaps the most lovely I have ever assisted in.

    How glorious. Our cantor sang the Exsultet — none of the clergy here could have pulled it off.

    Is this the Exultet you are talking about?

    This setting doesn’t seem that difficult to me. The range isn’t extreme, and it doesn’t require exceptional vocal agility. I can’t see why a priest or deacon couldn’t do it.

    • #105
  16. Midget Faded Rattlesnake Inactive
    Midget Faded Rattlesnake
    @Midge

    Carey J.:

    Mama Toad:

    How glorious. Our cantor sang the Exsultet — none of the clergy here could have pulled it off.

    Is this the Exultet you are talking about?

    This setting doesn’t seem that difficult to me. The range isn’t extreme, and it doesn’t require exceptional vocal agility. I can’t see why a priest or deacon couldn’t do it.

    It takes a full octave, and takes vocal flexibility, as well as a strong sense of pitch, to do  well. He makes it sound easy because he’s so good at it.  Most clergy I’ve met would struggle.

    • #106
  17. Songwriter Inactive
    Songwriter
    @user_19450

    Syzygy:

    Christians have nothing to complain about; at least their worship music has led to great things like soul and gospel. The majority of synagogue music (which is a cappela, at least in Orthodox services on the Sabbath and Holidays) is absolutely dreadful; the rule is that any Jew passionate about G-d must be utterly tone deaf, and anyone who can sing has no interest in the religion.

    Don’t get me started on Jewish pop music, the great scourge of our age…

     And yet Jews have contributed the vast majority of the standards in the great American songbook.  Practically every songwriter in the famed Tin Pan Alley was Jewish (with the exception of Cole Porter).  Culturally speaking, Jews are fount of great music.  Why then is synagogue music not awesome?  Interesting.

    • #107
  18. Carey J. Inactive
    Carey J.
    @CareyJ

    Midget Faded Rattlesnake:

    Carey J.:

    Mama Toad:

    How glorious. Our cantor sang the Exsultet — none of the clergy here could have pulled it off.

    Is this the Exultet you are talking about?

    This setting doesn’t seem that difficult to me. The range isn’t extreme, and it doesn’t require exceptional vocal agility. I can’t see why a priest or deacon couldn’t do it.

    It takes a full octave, and takes vocal flexibility, as well as a strong sense of pitch, to do well. He makes it sound easy because he’s so good at it. Most clergy I’ve met would struggle.

    As Crocodile Dundee might say: That’s not that vocally demanding. This is vocally demanding.

    Or this:

    • #108
  19. Midget Faded Rattlesnake Inactive
    Midget Faded Rattlesnake
    @Midge

    Carey J.:

    Midget Faded Rattlesnake:

    Carey J.:

    This setting doesn’t seem that difficult to me. The range isn’t extreme, and it doesn’t require exceptional vocal agility. I can’t see why a priest or deacon couldn’t do it.

    It takes a full octave, and takes vocal flexibility, as well as a strong sense of pitch, to do well. He makes it sound easy because he’s so good at it. Most clergy I’ve met would struggle.

    As Crocodile Dundee might say: That’s not that vocally demanding. This is vocally demanding.

    Or this:

    Heh, I sometimes warm up on the coloratura passages from “Der Hölle Rache”, though I don’t have the stamina to perform the whole piece in concert. But I have some talent for singing, which I’ve worked to develop.

    Priests don’t typically become priests  because  they can sing well. Some people just aren’t very musical, and even otherwise musical people may not have the pipes for singing (my dad, a virtuoso clarinetist, certainly didn’t). What’s vocally demanding for these people is different from what’s vocally demanding for professional singers.

    Agree that Damrau is awesome, though!

    • #109
  20. user_545548 Member
    user_545548
    @TonguetiedFred

    I don’t really know the difference between melody and harmony or meter or structure but I do like my music to rhyme.   My church sings contemporary songs and most of them are fine.   I visited my son’s church however and was appalled at how many of the songs they were singing had no real rhythm with the words awkwardly forced into the music.  It doesn’t have to be a simple nursery rhyme but shouldn’t there be some structure?

    • #110
  21. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Fred Brown: I visited my son’s church however and was appalled at how many of the songs they were singing had no real rhythm with the words awkwardly forced into the music.

    Must have been Matt Redman songs.*

    [Matt Redman fans, please take this in the spirit of levity. My dislike of Matt Redman songs is a running joke with our worship director who likes to inform me every time he’s slipping one into a service. “You might want to skip church this week” he’ll tell me . . .”]

    • #111
  22. Johnny Dubya Inactive
    Johnny Dubya
    @JohnnyDubya

    Songwriter:

    Syzygy:

    Christians have nothing to complain about; at least their worship music has led to great things like soul and gospel. The majority of synagogue music (which is a cappela, at least in Orthodox services on the Sabbath and Holidays) is absolutely dreadful; the rule is that any Jew passionate about G-d must be utterly tone deaf, and anyone who can sing has no interest in the religion.

    Don’t get me started on Jewish pop music, the great scourge of our age…

    And yet Jews have contributed the vast majority of the standards in the great American songbook. Practically every songwriter in the famed Tin Pan Alley was Jewish (with the exception of Cole Porter). Culturally speaking, Jews are fount of great music. Why then is synagogue music not awesome? Interesting.

     But there are so many great Hanukkah songs.  Such as…”Dredel, Dredel, Dredel” and…”Dredel, Dredel, Dredel”.

    /sarcasm off

    It seems unfair that the great Jewish songwriters were pressed into service to write terrific Christmas songs.

    • #112
  23. Carey J. Inactive
    Carey J.
    @CareyJ

    Midget Faded Rattlesnake:
    Heh, I sometimes warm up on the coloratura passages from “Der Hölle Rache”, though I don’t have the stamina to perform the whole piece in concert. But I have some talent for singing, which I’ve worked to develop.

    Priests don’t typically become priests because they can sing well. Some people just aren’t very musical, and even otherwise musical people may not have the pipes for singing (my dad, a virtuoso clarinetist, certainly didn’t). What’s vocally demanding for these people is different from what’s vocally demanding for professional singers.

    Agree that Damrau is awesome, though! 

    I guess I’m somewhat spoiled by my (Greek Orthodox) parish priest and deacon. Both have decent, if not professional grade, singing voices. It seems odd to me that someone who just couldn’t sing would want to be a priest. There are many ways of serving God that don’t require one to sing. 

    I read somewhere that Damrau has retired the Queen of the Night from her repertoire. I guess a steady regimen of singing “Der Hölle Rache” will wear anyone’s voice down.

    • #113
  24. Trink Coolidge
    Trink
    @Trink

    jzdro:

    Pilli:

    Has anyone ever participated in a traditional Latin High Mass with organ and full choir? One where it takes 10 minutes just to sing “Kyrie, eleison.” Magnificent! (And yes, I know. Kyrie, eleison is Greek.)

    I grew up with that. Beauty, worked on for a thousand years. Then they took it away.

     Amen.
    As a teenager in the early 60’s, I played the music for mass on weekdays in a small town.   When no choir members showed up . . . I’d run to the sacristy and beg Father Buscher to say a low mass.  He sent me back to the choir loft to play and sing the mass, alone.   I’ll never forget old Linus Allerding’s  booming voice joining mine from the pews below.   Perhaps the angels wept, but I will never forget those times or the music. Kyrie eleison.

    • #114
  25. user_333118 Inactive
    user_333118
    @BarbaraKidder

    Merina Smith:

    Last week I sang Mendelssohn’s I Waited For the Lord for the Easter service at church. It was glorious. The choir also sang Natalie Sleeth’s Joy In the Morning. That’s about as wild as I think it should get in church.

     This Mendelssohn choral piece, using text from Psalm 40, is one of my favorites.
    What a glorious experience to have sung it at your Easter service!

    • #115
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.