The Missing Debate — Omnibus killed the House GOP’s First Year

 

Remember all the omnibus talk from December and January?

That’s why this session of Congress does not feature any conversation about spending.  Recall that McConnell rescued the Democrats’ ONE POINT SEVEN TRILLION DOLLAR spending orgy by refusing to let it die — he performed CPR on a dead bill to make sure that this new Republican House majority would not get a chance to vote on the money.

Why would he do that?  Because of the slimness of the majority.  The same reason that McCarthy had to give up some ground for the speakership.  With a narrow majority, the leadership needs every vote, which means concessions.  Which means behaving like a conservative, or the crunchycons walk away from your bill.

There’s no talk of budget priorities, of returning to regular order, of shutdowns, none of it.  McConnell gave the Democrats a blank check, so that Republicans could not limit the spending — especially not conservative Republicans.

I know that some here pooh-pooh the idea of a GOP war against the Tea Party.  Call this exhibit #97.

I spit. The post linked above has a list of people to spit at.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 34 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    BDB (View Comment):

    We interrupt the Next Big War to bring you this “RESTRICT” Bill, which will spell the end of free speech. Think it’s bad? It’s worse than that. I haven’t had a chance to sit down and look at it — it’s awful enough from what bits I have seen.

    There’s no way it’s Constitutional, but that is NO LONGER A DEFENSE. Our inventive Supreme Court will let this thing fly with a mere haircut, and it needs burning.

    The war in Ukraine is not a big deal the way this is, and this is not just another in a line of (admittedly disastrous) spending increases. This is a bill to end free speech, to grant the government wide and vicious powers of policing speech (and any digital communications, like banking), with “adversaries of the United States” to be determined not by Congress, but by some flunkies in Homeland Security or the intel community.

    This is the government throwing off its pretense at rights and liberty — this guts the First Amendment and replaces it with “as the Secretary may determine,” and “not to exceed twenty years or one million dollars” throughout.

    This is big and its about to happen in the name of banning TikTok.

    Why? The government hates competition. We are their serfs to command, not China’s.

    I’m all in favor of helping Ukraine, but there isn’t much point in stopping Putin’s aggression in Ukraine if we’re just going to implement a Putin-style government here in the U.S., much of which would be accomplished with the RESTRICT bill.  

    • #31
  2. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    We interrupt the Next Big War to bring you this “RESTRICT” Bill, which will spell the end of free speech. Think it’s bad? It’s worse than that. I haven’t had a chance to sit down and look at it — it’s awful enough from what bits I have seen.

    There’s no way it’s Constitutional, but that is NO LONGER A DEFENSE. Our inventive Supreme Court will let this thing fly with a mere haircut, and it needs burning.

    The war in Ukraine is not a big deal the way this is, and this is not just another in a line of (admittedly disastrous) spending increases. This is a bill to end free speech, to grant the government wide and vicious powers of policing speech (and any digital communications, like banking), with “adversaries of the United States” to be determined not by Congress, but by some flunkies in Homeland Security or the intel community.

    This is the government throwing off its pretense at rights and liberty — this guts the First Amendment and replaces it with “as the Secretary may determine,” and “not to exceed twenty years or one million dollars” throughout.

    This is big and its about to happen in the name of banning TikTok.

    Why? The government hates competition. We are their serfs to command, not China’s.

    I’m all in favor of helping Ukraine, but there isn’t much point in stopping Putin’s aggression in Ukraine if we’re just going to implement a Putin-style government here in the U.S., much of which would be accomplished with the RESTRICT bill.

    This is probably a marvelous opportunity for many to pivot from support.  I may write this up,  Great point!

    • #32
  3. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    BDB (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    We interrupt the Next Big War to bring you this “RESTRICT” Bill, which will spell the end of free speech. Think it’s bad? It’s worse than that. I haven’t had a chance to sit down and look at it — it’s awful enough from what bits I have seen.

    There’s no way it’s Constitutional, but that is NO LONGER A DEFENSE. Our inventive Supreme Court will let this thing fly with a mere haircut, and it needs burning.

    The war in Ukraine is not a big deal the way this is, and this is not just another in a line of (admittedly disastrous) spending increases. This is a bill to end free speech, to grant the government wide and vicious powers of policing speech (and any digital communications, like banking), with “adversaries of the United States” to be determined not by Congress, but by some flunkies in Homeland Security or the intel community.

    This is the government throwing off its pretense at rights and liberty — this guts the First Amendment and replaces it with “as the Secretary may determine,” and “not to exceed twenty years or one million dollars” throughout.

    This is big and its about to happen in the name of banning TikTok.

    Why? The government hates competition. We are their serfs to command, not China’s.

    I’m all in favor of helping Ukraine, but there isn’t much point in stopping Putin’s aggression in Ukraine if we’re just going to implement a Putin-style government here in the U.S., much of which would be accomplished with the RESTRICT bill.

    This is probably a marvelous opportunity for many to pivot from support. I may write this up, Great point!

    Some of us d9nt need to pivot ;)

    • #33
  4. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    We interrupt the Next Big War to bring you this “RESTRICT” Bill, which will spell the end of free speech. Think it’s bad? It’s worse than that. I haven’t had a chance to sit down and look at it — it’s awful enough from what bits I have seen.

    There’s no way it’s Constitutional, but that is NO LONGER A DEFENSE. Our inventive Supreme Court will let this thing fly with a mere haircut, and it needs burning.

    The war in Ukraine is not a big deal the way this is, and this is not just another in a line of (admittedly disastrous) spending increases. This is a bill to end free speech, to grant the government wide and vicious powers of policing speech (and any digital communications, like banking), with “adversaries of the United States” to be determined not by Congress, but by some flunkies in Homeland Security or the intel community.

    This is the government throwing off its pretense at rights and liberty — this guts the First Amendment and replaces it with “as the Secretary may determine,” and “not to exceed twenty years or one million dollars” throughout.

    This is big and its about to happen in the name of banning TikTok.

    Why? The government hates competition. We are their serfs to command, not China’s.

    I’m all in favor of helping Ukraine, but there isn’t much point in stopping Putin’s aggression in Ukraine if we’re just going to implement a Putin-style government here in the U.S., much of which would be accomplished with the RESTRICT bill.

    This is probably a marvelous opportunity for many to pivot from support. I may write this up, Great point!

    Some of us d9nt need to pivot ;)

    If you want people to join you, build a bridge.  And this is a recent event of great magnitude.  Gives people cover to come in from the cold.

    • #34
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.