The Bulwark is disappointed in Jeb

 

J V Last has an article about Jeb Bush’s endorsement of DeSantis. It’s behind a paywall, but he tweeted out what I assume to be his salient points:

If Ron DeSantis’s governorship has been good for Florida, then why didn’t Jeb pass a “Don’t Say Gay” bill when he was governor? Why didn’t Jeb take over the New College of Florida to push a conservative agenda? Why didn’t Jeb offer a bill to outlaw the teaching of “theories” in undergraduate courses? Why didn’t Jeb spend taxpayer money to ship refugees to Martha’s Vineyard? Why didn’t Jeb move to take away Disney’s special zoning arrangement? Why didn’t Jeb appoint a vaccine skeptic as his state surgeon general? 

After all, if these are good policies for the people of Florida, Governor Bush had the opportunity to enact them himself. Why didn’t he?

Piquant points! Let’s take them one by one.

Why didn’t Jeb pass a “Don’t Say Gay” bill when he was governor?

This is somewhat confusing, since DeSantis didn’t pass a “Don’t Say Gay” bill either. The only relevant part of the bill that has to do with any of this:

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age- appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

This really, really bothers some people. 

Most of the bill concerns the rights of parents, which really, really bothers some people, too. 

Why didn’t Jeb take over the New College of Florida to push a conservative agenda?

Because he’s an old-style moderate Republican who has an antique notion of college as a place where the values of our civilization are handed down to the young. Oh, sure, they’re full of liberals, but you know, kids figure it out. We all go through that phase.

Also, there’s something a bit untoward about actually teaching history and politics from a conservative point of view. It’s a bit much. You want kids to get all sides. So the liberal faculty teaches both sides with cool impartiality, giving equal weight to all competing ideas, but conservative faculties ram through an agenda? Well the professors you get for a school like that are rather . . . ideological. It’s one thing to believe these things, but these guys, they really believe it. I mean, we’re talking Gadsden flag bumper stickers. 

Why didn’t Jeb offer a bill to outlaw the teaching of “theories” in undergraduate courses?

Here we see the true anti-intellectualism of DeSantis blaring to the fore: the man is opposed to theories. Why, the entirety of intellectual inquiry is based on theories, and the man wants to ban them with a stroke of a pen. Sensible Jeb would not ban theories, lest it cripple the ability of students to understand gravity.

DeFenders of DeSantis would make tiresome objections to this, noting that the “theories” were in fact doctrines of racial essentialism based in a creed that regards every institution in the country as fatally tainted by racism and incapable of reform, but they would, wouldn’t they? What they really want is a sugar-soaked curriculum full of noble Pilgrims, Founding Fathers, then some handwaving about the early 19th century, then the whole white-savior narrative about the Civil War, and then it’s on to pushing out the savage Redman so the Rotarians and other God-fearing men can bust the sod and conjure cities out of the dirt while Jesus floats over the nation, nodding in approval. Black history shall not be taught, except in a lesson about how the Harlem Globetrotters solved a mystery with the Scooby-Doo gang once.

It’s possible Jeb would have urged legislation to ban teaching of “theories” that advanced racial essentialism, if such a thing was happening in his tenure, but these theories were, at the time, in larval state in higher education. Which of course was an utterly neutral medium in which they found no particular nutriments. 

Why didn’t Jeb spend taxpayer money to ship refugees to Martha’s Vineyard? 

Because Jeb has friends there, and wouldn’t like to see them troubled by the logical conclusion of their political viewpoints? It’s possible. 

Why didn’t Jeb move to take away Disney’s special zoning arrangement?

I don’t know. I’m not a TrueCon who is conserving conservatism so the whole thing about fellating the satraps of corporate city-states doesn’t come naturally to me. 

Why didn’t Jeb appoint a vaccine skeptic as his state surgeon general? 

Maybe he’s an anti-immigrant racist who hates poor people?

Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, is the State Surgeon General of Florida. He also serves as Professor of Medicine at the University of Florida, where his research examines behavioral economic strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk in low-income and disadvantaged populations. 

Born in Nigeria, Dr. Ladapo received his medical degree from Harvard and PhD in Health Policy from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. He completed his clinical training in internal medicine at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, where he received the Harvard Medical School Class of 2012 Resident Teaching Award and the Daniel E. Ford Award in Health Services and Outcomes Research from John Hopkins University.

Also – and this seems so obvious I suspect I am missing Last’s point entirely – Jeb did not have to deal with a pandemic during his tenancy. 

In fact, he didn’t have to deal with a lot of things that now sluice through modern politics, but one suspects he wouldn’t have done much if these issues had presented themselves. He was a fundamentally decent man, and fundamentally decent men do not object to middle-school trans awareness pageants.  But having seen what DeSantis does, he is apparently impressed, and endorses DeSantis’ pro-active, bully-pulpit, happy-warrior approach.

The Bulwarkians, understandably dismayed, sigh, and draw a line through his name on the sheet of paper that contains the Names of the Good. 

But first they dip the quill in the inkwell, so the line may be strong from start to finish. 

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 75 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    I, for one, want non-Trump Republicans to win.

    • #61
  2. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    In a way, it’s kind of cool to see the Nevers revealing themselves as Democrats (see Rubin post above, Kristol, French, etc.). We needed a reveal on the beltway punditocracy.

    But it also reveals that it is not about a political party as such but the tribal identity politics of the pseudo-elites. Justification by faith self-congratulations alone! Being a zeitgeist-regurgitating, overpaid, unimaginative zombie with delusions of access to power and influence transcends party labels.

    Oh, no doubt the great divide in this country is being revealed as less about Republicans vs. Democrats and more about the elitists vs. the citizens. This is why I mock anyone who denigrates populism, because what they’re really saying is “I love elitism!”

    • #62
  3. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    In a way, it’s kind of cool to see the Nevers revealing themselves as Democrats (see Rubin post above, Kristol, French, etc.). We needed a reveal on the beltway punditocracy.

    I mean, the Bulwark made it clear when they launched that their target wasn’t just Trump but their target was anyone who dared say anything positive about him. And it wasn’t long after their launch that they made it clear they were more interested in attacking Republicans than Democrats. Anyone who fell for their scam is too stupid to be allowed a vote.

    I resemble that remark!

    • #63
  4. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Columbo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    In a way, it’s kind of cool to see the Nevers revealing themselves as Democrats (see Rubin post above, Kristol, French, etc.). We needed a reveal on the beltway punditocracy.

    I mean, the Bulwark made it clear when they launched that their target wasn’t just Trump but their target was anyone who dared say anything positive about him. And it wasn’t long after their launch that they made it clear they were more interested in attacking Republicans than Democrats. Anyone who fell for their scam is too stupid to be allowed a vote.

    I resemble that remark!

    Really?  I think you resemble VDH.

    • #64
  5. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Yeah, Bulwank writers going after VDH, . . . a man more knowledgeable than all the Bulwank writers put together . . . surely revealed where they really stand.

    • #65
  6. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    James,

    You raise what might be the essential question of our times for ideological conservatives.

    So, I would very much like to read, and even engage in, a dialog on it on an Internet forum with others who have the same interest.

    I say that just to affirm you for raising the question here, on what is unquestionably an Internet forum, whatever else one might say about it.

    [TAGS: Social Satire, Light-Hearted and As Always, Perfectly Incomprehensible]

    There is an awe inspiring perfection in absolute incomprehensibility. I get it.

    Parsing, please hold. We will be with you as soon as possible.

    Re-parsing, please hold. We will be with you as soon as possible.

    Re-parsing, please hold. We will be with you as soon as possible.

    You mean…

    Does not compute.  Does not compute.  Warning: Does not compute.

    • #66
  7. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    In a way, it’s kind of cool to see the Nevers revealing themselves as Democrats (see Rubin post above, Kristol, French, etc.). We needed a reveal on the beltway punditocracy.

    I mean, the Bulwark made it clear when they launched that their target wasn’t just Trump but their target was anyone who dared say anything positive about him. And it wasn’t long after their launch that they made it clear they were more interested in attacking Republicans than Democrats. Anyone who fell for their scam is too stupid to be allowed a vote.

    I resemble that remark!

    Really? I think you resemble VDH.

    I was thinking that looks like Anthony Stewart Head (“Giles” from Buffy The Vampire Slayer).

    • #67
  8. Pagodan Member
    Pagodan
    @MatthewBaylot

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    I, for one, want non-Trump Republicans to win.

    Maybe you do (I’m not convinced though), but the Bulwark types you dig so much, have made pretty clear they want Democrats to win, against any Republican. Sykes may be posting that no one is worse than Trump, but I’d give you better than even odds that Sykes and Co. will not be backing any current GOP front runner over a Biden or any other Democrat ticket. 

    • #68
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Pagodan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    I, for one, want non-Trump Republicans to win.

    Maybe you do (I’m not convinced though), but the Bulwark types you dig so much, have made pretty clear they want Democrats to win, against any Republican. Sykes may be posting that no one is worse than Trump, but I’d give you better than even odds that Sykes and Co. will not be backing any current GOP front runner over a Biden or any other Democrat ticket.

    But Gary is fine with that, as long as the dog-catchers in Arizona are Republican.

    • #69
  10. Pagodan Member
    Pagodan
    @MatthewBaylot

    Columbo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    In a way, it’s kind of cool to see the Nevers revealing themselves as Democrats (see Rubin post above, Kristol, French, etc.). We needed a reveal on the beltway punditocracy.

    I mean, the Bulwark made it clear when they launched that their target wasn’t just Trump but their target was anyone who dared say anything positive about him. And it wasn’t long after their launch that they made it clear they were more interested in attacking Republicans than Democrats. Anyone who fell for their scam is too stupid to be allowed a vote.

    I resemble that remark!

    Bulwark’s attack on VDH is when I decided to finally write Jay Nordlinger off entirely. His simping for the very people who were openly and publicly attacking a pretty non-controversial conservative writer at a publication Nordlinger still works for was a bridge too far (over and above his typical self-righteous preening.)

    • #70
  11. Concretevol Thatcher
    Concretevol
    @Concretevol

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    thelonious (View Comment):

    So it sounds like the Bulwark would endorse Jeb if he ran for president. Or… Would they end up trashing him anyway if he ran?

    Since the Bulwark is primarily a grift for the left I suspect they would only endorse a person for president if he had absolutely no chance of defeating a democrat. They want the republicans to nominate a lose with honor type of guy.

    More accurately, the Bulwark will be endorsing the Democrat candidate no matter who the Republican candidate is. The Bulwark is not conservative or Republican in any sense. Those labels are merely a costume they wear to fool the donor class. They are a Democrat blog.

    For once we are in total agreement!   Good to see :)

    • #71
  12. Gazpacho Grande' Coolidge
    Gazpacho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer (View Comment):

    I wonder about the never-Trump Republicans which seem to now be evolving into never populist Republicans. At the pundit level, these are guys that have staked out a certain geography in the political landscape and invested careers in their political positions. When the public debate shifts they stand to lose income and status so there is this weird flailing for relevance. Smart guys with insights that I once enjoyed reading are now just ranting at clouds.

    Motivations for voters are different. There does seem to be some small (but relevant in close elections) group of soft Republican voters who will vote against anyone with the smell of Trump or Trump’s populism. Their considerations seem to be purely aesthetic. Populist appeals to the working class are crass and low status.

    They have Kristolized into shimmering gems of irrelevance.

    • #72
  13. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Pagodan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    I, for one, want non-Trump Republicans to win.

    Maybe you do (I’m not convinced though), but the Bulwark types you dig so much, have made pretty clear they want Democrats to win, against any Republican. Sykes may be posting that no one is worse than Trump, but I’d give you better than even odds that Sykes and Co. will not be backing any current GOP front runner over a Biden or any other Democrat ticket.

    But Gary is fine with that, as long as the dog-catchers in Arizona are Republican.

    With only one exception, Tom Horne, I voted for every Republican except the six who had been endorsed by Trump in the primary.  All of those Republicans who I voted for won.

    • #73
  14. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I am caught in a quandary.  Who I want is a repeat of Ronald Reagan who was tough when he had to be but is temperamentally optimistic.  This is how I call the race at this point.

    ***Nothing*** is the same. Forget about it. 

    • #74
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    To those of you who have wondered if The Bulwark would ever say that DeSantis is worse than Trump,

    They’ll do the democrat thing and wait to attack DeSantis after/if he gets the nomination. The whole point is to be court jester conservatives. They don’t want to win elections just preen, virtue signal, and get money from gullible people.

    Pretty much. Though I’d argue they do want Democrats to win elections.

    I, for one, want non-Trump Republicans to win.

    Pro- Murkowski. Anti- Bob Lee. Pro-ranked choice voting.

    • #75
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.