Kevin McCarthy Finally Shows Boldness

 

To be clear, I am not a big fan of Kevin McCarthy, who is currently the House Minority Leader. Whenever I see him interviewed, he expresses himself with enthusiasm, but I’m not quite convinced that he means it. Maybe that’s my problem and not his.

But it appears that there’s a good chance he may be the next Speaker of the House, although that outcome is not set in stone. So, while McCarthy declares he will remove three Democratic committee members from House committees (which is not as easy as you’d think), he’s not a shoo-in for the Speaker position. All in all, Rep. McCarthy may be out over his skis. Let me say upfront, however, that I still hope he does win the Speaker’s job, and that he outrages some Democrats by removing their members from committees.

Let’s look at the position of Speaker first. The following convoluted description explains why he might not win the Speaker role:

McCarthy won the GOP nomination by a 188-31 vote, putting more Republicans against the party leader than he could afford to lose during a full House vote.

This could prove disastrous for the House minority leader while he courts GOP lawmakers for their support, as some Republicans have been outspoken that they won’t support his speaker bid. That list includes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Andy Biggs (R-AZ), who challenged McCarthy for the speaker nomination last week.

‘I’m not voting for Kevin McCarthy,’ Gaetz said on the Charlie Kirk Show last week. ‘And I am certain that there is a critical mass of people who hold my precise view. And so the sooner we can sort of dispense with the notion that Kevin is going to be speaker, then we can get to the important work.’

However, McCarthy could skirt by without garnering the lucky number of 218.

To win the speakership, McCarthy only needs to win a majority of the votes from lawmakers on the floor. However, House rules show that if GOP lawmakers who do not support McCarthy’s bid simply vote ‘present,’ the final number needed to win the majority is lowered — giving him a better chance to win.

That way, House Republicans can choose not to support McCarthy while not jeopardizing his chance at becoming speaker.

But not all lawmakers will make it easy for him, with some Republicans vowing to vote for another candidate in an effort to sink McCarthy’s chances. Gaetz, for example, has said he will vote for another candidate, although it’s not clear who might mount a bid against McCarthy.

These are the kinds of infighting that the Republicans cannot afford; they appear petty and bitter. Frankly, I would like to see someone stronger and bolder in that position, but when the Republicans’ vote was taken for the Speaker position, he was clearly favored; the time to select someone else has passed.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume that these machinations for the Speaker position are overcome and McCarthy can act on his promises to remove Ilhan Omar from the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell from the House Intelligence Committee. He can’t remove Omar without a full vote of the House. But of course, Omar is outraged at his announcement in response to her anti-Semitic remarks:

‘McCarthy’s effort to repeatedly single me out for scorn and hatred — including threatening to strip me from my committee — does nothing to address the issues our constituents deal with,’ Omar said in a statement.

‘What it does is gin up fear and hate against Somali-Americans and anyone who shares my identity, and further divide us along racial and ethnic lines,’ she added. ‘It is a continuation of a sustained campaign against Muslim and African voices, people his party have been trying to ban since Donald Trump first ran for office.’

Maybe Omar should have thought about the consequences of her comments before she spoke them. And, of course, her remarks are intended to smear others rather than for her to accept responsibility.

It would take too much space to list all the abuses, lies, and leaks that Adam Schiff promoted, in particular, the blatant lies he created for the Russian hoax. But if you’d like to review most of his unethical, unprofessional, and revolting activity, you can read it here.

And finally, there is Eric Swalwell, who allowed himself to be duped by, and become involved with, a suspected spy from China. Military representatives have said that he should have been kicked off the Intel Committee for the threat he posed to national security. I agree.

*     *     *    *

So, let me bring all these points together. The Republicans in Congress have been, to be generous, less than bold in acting against Democrats. They have not stood against more spending, or stood effectively for accountability, and they continue to fight with each other, therefore dividing the power of the GOP.

It is time for a change, big time. Here are the outcomes I hope to see:

  • Get McCarthy into the Speaker role, at this point, and move forward. To spend time trying to get someone else in this position is foolish.
  • Push his bold agenda, including the removal of Omar, Swalwell, and Schiff. If he backs down, push harder.
  • Be discriminating in deciding the most important investigations to pursue first. Establish criteria for what would be most valuable, most powerful, and that could have a major impact. For example, to get 51 former intelligence officers to explain why they seemed to discount the Hunter Biden laptop is a fool’s errand.
  • Don’t try to do everything in a month. Instead, try to create an agenda and schedule.
  • Find other areas to push against the Democrats to let them know there is a new party in power.
  • Find more people that the House can hold accountable for their unconscionable actions. Study the committees for other members who may have abused their positions or acted unethically.
  • Pass legislation immediately that will help ease inflation, such as drilling for oil and natural gas; find a way to make it happen.

We finally have some power to let the people know that we are in charge and we can actually improve their lives, turn the country around and make exciting things happen.

Let’s do it!

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 65 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    Rodin (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    McCarthy Frank Luntz isn’t a terrible guy, but his approach led to an historic loss the desired outcome.

    FIFY.

    The idea was to get back the majority (power) without expanding the Freedom Caucus overmuch.

    • #61
  2. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    [Duplicate comment]

    • #62
  3. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    Rodin (View Comment):

    Rodin (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    McCarthy Frank Luntz isn’t a terrible guy, but his approach led to an historic loss the desired outcome.

    FIFY.

    The idea was to get back the majority (power) without expanding the Freedom Caucus overmuch.

    Aha, OK, that makes sense. Though I thunk it gives McCarthy and McConnell too much credit. Don’t ascribe malevolence when incompetence explains things nicely. 

    • #63
  4. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Rodin (View Comment):

    Rodin (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    McCarthy Frank Luntz isn’t a terrible guy, but his approach led to an historic loss the desired outcome.

    FIFY.

    The idea was to get back the majority (power) without expanding the Freedom Caucus overmuch.

    Aha, OK, that makes sense. Though I thunk it gives McCarthy and McConnell too much credit. Don’t ascribe malevolence when incompetence explains things nicely.

    It was malevolence passing as incompetence.

    • #64
  5. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Rodin (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    Rodin (View Comment):

    Rodin (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):
    McCarthy Frank Luntz isn’t a terrible guy, but his approach led to an historic loss the desired outcome.

    FIFY.

    The idea was to get back the majority (power) without expanding the Freedom Caucus overmuch.

    Aha, OK, that makes sense. Though I thunk it gives McCarthy and McConnell too much credit. Don’t ascribe malevolence when incompetence explains things nicely.

    It was malevolence passing as incompetence.

    Timid, incompetent, fake. All of the above. 

    • #65
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.