Did the Police-State Dems Finally Jump the Shark with Their ridiculous Trump Raid?

 

With their unconscionable raid on Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago, the Totalitarian Police-State Democrats have put front and center the question “Do we want America to be a Police State?” It is now the number one issue for the upcoming midterm elections and perhaps for every election from here on out; that is, if we are still allowed free elections.

Forget about Roe v. Wade. Forget that there may be many an empty shelf come November with huge job losses and gut-wrenching high inflation. None of that matters when you live under a dictatorship, and the Democrats with their Mar-a-Lago raid have made it very clear they want to turn America into a dictatorship.

Every Democrat now will have to answer for this raid and answer the question, “are you trying to install a dictatorship here in America,”  and variants like, “are you trying to enslave me in your Police State?”

There will be no hiding from these questions. That is what this raid did. It left no doubt what the intentions are for the Democrats. This raid literally proved David Horowitz’s quote, “Inside every Progressive is a  Totalitarian screaming to get out.”

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 49 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):

    Next question: Why would the White House want people to think that the president didn’t know?

    That seems even sketchier, to me. If the White House isn’t in charge…who is?

    Right. If they say he didn’t know in order to protect him, they’ve inadvertently admitted he’s not in charge.

    Except he is in charge. This is an executive department and the buck stops with him. So ultimately, he must take the fall.

    I’m guessing they’re already searching for a low-level fall guy to throw under the bus.

    The beauty of having a lame duck president like Biden is that they can blame all this on him at some point…

    • #31
  2. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens
    • #32
  3. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Question for Peter Ducey to ask at the next White House briefing: Who is carrying out the duties of the President? You have told us that Joe Biden is not doing them. Who is our functional President?

    • #33
  4. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    One can hope.

    • #34
  5. Terry Mott Member
    Terry Mott
    @TerryMott

    I remember Obama making several claims that he first heard about something big by reading in the news.  I didn’t buy it then and don’t buy it now.

    Sure, Biden may have been kept out of the loop, but the White House wasn’t.

    • #35
  6. The Great Adventure Inactive
    The Great Adventure
    @TGA

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    Does it seem odd to anyone else that the White House is claiming that the president didn’t know about the raid?

    I suppose that’s possible.

    But I can’t imagine that FBI leadership would do something like this without approval from the President. Just in case things go sideways, they’ll want their careers protected. Life-long bureaucrats are not the sort to stick their neck out.

    I think it quite possible they told him that it was going down, but he forgot about it 15 seconds later. 

    • #36
  7. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    That seems even sketchier, to me. If the White House isn’t in charge…who is?

    I can’t help thinking it’s August. Washington is empty because everyone is on the Vineyard or Nantucket.

    Last August was Afghanistan.

    I think they leave Biden alone, and crazy stuff happens. He is playing out his fantasies.

    • #37
  8. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    LibertyDefender (View Comment):

    Unsk: The Totalitarian Police State Democrats with their unconscionable raid on Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago have put front and center the question “Do we want America to be a Police State” as the number One issue for the upcoming mid-term elections and perhaps for every election from here on out

    Welcome to the party, pal. We have been a police state since before the start of operation Crossfire Hurricane in late July, 2016. And let’s be clear: the police state that is the United States of America is the fully integrated combination of

    • The entire federal government, from top to bottom, including especially intelligence agencies;
    • The Democrat Party; and
    • All major media including corporate and social media.

    To take just one example, the Russia Collusion Hoax was conceived and commissioned by the Hillary for President campaign. At the time, the Democrat National Committee was underwritten by the Hillary Clinton campaign, since the DNC had spent all of its money rigging the primaries to keep out Bernie Sanders.

    For those keeping score, that’s Hillary and the DNC fully integrated.

    Through her lawyer Marc Elias of Perkins Coie, Hillary/DNC hired Mainstream Media alumnus Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS, who hired CIA asset and retired MI-6 officer Christopher Steele, who – through the Brookings Institute’s Igor Danchenko, fabricated the always-unverifiable Steele “Dossier” that was shopped to several MSM outlets.

    At this point, we have the MSM fully integrated with Hillary/DNC.

    National Intelligence Director James Clapper instructed FBI Director James Comey to brief only President-elect Donald Trump – without advisors – regarding the unverifiable Steele “dossier.” Comey dutifully complied, but limited his briefing to the “pee tape” allegation included in the Steele dossier.

    All of this is in the public record, which shows that at this recorded point in history, the highest levels of the federal government – including the FBI and intelligence agencies – are acting in concert with the Democrat Party and all major and social media, to overthrow the duly elected President of the United States.

    Not a single bad actor has been prosecuted, with the lone exception of Kevin Clinesmith who was given 1 year of probation for pleading guilty to felony evidence tampering. His law license has since been restored.

    We live in a police state.

    Douglas Pratt (View Comment):
    January 6 was supposed to be the Reichstag Fire. The possibility that it was a false flag operation is not really important; the Democrats did their best to elevate it into the kind of national emergency that is their main way of getting and holding power.

    Ricochet.com joined the propaganda. I’ve not seen a retraction. Or an apology.

    We live in a police state. They are everywhere.

    I got into an argument a while back with a Ricochet PTB where I asserted that our institutions are corrupt. He responded that they are sound. Too many in the  Republican establishment are asleep at the switch.

    • #38
  9. Eeyore Member
    Eeyore
    @Eeyore

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):
    …I can’t imagine the FBI doing this without involving the highest authority in the executive branch, if Biden wasn’t involved, someone else is the real authority in the Biden Administration. 

    Biden himself frequently prefaces a sentence at a press event with “They told me to [do such-and-such].”

    So the Klain Gang may be the contact. But Garland seems so arrogant and smarmy that I could easily imagine him saying “Nah, there’s no reason to put the White House in the loop. They could easily do something to muck it up.”

    • #39
  10. Douglas Pratt Coolidge
    Douglas Pratt
    @DouglasPratt

    I don’t have much use for Mitch McConnell, but the fact remains that if it wasn’t for him, the despicable Merrick Garland would be on the Supreme Court. 

    • #40
  11. GrannyDude Member
    GrannyDude
    @GrannyDude

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    Does it seem odd to anyone else that the White House is claiming that the president didn’t know about the raid?

    I suppose that’s possible.

    But I can’t imagine that FBI leadership would do something like this without approval from the President. Just in case things go sideways, they’ll want their careers protected. Life-long bureaucrats are not the sort to stick their neck out.

    Yes. Someone made the call, and you can be sure it wasn’t a regional bureau chief. As John Podhoretz said on the Commentary Podcast, if Biden wasn’t told, then why hasn’t Garland been fired. And if Garland wasn’t told, then why hasn’t Wray been fired? Etc., etc.

    I think it’s almost a certainty that Garland gave the go-ahead and either Biden signed off (and forgets) or that someone in the White House made it clear that they wanted kept out of the loop. That still seems inexcusable in a circumstance like this that involves a dangerous precedent for future administrations (can you say Pres. DeSantis green-lighting a search of Biden residences in 2025?). President Biden (if he had any ability to run the White House) would be out in front of this and cleaning house if he actually had not been told of the intentions of DOJ.

    Next question: Why would the White House want people to think that the president didn’t know?

    That seems even sketchier, to me. If the White House isn’t in charge…who is?

    One of the criticisms often leveled from the left (wrongly, I believe) is that the AG and DOJ are mere tools of the president, doing his political bidding. I suspect the White House thought it looked less political if Biden’s nose was clean here. I also suspect that strategy will backfire, only adding to the correct judgment that Biden is not the man in charge.

    I think I’m asking a slightly different question.

    It’s not about what actually happened. It’s about reading the spin.

    Whomever the Authorizer might have been, one of the decisions he or she had to make was how the event would be spun once it hit the virtual front pages.  Of course, they could just assume they’d be telling the truth, like always…

    …pause for hysterical laughter….

    Anyone with any swamp sense would have a number of half-truths, demi-truths, semi-lies and outright fabrications, but these would fall into two rough categories—“Responsible” and “Not Responsible.” The decision about which to go with would be postponed,  preserving flexibility, pending reaction from the American people.

    If they’d found something dramatically incriminating, they’d choose Door Number One. That is, if the gold-plated safe had opened to reveal an atomic bomb, or better still, a cocktail napkin on which has been scrawled “Jan. 5 2021: Tell Melania to Ask The Guy With The Horned Hat To Lead Insurrection” then Dr. Jill would’ve fetched her husband from the day room, helped him into his special President blazer, and parked him in front of the teleprompter to say he’d Saved America.

    The fact that they are, instead, choosing Door Number Two (“we hadn’t the foggiest!”)  means the FBI found nothing helpful to their cause, and they are now trying to rescue Biden (or “Biden”) from the gimlet glare of historians who will wonder why 235 years of peaceful-transition-preserving precedent had been overturned for no particular reason. 

     

     

    • #41
  12. EODmom Coolidge
    EODmom
    @EODmom

    Not asleep at the switch – unwilling to stand up and risk being thrown out of a club; risk a well paying gig; risk being mocked or made fun of; being attacked; risk lookin/feeling foolish; risk being afraid. Just afraid. Pick your monkey: hear, see or say no Evil. They are afraid monkeys. 

    • #42
  13. DrewInWisconsin, Oik Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oik
    @DrewInWisconsin

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oik (View Comment):

    This was in Newsweek?

    Newsweek frequently has some good conservative opinion columns. I mean, actual conservatives, not fake conservatives like Peggy Noonan.

    Josh Hammer is the new opinion editor. He is a straight-shooter and knows what time it is.

    And here’s another good one from Newsweek this morning.

    The Next President Must Prioritize Destroying the Deep State

    At CPAC in Dallas this past weekend, former President Donald Trump asserted that a “key priority for the next Congress and the next president will be to drain the swamp, once and for all.” Then, reiterating a point made in a keynote address to the America First Policy Institute last month, he specified that Congress “should pass groundbreaking reform empowering the president to ensure that any federal employee who is corrupt, incompetent, or unnecessary for the job can be told, ‘You’re fired.'”

    Such legislation would essentially formalize and strengthen President Trump’s Executive Order 13957, which President Joe Biden rescinded during his first week in office. But there’s a problem: The chance of even a Republican-controlled Congress carrying out this type of reform is close to zero.

    You see, Congress itself created—and, indeed, has since protected and bolstered—the Deep State, so there’s little reason to believe it would now reverse course and eliminate it. A few decades ago, members of the legislative branch began delegating their constitutional lawmaking authority to the myriad federal agencies that constitute the executive branch. (Incidentally, no one knows the exact number of entities that make up the branch. The best estimate is somewhere around 400. Four-hundred!)

    Why? Members decided that it would be easier to avoid being judged by their records if, well, there were virtually no records to judge. Rather than be required to spend time and energy informing themselves about a range of policy issues that might be put to a vote, legislators simply passed the buck to the bureaucracy—a permanent class of purportedly altruistic “experts.” This way, members of Congress are also freed up to focus on far more important tasks of governance, such as voting to rename schools and postal facilities—all while keeping the many accoutrements of influence that come along with a comfy seat on Capitol Hill.

    • #43
  14. Justin Other Lawyer Coolidge
    Justin Other Lawyer
    @DouglasMyers

    GrannyDude (View Comment):

    Justin Other Lawyer (View Comment):

    One of the criticisms often leveled from the left (wrongly, I believe) is that the AG and DOJ are mere tools of the president, doing his political bidding. I suspect the White House thought it looked less political if Biden’s nose was clean here. I also suspect that strategy will backfire, only adding to the correct judgment that Biden is not the man in charge.

    I think I’m asking a slightly different question.

    It’s not about what actually happened. It’s about reading the spin.

    Whomever the Authorizer might have been, one of the decisions he or she had to make was how the event would be spun once it hit the virtual front pages. Of course, they could just assume they’d be telling the truth, like always…

    …pause for hysterical laughter….

    Anyone with any swamp sense would have a number of half-truths, demi-truths, semi-lies and outright fabrications, but these would fall into two rough categories—“Responsible” and “Not Responsible.” The decision about which to go with would be postponed, preserving flexibility, pending reaction from the American people.

    If they’d found something dramatically incriminating, they’d choose Door Number One. That is, if the gold-plated safe had opened to reveal an atomic bomb, or better still, a cocktail napkin on which has been scrawled “Jan. 5 2021: Tell Melania to Ask The Guy With The Horned Hat To Lead Insurrection” then Dr. Jill would’ve fetched her husband from the day room, helped him into his special President blazer, and parked him in front of the teleprompter to say he’d Saved America.

    The fact that they are, instead, choosing Door Number Two (“we hadn’t the foggiest!”) means the FBI found nothing helpful to their cause, and they are now trying to rescue Biden (or “Biden”) from the gimlet glare of historians who will wonder why 235 years of peaceful-transition-preserving precedent had been overturned for no particular reason.

     

    This all makes sense.  One aspect that might play in is that I truly, honestly think the White House is in near-complete disarray from the standpoint of coordinating messaging and planning PR strategies.  They have shown over and over again that they have no idea how to play the game.  And I think the biggest explanation for this is that the guy who is supposed to be in charge (Biden) is not actually in charge.  My guess is that he is only marginally able to process and decide matters, which leaves too much uncertainty within the White House of where to go with things.

    But in summary, you are almost certainly correct–that if there were a bombshell discovery from the search, we would have learned about it by now.

    • #44
  15. LibertyDefender Member
    LibertyDefender
    @LibertyDefender

    Richard Easton (View Comment):
    I got into an argument a while back with a Ricochet PTB where I asserted that our institutions are corrupt. He responded that they are sound. Too many in the  Republican establishment are asleep at the switch.

    Nearly everyone who advocates against another Trump presidential campaign claims that Trump has too much “baggage.”

    The Republican Party establishment is baggage.

    • #45
  16. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    LibertyDefender (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):
    I got into an argument a while back with a Ricochet PTB where I asserted that our institutions are corrupt. He responded that they are sound. Too many in the Republican establishment are asleep at the switch.

    Nearly everyone who advocates against another Trump presidential campaign claims that Trump has too much “baggage.”

    The Republican Party establishment is baggage.

     

    • #46
  17. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    Douglas Pratt (View Comment):

    I don’t have much use for Mitch McConnell, but the fact remains that if it wasn’t for him, the despicable Merrick Garland would be on the Supreme Court.

    That’s not true.   Any GOP leader would have done that.   Hillary and the Dems wanted the delay, because she wanted to name the next Justice.   In sports, they measure the value of a player in terms of “wins against replacement”.   That is, how much value does a player add over a typical player.   McConnell’s WAR is negative.

    • #47
  18. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    Does it seem odd to anyone else that the White House is claiming that the president didn’t know about the raid?

    I suppose that’s possible.

    But I can’t imagine that FBI leadership would do something like this without approval from the President. Just in case things go sideways, they’ll want their careers protected. Life-long bureaucrats are not the sort to stick their neck out.

    Given that logic, does that mean Obama gave the approval or knowledge of the Steele Dossier and the garbage FISA warrants in 2016?

    • #48
  19. LibertyDefender Member
    LibertyDefender
    @LibertyDefender

    GlennAmurgis (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    Does it seem odd to anyone else that the White House is claiming that the president didn’t know about the raid?

    I suppose that’s possible.

    But I can’t imagine that FBI leadership would do something like this without approval from the President. Just in case things go sideways, they’ll want their careers protected. Life-long bureaucrats are not the sort to stick their neck out.

    Given that logic, does that mean Obama gave the approval or knowledge of the Steele Dossier and the garbage FISA warrants in 2016?

    I don’t think “that logic” is necessary to prove that Obama was aware of, and approved of, the entire Russia collusion hoax.

    It’s a matter of public record that John Brennan briefed President Barack Obama on the Hillary Clinton campaign’s plan to allege a connection between Trump and Russia.  Obama was on board the entire time.

    See my above post.  The Police State of America has been in place since at least 2016.  Top to bottom.

    • #49
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.