Liz Cheney and the J6 Committee Are Dangerous Jokes

 

The walls are closing in! This past week, they had Cassidy Hutchinson talk about her second-hand reports of Trump’s alleged actions on J6. The Secret Service agents who were there contradict her story. Any reputable committee would have asked her about that. In fact, a reputable committee would have not called since the people who were there disagree.

I’m an amateur historian and I know how important primary sources are. Presumably, there are staffers to the J6 committee who are also aware of this. The J6 committee is either incompetent, fraudulent, or both. They don’t care about the truth. They’re a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.

.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 100 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Cassandro (View Comment):
    swearing any oath

    Byron York was talking about this. They are being cagey about who is sworn. 

    • #91
  2. Columbo Member
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The next hearing is on Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:00 EDT.

    Why do you keep calling it a hearing? It’s not a hearing. It’s a TV show. It’s a paid, professionally-produced serialized TV show.

    You know if you’re acting in a TV show and the script calls for you to say you’ll tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, you’re not swearing any oath, you are just saying your lines, which are scripted.

    It’s Perry Mason. It’s Les Misérables. It’s Cats!

    It’s Three+ Stooges 

    • #92
  3. Cassandro Coolidge
    Cassandro
    @Flicker

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The next hearing is on Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:00 EDT.

    Why do you keep calling it a hearing? It’s not a hearing. It’s a TV show. It’s a paid, professionally-produced serialized TV show.

    You know if you’re acting in a TV show and the script calls for you to say you’ll tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, you’re not swearing any oath, you are just saying your lines, which are scripted.

    It’s Perry Mason. It’s Les Misérables. It’s Cats!

    It’s Three+ Stooges

    Thanks for the image.  I can almost see Nancy Pelosi, Kitzinger and Chaney woo-woo-wooing it up for the cameras.  Nyeh-eh-eh.

    • #93
  4. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Cassandro (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The next hearing is on Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:00 EDT.

    Why do you keep calling it a hearing? It’s not a hearing. It’s a TV show. It’s a paid, professionally-produced serialized TV show.

    You know if you’re acting in a TV show and the script calls for you to say you’ll tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, you’re not swearing any oath, you are just saying your lines, which are scripted.

    It’s Perry Mason. It’s Les Misérables. It’s Cats!

    It is effect direct examination, which is happening because McCarthy took his ball and went home, removing all of the five Republicans he had nominated.  Dummy.

    • #94
  5. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    We have a retired representative guest hosting our morning talk show today. Representative Jason Lewis. This is pretty interesting. He’s 100% pro Trump and he is absolutely one of the smartest people in this country on public policy. His position is, you’re never going to get any progress unless you sell good policy to lead the polls. That has always been my view. The other thing he was talking about was, Jerry Raskin was making a great big deal of trying to get Trump to take a cognitive test outside of the 25th amendment process. They absolutely have to go after Biden in this way. I’m not familiar with what Raskin actually did, but they need to pour it on 100%. The whole thing is just scandalous and patently obvious. 

    • #95
  6. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Now Jason Lewis is talking about getting rid of Humphrey-Hawkins: growth through inflationism. It’s preposterous. It shouldn’t even have to be explained it to anybody that thinks they are conservative or libertarian. You never hear anybody in leadership talk about it.

     

    • #96
  7. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    He was also talking about the actual nature of politics today like this thread. Here Amy Curtis is specifically taking a shot at the Principles First crowd. It looks to me like the Principles First position is that they are against Ron DeSantis. Some of them were talking like that, yesterday. I’m not sure if I’ve ever seen the head of Principles First specifically say that, but he whines about him all of the time.

     

     

     

    • #97
  8. DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    It looks to me like the Principles First position is that they are against Ron DeSantis.

    I was about to say “Who do these people think they’re fooling by calling themselves conservatives or Republicans,” but . . . I know who they’re fooling. He started this thread.

    • #98
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    He started this thread.

    I never looked. Do you mean Heath Mayo?

    Looking at the Minnesota ones, it looks like it’s the party line.

     

    • #99
  10. DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unapologetic … (View Comment):
    He started this thread.

    I never looked. Do you mean Heath Mayo?

    Looking at the Minnesota ones, it looks like it’s the party line.

    Oops. No, I thought this was someone else’s thread for a moment. Ha! :D

    You understand my confusion. There’s someone else who’s always posting about the J6 committee.

    • #100
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.