Notes from a Faith Healing Meeting

 

I went to a healing meeting with my wife and it was as atrocious as I expected.  Nevertheless, I was happy to be there because it beat sitting home alone on a Friday night with a wide-open internet.

I don’t have a particular dog in the fight around the theology of healing.  I’ve heard the stories of the near-death woman over whom the church gathered for intercession and there she is now singing in the choir.  And I’ve heard stories that went the other way.  I can’t argue with someone’s experience.

Further, I would never fault a person for grasping at any kind of hope in times of distress and uncertainty.  Recently a young boy had a dreadful accident and was near death.  I received frantic emails and texts that it was now time for the church to rally and pray in order to see a miracle.  A special service at a local faith-healing church was quickly organized.

When the boy died, there was another glowing email stating that the prayer indeed was answered because in death, we get absolute healing.  This is not the time, of course, to point out the dubious sleight-of-hand language trick or duplicity in logic.  One must quietly listen and let the family work out their grief in their own way.

Nevertheless, this was just another example of a pattern I have seen repeated over and over again and it goes like this:  If you do x, then God will do y.  Over my fifty-year travels in the Evangelical world (and some travels into nearby religious neighborhoods) I have seen different versions of this pattern.

  • If you wait upon the Lord with all your heart, you will receive the power of the Holy Spirit.
  • If you fully die to yourself and give yourself completely to God, you will begin to live above the plain experiencing the abundant life of Christ.
  • If you become a totally broken vessel, then God will use you in powerful ways.
  • If you totally and fully repent, you will be free of that nasty sin that keeps bringing you down and live in Christian perfection.
  • If you and your church travail in prayer, God will send revival.
  • If you truly have faith, then God will heal.

Even looking across the street at the rosary, a beautiful Catholic tool to meditate on several points of the gospel, one will eventually stumble upon a website where it is clearly stated that if you pray the rosary for 40 days, Mary will make sure your prayer intention gets answered.  If you do x, then God will do y.

The healing meeting I attended with my wife was yet another version of this Christian once-for-all Triumphalism—if you do x and then God will do y bringing you triumphantly into a new state of being.  The leader maintained that the biggest crisis and problem we are facing in the church today is that we are unaware of “who we are in Christ”.  What he meant by this is the teaching that believing in Christ identifies the believer with Christ to the extent that what happened to Christ is efficacious to the believer and, in turn, God works through the believer as if the believer were Christ.

If we master this belief and make it our own, then God would respond and in this new state of being, physical healing would be spontaneous and automatic.  He went on to pepper his talk with examples of random encounters he had with people in airports and restaurants and shops who had miraculous results because he brushed by with his head and heart aligned with who he is in Christ.

This is all well and good, of course, as long as one holds it in a theoretical way as was evident by the serene smiles and affirming nods of the message-friendly audience who had no intention of rushing out as community faith healers after the meeting.  I as well thought his stories funny and entertaining in the same way watching the Mighty Ducks miraculously beat the sinister, black-uniformed, Russian-accented, Icelandic team makes for a feel-good evening.

But there were people at that meeting who were really sick.  In front of me was a woman with cancer kneeling in desperation as people around her put their hands on her and began to make demonstrative prayers ordering the cancer to leave.  To my left was a noisy, disruptive, Down Syndrome child and the mother who cared for her with similar intercession.  Interspersed in these spontaneous groups of prayer was a pastor from another healing meeting who walked around asking people about their shoulder pain.  He seemed to have some success when praying for someone with a shoulder pain of “eight” when his intercession reduced it down to a “three” – whatever eight or three means at any given moment.

I hope God really healed them.  I hope God heals everybody.  But if this “if I do x then God does y” scenario being taught really worked and children’s hospitals were being emptied and patients were rising from their cancer beds to return to work, you would think it would turn heads and make the news like it did in Jesus’ day.

I wondered about the woman in front of me with cancer if her husband would one day be speaking at her funeral saying that the prayers were answered because his wife is now completely healed in heaven.  I wondered if the mother of the Down Syndrome child would one day crack overwhelmed by the prospect of taking care of a special needs child for the rest of her life, toss her Bible in the trash, and say, “to hell with it.”

Some weeks later, I talked to a friend who attended the healing meeting.  He and his wife attended the whole weekend while I opted to work in the yard on Saturday and go to my own church on Sunday.  He said that Friday night was good but Saturday afternoon was even better.  It was tremendous.

I wondered what he meant by that.  Did he mean that the speaker’s method of effective ministry took hold of my friend’s heart with such clarity and vision that he began to live a life of proclaiming God’s kingdom of definitive power and resurrection?  I knew my friend and his sedate lifestyle enough to not bother asking.  He simply liked the stories told Saturday night better.

Religion in general, and Christianity in particular, teaches us to pray.  It isn’t always clear why but the directive is unambiguous.  Leave it to us moderns, to turn it into something where we control God.  We can split the atom, after all, and create complex, self-driving cars.  Certainly, we can puzzle out the right formula to get exactly what we want in prayer.  There has to be a cause and effect somewhere.  There has to be an x I can do in order to obtain y.

The best advice concerning prayer I can give at this juncture is to ask God for wisdom that each day and moment, we may understand what His will is and be inspired to do the next right thing.  We pray that God gives us the strength to do the things he expects and what our responsibilities demand with an attitude of humility and trust.  We relinquish sin and resentment and fear replacing it with gratitude and acceptance.  We pray for others, holding the results with hope and expectation but loosely in order to gain a greater empathy and compassion for the needs of others.

And if in God’s wisdom and providence it happens that a miracle is to occur, it will find us.

Published in Religion & Philosophy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 63 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Charles D Chrisman Coolidge
    Charles D Chrisman
    @Charles D Chrisman

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Charles D Chrisman (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Yes, there are a lot of agnostics out there who are actually atheists (most of them, I think).

    But there do seem to be some men who carry a current caution about God, acting as if He actually might exist and just don’t know, and they modify their behavior accordingly.

    The funny thing is that he was a good man in general.”

    As a “Christian”, (I much prefer to call myself a “believer”) it is my perception that we live in a duality of worlds and words.  By this world’s standards, it is undeniable that there are those who are basically “good” and those who are “evil” in a relative sense.  Mussolini was “evil” relative to the average person and yet certainly “good” in comparison to Hitler in our fuzzy understanding of those words and the truth of those relative positions stands to our minds.  Yet there is a difference between “good” and “Good”, the same difference as between our own POV and God’s.

    “good” imperfectly recognizes that “Good” exists, particularly on an emotional level concerning our desire for justice (especially in the case of others) yet it does not have the complete vision of what that means.  Many “religions” acknowledge the need for order in the universe based on that partial concept.  It is the problem of the finite trying to judge the Infinite, the part, judging the Whole, man judging God without understanding.  Even God cannot remedy the lack of knowledge which is ours by giving us that knowledge.  But in His Goodness, His definition of it, His demonstration of it in this world CONTRASTED against our knowledge of “evil” that we who know in part may trust Him in full, may trust Him in Good, not good.

    Man was created in Good and he still retains some of it.  But it is a spoiled good, a polluted good and only to be judged and thrown out as useless to Good Himself.  This is why the problem of evil, the “Theodicy” is built on the false premise that God allows evil to come to those who are good.  There is good in almost all of us.  But Good is what is required by perfection and none save God is Good. 

    Bad things don’t happen to Good people because there are none. Yet Good comes to some because He is love and shows it in His forgiveness to those who are His.

    Forgive me, I know this is tangential to your comment.  I submit it as more of a background in support of your observations more than anything other than that.

    • #61
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Charles D Chrisman (View Comment):
    “good” imperfectly recognizes that “Good” exists

    I am particularly struck by this above.  Good is so good that it is best described by analogy; that Good is so good, it is like a light brighter than the sun, but that doesn’t blind you when you look at it.  :)

    • #62
  3. Charles D Chrisman Coolidge
    Charles D Chrisman
    @Charles D Chrisman

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Charles D Chrisman (View Comment):
    Good is so good, it is like a light brighter than the sun, but that doesn’t blind you when you look at it. :)

    Very nicely put!  Thank you!

     

    • #63
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.