Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Vax Mandates a Purge of Conservatives
This morning, I was listening to the local radio guy, BloomDaddy. One of his daily features is a debate between opposing sides – often Republican vs Democrat. This morning, he asked the question if Vax mandates are a method to purge or cleanse the ranks of government agencies and large corporations of conservatives.
Both Republican and Democrat debaters acknowledged that those who oppose the vax mandates tend to be more conservative, and religious. Where they differed in opinion was the Republican noted one of the intents of vax mandates was to get large numbers of conservatives to resign, withdraw and remove themselves from public service and life, and to replace them with new hires that were compliant with the vax mandate and who also would tend to be more liberal. The implicit goal was to create a workforce — in government agencies, the military complex, and corporations — that was more consistently liberal in makeup.
The Democrat was spitting about he would not even justify a conspiracy theory like that on a government mandate and it was un-American to tell businesses how they should operate (i.e., not be able to mandate a vax as a condition for employment).
I have been puzzled by the vehement insistence of these mandates, and the demonization of those opposed, and the premise posited above is the most logical explanation. Clearly, it is not about public safety, those who are vaxxed should not have any concern about those unvaxxed (if the vaxxes worked, right?). And those who opt to not get vaxxed are not worried about their statistical risk of death of less than 99.95 percent if they feel healthy and young.
Occam’s razor seems perfectly suited to explain the strategy behind the Liberal Socialists mandating this vax, and demonizing those conservatives who resist.
The conundrum is that conservatives are opting to be purged, because they are resisting the vax, thereby fulfilling the goal of the liberals of purging them.
Hmmm… Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
Published in General
You are hung up on facts and actual numbers. Lefty preferred narratives and perceptions see anti-vax as a right-wing ideology and proceed accordingly. We know that because otherwise they would not bathe in rhetoric about the anti-vaxers keeping the pandemic going with its implicit criticism of African-American relutance.
From a recent meme thread:
And while those who may be “vaccine-skeptic” on the covid front might be mostly conservative, they aren’t anti-vax in general, and those who are anti-vax in general are definitely on the left.
Of course, it becomes clearer every day of the week that the COVID Experimental Therapies are causing an exponential rise in adverse effects. So if there is a serious risk in getting the “vaccines,” then being laid off from a job might actually beat the alternative.
Many prominent indie scientists have said for over a year that each successive jab adds more injury to the human body, a body that was not designed to have spike proteins slam our ribosomes into making spike proteins rather than the usual proteins needed by hungry mitochondria to keep the body’s energy producers pumped up.
With the “vaccines” maiming people and killing people, maybe being purged from the workplace is far less a loss than the alternative. After all, who in their righht mind would willingly risk being a victim of chronic health situations such as transverse myelitis, MS, Guillan Barre, chronic migraines, skin problems, blood clots so severe one’s limbs are amputated, early onset Alzheimer’s and death.
All for a “vaccine” which does not prevent infection, nor prevent transmission. And it has become more apparent each week that had actual remedies been given to those hospitalized with supposed COVID, over the last 17 months, we might have lost fewer than 100,000 people from the effects of the pandemic. (And was there ever a COVID virus? It looks more and more like people in the hospitals might have had only a flu, a plain old normal flu. But the effects of not giving real remedies combined with the inappropriate rocephin, inappropriate fentanyl, and kidney-killing remdesivir, these actions were what brought about the cytokine storm, used by the media to convince the public of two falsehoods: that this was the first time a cytokine effect had occurred in humans and secondly that COVID was real.)
Also, how incredibly interesting is it: in August 2019, the global bankers had one of their meetings, held in Colorado, where they approved this plan titled “Going Direct Reset” which they voted on and approved. This approved plan, when a little later on ended up partnering with the COVID 19 restrictions and thus managed to bring about a financial coup d’etat.
Are people aware that this “Going Direct Reset” & its partnering with COVID policies/protocols were the mechanism by which various functions of the Federal Reserve and US Treasury – including those entities’ financial resources – were handed over to Blackrock?
We the People are now living in a dystopian nation, where digitalization of the voting process allows Central Powers to control our selections. Where our supposed Guardians of our wealth, the Fed and the Treasury, have ceded our wealth to a hedge fund. All without many citizens even aware of this occurring. (Although now that Biden is mentioning the 450K payments to families of illegals, people are finally sensing something has shifted in terms of national finances.)
Catherine Austin Fitts discusses the matter here:
https://www.rokfin.com/post/48152/Interview-with-Catherine-Austin-Fitts
Carol you never cease to amaze. The information you pass on is always in depth and just a bit out of the ordinary, but very interesting. Thanks for your input,
You are welcome. And I never cease to be amazed by my twitter and FB private group friends, who on a weekly basis present new websites for me to follow.
Catherine Austin Fitts is someone I have followed since 2005 or so, when our big societal problem was “why does it take two paychecks to do less than what one paycheck did 40 years ago?”
Seems so quaint these days.