Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections

 

Rigged CoverMollie Hemingway applies her talent—rigorous and thoughtful old-school journalism—to documenting the 2020 assault against America perpetrated by the evil alliance of the progressive movement, the entrenched bureaucracy, modern “journalism”, and big technology firms. Yes, the election was rigged. But the core of Rigged is the story of years of lawfare, private takeovers of election boards by well-funded progressives, ill-considered and/or uncontested consent agreements, the flouting of long-standing election law, and the shielding thereof by a twisted judiciary.

This book does not lay out specific proof that Trump won on November 3, 2020. It does show how the unprecedented surge in mail-in voting, and the suppression of the anti-fraud measures that are supposed to accompany it, made 2020 a perfect storm for untraceable fraud. Meanwhile, the media’s four-year campaign to oust Trump by any means necessary ground on, with regular assistance from an entrenched bureaucracy willing to do anything to avoid draining the swamp. Add in a huge assist by abrupt changes in the censorship practices of big social media firms, and you have the tools to lift a mediocre basement-dweller over the most energetic and energizing politician of my lifetime. (I’m 54, fwiw.)

My copy of Rigged, pictured, is festooned with Post-It flags for the statements and quotations that were new to me or struck me as particularly significant. I can’t possibly mention them all in this review—I placed 77 of these markers. But I can hit the highlights of each chapter.

Mollie sets the stage with a brief prologue, letting you know that you aren’t crazy if you think Trump’s victory was stolen.

The first chapter is a discussion of the changes in voting laws over the history of the United States, from pre-colonial times to the present. Some of this was completely new to me, especially that the secret ballot wasn’t really all that secret until late in the 19th century, with the introduction of “Australian-style” ballots printed by the government. Fully public and partially public voting practices prior to this were shockingly prone to coercion and fraud, especially in the form of vote-buying. The reforms of the time were particularly focused on abolishing voting by mail, and eliminating long time periods for voting. Election day was established by amendment to be the Tuesday after the first Monday of November to avoid influencing the outcome of states that voted later in the calendar based on reports of the outcome in other states. Mollie’s exposition shows how we (these United States) are going backward to known-abusive voting procedures.

The second chapter discusses how Trump’s enemies were strewn through the establishment, and included antagonistic Republicans. Trump’s policies are poison for big-government enthusiasts in both parties, and those policies’ successes across a variety of topics were embarrassing to the failures that preceded him. His foreign policy successes, like Peace in the Middle East, demonstrated the bankruptcy of the establishment’s own policy preferences. Meanwhile, Trump’s economic policies were so successful, across all classes and among minorities, that re-alignment of traditional Democratic constituencies was in full swing. The establishment desperately needed to stop Trump.

The third chapter lays out the impact Covid-19 had on the presidential contest. And how every twist and turn in the course of events was portrayed in the media in the worst possible light for Trump, and the best possible light for his antagonists (particularly Cuomo in New York), regardless of the hypocrisy. The politicization of science, already a grave problem in any topic that lives on public research funds, reached new heights in 2020 (and continuing today, I might add). Mollie doesn’t really dwell on the scientific details of Covid-19, as that isn’t really relevant to the theme of Rigged. Her presentation is focused on the excuse Covid provided for activists to push a huge expansion of mail-in voting—precisely the tool needed to enable untraceable fraud on a grand scale.

Chapter four moves on to the horrifying violence that engulfed major cities in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd at the knee of Derek Chauvin. The initial impressions of Floyd’s demise, now known to be not quite so simple, were seized by anti-police activists in the black community to advance their agenda. An agenda that is Marxist to its core, and contemptuous of American standards of justice. Mollie lays out point after point showing how the progressive movement’s vested interest in stopping Trump’s gains in minority communities led its politicians, media apologists, and social media censors to do everything they could to keep tensions simmering. And to hide the truth about Antifa and BLM activist behavior.

Chapter five covers the convention season, and how the lackluster “virtual” convention held by the Democrats was outshone by a very unconventional Republican convention. Unconventional because all the usual players were unavailable, and the Charlotte host site was effectively sabotaged by North Carolina’s Democrat governor. The good news for Trump could not be allowed to stand, and the mainstream news media leveraged conveniently anonymous sources to gin up a controversy over a canceled visit to a military cemetery in France. That numerous eyewitnesses contradicted the “sources”, insisting that Trump did not defame any soldiers, was ignored. Corrections to the record were naturally held until they could help Trump anymore. No apologies from Fake News, of course.

Chapter six describes the debate season and the journalist malpractice that surrounded it. Mollie highlights the shameful conduct of the Commission on Presidential Debates and points out that it is likely to have no future.

Chapter seven is a deep dive into Big Tech’s assistance to the progressive movement, with a particular focus on the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), Mark Zuckerberg’s vehicle for buying elections. Specifically, CTCL gave huge sums, with strings attached, to election boards around the country. The strings were basically to push mail-in voting to the max, and eliminate the signature matches, address checks, witness requirements, and any other anti-fraud measure that normally accompanies mail-in voting. And “cooperate” with CTCL “advisors”. Mollie documents how that meant CTCL running some elections. Georgia was the biggest recipient, at $31 million. More on that in chapter ten.

Chapter eight is all about Hunter. And all the trouble he creates for the Biden family while leading the family’s worldwide grift. Trouble that reflects poorly on his father, and so must be suppressed. Especially the classic October surprise: Hunter’s abandoned laptop with oodles of embarrassing and incriminating content. The journalistic malpractice (or to be more honest, malice) was breathtaking. Major media, big tech, and bureaucrats closed ranks to silence all news about this event. At least until the election was safely in Biden’s pocket. Yes, anyone inclined to bypass major news media for more trustworthy sources knew all about it, but the general public doesn’t do this. Numerous polls, after the fact, show that earlier knowledge of this scandal would have changed many Biden voters’ minds. More than enough to flip the result.

Chapter nine is about the legal and judicial shenanigans used in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to suppress the Green Party and candidates that would siphon voter support on the left, plus an account of similar legal and judicial misconduct to suppress poll-watchers and post-election challenges to signature verification misconduct. The election boards in both states flouted state laws with impunity, thanks to sympathetic judges. Mollie throws stones at Rudy Guiliani, too. He disrupted Trump’s legal efforts quite badly, as Mollie explains.

The tenth and final chapter focuses on Georgia’s Fulton County and Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensburger. As a Georgia resident myself, much of this has been covered locally ad nauseam. However, one bit about Raffensburger’s stonewalling on FOIA requests, requests needed by Mark Davis, a local election integrity expert, for Trump’s legal challenges, left my jaw on the floor. I was already upset at Raffensburger for the outrageous consent agreement that changed mail-in ballot handling, but the sheer malice towards conservatism shown by the post-election conduct Mollie documents has me furious. Not to mention the mind-boggling revelation that Raffensburger’s right hand in the office is a clear Democrat activist.

Mollie adds a brief epilogue to tie it all back together.

I thoroughly enjoyed Mollie’s writing, and learned a few things I’d missed in the past year or so. I highly recommend you get your own copy.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 315 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Motions to intervene are not easy, but they are not impossible.  Time for the Republican Party to get its act together before the election, and to not whine after the election.

    There were many legal attempts to stop the illegal procedure changes well in advance of the election.  In Georgia, a suit against the consent agreement was filed before the primariesMollie covers this.  They were dismissed for not having harmed the plaintiffs yet.  With instructions to file after the election.  Suits filed after the election were dismissed as moot.  Surely, as a practicing lawyer, you heard about these at the time?  I did, and I’m just an engineer.

    • #121
  2. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Mollie points out that the Trump campaign did it best to rig the Republican nomination to discourage any candidates from taking on Trump.

    What year are you talking about? What are you talking about?

    In the 6th paragraph of Comment #73 I said, 

    Previously, if a Republican received votes in a MA presidential primary, he or she would receive a proportionate share of delegates.  Now this was changed to a requirement that that delegate had to win 50% of the vote.  Page 42.  There used to be a requirement in Florida that a candidate get nominating signatures or pay a ballot access fee; however now if the candidate was the incumbent president, he or she would automatically qualify.  Page 42-43.  In Kentucky, a delegate could not be nominated unless they had previously supported the last presidential nominee.  Page 43.  And in the Soviet States of Arizona and others, the Arizona State Republican Party simply did away with primaries.

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    She notes that in 2016, Trump received 44.9% plurality of the vote; what she doesn’t acknowledge is that Trump, was the first Republican nominee in memory to not win a majority of the primary vote as Romney had done in 2012, McCain had done in 2008, George W. Bush had done in 2004 and 2000, Dole had done in 1996, George H.W. Bush had done in 1992 and 1988, Reagan had done in 1984 and 1980 and Nixon had done in 1972 and 1968. It is remarkable that Trump could never break 50% of the Republican Primary vote.

    There were 16 candidates.

    No, there were 17 candidates, Trump and 16 others.

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    A great deal is made of Mark Zuckerberg funding a group to promote absentee voting. What, we don’t have any billionaires ourselves? Two can play the same game. Again, Mollie fails to appreciate the once in a century experience of the pandemic.

    Total lawyer argument defending a client. You really endorse billionaires renting the election system in a way that skews it for their favorite candidate?

    No.  But we need to grow up and stop being professional victims.  The laws have been changed to provide for more protections in absentee voting.  We have our own billionaires too.

    Mark Elias created the conditions that we had worse ballot controls than ever. You are seriously for this?

    Mark Elias is a clever lawyer.  We need to have our own clever lawyers, instead of clowns like Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Lin Wood.

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    On page 85, Mollie notes that the liberal press were mean to Trump about COVID-19. Big surprise. Call the Waaaaambulance! The press has been hostile to Republicans as long as I have been aware of politics, starting with Barry Goldwater in 1964. However, there have been Republican Presidents who have been able to reach beyond the press and make their cases to the nation, such as Ike, Reagan and George W. Bush. It is easy to be part of the Party of Santa Claus like Democrats; it is harder to earn respect by being a Dick Cheney, or a Margaret Thatcher.

    It’s worse than that. The four tech companies control the public square.

    In 1955 Liberals owned the opinion magazines.  And William F. Buckley, Jr. created National Review.  In 1966 CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS had a monopoly over news tv channels.  And Murdoch created the Fox News Channel.  Create your own parallel tech company.

    I would also say that the media is far more Democrat now than what you are describing.

    The media is strongly liberal.  Unfortunately, instead of being conservative, the FNC has turned Trumpy.  There is a huge market available for a conservative non-Trumpy news channel. 

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The Democrats pressed for advantage in lawsuits before the election, and Trump whined, but did precious little to file his own lawsuits or to intervene in Democratic lawsuits.

    I wish you would elaborate on this. I don’t think the heritage foundation would put it this way and they were the ones raising the alarm.

    Why the heck didn’t the Heritage Foundation, or the Federalist Society launch lawsuits or organize others to file them.  

     

    • #122
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    As for the pandemic, both Trump and Biden have shown themselves unable to distinguish themselves with this rare event like Republican Governors DeSantis or DeWine.

    I would love to know why you liked DeWine’s COVID-19 policy.

    DeWine is the Republican Governor who is taking COVID-19 seriously.  

    • #123
  4. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

     

    Who “rigged” the election were the Democrats who figured out the rules and strategy quickly and adapted to the pandemic. The blame should be put at the feet of the state, and national parties and the Trump campaign for not adapting to the pandemic and filing their own lawsuits.

    And illegally changed them.

    You must work very hard to keep ignoring things that have been pointed out to you over and over. Lawsuits WERE filed, and dismissed for lack of “standing.” Because no “damage” had yet occurred. After the election they were dismissed as “moot.”

    Well, the Democrats found a way to file lawsuits to open up absentee ballots before the election. Why the heck didn’t the Republicans file their own lawsuits to increase security before the election? Why the heck didn’t the Republicans file motions to intervene in those lawsuits before the election.

    Child Protective Services (now the Department of Child Safety) and take children from negligent or abusive parents, and file Dependency Petitions, only to have grandparents represented by Gary Robbins file motions to intervene to force their way into those lawsuits. When CPS tried to stop me, I went to the legislature to create a right of participation by foster parents and relatives. When CPS filed a Special Action to stop me, I won in the Court of Appeals.

    Motions to intervene are not easy, but they are not impossible. Time for the Republican Party to get its act together before the election, and to not whine after the election.

    What am I missing here? The man just said/wrote that lawsuits were filed, and yet you ask “why the heck didn’t the Republicans file their own lawsuits”? What about “lawsuits were filed” was not clear to you? 

    • #124
  5. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Who “rigged” the election were the Democrats who figured out the rules and strategy quickly and adapted to the pandemic. The blame should be put at the feet of the state, and national parties and the Trump campaign for not adapting to the pandemic and filing their own lawsuits.

     

    Nice of you to put it more fairly. The problem is nobody could respond to Zuckerberg. It was too different and he did it in the middle of September. It’s terrible. If you don’t think of it any other way I absolutely don’t get it. Billionaires renting the election system.

    And, they didn’t just “figure out the rules and strategy and quickly adapted…” They changed the rules illegally/unconstitutionally for their benefit.

    They didn’t act illegally nor unconstitutionally.  How do I know that?  Because the Republicans never got their act together to have a Court declare what the Democrats did “illegal” or “unconstitutional.”  

    • #125
  6. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Who “rigged” the election were the Democrats who figured out the rules and strategy quickly and adapted to the pandemic. The blame should be put at the feet of the state, and national parties and the Trump campaign for not adapting to the pandemic and filing their own lawsuits.

     

    Nice of you to put it more fairly. The problem is nobody could respond to Zuckerberg. It was too different and he did it in the middle of September. It’s terrible. If you don’t think of it any other way I absolutely don’t get it. Billionaires renting the election system.

    And, they didn’t just “figure out the rules and strategy and quickly adapted…” They changed the rules illegally/unconstitutionally for their benefit.

    In the big picture, Gary is making the argument against Principles First and for Trump.

    If you make his head explode, I’m not cleaning it up!

    I don’t think that it is my head that is exploding.  

    • #126
  7. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The Dems got going and used Facebook, Twitter and new technologies in 2020.  So instead of whinning, it is time for the Republican Party to get busy, stop whining, and match the Democrats. 

    It’s the ownership of these properties. They are in the pockets of the Democrat party for a variety of reasons. 

    You can’t create competition like you could in the days of newspapers and hand bills because of the first mover phenomenon and the network effect phenomena. They control the public square.

    • #127
  8. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Flicker (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    And illegally changed them.

    You must work very hard to keep ignoring things that have been pointed out to you over and over. Lawsuits WERE filed, and dismissed for lack of “standing.” Because no “damage” had yet occurred. After the election they were dismissed as “moot.”

    And by refusing to hear pre-election concerns, judges effectively held to a standard that denied time needed to establish fraud after the elections even if standing was not an issue.

    If you lose in the trial court, take it up to the appellate courts.  Or to the state legislatures.  At a minimum, stop being a victim.

    The legal system, including the judiciary, showed itself to be totally corrupt in election fraud issues and voters’ rights.

    “Corrupt”?  “Corrupt?”  So all of these Trump judges are corrupt?

    Why have a legal system if it ignores (or validates the fraudulence of) one of the most fundamental rights in a republic, of a fair election?

    If you fail to protect yourself before the election, that’s on you, not on the other side.  The Court deals with cases and controversies that are brought to the Court.  When only the Democrats go to Court, the Republicans have ceded the ground to them.  

    Once that is gone, all law is a matter of whim and bias.

    So get off of the ground and get going.  Stop whining.  It is unattractive and smells of being losers.

     

    • #128
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Previously, if a Republican received votes in a MA presidential primary, he or she would receive a proportionate share of delegates.  Now this was changed to a requirement that that delegate had to win 50% of the vote.  Page 42.  There used to be a requirement in Florida that a candidate get nominating signatures or pay a ballot access fee; however now if the candidate was the incumbent president, he or she would automatically qualify.  Page 42-43.  In Kentucky, a delegate could not be nominated unless they had previously supported the last presidential nominee.  Page 43.  And in the Soviet States of Arizona and others, the Arizona State Republican Party simply did away with primaries.

    Just to be clear this is 2020?

    • #129
  10. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    kedavis (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

     

     

     

     

    Except it seems likely to have been more than just get-out-the-LEGITIMATE-vote. Or else what’s the point in making sure all these operations are run by Democrats?

    Then get into the game before the election, instead of complaining after the fact.

    When Clinton and the Democrats enacted “Motor Voter” to register voters at the MVD, the Republicans in the Arizona Legislature stuck back.  Given that older voters favor the GOP, when someone gets a driver’s license in Arizona, it is valid until they turn 65 years old.  Yes, we have a 47 year driver’s license if you get it when you are 18.  Two can play at this game.  

    Once you turn 65, you have to be renewed periodically, and then have the opportunity to re-register to vote again!

    • #130
  11. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    genferei (View Comment):

    (View Comment):
    Given the statistics involved with the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach County with the massive vote for Pat Buchanan, would you agree that a majority of voters in Florida intended to vote for Al Gore? Should Al Gore have been our 43rd President? See the article from the Stanford Graduate School of Business that concludes that 2,000 votes for Buchanan were meant to have been cast for Gore. Bush won by 537 votes. It there any question that Gore “really” won Florida, and thus “really won” the 2000 election?

    I guess under prevailing theories of law and morality asking these questions is tantamount to treason and anyone contemplating them is a domestic terrorist. Do I have that right?

    My point is that complaining after the fact is for losers.  Winners plan beforehand.

    • #131
  12. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    No.  But we need to grow up and stop being professional victims.  The laws have been changed to provide for more protections in absentee voting.  We have our own billionaires too.

    And you need to recognize the general nature of how the Democrat party wields power.

    I cannot relate to how you think about this at all.

    The Democrat party does not follow the Judge Learned Hand spirit of liberty speech so quit acting like they do.

    • #132
  13. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    EHerring (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    I do think that there were serious irregularities with the election, but some of the claims were not plausible, in my view.

    And you’ve done some fine work arguing such.

    Better than my work, at least for the most part. But I did some real working logicing up Wisconsin. And I checked up on “AVCBs” or whatever they’re called before running too far with the idea of 173,000 votes without corresponding registrations in Michigan.

    (All in the big post. The interested reader can CTR-F for key words.)

    Frankly it would be more helpful to me for you to say what allegations remain, instead of all of the ones that you have disproved. I suggest that you create a smaller post about where there still are grounds to argue.

    Another issue. Given the statistics involved with the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach County with the massive vote for Pat Buchanan, would you agree that a majority of voters in Florida intended to vote for Al Gore? Should Al Gore have been our 43rd President? See the article from the Stanford Graduate School of Business that concludes that 2,000 votes for Buchanan were meant to have been cast for Gore. Bush won by 537 votes. It there any question that Gore “really” won Florida, and thus “really won” the 2000 election? https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/publications/butterfly-did-it-aberrant-vote-buchanan-palm-beach-county-florida

    All that tells me is stupid people shouldn’t vote. They also had some stupid people on the buses giving instructions to people they were busing to the polls in Florida 2000..

    And in 1980, the Networks called the election for Reagan before the polls closed in California.

    • #133
  14. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    EHerring (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):
    my take home thus far is that fraudulent elections are the norm, clean elections are virtually nonexistent in America since the Founding. Amazing that the Republic has survived.

    The founders anticipated as much. That is one reason we have the electoral college system.

    Agreed.

    • #134
  15. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    Others have contributed rebuttals, so I won’t do a proper fisking. But this one item can’t be allowed to stand:

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Little is made of Trump’s disastrous rally in Tulsa. It appears that Mollie does not note how the Trump campaign initially set this rally for June 19th, or “Juneteenth,” or was completely unaware of the horrific Race Riot by whites in Tulsa, in May 31, 1921 and June 1, 1921 killing dozens of blacks and burning down their business district. I also note that Mollie does not mention 2012 Republican Candidate Herman Cain who died of COVID-19 after going to this rally and refusing to wear a mask. Mollie does not note the iconic picture of Trump after the rally where Trump looks disheveled.

    I attended this rally. It was anything but disastrous, except for the astonishingly biased media coverage. Honest coverage from this attendee is available here:

    https://ricochet.com/771146/my-first-trump-rally/

    I think that this picture says it all.  This is one of the few times that Trump was photographed when he was not camera ready.

    The Tulsa Rally Was a Really Bad Sign for Trump

     

    • #135
  16. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Who wants to refute him this time?

    Phil already did that with his review.

    Phil did a good review.  However, I have pointed out some weaknesses.  I hope that he will respond to them.

    • #136
  17. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    “My point is that complaining after the fact is for losers.”

    After throwing a four year temper tantrum, the clown has the nerve to toss around faux-machismo like this now. Funny stuff, I tell you…

    • #137
  18. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Motions to intervene are not easy, but they are not impossible. Time for the Republican Party to get its act together before the election, and to not whine after the election.

    There were many legal attempts to stop the illegal procedure changes well in advance of the election. In Georgia, a suit against the consent agreement was filed before the primaries. Mollie covers this. They were dismissed for not having harmed the plaintiffs yet.  With instructions to file after the election. 

    Then take it up to the appellate courts.  And go to the legislature, which in Arizona and Georgia are controlled by Republicans and there were Republican Governors.

    Suits filed after the election were dismissed as moot.

    They should have taken it up to the appellate courts and the legislatures.

    Surely, as a practicing lawyer, you heard about these at the time?

    Yes.  And I was amazed at the GOP incompetence.  

    I did, and I’m just an engineer.

    Thank you for keeping this world working.

    You wrote a great review here.  Good job.

     

    • #138
  19. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

     

    Who “rigged” the election were the Democrats who figured out the rules and strategy quickly and adapted to the pandemic. The blame should be put at the feet of the state, and national parties and the Trump campaign for not adapting to the pandemic and filing their own lawsuits.

    And illegally changed them.

    You must work very hard to keep ignoring things that have been pointed out to you over and over. Lawsuits WERE filed, and dismissed for lack of “standing.” Because no “damage” had yet occurred. After the election they were dismissed as “moot.”

    Well, the Democrats found a way to file lawsuits to open up absentee ballots before the election. Why the heck didn’t the Republicans file their own lawsuits to increase security before the election? Why the heck didn’t the Republicans file motions to intervene in those lawsuits before the election.

    Child Protective Services (now the Department of Child Safety) and take children from negligent or abusive parents, and file Dependency Petitions, only to have grandparents represented by Gary Robbins file motions to intervene to force their way into those lawsuits. When CPS tried to stop me, I went to the legislature to create a right of participation by foster parents and relatives. When CPS filed a Special Action to stop me, I won in the Court of Appeals.

    Motions to intervene are not easy, but they are not impossible. Time for the Republican Party to get its act together before the election, and to not whine after the election.

    What am I missing here? The man just said/wrote that lawsuits were filed, and yet you ask “why the heck didn’t the Republicans file their own lawsuits”? What about “lawsuits were filed” was not clear to you?

    And if they lost in the trial court, take it up to the appellate courts, and go to the legislatures.

    • #139
  20. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The Dems got going and used Facebook, Twitter and new technologies in 2020. So instead of whinning, it is time for the Republican Party to get busy, stop whining, and match the Democrats.

    It’s the ownership of these properties. They are in the pockets of the Democrat party for a variety of reasons.

    You can’t create competition like you could in the days of newspapers and hand bills because of the first mover phenomenon and the network effect phenomena. They control the public square.

    For now.  Just as CNN owned the new network in 1996 when FNC was created.

    • #140
  21. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Previously, if a Republican received votes in a MA presidential primary, he or she would receive a proportionate share of delegates. Now this was changed to a requirement that that delegate had to win 50% of the vote. Page 42. There used to be a requirement in Florida that a candidate get nominating signatures or pay a ballot access fee; however now if the candidate was the incumbent president, he or she would automatically qualify. Page 42-43. In Kentucky, a delegate could not be nominated unless they had previously supported the last presidential nominee. Page 43. And in the Soviet States of Arizona and others, the Arizona State Republican Party simply did away with primaries.

    Just to be clear this is 2020?

    Yes.  See pages 42 and 43 of the book.

    • #141
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The Dems got going and used Facebook, Twitter and new technologies in 2020. So instead of whinning, it is time for the Republican Party to get busy, stop whining, and match the Democrats.

    It’s the ownership of these properties. They are in the pockets of the Democrat party for a variety of reasons.

    You can’t create competition like you could in the days of newspapers and hand bills because of the first mover phenomenon and the network effect phenomena. They control the public square.

    For now. Just as CNN owned the new network in 1996 when FNC was created.

    I don’t think so. We can’t keep going, year after year like this, either. 

    Plus the thing about Fox, is you were talking about 750,000 people during the day and 3 million during prime time. It’s nothing. Talk radio is 20,000,000 to 30,000,000 depending on how you analyze it. Each network news cast is 10 million. NPR is big but I don’t know what the figure is.

    • #142
  23. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Previously, if a Republican received votes in a MA presidential primary, he or she would receive a proportionate share of delegates. Now this was changed to a requirement that that delegate had to win 50% of the vote. Page 42. There used to be a requirement in Florida that a candidate get nominating signatures or pay a ballot access fee; however now if the candidate was the incumbent president, he or she would automatically qualify. Page 42-43. In Kentucky, a delegate could not be nominated unless they had previously supported the last presidential nominee. Page 43. And in the Soviet States of Arizona and others, the Arizona State Republican Party simply did away with primaries.

    Just to be clear this is 2020?

    Yes. See pages 42 and 43 of the book.

    OK, and this is a crisis, why? Was there some scheme that got torpedoed by this?

    • #143
  24. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

     

    Who “rigged” the election were the Democrats who figured out the rules and strategy quickly and adapted to the pandemic. The blame should be put at the feet of the state, and national parties and the Trump campaign for not adapting to the pandemic and filing their own lawsuits.

    And illegally changed them.

    You must work very hard to keep ignoring things that have been pointed out to you over and over. Lawsuits WERE filed, and dismissed for lack of “standing.” Because no “damage” had yet occurred. After the election they were dismissed as “moot.”

    Well, the Democrats found a way to file lawsuits to open up absentee ballots before the election. Why the heck didn’t the Republicans file their own lawsuits to increase security before the election? Why the heck didn’t the Republicans file motions to intervene in those lawsuits before the election.

    Child Protective Services (now the Department of Child Safety) and take children from negligent or abusive parents, and file Dependency Petitions, only to have grandparents represented by Gary Robbins file motions to intervene to force their way into those lawsuits. When CPS tried to stop me, I went to the legislature to create a right of participation by foster parents and relatives. When CPS filed a Special Action to stop me, I won in the Court of Appeals.

    Motions to intervene are not easy, but they are not impossible. Time for the Republican Party to get its act together before the election, and to not whine after the election.

    What am I missing here? The man just said/wrote that lawsuits were filed, and yet you ask “why the heck didn’t the Republicans file their own lawsuits”? What about “lawsuits were filed” was not clear to you?

    And if they lost in the trial court, take it up to the appellate courts, and go to the legislatures.

    They lost on most appeals and now that the last option is being exercised, you and others have said that Trump is trying to steal the 2024 election. From what I can tell, you’re just a whiner, or more likely are trying to distract from the fact that NTs supported Biden over Trump.  Whatever. Another thread to unfollow. 

    • #144
  25. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    philo (View Comment):

    “My point is that complaining after the fact is for losers.”

    After throwing a four year temper tantrum, the clown has the nerve to toss around faux-machismo like this now. Funny stuff, I tell you…

    “Clown”?  The Code of Conduct prohibits the following:

    • Personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against people, groups, or classes. Public figures may be exempt from this rule, provided the comment otherwise adheres to the CoC.
    • Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments. Imagine you’re a guest at a dinner party with a group of seemingly nice people you don’t know… how would you handle yourself?
    • #145
  26. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Previously, if a Republican received votes in a MA presidential primary, he or she would receive a proportionate share of delegates. Now this was changed to a requirement that that delegate had to win 50% of the vote. Page 42. There used to be a requirement in Florida that a candidate get nominating signatures or pay a ballot access fee; however now if the candidate was the incumbent president, he or she would automatically qualify. Page 42-43. In Kentucky, a delegate could not be nominated unless they had previously supported the last presidential nominee. Page 43. And in the Soviet States of Arizona and others, the Arizona State Republican Party simply did away with primaries.

    Just to be clear this is 2020?

    Yes. See pages 42 and 43 of the book.

    OK, and this is a crisis, why? Was there some scheme that got torpedoed by this?

    It shows that the GOP manipulated the rules just as the Dems did in 2020.  

    • #146
  27. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    “My point is that complaining after the fact is for losers.”

    After throwing a four year temper tantrum, the clown has the nerve to toss around faux-machismo like this now. Funny stuff, I tell you…

    “Clown”? The Code of Conduct prohibits the following:

    • Personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against people, groups, or classes. Public figures may be exempt from this rule, provided the comment otherwise adheres to the CoC.
    • Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments. Imagine you’re a guest at a dinner party with a group of seemingly nice people you don’t know… how would you handle yourself?

    Not a personal attack at all, just a perfect description of someone who alters their true character behind a Reagan costume:

    • #147
  28. Norm McDonald Bought The Farm Inactive
    Norm McDonald Bought The Farm
    @Pseudodionysius

    Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments.

    By that standard, I violate the CoC every time I open up my yap.

    • #148
  29. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    philo (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    “My point is that complaining after the fact is for losers.”

    After throwing a four year temper tantrum, the clown has the nerve to toss around faux-machismo like this now. Funny stuff, I tell you…

    “Clown”? The Code of Conduct prohibits the following:

    • Personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against people, groups, or classes. Public figures may be exempt from this rule, provided the comment otherwise adheres to the CoC.
    • Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments. Imagine you’re a guest at a dinner party with a group of seemingly nice people you don’t know… how would you handle yourself?

    Not a personal attack at all, just a perfect description of someone who alters their true character behind a Reagan costume:

    It is uncontroverted that in 2020 I voted for a Democrat for President for the first time since 1972.  That I contributed to his campaign should not be a surprise, nor that I helped Biden take on Sanders in Nevada.  https://ricochet.com/725739/neverbernie-or-what-i-saw-in-las-vegas/

    • #149
  30. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Norm McDonald Bought The Farm (View Comment):

    Defamatory, gossipy, or rude comments.

    By that standard, I violate the CoC every time I open up my yap.

    But you do so with a twinkle in your eye, and not malice in your heart.

    I work very hard to not violate this part of the Code of Conduct, especially with my “special friends.”  I am usually, but not always, successful.

    • #150
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.