Roald Dahl’s Message to Anti-vaccination Groups

 

“Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old. As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed and not feeling particularly alarmed about it. Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of coloured pipe-cleaners, and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and her mind were not working together and she couldn’t do anything.

‘Are you feeling all right?’ I asked her.

‘I feel all sleepy,’ she said.

In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead.

The measles had turned into a terrible thing called measles encephalitis and there was nothing the doctors could do to save her. That was…in 1962, but even now, if a child with measles happens to develop the same deadly reaction from measles as Olivia did, there would still be nothing the doctors could do to help her. On the other hand, there is today something that parents can do to make sure that this sort of tragedy does not happen to a child of theirs. They can insist that their child is immunised against measles.

…I dedicated two of my books to Olivia, the first was ‘James and the Giant Peach’. That was when she was still alive. The second was ‘The BFG’, dedicated to her memory after she had died from measles. You will see her name at the beginning of each of these books. And I know how happy she would be if only she could know that her death had helped to save a good deal of illness and death among other children.”

– Roald Dahl, 1986

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 192 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    The risk from covid is also very low for most people. The constant fearmongering of covid hysterics discredits their arguments. 

    What we have is a difference of opinion about tradeoffs and risks, and some are trying to impose one opinion on others when there’s very little justification to do so. 

    The risk of death from COVID is very low for most people. The risk of adverse, long term side effects seems very unpredictable and greater than zero.

    I agree we’re talking about risks and tradeoffs, but I think some of the arguments are speculative (putting it kindly– “people will develop blood clots 6 or 7 years down the road from the vaccine (but not from COVID itself)”) and downplay considerations on one side or the other based on someone’s previous decision to vaccinate or not vaccinate (confirmation bias). 

    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that. 

    Adults should be free to choose and kids probably shouldn’t be vaccinated at all — and should definitely not be compelled to vaccinate in order to participate in civilized society (universities).

    The situation sucks. We’ve got to choose between a Chinese Communist Party bioweapon virus which is never going away entirely, or a relatively new immunotherapy technology that may involve unforeseen consequences. We’re all gonna die, though, so make your choice and move on with life. The Lord sits on His throne.  

    • #91
  2. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I think it’s a bit misleading to keep calling mRNA vaccines “experimental.”

    The person who invented mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, is very worried about the COVID mRNA vaccines because they inject an artificial version of the strike protein, which is very toxic, into you. The COVID mRNA vaccines are very experimental and have not been thoroughly tested which will take years. The negative reactions to these “vaccines” are not fully known at all. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

    Malone shows wisdom in pointing out that the negative reactions to these experimental jabs are unknown. It could be 3 to 7 years from now before we realize what effect the “vaxxes” will have overall on human reproduction. The mounting statistics relating to women getting jabbed and then miscarrying their babies does not bode well.

    If the jabs do diminish the ability of Americans to reproduce, China will definitely emerge the winner on this silent war against humanity.

    Plus Dr Robert Malone is joined in his critical thinking about the experimental jabs by none other than former Pfizer executive Dr Michael Yeadon.

    From his interview with Robert F Kennedy Jr:

    Because COVID vaccines use experimental technology that may pose serious side effects such as blood clots, Dr Yeadon said, “we should absolutely not be offering them to young, healthy people who are not at risk from the virus.”

    He also said: “I have two healthy adult girls, 25 and 29 years-old, and I would be really upset if they ended up being coerced into taking these products because they’re healthy and young, and there are not any measurable risks from COVID-19.”

    Listen to the full interview to hear Yeadon and RFK, Jr. discuss the totalitarian nature of vaccine passports and why the push for COVID vaccine booster shots is clouded in deception.

    The full article can be read and the full filmed interview can be viewed here:

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dr-mike-yeadon-rfk-jr-the-defender-podcast-safety-mrna-vaccine-technology/

    And apparently no matter how many times this is stated, the wisdom the statement contains seems to go right over some people’s heads:

    The COVID vaccines would never, ever have been given emergency authorization without the murderous withholding of remedies like HCQ and ivermectin, due to language in some very sensible vaccine authorization rules and regs, which the rule makers utilized as they were aware that far too often, vaccines are more dangerous than available remedies.

    Children’s Health Defense is a Robert F Kennedy anti- vaxx website- why don’t you quote other health experts like Jenny McCarthy?

    This isn’t exactly an appeal to authority fallacy. More like an appeal to anti-supposed-crazy.

    Also appeal to emotion. Diversion too. You’re like a one stop logical fallacy shop.

    try reading the claims by the “Pfizer scientist” who left the field 10 years ago & thought they were years away from perfecting mRNA technology(BTW by saying he left the field 10 years ago I am being generous-he left Pfizer before that & his field isn’t vaccines). I guess he isn’t aware that science can progress without him in 10 years- and there was a greatt deal of work done in those 10 years to perfect the vaccines. And Pfizer wasn’t a leader in the technology-hence they partnered with BioNTech-maybe they should interview the actual developers of the vaccine?

    • #92
  3. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that. 

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    • #93
  4. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    The risk of death from COVID is very low for most people. The risk of adverse, long term side effects seems very unpredictable and greater than zero.

    Agreed. Unknowns all around which is why I’m so disappointed in the news and other institutions who have been getting it so wrong in two ways: claiming certainty when there really isn’t certainty and limiting questioning and alternative ideas (probably based on politics). 

    • #94
  5. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever. 

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    • #95
  6. DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) Coolidge
    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!)
    @DonG

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I think it’s a bit misleading to keep calling mRNA vaccines “experimental.”

    The person who invented mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, is very worried about the COVID mRNA vaccines because they inject an artificial version of the strike protein, which is very toxic, into you. The COVID mRNA vaccines are very experimental and have not been thoroughly tested which will take years. The negative reactions to these “vaccines” are not fully known at all. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

    If you believe he invented the vaccine I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you- a real bargain.

    Reading tip:  “invented mRNA vaccines” is not the same as “invented the vaccine”.   The first is a technology the second is a particular product made with that technology.

    • #96
  7. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever.

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    Not a she & have never advocated mandatory vaccines- but will push back against untrue claims by anti-vaxxers- and RFK is an antivaxxer. While broken clocks can be right twice a day RFK is not close to that level of consistency – wasn’t impressed the limited times I saw him while we were both attending the same university.

    • #97
  8. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I think it’s a bit misleading to keep calling mRNA vaccines “experimental.”

    The person who invented mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, is very worried about the COVID mRNA vaccines because they inject an artificial version of the strike protein, which is very toxic, into you. The COVID mRNA vaccines are very experimental and have not been thoroughly tested which will take years. The negative reactions to these “vaccines” are not fully known at all. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

    If you believe he invented the vaccine I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you- a real bargain.

    Reading tip: “invented mRNA vaccines” is not the same as “invented the vaccine”. The first is a technology the second is a particular product made with that technology.

    He didn’t invent either-he is a listed coauthor on 2 important papers over 30 years ago that helped lead to the development of mRNA vaccines.

    • #98
  9. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever.

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    Not a she & have never advocated mandatory vaccines- but will push back against untrue claims by anti-vaxxers- and RFK is an antivaxxer. While broken clocks can be right twice a day RFK is not close to that level of consistency – did even like him the limited times I saw him while we were both attending the same university.

    Do you think we have anti-vaxxers herein this discussion? If we do, maybe they should let us know so any doubt is gone. I’m not anti-vaccination.

    • #99
  10. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    MiMac (View Comment):
    try reading the claims by the “Pfizer scientist” who left the field 10 years ago & thought they were years away from perfecting mRNA technology

    “10 years” sounds like “years” to me.

    • #100
  11. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever.

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    Not a she & have never advocated mandatory vaccines- but will push back against untrue claims by anti-vaxxers- and RFK is an antivaxxer. While broken clocks can be right twice a day RFK is not close to that level of consistency – did even like him the limited times I saw him while we were both attending the same university.

    A good first step would be to not brush with the broad brush of “anti vaxxer”. I am pro every vax that is appropriate for me and my family. As previously mentioned, I did not get the Gardisol vaccine because there was no point. I feel similarly about the Covid shots.

    And it adds to my general suspicion of the medical community that no one’s personal circumstances and risk factors are being taken into account; instead it’s everyone must get it now. People who shouldn’t get the shot because of their own health conditions, people like me who frankly don’t need it, and people with health conditions that make Covid very dangerous are all being treated the same

    This is a very dangerous way to do medicine, IMHO. Although is it consistent with the way I, as a patient, have been treated. I’ve spent the past decades politely declining prescriptions.

    • #101
  12. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    kedavis (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):
    try reading the claims by the “Pfizer scientist” who left the field 10 years ago & thought they were years away from perfecting mRNA technology

    “10 years” sounds like “years” to me.

    Yes he was right- they where “years away” TEN years ago from perfecting mRNA vaccine technology – but by 2020 they where weeks away…so his criticism is worthless.

    • #102
  13. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Annefy (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever.

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    Not a she & have never advocated mandatory vaccines- but will push back against untrue claims by anti-vaxxers- and RFK is an antivaxxer. While broken clocks can be right twice a day RFK is not close to that level of consistency – did even like him the limited times I saw him while we were both attending the same university.

    A good first step would be to not brush with the broad brush of “anti vaxxer”. I am pro every vax that is appropriate for me and my family. As previously mentioned, I did not get the Gardisol vaccine because there was no point. I feel similarly about the Covid shots.

    And it adds to my general suspicion of the medical community that no one’s personal circumstances and risk factors are being taken into account; instead it’s everyone must get it now. People who shouldn’t get the shot because of their own health conditions, people like me who frankly don’t need it, and people with health conditions that make Covid very dangerous are all being treated the same

    This is a very dangerous way to do medicine, IMHO. Although is it consistent with the way I, as a patient, have been treated. I’ve spent the past decades politely declining prescriptions.

    We know a lot of people suffered through the Covid virus and have immunity. @MiMac why is there a push for them to get a jab they don’t need?

    • #103
  14. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Annefy (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever.

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    Not a she & have never advocated mandatory vaccines- but will push back against untrue claims by anti-vaxxers- and RFK is an antivaxxer. While broken clocks can be right twice a day RFK is not close to that level of consistency – did even like him the limited times I saw him while we were both attending the same university.

    A good first step would be to not brush with the broad brush of “anti vaxxer”. I am pro every vax that is appropriate for me and my family. As previously mentioned, I did not get the Gardisol vaccine because there was no point. I feel similarly about the Covid shots.

    And it adds to my general suspicion of the medical community that no one’s personal circumstances and risk factors are being taken into account; instead it’s everyone must get it now. People who shouldn’t get the shot because of their own health conditions, people like me who frankly don’t need it, and people with health conditions that make Covid very dangerous are all being treated the same

    This is a very dangerous way to do medicine, IMHO. Although is it consistent with the way I, as a patient, have been treated. I’ve spent the past decades politely declining prescriptions.

    We know a lot of people suffered through the Covid virus and have immunity. @ MiMac why is there a push for them to get a jab they don’t need?

    Thanks, Bob. I should have included recovered individuals.

    • #104
  15. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    Do you think we have anti-vaxxers herein this discussion? If we do, maybe they should let us know so any doubt is gone. I’m not anti-vaccination.

    People looking to RFK, Jr. as a resource are probably anti-vaxxers. They may have understandable reasons for that due to personal experience (Carol), but the expansion of that position to the general public is simply a misunderstanding of risk/benefit analysis. There will always be people with adverse reactions to any kind of treatment/vaccine/drug. Always.

    My Little Miss Anthrope has had some of the weirdest, rarest reactions to chemo drugs, for example, that doctors have ever (never) seen. It’s at least in part due to her underlying congenital condition, but guess what? She did just fine with the COVID vaccine. One day on the couch. Same as my experience.

    • #105
  16. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    Do you think we have anti-vaxxers herein this discussion? If we do, maybe they should let us know so any doubt is gone. I’m not anti-vaccination.

    People looking to RFK, Jr. as a resource are probably anti-vaxxers. They may have understandable reasons for that due to personal experience (Carol), but the expansion of that position to the general public is simply a misunderstanding of risk/benefit analysis. There will always be people with adverse reactions to any kind of treatment/vaccine/drug. Always.

    My Little Miss Anthrope has had some of the weirdest, rarest reactions to chemo drugs, for example, that doctors have ever (never) seen. It’s at least in part due to her underlying congenital condition, but guess what? She did just fine with the COVID vaccine. One day on the couch. Same as my experience.

    I guess the question and issue revolve around community and individual. Any push for mandatory vaccine must be based on community, in my view, and even then if the evidence shows that one’s developed immunity is better than the vaccine provided immunity, what is the case?

    • #106
  17. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    Do you think we have anti-vaxxers herein this discussion? If we do, maybe they should let us know so any doubt is gone. I’m not anti-vaccination.

    People looking to RFK, Jr. as a resource are probably anti-vaxxers. They may have understandable reasons for that due to personal experience (Carol), but the expansion of that position to the general public is simply a misunderstanding of risk/benefit analysis. There will always be people with adverse reactions to any kind of treatment/vaccine/drug. Always.

    My Little Miss Anthrope has had some of the weirdest, rarest reactions to chemo drugs, for example, that doctors have ever (never) seen. It’s at least in part due to her underlying congenital condition, but guess what? She did just fine with the COVID vaccine. One day on the couch. Same as my experience.

    I guess the question and issue revolve around community and individual. Any push for mandatory vaccine must be based on community, in my view, and even then if the evidence shows that one’s developed immunity is better than the vaccine provided immunity, what is the case?

    If they were all saying “if you haven’t had the virus, you should get the vaccine”, their credibility would be much higher.

    • #107
  18. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    MiMac (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):
    try reading the claims by the “Pfizer scientist” who left the field 10 years ago & thought they were years away from perfecting mRNA technology

    “10 years” sounds like “years” to me.

    Yes he was right- they where “years away” TEN years ago from perfecting mRNA vaccine technology – but by 2020 they where weeks away…so his criticism is worthless.

    But he said “years away” ten years ago, right?  Not LAST year.

    • #108
  19. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Annefy (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I see no one here advocating for mandatory vaccinations or vaccine passports or vaccinating pregnant women, but people opposed to taking the vaccine make it sound as if we who are open to vaccination are doing just that.

    WC, there are more than just two sides to this, and there is also no one saying you are advocating mandatory vaccines. However, MiMac nudges right up against that, position, but even worse he’s using the worst kind of “persuasion” techniques. That’s why I replied to his comments and not yours, which were reasonable and measured.

    Welcome back, by the way. This place was a little less homey without you around.

    I think MiMac is a she. She’s also in the biz and seems highly educated on the subject. Sometimes her frustration comes through, I agree. But, I admit my bias is toward her (and vaccine developer Mendel) and very much opposed to RFK, Jr. My policy is to never, ever side the leftists on anything. Ever.

    Thanks for the warm welcome, Ed.

    Not a she & have never advocated mandatory vaccines- but will push back against untrue claims by anti-vaxxers- and RFK is an antivaxxer. While broken clocks can be right twice a day RFK is not close to that level of consistency – did even like him the limited times I saw him while we were both attending the same university.

    A good first step would be to not brush with the broad brush of “anti vaxxer”. I am pro every vax that is appropriate for me and my family. As previously mentioned, I did not get the Gardisol vaccine because there was no point. I feel similarly about the Covid shots.

    And it adds to my general suspicion of the medical community that no one’s personal circumstances and risk factors are being taken into account; instead it’s everyone must get it now. People who shouldn’t get the shot because of their own health conditions, people like me who frankly don’t need it, and people with health conditions that make Covid very dangerous are all being treated the same

    This is a very dangerous way to do medicine, IMHO. Although is it consistent with the way I, as a patient, have been treated. I’ve spent the past decades politely declining prescriptions.

    We know a lot of people suffered through the Covid virus and have immunity. @ MiMac why is there a push for them to get a jab they don’t need?

    Don’t think those who had it are the target group- the vast majority of those not vaccinated aren’t COVID survivors. If I had definitely had COVID I wouldn’t get vaccinated for at least several months afterward(like 9-if at all), since you almost certainly have a significant degree of immunity. I think such people should listen to status of booster shots and wether they will be useful. Since I was among the 1st people to get the vaccine after it got the EUA I will also track the status of booster shots. If the data supports booster shots then I would get one if I had the infection early in the pandemic- just as I will for myself if the data shows waning immunity long after the vaccine. So far the data indicates that those with prior infection are protected against severe outcomes- but I think it prudent to keep an eye on it.

    • #109
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Annefy (View Comment):
    This is a very dangerous way to do medicine, IMHO. Although is it consistent with the way I, as a patient, have been treated. I’ve spent the past decades politely declining prescriptions.

    Depending on what the prescriptions were for, that may not have been your best strategy.  A well-stocked home pharmacy shouldn’t include just Band-Aids etc.  Just one example, I’ve rarely needed Tylenol 3 after a regular tooth extraction, but I get the prescription filled anyway.  Then later when I broke another tooth just after dinner on Friday, and there was no way I could get to see anyone until Monday at the earliest, having some on hand was a blessing.

    • #110
  21. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    Do you think we have anti-vaxxers herein this discussion? If we do, maybe they should let us know so any doubt is gone. I’m not anti-vaccination.

    People looking to RFK, Jr. as a resource are probably anti-vaxxers. They may have understandable reasons for that due to personal experience (Carol), but the expansion of that position to the general public is simply a misunderstanding of risk/benefit analysis. There will always be people with adverse reactions to any kind of treatment/vaccine/drug. Always.

    Perhaps RFK Jr is unreliable, I have no idea and don’t much care to find out, but few of the arguments made here are dependent on that in any way. I think the vast majority of people here (on both sides) are offering reasonable and moderate positions which generally leaves only room for a moderate policy position of letting people decide for themselves and little justification to judge strongly one way or the other. However, some (not you WC) are engaging in a little motte and bailey by conflating extreme arguments with any argument at all.

    That is not helpful. That gets hackles up and initiates stubborn contrarian mode. The truth is that hardly any of the questions surrounding covid have clear obvious answers. Only one answer is obvious IMO – we know enough to cease the government authoritarianism and general cultural hysteria. That was understandable in March 2020. No longer. Still, covid is real and not nothing, but we can be measured in our responses and let people respond in their own ways.

    • #111
  22. Steve C. Member
    Steve C.
    @user_531302

    Does anyone have any idea why kids don’t get COVID-19? 

    • #112
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Steve C. (View Comment):

    Does anyone have any idea why kids don’t get COVID-19?

    Something about some kind of receptors things not being mature enough for binding.

    • #113
  24. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I think it’s a bit misleading to keep calling mRNA vaccines “experimental.”

    The person who invented mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, is very worried about the COVID mRNA vaccines because they inject an artificial version of the strike protein, which is very toxic, into you. The COVID mRNA vaccines are very experimental and have not been thoroughly tested which will take years. The negative reactions to these “vaccines” are not fully known at all. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

    If you believe he invented the vaccine I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you- a real bargain.

    Well, as is often the case, people may not be precise with words.

    he didnt invent the vaxx, but it may be Robert Malone had a hand in the technology of the stuff that supports. 

    https://patents.justia.com/patent/20070218077

     

     

    • #114
  25. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I think it’s a bit misleading to keep calling mRNA vaccines “experimental.”

    The person who invented mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, is very worried about the COVID mRNA vaccines because they inject an artificial version of the strike protein, which is very toxic, into you. The COVID mRNA vaccines are very experimental and have not been thoroughly tested which will take years. The negative reactions to these “vaccines” are not fully known at all. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

    If you believe he invented the vaccine I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you- a real bargain.

    Well, as is often the case, people may not be precise with words.

    he didnt invent the vaxx, but it may be Robert Malone had a hand in the technology of the stuff that supports.

    https://patents.justia.com/patent/20070218077

    I’ve heard of the mRNA technology being described as an “operating system” which is then “programmed” to produce specific “products.”  That still puts Malone near the top, because it’s impossible to “program” without the “operating system” being there first.

     

    • #115
  26. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Ed G. (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The WuFlu is of little danger to people under 40. Seasonal flu killed many more people in that age group. Yet the government and schools are pressuring people to get vaccines which are useless to them. Even if the long term side effects are nil, this makes no sense.

    We already know that due to the vaccine program, there are 25 times as many young males, age 13 to 28, experiencing myocarditis this year as did in 2019.

    These young men will be on heart medication for the rest of their lives. For families who have hospitalized their son, three weeks in a hospital makes a huge dent in the kid’s college savings fund.

    Never forget: the vax manufacturers are not liable for the things that go wrong. The vax distributers aren’t. The doctor or nurse that injects you isn’t.

    On top of that some young people are dying. Although their risk of death from COVID itself is a mere one in a million or one in ten million.

    Risk to benefit: there is plenty of risk with the COVID vaxxes. There is little benefit, unless you believe the baloney of the vaxxes having “98% efficacy.”

    Plz- you are very wrong- the vast majority of cases of vaccine associated myocarditis are followed by recovery(at this point at least 79%- the number will probably rise with more time) and the rate of myocarditis is low (Millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccine have been given, and there have only been 1,000 cases of heart inflammation. Doing the math, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that for every million doses given, there have been 67 cases of heart inflammation in boys 12 to 17 (nine in girls of that age group), 56 in those aged 18 to 24 (six in girls), and 20 in males 25 to 29 (three in girls). That means the risk is quite low.). The base line rate of myocarditis (pre-COVID)is on the order of 20 per million (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721735/) and many viral infections can cause myocarditis- particularly COVID itself. It is likely some of the increase is due to heightened scrutiny b/c many cases of myocarditis are quite mild and would not be noted- the same problem we have with really knowing the COVID infection rate.

    the constant fear mongering by many anti-vaxxers only discredits their arguments.

    The risk from covid is also very low for most people. The constant fearmongering of covid hysterics discredits their arguments.

    What we have is a difference of opinion about tradeoffs and risks, and some are trying to impose one opinion on others when there’s very little justification to do so.

     Ot trying to impose anything. I do, however reserve the right to judge others who think that the vaccine is experimental are akin to flat earthers. 

    • #116
  27. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    MiMac (View Comment):
    Don’t think those who had it are the target group- the vast majority of those not vaccinated aren’t COVID survivors.

    How do you know that?

    How does one confirm having had a virus with a symptom list as deep as my pantry?

    I have never heard one caveat in the massive push for this shot about screening for having recently had the virus.

    Honestly, how do we know that the adverse reactions are not for that very reason, having recently “had it”?

    I got an email from my employer saying the governor made doses available. Included in the email was a mandatory survey that could only be completed if I gave all my personal info, including what could be perceived as HIPAA, even if I was declining the shot.

    Opting out of the shot was way harder than opting in.

    • #117
  28. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Steve C. (View Comment):

    Does anyone have any idea why kids don’t get COVID-19?

    Something about some kind of receptors things not being mature enough for binding.

    Yes, and I also read that the immune responses in older people is different. Which may be what you said, but I recall it was slightly different. 

    • #118
  29. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I think it’s a bit misleading to keep calling mRNA vaccines “experimental.”

    The person who invented mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, is very worried about the COVID mRNA vaccines because they inject an artificial version of the strike protein, which is very toxic, into you. The COVID mRNA vaccines are very experimental and have not been thoroughly tested which will take years. The negative reactions to these “vaccines” are not fully known at all. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

    If you believe he invented the vaccine I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you- a real bargain.

    Well, as is often the case, people may not be precise with words.

    he didnt invent the vaxx, but it may be Robert Malone had a hand in the technology of the stuff that supports.

    https://patents.justia.com/patent/20070218077

    I’ve heard of the mRNA technology being described as an “operating system” which is then “programmed” to produce specific “products.” That still puts Malone near the top, because it’s impossible to “program” without the “operating system” being there first.

    The patent application is 20 years old- not exactly cutting edge stuff- especially in mRNA technology- there have been great strides in the last 10 years. He is nowhere near the top- for that look to BioNTech and Moderna founders. People such as Dr. Katalin Karikó & Dr. Drew Weissman are serious Noble Prize candidates. Malone made important contributions 30 years ago- but he hasn’t been a major factor for awhile in the development of the current vaccines. He is LinkedIn  page currently lists him in Madison Va- last time I drove thru the big business there was Madison Wood Preservers- not any virology labs in town-but visit Clore furniture. If you are there keep driving south on 29 until you reach Rt 33 and head East to Barboursville vineyards and really enjoy your day. I like Horton wines as well & it is just down the road. Barboursville vineyards would be a great place for a Ricochet get together….

    • #119
  30. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

     Ot trying to impose anything. I do, however reserve the right to judge others who think that the vaccine is experimental are akin to flat earthers. 

    You must be able to speak to why the vaccines have not been approved by the FDA and why the liability exemptions are still in place.

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.