Glimmers of Hope

Do you follow the science? Do you have an aversion to the scolds who routinely declare code reds for humanity? Perhaps you’re being driven to despair. But we at Ricochet hope to see you flourish, we want to see you b(j)orn again! Our guest this week is the absorbingly optimistic Bjørn Lomborg, exactly the man to set us straight on the U.N. climate report and the cataclysmic media circus that’s followed. The fellas also get into infrastructure – whatever that means – and the attendant endemic of thoughtless dishonesty. Also, Rob got a smidgeon of hope from some youngsters recently and Peter needs some recommendations for a good binge-worthy TV series: help him out in the comments!

Music from this week’s show: O-o-h Child by The Five Stairsteps

Subscribe to The Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Please Support Our Sponsor!

ExpressVPN

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 130 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    filmklassik (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    filmklassik (View Comment):

    I’m eager to hear others’ reactions to Rob’s persistent belief that America’s young people — its young boys, especially — are rolling their eyes at most Woke shibboleths — particularly the ones having to do with Race.

    Where the culture is concerned — where Wokeness is concerned — it is astonishing to me that even as Rome is burning, Rob continues to maintain that someone left the oven door open.

    Which raises the question: What would Rob need to see in order to be persuaded that most (not all, mind you, but most) Americans under the age of 30 fall into two overlapping categories where Wokeness is concerned:

    1) Those who have fully embraced the new Woke religion, and —

    2) — those who have not fully embraced it, but — like most compliant majorities throughout world history — are not sufficiently alarmed by it to put up much of a fight?

    What would Rob need to see?

    Even those who don’t fully embrace it may not mind using it as a tool to force out older workers to make room for themselves.

    That’s another Rob Long argument: That a lot of “Wokeism” is more of an economic cudgel than a de facto (and growing) religious movement. He’s wrong, my friend. Big time. And that means, on this issue, that you are too.

    By “you” I hope you mean Rob, because I agree with you.

    • #31
  2. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I am not going to get into a big argument about this.

    Anybody with a brain recognizes that consumption taxation is superior to income taxation. They start central planning with the tax code and then everything goes south after that. It’s as stupid as the Soviet GOSPLAN. No value added. Zero.

    You can leave the environmental stuff out of it, fossil fuel is a good target for a consumption tax because it’s a finite resource. Obviously there are other finite resources, but there is nothing that an economy wants more because of the output it creates. 

     

    • #32
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    So, is oil really worth $100 a barrel? Another way of looking at it is to compare oil to a horse. A horse laboring a standard 40-hour work week (eight hours a day, five days a week, 50 weeks a year) would have to labor for more than one year to produce the energy in a barrel of oil. Do you think a horse could be fed and maintained for a year for $100? Not likely.

    Human labor is even worse. A fit human adult can sustain about one-tenth of a horsepower, so a human would have to labor more than 10 years to equal a barrel of oil.

    Oil and oil products have the advantages of being easily combustible with high energy content. Additionally, oil is widely available and is easily transported through ocean tankers, tank trucks and pipelines. Gasoline and diesel fuel are easily and safely dispensed into our vehicles, and heating oil is similarly delivered to our homes.

    https://www.mcall.com/opinion/mc-xpm-2011-05-24-mc-barrel-oil-explainit-20110524-story.html

     

     

     

    • #33
  4. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    Advocating a carbon tax? Bjørn Lomborg sounds like a nut.

    Carbon taxes are idiotic. The Left treats carbon taxes like a religion. Can’t you guys just tithe and go to a regular church like normal non-sun god folk?

    The cognitive dissonance is amazing. Bjorn flip-flops continually between “GW is a problem that must be stopped” and “GW has no downsides”. The reality is that the social cost of carbon is negative. More fossil fuel use is *good* for humanity. We spend about 10% of GDP on energy and the Warmists want that cost to double (like Germany) or worse. That just makes people poor, sick and uncomfortable. Four million Africans die *each* year because they don’t have cheap energy for cooking and water. I imagine most the five million people dying from heat and cold would be saved by cheap energy. The *only* moral choice is to pursue cheap energy, which is fossil and nuclear.

    The ignorance and lack of sensitivity about this from the left is sickening.

    • #34
  5. filmklassik Inactive
    filmklassik
    @filmklassik

    kedavis (View Comment):

    filmklassik (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    filmklassik (View Comment):

    I’m eager to hear others’ reactions to Rob’s persistent belief that America’s young people — its young boys, especially — are rolling their eyes at most Woke shibboleths — particularly the ones having to do with Race.

    Where the culture is concerned — where Wokeness is concerned — it is astonishing to me that even as Rome is burning, Rob continues to maintain that someone left the oven door open.

    Which raises the question: What would Rob need to see in order to be persuaded that most (not all, mind you, but most) Americans under the age of 30 fall into two overlapping categories where Wokeness is concerned:

    1) Those who have fully embraced the new Woke religion, and —

    2) — those who have not fully embraced it, but — like most compliant majorities throughout world history — are not sufficiently alarmed by it to put up much of a fight?

    What would Rob need to see?

    Even those who don’t fully embrace it may not mind using it as a tool to force out older workers to make room for themselves.

    That’s another Rob Long argument: That a lot of “Wokeism” is more of an economic cudgel than a de facto (and growing) religious movement. He’s wrong, my friend. Big time. And that means, on this issue, that you are too.

    By “you” I hope you mean Rob, because I agree with you.

    Apologies.  I misunderstood you.  I thought I heard you making Rob’s argument:  Namely, that Wokeness is a trendy ideology being cynically exploited by young careerists, rather than a rapidly metastasizing religion.  (I have no doubt the former scenario happens, by the way — on occasion —  just as I have no doubt the vast majority of Woke zealots are true believers.  Which makes it that much scarier).

    Again:  Sorry for the mistake.

    • #35
  6. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    Peter Robinson (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    The guys will keep me company in the morning as I always listen to this podcast on my Saturday run, but I read the description and happen to have just wrote on Ricochet about what I think is a binge worthy television show: The Kominsky Method. If you go to that write up on the Main Feed, other members chimed in with their suggestions for other good shows in the comments. :)

    Just what I needed! Thanks, Lois!

    Two more

    Ted Lasso

    The Chosen

    • #36
  7. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    I don’t have a head for this stuff, but I have been hearing a lot of pretty good discussion that this vaccine is no better than what you would expect from giving everybody a therapeutic. If you did it with a therapeutic, everybody would end up with natural immunity which is proven superior for COVID-19. 

    It’s like there are three categories of vaccines. Childhood vaccines and the flu shot, which society seems pretty satisfied with. The COVID-19 shot is not in the category of efficacy of the other two. 

    If anybody wants to add or subtract to that, go ahead.

    • #37
  8. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    kedavis (View Comment):

    filmklassik (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    filmklassik (View Comment):

    I’m eager to hear others’ reactions to Rob’s persistent belief that America’s young people — its young boys, especially — are rolling their eyes at most Woke shibboleths — particularly the ones having to do with Race.

    Where the culture is concerned — where Wokeness is concerned — it is astonishing to me that even as Rome is burning, Rob continues to maintain that someone left the oven door open.

    Which raises the question: What would Rob need to see in order to be persuaded that most (not all, mind you, but most) Americans under the age of 30 fall into two overlapping categories where Wokeness is concerned:

    1) Those who have fully embraced the new Woke religion, and —

    2) — those who have not fully embraced it, but — like most compliant majorities throughout world history — are not sufficiently alarmed by it to put up much of a fight?

    What would Rob need to see?

    Even those who don’t fully embrace it may not mind using it as a tool to force out older workers to make room for themselves.

    That’s another Rob Long argument: That a lot of “Wokeism” is more of an economic cudgel than a de facto (and growing) religious movement. He’s wrong, my friend. Big time. And that means, on this issue, that you are too.

    By “you” I hope you mean Rob, because I agree with you.

    Rob is an Episcopalian. Why would he know about religious faith?

    • #38
  9. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Good news, but why should we think  that voting will fix it.  They’ll not allow honest voting.  The rest of the world  has to fix it, but they also have to deal with China.  Optimism is good and should be spread, but we have to have some radical thrust to get rid of these fools or our country, as we knew it, comes to an end..  

    • #39
  10. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Peter Robinson (View Comment):

    Mark Alexander (View Comment):

    Binge-worthy TV, past and present:

    Elementary

    As Time Goes By

    Slings and Arrows

    Eli Stone

    Lethal Weapon (Seasons 1&2 only)

    800 Words

    After Life

    Yellowstone

    The Queen’s Gambit

    Friday Nights Lights

    The Great British Baking Show

    Longmire

    Miranda

    Corner Gas

    Bosch

    Justified

    I’ve seen half of these–but that leaves the whole other half. Thanks, Mark!

    The Other Place. (Only two seasons)

    • #40
  11. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    This guy is always good and original. It’s on all podcast platforms. No visuals.

    • #41
  12. Psmith Inactive
    Psmith
    @psmith

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    I don’t have a head for this stuff, but I have been hearing a lot of pretty good discussion that this vaccine is no better than what you would expect from giving everybody a therapeutic. If you did it with a therapeutic, everybody would end up with natural immunity which is proven superior for COVID-19.

    It’s like there are three categories of vaccines. Childhood vaccines and the flu shot, which society seems pretty satisfied with. The COVID-19 shot is not in the category of efficacy of the other two.

    If anybody wants to add or subtract to that, go ahead.

    Robert Malone, an inventor of the. mRNA technology used in Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, has a great interview on John Solomon’s Aug 9 podcast that says pretty much what you just said. Looks like you do have a head for this stuff.

    • #42
  13. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    I think Rob is right about boys being “less woke” than girls.  At least I see this in discussions with students, though I don’t lead any of them to any ideology at all.  (Since I don’t, they often have more open conversations.)  I don’t know the reason for the sex connection, but his anecdote sounds spot on to me.  I’m glad his goddaughter was done with masks, too, though mask mandates are quickly sweeping through schools again, including in red states.  I totally just don’t get it.  I would home school at this point whatever that did to my budget.  

    • #43
  14. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Psmith (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    I don’t have a head for this stuff, but I have been hearing a lot of pretty good discussion that this vaccine is no better than what you would expect from giving everybody a therapeutic. If you did it with a therapeutic, everybody would end up with natural immunity which is proven superior for COVID-19.

    It’s like there are three categories of vaccines. Childhood vaccines and the flu shot, which society seems pretty satisfied with. The COVID-19 shot is not in the category of efficacy of the other two.

    If anybody wants to add or subtract to that, go ahead.

    Robert Malone, an inventor of the. mRNA technology used in Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, has a great interview on John Solomon’s Aug 9 podcast that says pretty much what you just said. Looks like you do have a head for this stuff.

    They are panicking about the efficacy and the public’s reaction. Statists suck. 

     

     

     

     

    • #44
  15. Quickz Member
    Quickz
    @Quickz

    The conclusion I reached over the whole “Infrastructure Bill” thing is either that 1) There are a group of GOP(e?) politicians that are NOT working for conservative/right/Am1st principles but are rather working for the uniparty/citadel and just passed this behemoth because… they really want to. They (in some way) benefit from this. OR 2) There is an unspoken back-room Senator gentlemen’s agreement that if they got together to pass THIS bill, then the upcoming budget reconciliation $5 trillion whatever bill will be scuttled and left in ruins (picture McCain’s “thumbs down” moment on the “Repeal of Obamacare” bill) by certain Dems.

    I can only understand one or the other of these. The only other options are that the GOP is really dumb, and I just don’t believe that. If the reconciliation bill is routed, we might never know officially, but I guess that would be why. But if a budget reconciliation bill does pass – then what did they just do? It becomes option 1 again.

    *

    On the Covid discussion: No one will say that there is no way to stop the virus because, 1) Modern day pols cannot say anything they do is wrong, 2) It would be an admission that the last Administration really didn’t botch anything – we were all going to get it, 3) and I cannot stress how important this one is, b/c it is the ONLY reason this administration is in power right now, is that Covid will be used to turn over/modify/eliminate voter integrity laws in time to flood the zone with outside money (like last time), mail-in ballot (last time), ballot harvesting (ibid), and litany of other skeezy maneuvers that were able to win them this election. 

    They know that the parties bases are shifting, demographics is not turning out to be destiny, the Dem party is about to shift hard left and the country is not. They are likely to lose big next year and lose the WH after that – possibly for a number of elections – Covid is the ONLY WAY they can keep Orange Man Bad and Cheat – I mean, “fortify” the election.

    Word

    • #45
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Quickz (View Comment):
    The conclusion I reached over the whole “Infrastructure Bill” thing is either that 1) There are a group of GOP(e?) politicians that are NOT working for conservative/right/Am1st principles but are rather working for the uniparty/citadel and just passed this behemoth because… they really want to. They (in some way) benefit from this. OR 2) There is an unspoken back-room Senator gentlemen’s agreement that if they got together to pass THIS bill, then the upcoming budget reconciliation $5 trillion whatever bill will be scuttled and left in ruins (picture McCain’s “thumbs down” moment on the “Repeal of Obamacare” bill) by certain Dems.

    We’ve known since Reagan for sure, and likely for long before that, that you can’t trust the Dims to keep an agreement if they get what they wanted/needed, first.

    • #46
  17. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    It’s too late to control spending with political will.  They are going to force up GDP + inflation in any ratio, it doesn’t matter, so they can deflate the debt and meet every obligation while they re-distribute because they’ve screwed up the economy so much. 

    The Fed is combined with the treasury just like a banana republic and the ruling class is going to do it this way because the alternative is unthinkable.

    • #47
  18. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    Jim Kearney (View Comment):

    @ peterrobinson – We also just finished the latest season of Line of Duty and are looking forward to Sunday night’s season four finale of Unforgotten. We’re watching the latter on the PBS Masterpiece streaming channel (via Amazon Prime), which is where you’ll find my top recommendation, the original Belgian production of the clever mystery series Professor T. With all respect to the entire Brit cast of the English language adaptation, see the original.

    Koen de Bouw adds multilayered complexities of humor, madness, genius, and humanity to the title role. It’s one of the finest characterizations I’ve seen on TV, right up there with Dennis Franz on NYPD Blue (always worth an heroic 261 episode binge itself, now more than ever) and, on the other side of the law, Ian MacShane’s brilliant Al Swearingen on@ jameslileks deservedly beloved Deadwood. Unlike Franz and MacShane, Mr. de Bouw does it all without the distinct advantage of David Milch’s writing.

    As a palate-clearing sorbet at the end of any evening with an intense drama binge, I’ll recommend another @ jameslileks favorite, the original live CBS black & white prime time What’s My Line? Instead of bingeing, we like to string this one out one episode per night, moving forward one week in history each time. While you don’t want to miss the classic Steve Allen panelist period, or Ernie Kovacs’ memorable guest shots, I do recommend joining the free YouTube subscription archive around 1959, to see the abrupt changes in fashion (and the tamping down of Bennett Cerf’s condescending sexism) when Kennedy style and attitudes hit the country. Tell me if you think Dorothy Kilgallen is as tough an interrogator as Sipowicz, and isn’t Arlene Francis an amazingly intuitive listener when she makes guesses based on the slightest audience reactions to questions?

    Three more for the road: a women’s and couples favorite with three strong female investigators, Scott & Bailey a Manchester-set police procedural written by Sally Wainwright; another actor’s tour de force, David Suchet in Agatha’s Christie’s Poirot ; and in modern day Brittany, see the fine French newcomer Agathe Koltes with the excellent Phillippine Leroy-Beaulieu in the lead as a formidable middle-aged homicide investigator stuck reporting to her ambitious, fast-rising daughter.

    You’ll notice that most of my recommendations work as standalone hours (often with season-long subplots) but for each I think you’ll be just as eager to see the next hour as with any and all arcs of the to be continued variety.

    Love the Belgian/Flemish? Professor T also. Have only seen one episode of the British version but the actor was the fussy detective in the first Death in Paradise. He just doesn’t have quite the seriousness/centerness (?) of de Bouw. Besides you get to listen to Flemish and sometimes French and the mixing up of the two. 

    • #48
  19. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    Jim Kearney (View Comment):

    @ peterrobinson – We also just finished the latest season of Line of Duty and are looking forward to Sunday night’s season four finale of Unforgotten. We’re watching the latter on the PBS Masterpiece streaming channel (via Amazon Prime), which is where you’ll find my top recommendation, the original Belgian production of the clever mystery series Professor T. With all respect to the entire Brit cast of the English language adaptation, see the original.

    Koen de Bouw adds multilayered complexities of humor, madness, genius, and humanity to the title role. It’s one of the finest characterizations I’ve seen on TV, right up there with Dennis Franz on NYPD Blue (always worth an heroic 261 episode binge itself, now more than ever) and, on the other side of the law, Ian MacShane’s brilliant Al Swearingen on@ jameslileks deservedly beloved Deadwood. Unlike Franz and MacShane, Mr. de Bouw does it all without the distinct advantage of David Milch’s writing.

    As a palate-clearing sorbet at the end of any evening with an intense drama binge, I’ll recommend another @ jameslileks favorite, the original live CBS black & white prime time What’s My Line? Instead of bingeing, we like to string this one out one episode per night, moving forward one week in history each time. While you don’t want to miss the classic Steve Allen panelist period, or Ernie Kovacs’ memorable guest shots, I do recommend joining the free YouTube subscription archive around 1959, to see the abrupt changes in fashion (and the tamping down of Bennett Cerf’s condescending sexism) when Kennedy style and attitudes hit the country. Tell me if you think Dorothy Kilgallen is as tough an interrogator as Sipowicz, and isn’t Arlene Francis an amazingly intuitive listener when she makes guesses based on the slightest audience reactions to questions?

    Three more for the road: a women’s and couples favorite with three strong female investigators, Scott & Bailey a Manchester-set police procedural written by Sally Wainwright; another actor’s tour de force, David Suchet in Agatha’s Christie’s Poirot ; and in modern day Brittany, see the fine French newcomer Agathe Koltes with the excellent Phillippine Leroy-Beaulieu in the lead as a formidable middle-aged homicide investigator stuck reporting to her ambitious, fast-rising daughter.

    You’ll notice that most of my recommendations work as standalone hours (often with season-long subplots) but for each I think you’ll be just as eager to see the next hour as with any and all arcs of the to be continued variety.

     

    I will move Scott & Bailey up on my list per your recommendation. Thanks.

    • #49
  20. Mark Alexander Inactive
    Mark Alexander
    @MarkAlexander

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    It’s too late to control spending with political will. They are going to force up GDP + inflation in any ratio, it doesn’t matter, so they can deflate the debt and meet every obligation while they re-distribute because they’ve screwed up the economy so much.

    The Fed is combined with the treasury just like a banana republic and the ruling class is going to do it this way because the alternative is unthinkable.

    Exactly why the stock market is still up, as well as real estate; all those trillions need to go somewhere. Without this continual spending, the economy goes…

    • #50
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Mark Alexander (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    It’s too late to control spending with political will. They are going to force up GDP + inflation in any ratio, it doesn’t matter, so they can deflate the debt and meet every obligation while they re-distribute because they’ve screwed up the economy so much.

    The Fed is combined with the treasury just like a banana republic and the ruling class is going to do it this way because the alternative is unthinkable.

    Exactly why the stock market is still up, as well as real estate; all those trillions need to go somewhere. Without this continual spending, the economy goes…

    But once they’ve “bought” everything, where does the money go then?

    • #51
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Mark Alexander (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    It’s too late to control spending with political will. They are going to force up GDP + inflation in any ratio, it doesn’t matter, so they can deflate the debt and meet every obligation while they re-distribute because they’ve screwed up the economy so much.

    The Fed is combined with the treasury just like a banana republic and the ruling class is going to do it this way because the alternative is unthinkable.

    Exactly why the stock market is still up, as well as real estate; all those trillions need to go somewhere. Without this continual spending, the economy goes…

    People have no idea. They have to force a wage-price spiral and then re-distribute some of it. I just heard some really compelling stuff from a guy that works at the Bridgewater hedge fund. 

    • #52
  23. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Alexander (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    It’s too late to control spending with political will. They are going to force up GDP + inflation in any ratio, it doesn’t matter, so they can deflate the debt and meet every obligation while they re-distribute because they’ve screwed up the economy so much.

    The Fed is combined with the treasury just like a banana republic and the ruling class is going to do it this way because the alternative is unthinkable.

    Exactly why the stock market is still up, as well as real estate; all those trillions need to go somewhere. Without this continual spending, the economy goes…

    But once they’ve “bought” everything, where does the money go then?

    The Fed just keeps buying bonds or whatever it takes until inflation gets out of control. That is the only thing that is going to stop them because that’s when interest rates will break the government. That’s why I say they think about the combination of GDP + inflation. 

    • #53
  24. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Alexander (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    It’s too late to control spending with political will. They are going to force up GDP + inflation in any ratio, it doesn’t matter, so they can deflate the debt and meet every obligation while they re-distribute because they’ve screwed up the economy so much.

    The Fed is combined with the treasury just like a banana republic and the ruling class is going to do it this way because the alternative is unthinkable.

    Exactly why the stock market is still up, as well as real estate; all those trillions need to go somewhere. Without this continual spending, the economy goes…

    But once they’ve “bought” everything, where does the money go then?

    The Fed just keeps buying bonds or whatever it takes until inflation gets out of control. That is the only thing that is going to stop them because that’s when interest rates will break the government. That’s why I say they think about the combination of GDP + inflation.

    Last I heard, bond rates only need to go up a pretty small amount, before the entire federal budget ends up paying interest on the debt.  Seems like that could happen by the end of this year, even.  Unless you mean the Fed will just sell the bonds to itself, or something.  But that doesn’t seem sustainable for very long either.

    • #54
  25. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Last I heard, bond rates only need to go up a pretty small amount, before the entire federal budget ends up paying interest on the debt. 

    Less than six months ago I heard that two percentage points increase on the five year treasury breaks the whole West. In the meantime nobody is supposed to get any real return on short term money and savings accounts. This is no way to run a civilization.

     

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Unless you mean the Fed will just sell the bonds to itself, or something.  But that doesn’t seem sustainable for very long either.

    The treasury issues the bonds and then the Fed or the private sector buys them. I think the Fed already owns 50% of all of the issuance of all time. Global central banks are net sellers right now.

    Then there is a bunch of complicated crap about reverse repos and banks and so forth. Supposedly it’s just an Enron situation to fund the government and get around capital requirements at banks.

    • #55
  26. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    People have no idea.

     

     

     

     

     

    • #56
  27. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    @peterrobinson – I highly recommend Burn Notice.  A nice blend of comedy, action, and intelligent plots.  If you want get a feeling for spy tradecraft, this is a good show.  It’s also one of the best blends of episodic and binge content out there.  For almost every episode, the A plot is about helping some client, and wrapped up in the show.  The B plot connects with a season-long plot thread, so it is definitely bingeable.

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    Advocating a carbon tax? Bjørn Lomborg sounds like a nut.

    Carbon taxes are idiotic. The Left treats carbon taxes like a religion. Can’t you guys just tithe and go to a regular church like normal non-sun god folk?

    The cognitive dissonance is amazing. Bjorn flip-flops continually between “GW is a problem that must be stopped” and “GW has no downsides”. The reality is that the social cost of carbon is negative. More fossil fuel use is *good* for humanity. We spend about 10% of GDP on energy and the Warmists want that cost to double (like Germany) or worse. That just makes people poor, sick and uncomfortable. Four million Africans die *each* year because they don’t have cheap energy for cooking and water. I imagine most the five million people dying from heat and cold would be saved by cheap energy. The *only* moral choice is to pursue cheap energy, which is fossil and nuclear.

    I’m not a big fan of nuclear energy, but Angela Merkel and the largest European NATO country (sorry unfree, fanatical Turkey) jumping in bed with Putin isn’t a solution either, especially while the presidential shell of Joe Biden blocks oil from Canada yet begs for it from OPEC.

    I think diversified energy sources probably have to be the best solution anyway.

    Nuclear power is probably the safest and cleanest form of power generation alongside hydroelectric.  They are also much less sensitive to price fluctuations.

    Gas turbines are clean and generally efficient, but they are very price dependent, and they have pretty severe nitrogen oxide emissions like most high-temperature, high efficiency combustion engines.

    Personally, I think we should use green activists as disposable labor.

    • #57
  28. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    @ peterrobinson – I highly recommend Burn Notice. A nice blend of comedy, action, and intelligent plots. If you want get a feeling for spy tradecraft, this is a good show. It’s also one of the best blends of episodic and binge content out there. For almost every episode, the A plot is about helping some client, and wrapped up in the show. The B plot connects with a season-long plot thread, so it is definitely bingeable.

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):

    Advocating a carbon tax? Bjørn Lomborg sounds like a nut.

    Carbon taxes are idiotic. The Left treats carbon taxes like a religion. Can’t you guys just tithe and go to a regular church like normal non-sun god folk?

    The cognitive dissonance is amazing. Bjorn flip-flops continually between “GW is a problem that must be stopped” and “GW has no downsides”. The reality is that the social cost of carbon is negative. More fossil fuel use is *good* for humanity. We spend about 10% of GDP on energy and the Warmists want that cost to double (like Germany) or worse. That just makes people poor, sick and uncomfortable. Four million Africans die *each* year because they don’t have cheap energy for cooking and water. I imagine most the five million people dying from heat and cold would be saved by cheap energy. The *only* moral choice is to pursue cheap energy, which is fossil and nuclear.

    I’m not a big fan of nuclear energy, but Angela Merkel and the largest European NATO country (sorry unfree, fanatical Turkey) jumping in bed with Putin isn’t a solution either, especially while the presidential shell of Joe Biden blocks oil from Canada yet begs for it from OPEC.

    I think diversified energy sources probably have to be the best solution anyway.

    Nuclear power is probably the safest and cleanest form of power generation alongside hydroelectric. They are also much less sensitive to price fluctuations.

    Gas turbines are clean and generally efficient, but they are very price dependent, and they have pretty severe nitrogen oxide emissions like most high-temperature, high efficiency combustion engines.

    Personally, I think we should use green activists as disposable labor.

    Or since they’re already Green, only one word needs to be added:  Soylent.

    • #58
  29. filmklassik Inactive
    filmklassik
    @filmklassik

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    I think Rob is right about boys being “less woke” than girls. At least I see this in discussions with students, though I don’t lead any of them to any ideology at all. (Since I don’t, they often have more open conversations.) I don’t know the reason for the sex connection, but his anecdote sounds spot on to me. I’m glad his goddaughter was done with masks, too, though mask mandates are quickly sweeping through schools again, including in red states. I totally just don’t get it. I would home school at this point whatever that did to my budget.

    If only. We are talking about an entire generation of Americans — both girls and boys (sorry Lois; sorry Rob) — that is not flat-out rejecting such Woke ideas as “America is a systemically racist country” and “Racism informs all walks of life and institutions” and “Colorblindness is no longer something we should strive for.  Even though our parents and grandparents believed that it was — that was back in the ‘70s, ‘80’s, and ‘90s — and now we know better!  We’re so much more enlightened now.” 

    • #59
  30. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Peter Robinson (View Comment):

    Mark Alexander (View Comment):

    Binge-worthy TV, past and present:

    Elementary

    As Time Goes By

    Slings and Arrows

    Eli Stone

    Lethal Weapon (Seasons 1&2 only)

    800 Words

    After Life

    Yellowstone

    The Queen’s Gambit

    Friday Nights Lights

    The Great British Baking Show

    Longmire

    Miranda

    Corner Gas

    Bosch

    Justified

    I’ve seen half of these–but that leaves the whole other half. Thanks, Mark!

    The Other Place. (Only two seasons)

    New Tricks:  After she shoots a dog during a drug raid (shooting a drug dealer would have been OK) a tough Scotland yard inspector is sent to Siberia; that is, a Cold Case unit staffed entirely by eccentric retired cops.  This lasted 12 seasons.

    The Inspector Lynley Mysteries:  The aristocratic Lynley is paired with a defiantly lower class policewoman, because higher-ups hope she will punch him in the nose so they can finally fire her.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.