Steve’s happy place!

Steve returns as host this week, and after some of the ritual lover’s quarrel over whisky (including a celebration of Steve’s happy place—see nearby pic), Steve and Lucretia get down to the main business, which is slagging the left, and taking on the problem of “scientific expertise” in modern government.

We begin with an update on the egregious 1619 Project, with a look at a long essay from Princeton University’s eminent historian Sean Wilentz that appeared, for some strange reason, in a Czech publication. Actually not so strange: as Wilentz explains in the article, an orthodoxy has grown up around the 1619 Project that effectively bans any criticism of it in leading academic publications, let alone the New York Times. Wilentz, a high-octane liberal, goes through some amazing stories of the bad faith of New York Times editors and many academics (including the American Historical Review), but as Lucretia points out, he exhibits terminal cluelessness about how his brand of weak-minded liberalism paved the way for the extremism of the 1619 Project that Wilentz now thinks is deeply flawed.

From here our dynamic whisky crusaders have a good laugh at how progressives propose to re-write the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution in the pages of Democracy: A Journal of [Bad] Ideas. Yet somehow when you suggest to progressives that they hate the American Founding and our Constitution, they get very upset, despite this obvious confession.

But the main event this week is a reflection on “scientific expertise” in government, whose defects were on full display this week especially with the confusion of the FDA over COVID vaccine booster shots, and several other aspects of the whole sorry COVID story. We enlist two surprising witnesses: the old socialist warhorse Harold Laski, who wrote a terrific attack on “scientific expertise” in government way back in 1931, entitled “The Limitations of the Expert.” (This link may be behind a paywall for most readers.) And then we also take in similar cautions from Hans Morgenthau, in a mid-1960s essay “Science and Political Power.” (Also behind a paywall, unfortunately.) But we offer key highlights from both essays, culminating with a reminder of the key part of President Eisenhower’s farewell address:

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

Subscribe to Power Line in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There are 8 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Once in a discussion about the New York Times and Duranty a Times supporter posted this link to the discussion. It says the Times doesn’t have the award but it doesn’t say that they returned it. The Pulitzer board won’t rescind it though.

    • #1
  2. StoughtonObserver Member
    StoughtonObserver
    @Bruce W Banerdt

    Looks like my shop cabinet. 🤠

    • #2
  3. kentwerger Thatcher
    kentwerger
    @kentwerger

    Steve and Lucretia, Re: 1619 Project

    Why not alert your listeners to “The 1776 Report” that was printed January 2021 by the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission. The commission was cancelled by Biden 10 minutes into his Presidency. They published the report which can be purchased on Amazon or downloaded for free from Hillsdale.edu.

     

    • #3
  4. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    The “experts” at the CDC overestimated outside COVID exposure by about 100 times. https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/cdc-exaggerated-outdoor-covid-risks And they continue to ignore natural immunity. 

    • #4
  5. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Once in a discussion about the New York Times and Duranty a Times supporter posted this link to the discussion. It says the Times doesn’t have the award but it doesn’t say that they returned it. The Pulitzer board won’t rescind it though.

    According to a new book (discussed on a Ricochet podcast), Walter Duranty was whitewashing the Soviet Union not just out of personal inclination, but because the management of the New York Times was eager to open trade with the USSR.

    • #5
  6. Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer Member
    Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer
    @ape2ag

    Steve Hayward facetiously reading lefty nonsense could be regular segment for the podcast.

    • #6
  7. Lucretia Contributor
    Lucretia
    @Lucretia

    Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer (View Comment):

    Steve Hayward facetiously reading lefty nonsense could be regular segment for the podcast.

    Sometimes I wonder if it’s facetious….

    • #7
  8. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Lucretia (View Comment):

    Ernst Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer (View Comment):

    Steve Hayward facetiously reading lefty nonsense could be regular segment for the podcast.

    Sometimes I wonder if it’s facetious….

    I need to be sure not to get on the bad side of either Mark Steyn or Lucretia.

    • #8