Check Your (Executive) Privilege

It’s the holiday season in the faculty lounge and the subpoenas are hung by the chimney with care. On this episode, Professors Epstein and Yoo do a deep dive into the strengths and weaknesses of the impeachment case, the shortcomings of the Inspector General’s report on the Russia investigation, and the greatest legal question of our time: can you impeach an ex-president? All that plus Richard breaks down the economics of Christmas, John calls for civil disobedience in the Berkeley food scene, and Franklin Pierce finally gets called to account.

Subscribe to Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Senik in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 4 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Ralphie Member
    Ralphie
    @Ralphie

    Horowitz report reminds me of Comey’s report on Hillary. Somewhere, sometime, someone(s) big needs to actually held accountable for these messes politicians make due to being power hungry. 

    Millions of dollars of cost, and tons on time blabbering on when most of us need to get up and go to work and actually produce something of value. 

    • #1
  2. LibertyDefender Member
    LibertyDefender
    @LibertyDefender

    … in which Professor Epstein gratuitously assigns the worst possible interpretation of Donald Trump’s blurtings.

    So what else is new.

    It continues to amaze me how so many learned constitutional scholars fail to recognize that “Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors” are not the only *impeachable* offenses, but rather are the offenses that require removal upon *conviction.* It’s essentially a minimum sentencing provision.

    • #2
  3. Penfold Member
    Penfold
    @Penfold

    Maybe Gaetz really meant we should be impeaching a certain former VICE president.  hmmm

    • #3
  4. Troy Senik Contributor
    Troy Senik
    @TroySenik

    Penfold (View Comment):

    Maybe Gaetz really meant we should be impeaching a certain former VICE president. hmmm

    It was a reference to Obama:

    https://gaetz.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-matt-gaetz-exposes-extreme-anti-trump-bias-democrat-witnesses

    • #4