Let’s Get Small, Comrade

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 51 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Matt Bartle Member
    Matt Bartle
    @MattBartle

    I like American Housewife a lot.

     

    • #31
  2. Podkayne of Israel Inactive
    Podkayne of Israel
    @PodkayneofIsrael

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Chuckles the Clown did not shell himself.

    Any Chuckles the Clown reference gets my vote.

    I had to google it. But found the episode:

    Excellent TV comedy. The best.

    • #32
  3. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    Arahant (View Comment):

    To really spell Bernie in Russian, it would look more like: БЕРНИЙ in all caps or Берний in mixed case.

    Or maybe говнюк

    • #33
  4. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    To really spell Bernie in Russian, it would look more like: БЕРНИЙ in all caps or Берний in mixed case.

    Or maybe говнюк

    Lucky for you, Max’s filter doesn’t have Russian words.

    • #34
  5. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    J Ro (View Comment):

    Jonah’s recollection of the “cultural oomph” of being on Larry King 20 years ago reminded me of King’s interview of that popular animal expert from the zoo:

    Zookeeper brings out a large lizard which is obviously using its four legs. King: “Is that a snake?”

    Zookeeper brings out a wingless bird and explains that its wings were lost in a mishap with some high voltage cables. King: “Will it ever fly again?”

    What a pro! Kudos to his agent, though, for keeping him on the air so long, and to King himself for having more wives than a Saudi king.

    Worst late-night interviewer I ever saw was David Letterman.

    Once I saw him congratulate a perplexed Jeff Goldblum on his Academy Award nomination.  After several confused exchanges, an embarrassed Letterman realized he was thinking of Goldblum’s ex-wife, Geena Davis.

    On another occasion, he took a dislike to his guest, actor Rutger Hauer, and I saw him intentionally ruin the story Hauer was telling (about getting lost in the desert during a movie shoot).

    If there is such a thing as an interviewer’s code of ethics, he violated it!

    • #35
  6. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    Taras (View Comment):

    J Ro (View Comment):

    Jonah’s recollection of the “cultural oomph” of being on Larry King 20 years ago reminded me of King’s interview of that popular animal expert from the zoo:

    Zookeeper brings out a large lizard which is obviously using its four legs. King: “Is that a snake?”

    Zookeeper brings out a wingless bird and explains that its wings were lost in a mishap with some high voltage cables. King: “Will it ever fly again?”

    What a pro! Kudos to his agent, though, for keeping him on the air so long, and to King himself for having more wives than a Saudi king.

    Worst late-night interviewer I ever saw was David Letterman.

    Once I saw him congratulate a perplexed Jeff Goldblum on his Academy Award nomination. After several confused exchanges, an embarrassed Letterman realized he was thinking of Goldblum’s ex-wife, Geena Davis.

    On another occasion, he took a dislike to his guest, actor Rutger Hauer, and I saw him intentionally ruin the story Hauer was telling (about getting lost in the desert during a movie shoot).

    If there is such a thing as an interviewer’s code of ethics, he violated it!

    For years, Larry King broadcast live from a booth at Duke Ziebertt’s Restaurant which was last at Connecticut Ave and L Street in DC.  A long-time waiter and the bartender told me that King was fed and given free drinks for years and never tipped anybody–and made demands on staff to boot. 

    • #36
  7. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Do not re-watch Diner if you have fond memories of it.

    • #37
  8. Blue Yeti Admin
    Blue Yeti
    @BlueYeti

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Do not re-watch Diner if you have fond memories of it.

    I watched it about six months ago and thought it held up great. Period pieces tend to age better, I think. 

    • #38
  9. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Do not re-watch Diner if you have fond memories of it.

    I have it on my DVR waiting.  Why?

     

    • #39
  10. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Do not re-watch Diner if you have fond memories of it.

    I have it on my DVR waiting. Why?

    It just didn’t hold up for me, but I guess @blueyeti disagrees. Might be a chick/dude thing.

    • #40
  11. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Do not re-watch Diner if you have fond memories of it.

    I have it on my DVR waiting. Why?

    It just didn’t hold up for me, but I guess @blueyeti disagrees. Might be a chick/dude thing.

    I saw it once, maybe a year or so after it came out.  Honestly, the only thing I remember about it is the guy who was engaged making his fiancee take a test on the history of the Baltimore Colts, and then walking into the room and saying “The wedding is off”.

    Am I even close on that particular bit?

     

     

    • #41
  12. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    J Ro (View Comment):

    Jonah’s recollection of the “cultural oomph” of being on Larry King 20 years ago reminded me of King’s interview of that popular animal expert from the zoo:

    Zookeeper brings out a large lizard which is obviously using its four legs. King: “Is that a snake?”

    Zookeeper brings out a wingless bird and explains that its wings were lost in a mishap with some high voltage cables. King: “Will it ever fly again?”

    What a pro! Kudos to his agent, though, for keeping him on the air so long, and to King himself for having more wives than a Saudi king.

    Worst late-night interviewer I ever saw was David Letterman.

    Once I saw him congratulate a perplexed Jeff Goldblum on his Academy Award nomination. After several confused exchanges, an embarrassed Letterman realized he was thinking of Goldblum’s ex-wife, Geena Davis.

    On another occasion, he took a dislike to his guest, actor Rutger Hauer, and I saw him intentionally ruin the story Hauer was telling (about getting lost in the desert during a movie shoot).

    If there is such a thing as an interviewer’s code of ethics, he violated it!

    For years, Larry King broadcast live from a booth at Duke Ziebertt’s Restaurant which was last at Connecticut Ave and L Street in DC. A long-time waiter and the bartender told me that King was fed and given free drinks for years and never tipped anybody–and made demands on staff to boot.

    The story I heard about Letterman was that he treated his female staff as a harem.

    Supposedly he took one of his mistresses along on a family vacation with his (common law?) wife and children.

    • #42
  13. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Taras (View Comment):

    J Ro (View Comment):

    Jonah’s recollection of the “cultural oomph” of being on Larry King 20 years ago reminded me of King’s interview of that popular animal expert from the zoo:

    Zookeeper brings out a large lizard which is obviously using its four legs. King: “Is that a snake?”

    Zookeeper brings out a wingless bird and explains that its wings were lost in a mishap with some high voltage cables. King: “Will it ever fly again?”

    What a pro! Kudos to his agent, though, for keeping him on the air so long, and to King himself for having more wives than a Saudi king.

    Worst late-night interviewer I ever saw was David Letterman.

    Once I saw him congratulate a perplexed Jeff Goldblum on his Academy Award nomination. After several confused exchanges, an embarrassed Letterman realized he was thinking of Goldblum’s ex-wife, Geena Davis.

    On another occasion, he took a dislike to his guest, actor Rutger Hauer, and I saw him intentionally ruin the story Hauer was telling (about getting lost in the desert during a movie shoot).

    If there is such a thing as an interviewer’s code of ethics, he violated it!

    In terms of humor, Letterman’s 11 years on NBC have about 2-3 times as much content as his 22 years on CBS, since  ex-girlfriend/head writer Merrill Markoe and writers like Chris Elliott never made it to the CBS show (which drew its strength in it’s early days from Letterman’s anger at not getting the Tonight Show gig, but really was a going-through-the-motions dead show walking for its final decade, when the host set the template for today’s angry, political late night snark-fests that only play to a niche audience).

    • #43
  14. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    @jon1979 — Significantly, Letterman’s bitter, partisan approach was rewarded by the Hollywood elite with awards, while Jay Leno won in the ratings, decade after decade.

    Leno even won during the writers’ strike, when Letterman made a separate deal with the union and got his writers back.

    • #44
  15. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Taras (View Comment):

    @jon1979 — Significantly, Letterman’s bitter, partisan approach was rewarded by the Hollywood elite with awards, while Jay Leno won in the ratings, decade after decade.

    Leno even won during the writers’ strike, when Letterman made a separate deal with the union and got his writers back.

    There was always a certain meanness behind Letterman’s humor, but it was softened in the early going by the creativity and the originality of upending the normal talk show apple cart. But by the time you get at least to the end of the 1990s, there was little new in terms of bits, and the meanness began to outweigh the comedy, even in the non-political areas. Once he decided by about 2004 or so he wanted to be CBS’ version of Keith Olbermann over on MSNBC, it really was just a death march to retirement over the next decade.

    • #45
  16. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Taras (View Comment):

    @jon1979 — Significantly, Letterman’s bitter, partisan approach was rewarded by the Hollywood elite with awards, while Jay Leno won in the ratings, decade after decade.

    Leno even won during the writers’ strike, when Letterman made a separate deal with the union and got his writers back.

    There was always a certain meanness behind Letterman’s humor, but it was softened in the early going by the creativity and the originality of upending the normal talk show apple cart. But by the time you get at least to the end of the 1990s, there was little new in terms of bits, and the meanness began to outweigh the comedy, even in the non-political areas. Once he decided by about 2004 or so he wanted to be CBS’ version of Keith Olbermann over on MSNBC, it really was just a death march to retirement over the next decade.

    That was about when I quit watching.

    And  had been watching religiously since shortly after he went on the air in 1982.  Taped it every night and watched later.  Only episodes I missed were when something pushed the show back outside the window I had the VCR set up for.

    • #46
  17. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    I taped them starting when he moved to CBS, and still have the tapes.

    • #47
  18. davenr321 Coolidge
    davenr321
    @davenr321

    davenr321 (View Comment):

    “Old” Movies I’ve watched with my 10 year-old son that he liked:

    1930s serials

    Anything with Charlton Heston prior to around 1975, even The Omega Man.

    Young Frankenstein, Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

    Plenty more… Dad’s crap filter makes sure we don’t see the crap that Hollywood put out then and now.

    We watched “The Magnificent Seven” last night -1960 film. I pointed out that, in addition to all the actors being now dead, they were in a lot of really great movies together… My son thought it was magnificent! then we watched the trailer for “The Seven Samurai”… we’ll now start a Kurosawa study  and the occidental interpretations, not, of course, losing the irony of “Throne of Blood” when it comes to “cultural appropriation.”

    • #48
  19. Old Bathos Member
    Old Bathos
    @OldBathos

    davenr321 (View Comment):

    davenr321 (View Comment):

    “Old” Movies I’ve watched with my 10 year-old son that he liked:

    1930s serials

    Anything with Charlton Heston prior to around 1975, even The Omega Man.

    Young Frankenstein, Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

    Plenty more… Dad’s crap filter makes sure we don’t see the crap that Hollywood put out then and now.

    We watched “The Magnificent Seven” last night -1960 film. I pointed out that, in addition to all the actors being now dead, they were in a lot of really great movies together… My son thought it was magnificent! then we watched the trailer for “The Seven Samurai”… we’ll now start a Kurosawa study and the occidental interpretations, not, of course, losing the irony of “Throne of Blood” when it comes to “cultural appropriation.”

    When you watch Seven Samurai, be prepared to especially enjoy the character whose corresponding character was played by James Coburn: Extraordinary exercise of deadly skill followed by a nap as if it were another day at the office, indifferent to the awed perceptions of others.

    In my youth, there was an annual Samurai film festival at the old Biograph theater in DC. Seven Samurai, the Yojimbo and Sanura films. All-day immersions. My media-spoiled kids and grandkids are appalled at the prospect of black and white films with subtitles and no CGI.  They will always fail to appreciate the artistry of films from that era.

    • #49
  20. Taras Coolidge
    Taras
    @Taras

    @oldbathos — One probably not for your kids is Masako Kobayashi’s Harakiri (1962).

    I had the rare privilege of seeing this exploration of the dark side of the Samurai code, without knowing where the story was going.

    So that when the shattering catharsis finally came, and we learned what was really going on all along, I was as stunned as the characters in the film.  In his essay on the film, Roger Ebert called this “one of the great dramatic moments of all samurai films.”

    N.B.:  All these comments refer to the 1962 film, not the 2011 remake, which I didn’t know existed until today.

    • #50
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Hey guys, I think it’s time for a follow-up to the We Work episode.

    • #51
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.