Brit Hume argues on Twitter: “I suppose you can also be pro-tax cuts, pro-deregulation, pro-defense increases, pro-gun rights, pro-life and anti-Trump. But at some point, it begins to seem ridiculous.” John McCormack of the Weekly Standard ripostes: “I suppose you can oppose sexual assault, conspiracy theories, lying, adultery, mocking American POWs, sanitizing dictators & white supremacists, and still be pro-Trump. But at some point, it begins to seem ridiculous.” This perfect distillation of the fight on the Right is the subject of maybe the best podcast we’ve ever done. Give a listen.

Subscribe to The Commentary Magazine Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

There are 6 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Dr.Guido Member
    Dr.Guido
    @DrGuido

    …except Hume is dealing with facts of governance and that’s what the election of Trump (and I was a #NeverTrumper) was, especially when his opponent was ….HRC…. and all the vile baggage she personally carried.

    Hume wins this one in a runaway.

    • #1
  2. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Hume = Donald Trump is enacting conservative policy.

    McCormack = Donald Trump is a bit of a lout.

    They are both right ….

    What is more important to conservatives the policy or the guy enacting the conservative policy?

    • #2
  3. Jeff Hawkins Inactive
    Jeff Hawkins
    @JeffHawkins

    The Comedy Cellar…for a right wing rank punditry podcast

    JPod overrates his raconteur skills

    • #3
  4. Icarus213 Coolidge
    Icarus213
    @Icarus213

    It warms my heart whenever John says “beautiful monthly mailbox in your magazine.”  This was one of those times.

    • #4
  5. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

    Dr.Guido (View Comment):

    …except Hume is dealing with facts of governance and that’s what the election of Trump (and I was a #NeverTrumper) was, especially when his opponent was ….HRC…. and all the vile baggage she personally carried.

    Hume wins this one in a runaway.

    What the President says is part of what the President does.  What he says is a fact of governance. He says a lot of vulgar nonsense very often. So we have a President who, for the most part, should be ignored or parsed to the point of idiocy when he speaks. That is better than Hillary. But then so are most people.

    • #5
  6. Joe D. Inactive
    Joe D.
    @JosephDornisch

    If there wouldn’t have been a bunch of investigations about Clinton activities during the campaign or her prior time in office, it’s not because there shouldn’t have been – so for me the Russia investigations are a wash. Also, I am much more concerned about FBI bias and interference than I am about Russia interference.

    I am also very skeptical that all of the other contenders would have gotten out of the Paris accord, or the Iran agreement.

    • #6
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.