The Education of Our Children

 

I was looking through some old pictures.  My kids are 19, 21, and 22 now, and I miss the days when they were little girls.  They grew up on a mountaintop in northeast Tennessee.  We had 60 acres, surrounded by National Forest – it was a great place for kids to grow up.  Anyway, I noticed a pattern in these old pictures.  See if you notice the same thing I did, in this series of pictures of my youngest daughter, when she was 8-10 years old:

Ok, so what do you notice about these pictures?

The first thing I noticed was that she seemed to spend a lot of time doing stuff that eight-year-olds aren’t supposed to do.  Too dangerous.  Riding in the back of pickups (while carving a stick with a knife), riding 4-wheelers (overloaded with other kids), climbing up a slippery hot metal roof to help her Dad sweep the chimney, and so on.  You may be thinking, “Didn’t she get hurt a lot?”  And I admit, yes, she did.  But she was indestructible (like most kids), and bounced back.  Nothing serious – lots of scrapes and bruises, a couple of broken bones.  But valuable lessons learned each time.

I also noticed how often she was working.  Not playing frisbee with her Dad, but helping me do jobs that needed to be done.  She was expected to contribute to the family at a very early age.  We went fishing too, but we worked a lot.  And she helped.

But the big thing I noticed was how many of the pictures were of her learning a new skill from me, or my Mom, or a friend from church.  How to knit.  How to shoot.  How to sew.  How to fish.  How to cook.  She can operate a chain saw, various power tools, impact wrenches, etc.  She can drive a stick shift, operate a skid steer, change tires, change her oil, fix a toilet, replace light fixtures, and split firewood.  And so on and so on and so on.

It’s incredible how much time we spend teaching our kids.  Not schools or tutors.  Family.  Families spend so much time teaching kids, that the contribution of schools to their education seems almost insignificant.  Now that schools are teaching less and indoctrinating more, their contribution becomes even more insignificant.

My daughter just got back from her first year of college.  She goes to a very elite university on the east coast.  It’s so expensive that I wouldn’t have even considered it if she had not gotten an athletic scholarship.  Very selective school.  Top shelf students.  But she was amazed at how spoiled, and how helpless, her housemates were.  She lived with four other girls, none of whom knew how to mop a floor, clean a toilet, cook a meal, or any other basic skills.  My daughter basically ran the household for the rest of them.  She was amazed.

She was also dismayed – “Are all the kids my age this helpless?”

I told her that it may not be all bad.  As kids become more and more soft, spoiled, and helpless, kids like my daughter will stand out more.  And as schools get worse and worse, and parents get softer and less self-sufficient, kids that are raised well will have more and more of an advantage.  This isn’t good for our society, but it may be good for the kids out there who aren’t completely helpless.  I guess.

The world is getting stranger, people are getting softer, and they’re raising some helpless kids.  So raise your children well.

And if you can’t do that, you might consider my approach – just do the best you can.

It’s important.  Your kids will thank you.  Even for all the hard work you had them do.  They’ll thank you even for that.

Well, eventually…

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 65 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Lots of boys/men are… interested in… women (actors, models…) taller than they are. Then they get older and marry women who aren’t as tall as they are.

    It wasn’t for lack of trying on my part. Or my brothers. A couple of my cousins ended up marrying women taller than they were. They told me tall women were hard to put down.

    Women also tend to want men who are even taller than they are. As well as earning more, etc.

    Men drool over Tina Louise (Ginger Grant), 5′ 8″, but they usually marry a Dawn Wells (Mary Ann), 5′ 4″.

    The first woman I proposed to was five foot even (she turned me down).  My first wife was five-foot-eleven, same as me . . .

    • #61
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Stad (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Lots of boys/men are… interested in… women (actors, models…) taller than they are. Then they get older and marry women who aren’t as tall as they are.

    It wasn’t for lack of trying on my part. Or my brothers. A couple of my cousins ended up marrying women taller than they were. They told me tall women were hard to put down.

    Women also tend to want men who are even taller than they are. As well as earning more, etc.

    Men drool over Tina Louise (Ginger Grant), 5′ 8″, but they usually marry a Dawn Wells (Mary Ann), 5′ 4″.

    The first woman I proposed to was five foot even (she turned me down). My first wife was five-foot-eleven, same as me . . .

    A lot of these things seem to be at least half instinctual.  And both men and women will sometimes start something that they “think” is just fine, but down the line their instincts sabotage it.  Maybe your 5′ 11″ first wife had something in her psyche that made her want someone taller, regardless of her conscious decision-making.  Or, if her psyche wanted to dominate, maybe she needed someone who didn’t seem to be her equal.

    There are many variables, of course.  Your much-greater height might have been intimidating to first choice, rather than feeling safe or something.  Her subconscious might have been “triggered” by you being tall like her abusive father who cheated on her mother, or something.  (Which reminds me of https://ricochet.com/973735/my-six-month-winter-in-minnesota/ that I just read.)  If she’d been 5′ 5″ or if you’d been 5′ 8″ she might have said yes.

    • #62
  3. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    EHerring (View Comment):
    Clemson is a good school.

    Ask a Gamecock if he agrees.

    I am a gamecock, just on honest one.

    • #63
  4. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    EHerring (View Comment):

    Our middle daughter is not an athlete, so we pay tuition for her. Which why she goes to Clemson.

    A few schools that she looked at had that type of policy. But with my income, we would pay full price. And that line is not outrageously high. Maybe over $100k annual income, or something? I can’t remember.

    Now, to be fair, could I afford full price? I suppose I could, but I’d have to delay retirement by a few years.

    But the question is, is that a good idea? With some academic scholarships she got, we pay Clemson about $16k per year – so $64k for a four year degree. Which is cheaper than just one year at a lot of schools.

    Clemson is a good school.

    It really is. We’ve been very impressed. Some of the best math & engineering in the country. I’m not sure if I’d go there to major in Peruvian-American Lesbian Literature, but for engineering, sign me up.

    Plus, with all those kids majoring in math and engineering, about half the kids are conservative. And probably over 15% of the professors. So it’s a much less toxic place.

    On Sunday mornings, my daughter walks down the hall of her dorm and says, “I need a ride to church.” There’s always somebody going.

    She goes to the same church as Trevor Lawrence and about 50 football players. Pretty cool.

    My youngest married a Clemson engineer. My oldest married a Carolina engineer. Such is life.

    • #64
  5. TreeRat Inactive
    TreeRat
    @RichardFinlay

    Muleskinner, Weasel Wrangler (View Comment):

    TreeRat (View Comment):
    When my daughter was accepted at MIT, we toured & met with the Financial Aid folks. When I questioned the value they put on our house, they said they calculated it based on appreciation rates since it was purchased; the value they put on it was roughly equivalent to the four-year cost of attending. I offered to trade them even up. They declined. I think our ‘aid’ was about $500 — a loan, not a grant.

    Skinner’s first step in higher education reform is to outlaw any release of the FAFSA, or any information on it to anyone except the federal government for the express purpose of awarding Pell Grants. That information is all a school needs to segment the market for purposes of price discrimination. That is they can divide up the market and set prices between students in a way that maximizes the schools’ revenue. The schools don’t hand out “aid,” to students, rather they set prices as high as each customer will bear.

    The price they set for ‘me’ was much more than my daughter/my wife/I could bear.

    • #65
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.