Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
TX06 Special Election Followup
Today is May 1st and municipal election day in Texas. I wanted to follow up on the results of the TX06 special election that was held also. I thought there might be interest since there were 4 previous posts on the election with over 200 replies. I guess it is technically 3 posts (one, two, three) and a podcast in the last month.
The big contention was whether this “anti-Trump” upstart, Michael Wood, would be the future of the GOP. One of the candidates in the race was the widow of the individual who previously occupied the office. Mrs. Wright is the leading vote-getter and will be in the run-off. With 94% of the votes in, second place is barely held by Jake Ellzey, who I thought was the most likely winner (I didn’t know about the widow component). If these results hold, it will be two GOP candidates in the runoff. Third place is some Democrat that would certainly lose in the runoff. And that anti-Trump upstart? He is currently in 9th position with about 3% of the vote. It looks like that bold strategy didn’t pay off in MAGA country. Paging Liz Cheney…
| Candidate | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Susan Wright GOP | 15,020 | 19.21% |
| Jake Ellzey GOP | 10,842 | 13.86% |
| Jana Sanchez DEM | 10,476 | 13.40% |
| Brian Harrison GOP | 8,474 | 10.84% |
| Shawn Lassiter DEM | 6,941 | 8.88% |
| John Castro GOP | 4,308 | 5.51% |
| Tammy Allison DEM | 4,222 | 5.40% |
| Lydia Bean DEM | 2,913 | 3.72% |
| Michael Wood GOP | 2,497 | 3.19% |
| Michael Ballantine GOP | 2,212 | 2.83% |
The important thing is that the Camping Ban looks like it is passing in Austin. Yeah!
Published in Elections
And also adopted by themselves, not imposed by anyone else.
I love Austrian economics. I think it’s the best system. I think it’s the best way to view things.
Having said that, I wish somebody would tell me what the hell is wrong with MAGA ***policy***.
The institutions suck.
Everything moves left all of the time.
China.
We have done every single thing wrong in the face of automation and globalized labor. So now we are getting populism and Socialism shoved down our throats.
My big beef mostly was that Trump didn’t know anything about civics and government and he wasn’t really into it. Being a government executive is completely different from what he did before. Having said that, he did pretty well and he highlighted a ton of garbage that needed sunlight as a disinfectant.
I dislike everybody that Gary likes, basically.
George Orwell’s version of The Big Lie is “2 + 2 = 5”.
Which our esteemed original poster even includes in his Ricochet nickname.
The 2 + 2 = 5 Wikipedia entry is very interesting. Check it out.
It’s interesting to see details of how far back the expression goes, but the “contemporary usage” section doesn’t get into the aspect of it becoming “we will tell you what to believe, and you will believe what we tell you, rather than reality.” But if it did, I expect wiki would redact it.
I won’t quibble with that, nor have I (except to complain it is a lazy assertion often used to avoid presenting an argument.) I can’t claim the NT title as I voted for the guy twice, but admit to being Never Again Trump. I don’t mind the moniker NAT & expect many Trump supporters here to call me that and sit back with self-righteous satisfaction.
On one point I am amused however. Considering the NT term is commonly thrown around here as a pejorative, why are those who use it so prickly at the notion of “Ever-Trump?” Could it be that both terms are obnoxious? It appears to be a dilemma for some Trump acolytes. Never-Trump bad, Ever-Trump … bad … too? Methinks they protest too much.
I’m Ever-Trump until a better replacement comes along. I hope there is one, but until that happens I want to keep him in the running. DeSantis might turn out to be the better replacement, but it’s too early to toss Trump out. We might need him in case DeSantis doesn’t pan out.
I don’t care about insults at all. I mean zero. Gary can call me anything he wants. He can call anybody else whatever he wants.
***Shoot holes in the MAGA policy instead***. I get that Trump had some weaknesses, but he also had a lot of strengths and he highlighted the right things.
I can tell you the Minnesota anti-trump, Principles First crowd are idiots in this sense. I mean terrible. Everybody around PF has gotten dumber and dumber overtime and I’m not exaggerating.
Their only solid principle seems to be calling themselves Principles First, and the rest can go hang.
The bulk of Republicans are far more discerning than you give them credit for. I would simply point you to the replacement of Mark Meadows in the House. Meadows’ family friend was running and Trump gave his endorsement, but another candidate – younger, more articulate won. Your cartoon character is exactly what you accuse others of.
Gary uses lies from the press that have been shown to be a lie and continues to do so. You may believe the lies in the NYT, WaPo, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS. That is your right. But then to say those who accuse Gary of lying for citing the same pile of dribble Gary does is rather circular.
As for criticism, I have lots of criticisms of Trump. He’s an amateur in politics for one. He has never been able to figure out who his friends and enemies are. He evidently is easily flattered. He is weak. But he is far better than the alternatives. Whether Republican or Democrat opponents. So it really depends on the nature of the criticism.
That he did not shut down the riots and burning was his largest failing. That he didn’t sack the Secretary of Defense within 24 hours of his opposing calling out the National Guard shows how weak he is. That he didn’t sack the people in the FBI, the CIA, up and down the chain of command in the national security apparatus while releasing all the documents, shows he was weak. When he called for removing troops from the never-ending wars and the generals obstructing him, he should have sacked them. He is weak.
It depends on the criticism. Gary;’s criticisms are trash.
Nepotism. Trump promoting his children is a perfectly valid criticism. Why shouldn’t it also apply to Liz Cheney? Plus she is a neocon who has learned nothing and is probably incapable as neocons are.
Gary endorses Nicole Wallace.
I look forward to her also getting 3% of the vote.
She starts out as a California RINO political operator. She’s obviously just like former libertarian Joe Scarborough who has completely changed her views for the money. Gary actually listens to this [redacted]. She is a [remunerated for physical activity]. All of these Never Trumper’s are extremely stupid about the media and the bureaucracy.
Unlike “evil” which is how a particular NTer here refers to Trump and his supporters.
Right, because Trump is an existential threat to the country, not like that Biden guy who… oh, never mind.
I look forward to the day when we think of the powers and principalities behind the democrats and the progressives as the enemy. I voted for Trump over Biden, rightly believing Trump to be the lesser danger to America and the lesser evil. However, Trump’s time is past, love Trump or hate Trump, now is the time is to move onto new leaders. I personally recommend evaluating them on their proposed policies, their histories, and their ability to get elected and implement policy. Judge Trump by Trump — judge other politicians by what they are going to do, not by their relationship to Trump. Those who stand for conservatism and freedom need to stand together against the progressive, statist onslaught. Divided we fall.
But if we do fall, I suggest going into a sort of tuck so you can roll with it. Don’t leave any limbs splayed out where they will get broken.
Haha, yes. One of the most important things I learned in Aikido training was how to fall properly to disperse the impact over a large area.
There might at least still be a difference between non-Trump and Anti-Trump candidates.
I don’t get why a guy like that would talk like that.
What? Veruca Salt was GREAT!
I check these threads occasionally and am amused that the answer the (self-proclaimed) NTs and NATs have is to go back to the GOPe fools such as the Bushes and Mittens who gave us the policies that let to Trump in the first place. Lather; rinse; repeat.
I think I’ll let my voter registration lapse, ignore it all, and just enjoy life in general. You know, since I told the RNC caller to go fornicate himself and put me on the “do-not-call” list, I haven’t been bothered at all.
Is anyone a fan of Bret Stephens?
They do seem to give new meaning to the word “clueless.”
Discussing policy > amateur analysis of the electorate
They always talk about suburban mothers, yada yada yada.
If the GOP figures out what they are doing they can pick up a multi racial working class along with whoever else is going to stay in the GOP. Social conservatives and business owners or whatever. In my opinion that actually represents actual real world problems. This is basically the American Greatness / Claremont view point.
When Andrew Klavan was discussing 1984 he pointed out that that was the big crime of the government in the book. Not that they were making people agree to a lie, but that they were making people believe what ever they said was truth. They could say go back to saying 2 + 2 = 4 and that wouldn’t make it right. It’s based on power, not truth, and they could return to saying 2 + 2 = 5.
Trump may be completely lacking in ethics but he is one hell of a brander.
There are four questions I ask when someone signs a will to determine if they are of sound mind. Unlike the old saw, there are correct and wrong answers to these questions:
I can think of a few other questions to determine mental soundness:
If someone answers “yes” to any of these five questions, their mental soundness must be questioned.