Where Are the Outbreaks?

 

If you listen to those who are supposedly in the know, we’re having a winter spike because people are getting together in their homes for dinner parties and Thanksgiving meals. We’re having a spike because selfish people won’t wear masks in public. But what’s actually behind the outbreaks? New York State issued the findings from contact tracers, and to say it doesn’t fit the preferred narrative is an understatement.

Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant. No, the real spread is within households. And why are people getting sick? Some insight:

What might we have done instead of shutting down entire sectors of our economy, thereby destroying them? That will be the subject of countless case studies moving forward, but one very effective strategy would have been to pour a fraction of the money we put into loans meant to bail out the restaurant and service industries and put it into rigorous testing, quarantine hotels, and paid sick leave for those who fell ill and short-term disability leave for high-risk households.

Instead of helping these low-income service industry workers, we destroyed their financial security and their children’s educations, all while upper-class Americans continued to order Door Dash from the remaining restaurants and worked from home remotely.

The story of our pandemic response is one of the privileged wrecking the entire lower-class, senselessly and thoughtlessly. The latest statistics on where we’re seeing spread is just another data point in that narrative.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 59 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    cirby (View Comment):

    We’re supposed to have a big uptick in cases – but we’re also in a big uptick in testing.

    In Florida, it’s more positive tests per week than during the peak of the epidemic – but only about half as many hospitalizations and deaths.

    The trend for those is up somewhat – but nowhere near enough to match the “positive” cases. This is in a state that’s effectively been out of lockdown for months, with only “masks indoors while not in your house” as the rule.

    And, after more than nine months, I still don’t know anyone personally who has died or who has been hospital-level sick. I’ve now met a total of TWO people who merely tested positive, and I didn’t know either of them beforehand. I assume I do know someone, somewhere, who passed on, but the news hasn’t made it through the grapevine to me yet.

    I am aware of (but didn’t know personally) only two people who have died from covid.  One was a former co-worker of my wife, here in Milwaukee.  The other was the sister-in-law of one of my off-shore team in India.  Both were under the age of 50.

     

    I’ve known a few people who have it and recovered in a few days, including my brother and his family.  My employer reports every week on case counts.  As of Thursday, out of a total workforce of about 2000 spread across 5 states, we’ve had about 200 cases, with more than 150 returned to work, and no reported fatalities.

     

     

    • #31
  2. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker (View Comment):
    Starting contact tracing in the Autumn some 8 months into a supposed pandemic is insanity.

    There’s that old expression about closing the barn door . . .

    • #32
  3. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Roderic (View Comment):
    masks and other measures must actually work pretty well.

    At the expense of the economy, people’s emotional well-being, and chidren’s education.  Not worth it not matter how effective the measures are, not at this point . . .

    • #33
  4. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Gazpacho Grande' (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel: Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    The word you are looking for is not despite, it is because.

    Specifically: because restaurants are now closed for indoor dining less than 1.5% who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    You might argue it wasn’t necessary (ie prove causality) or that the costs were greater than the benefits, but that’s separate from the logic of the argument.

    No. It’s not 1.5% because restaurants are now closed. Speaking of logic.

    If close contact indoors inevitably meant infection, why aren’t airlines out of business? Why are grocery stores still open? All the people working in those gigs would have had a serious spike of infections.

    And that hasn’t happened. So no, I don’t think closing the restaurant can be given credit for the low traced contact percentage.

    There were hardly any serious stories about the protests and riots being virus-spreading events.  That, and only Trump rallies, Thanksgiving dinners, and large religious celebrations were considered “superspreader” events . . .

    • #34
  5. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    People in homes sleep together, kiss each other, often drink from the same glasses, etc.

    Yuk!

    • #35
  6. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Zafar (View Comment):
    Zafar

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    That would be fine logic if you could actually carry it to states that have not kept restaurants shuttered for months. You can’t. There are many states in which people go out as normal, though they wear a mask to walk from the door to the table, where they immediately take their masks off and enjoy their meals.

    That’s a fair point. I don’t know how the infections break down by source when you compare Texas and California. It would be interesting to see them.

    There’s also the possibility that climate has an impact, so a lot of states may have we additional variables to take into account.

    And parts of Texas did have that temporary morgue thing due to peaks in deaths – I’m not sure that California also did.

    I have looked for data on how infection spread breaks down by state, but I can’t find contact tracing that is that granular.

    I can tell you that while I spend a lot of time in Austin, I also live in a county in TN that has around a half a million residents. Restaurants have been open for months now with only 213 citizens of any age who have died from Covid-19.  I can also see from the health department that 128 of the deceased have been 75+.  (This does not mean I don’t value older citizens, but come on.  75+ means a person has had good innings.)

    So after having to circle the strip mall parking lot Saturday for ten minutes before I found a space because it was so crowded, I just can’t feel the panic many seem to feel when looking at that number in my own very open corner of the world. 

    The truth is that even if I was full of fear, I could still look at the fact that a state like Texas has a much lower number of per capita infections than California and think that the lockdowns in California have not been that useful in stopping spread.  (To be fair, Tennessee currently has a higher infection rate than CA.  I guess you could jump to “mask mandates,” but voluntary compliance on that front is very, very high here.  I just think the spread has hit rural pockets where it hadn’t previously b/c spread is inevitable.)

    I’ve also found data saying TX has a higher death rate than CA, but that is separate from a higher spread rate.  Also, other fervent lockdown states like NY, NJ, and Michigan have much higher death rates, sooooo……  

    Per your morgue story, death rates are higher in (much poorer) El Paso than (much richer) Austin, to be sure as well, but Austin’s restaurants are open, so I’d want to look at other reasons for why this is this case.   

    I just think it’s a LOT more complicated than closing the restaurant (or any other) industry.  

    • #36
  7. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):
    I am aware of (but didn’t know personally) only two people who have died from covid. One was a former co-worker of my wife, here in Milwaukee. The other was the sister-in-law of one of my off-shore team in India. Both were under the age of 50.

    This anecdote is surely true, but my immediate question would be: “What other health issues did they have?” When looking at data about death rates across the country, people under 50 are not at high risk. 

    I mean… I only known one person ever who died of the flu, and she was under 10.  That doesn’t really tell me a lot about the risks of death-by-flu across society.

    I also know many people at this point who have had Covid.  Some have been very sick.  Some have barely noticed.  One had it, didn’t know it, but found antibodies due to testing at a university.  No one I know personally has died of Covid.  These anecdotes also mean nothing when it comes to evaluating hard data.  My social circle is just too small.

    • #37
  8. Buckpasser Member
    Buckpasser
    @Buckpasser

    Why are people in government so happy that they can tell us who gets to work and who gets to live on welfare for the rest of their lives?

    • #38
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    Lois Lane

    Roderic (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel: Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant. No, the real spread is within households.

    So if spread isn’t happening in restaurants and other public indoor venues, where people are wearing masks, social distancing, and so on, and there is spread in households, where people are not wearing masks, etc., then masks and other measures must actually work pretty well.

    I think there is some utility to masks, but that utility has been wildly overstated.

    My money is on “other”. It’s probably a decent thing to do when you have obvious social distancing / time exposure issues or whatever you want to call it, but I don’t think it changes the spread through society at all. 

    I really resent it when politicians say stupid things like “masks are the most important tool”. It most obviously isn’t. 

    The Minnesota governor has literally said it will be the last policy he cancels. Ridiculous.

    • #39
  10. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    Lois Lane

    Roderic (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel: Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant. No, the real spread is within households.

    So if spread isn’t happening in restaurants and other public indoor venues, where people are wearing masks, social distancing, and so on, and there is spread in households, where people are not wearing masks, etc., then masks and other measures must actually work pretty well.

    I think there is some utility to masks, but that utility has been wildly overstated.

    My money is on “other”. It’s probably a decent thing to do when you have obvious social distancing / time exposure issues or whatever you want to call it, but I don’t think it changes the spread through society at all.

    I really resent it when politicians say stupid things like “masks are the most important tool”. It most obviously isn’t.

    The Minnesota governor has literally said it will be the last policy he cancels. Ridiculous.

    Oh, I agree.  1000%.  But I’m tired of arguing about the efficacy of masks.  I don’t wear one when I don’t have to wear one unless I really am around someone else (as in super up close, not 6 feet away in passing) who is clearly vulnerable in some way.  

    • #40
  11. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    kedavis (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    I don’t think leftist politicians planned to put people in the service economy out of work and move them to welfare, thus relieving them of the burden of work. But I think that once that became an option, they found it palatable. Not because they are Machiavellian Marxist geniuses seeing six steps ahead of everyone else, but because they are fools who find reaffirmation in the half-baked, never-interrogated mindset they’ve had since college.

    Old-style progressives in the 30s: People need jobs! Good jobs, quality work, the sort of labor that lends dignity and a sense of belonging and accomplishment!

    Modern progressives: actually no, turns out you don’t. Work is inherently exploitative. You need the dole, so you can free.

    But how are those elites going to get their fine wines and cigars and meals and stuff delivered – or even made to start with! – let alone their high-speed internet and working plumbing and stuff, and their trash collected, and all the rest, if they’ve put all the people who do those things out of work, because they must stay home?

    Do the elites EVER realize how badly they messed up, and suffer the consequences?

    Thinking about those things (and the growing of the food mentioned by @caroljoy in Comment #13) would require second and third order thinking about the consequences of their actions. And Progressives have demonstrated a long history of thinking no deeper than first order – the immediate result – and not thinking about how people might respond to the changed incentives of the immediate response. 

    I appreciated that Sen. Ted Cruz on Sunday jabbed at millionaire media personality Jake Tapper and billionaire tech mogul Bill Gates by asking how they would feel about the shutdown they claim to want if their own money were frozen. I have also liked people calling for the salaries and benefits of politicians to be stopped as long as the shutdowns they order continue. 

    As with so many things, the people making the policies are not seriously impacted by those policies. 

    • #41
  12. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker (View Comment):

    Al French of Damascus (View Comment):

    Oregon has been relatively transparent with its COVID statistics, but one area I haven’t seen shared is its contact tracing. I read recently that some jurisdiction – can’t recall which – was unable to trace 60% of its cases. I suspect that Oregon is in that ball park. I have not seen a breakdown of socioeconomic factors of the infected, but it is reported by zip code, so it could be figured out.
    Although transparent with some of its statistics, one area where the state is opaque is policy decision making. Schools are shut and restaurants are closed, but the governor won’t share how those decisions were reached.

    Contact tracing is valuable if it is instituted in a large scale manner early on.

    By May 2020, over 2.4% or more of the population was already infected. (At least that is what testing stated.) By late summer,that possibly over 10% was. Of course some things I’ve read state the most accurate way to do test results involves looking at antibodies.

    Starting contact tracing in the Autumn some 8 months into a supposed pandemic is insanity.

    Important to note there is plenty of money for the contact tracing, some 100 billion bucks, and a lot of juicy jobs that pay 20 bucks an hour. With it now being realized that Bill Gates had already arranged for which Congress critter would promote the needed legislation to bring about the 100 billion bucks. That arrangement occurred in August of 2019. (Anyone else feel a bit more suspicious of Gates after realizing this Act of God might have been planned as early as August 2019?)

    Today on “Meet The Press” the head of the NIH, Dr Francis Collins let it slip that the vaccines have been looked into for a year. Was that a slip of the tongue, and was it Freudian? Or just a mistake in the information he offered?

    (This was was re-edited at 11:40Pm Ca time, as earlier it inadvertently truncated and left out pertinent info and misrepresented a statistic.)

    Contact tracing budgeting claim off by a factor of 10x-https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11609

    vaccine development started within days of the reported sequence of the viral mRNA which occurred in early Jan- so Dr Collins use of a year is correct (colloquially 10-11 months is a year).

    • #42
  13. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel: Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    The word you are looking for is not despite, it is because.

    Specifically: because restaurants are now closed for indoor dining less than 1.5% who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    You might argue it wasn’t necessary (ie prove causality) or that the costs were greater than the benefits, but that’s separate from the logic of the argument.

    That also depends on when the testing was done, etc.  If contact tracing done when restaurants were still open, showed that “less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant,” then closing the restaurants was not a valid step to take.

    • #43
  14. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel: Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    The word you are looking for is not despite, it is because.

    Specifically: because restaurants are now closed for indoor dining less than 1.5% who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    You might argue it wasn’t necessary (ie prove causality) or that the costs were greater than the benefits, but that’s separate from the logic of the argument.

    That also depends on when the testing was done, etc. If contact tracing done when restaurants were still open, showed that “less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant,” then closing the restaurants was not a valid step to take.

    Not to mention there are significant delays between actions and any effect that is observable on the order of 2-4 weeks at a minimum.

    • #44
  15. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gazpacho Grande' (View Comment):

    Sal (View Comment):

    Gazpacho Grande’ (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bethany Mandel: Despite the fact that restaurants are now closed for indoor dining, in the middle of winter, thereby effectively destroying the rest of those who have survived to this point, less than 1.5% of those who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    The word you are looking for is not despite, it is because.

    Specifically: because restaurants are now closed for indoor dining less than 1.5% who tested positive could have their infection traced to a restaurant.

    You might argue it wasn’t necessary (ie prove causality) or that the costs were greater than the benefits, but that’s separate from the logic of the argument.

    No. It’s not 1.5% because restaurants are now closed. Speaking of logic.

    If close contact indoors inevitably meant infection, why aren’t airlines out of business? Why are grocery stores still open? All the people working in those gigs would have had a serious spike of infections.

    And that hasn’t happened. So no, I don’t think closing the restaurant can be given credit for the low traced contact percentage.

    Airplanes have HEPA-filtered ventilation systems that provide top to bottom air flow. This minimizes the possibility of transmission in the aircraft where people spend most of their time when traveling. Restaurants do not have such high-end ventilation systems. There have been proven cases of people contaminated by air flowing across the room.

    But they can still get it from direct contact – there’s no hepa filter in the aisles the flight attendants walk through, is there? Hepa shields? Hepa masks?

    How about grocery stores? Hepa-carts?

    What about the Hepa-potomus at the zoo?

    • #45
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    MarciN (View Comment):
    I was thrilled to see the head of the NIH beseech the public to stop spreading conspiracy theories about the vaccines. We desperately need these vaccines. We can’t push back the public’s fears of this virus at this point. The public is really afraid of it. If we want the normalcy that will protect people from joblessness, we have to have the vaccines now.

    It does seem odd for many news outlets etc who were pushing the panic, especially if they thought it would help defeat Trump, now calling for calm.

    • #46
  17. Shauna Hunt Inactive
    Shauna Hunt
    @ShaunaHunt

    It’s rampant in my neighborhood. We have had people die in the under 50 category. I also have friends who have had it and would be considered “long haulers”. I have a friend in Britain who has it a second time. I’m worried she’s not going to pull through this. She’s 47.

    • #47
  18. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Do the elites EVER realize how badly they messed up, and suffer the consequences?

    I can really see how this whole crazy, can go sideways, very sideways, and these elites will suffer consequences. 

    I heard it happened once before, in France, a good long time ago…

    • #48
  19. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker (View Comment):
    Who is gonna getup at 6 am to plow the field and feed the cows?

    People who want to eat will work. It may take time to get to that point….

    • #49
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Jules PA (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Do the elites EVER realize how badly they messed up, and suffer the consequences?

    I can really see how this whole crazy, can go sideways, very sideways, and these elites will suffer consequences.

    I heard it happened once before, in France, a good long time ago…

    Too bad they can’t think of that BEFOREHAND.  And they’re supposed to be the elites, aren’t they supposed to be better at thinking?  And remembering stuff from history?

     

    • #50
  21. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Shauna Hunt (View Comment):

    It’s rampant in my neighborhood. We have had people die in the under 50 category. I also have friends who have had it and would be considered “long haulers”. I have a friend in Britain who has it a second time. I’m worried she’s not going to pull through this. She’s 47.

    Again, I would want to know about all their other health issues as age is only one indicator of risk.  In fact, age is only a giant indicator on one level because older people have many more underlying issues in their twilight years.  (People in their seventies don’t automatically die with Covid.)

    Someone could easily be overweight, have diabetes, respiratory disease, etc., when younger.  A perfectly healthy person under 50 is not at high risk per all the published data.

    I am sorry your friends have been ill though, and I hope your one friend pulls through soon.

    • #51
  22. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    Shauna Hunt (View Commen

    double entry

    • #52
  23. MiMac Thatcher
    MiMac
    @MiMac

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    Shauna Hunt (View Comment):

    It’s rampant in my neighborhood. We have had people die in the under 50 category. I also have friends who have had it and would be considered “long haulers”. I have a friend in Britain who has it a second time. I’m worried she’s not going to pull through this. She’s 47.

    Again, I would want to know about all their other health issues as age is only one indicator of risk. In fact, age is only a giant indicator on one level because older people have many more underlying issues in their twilight years. (People in their seventies don’t automatically die with Covid.)

    Someone could easily be overweight, have diabetes, respiratory disease, etc., when younger. A perfectly healthy person under 50 is not at high risk per all the published data.

    I am sorry your friends have been ill though, and I hope your one friend pulls through soon.

    One major problem with your thinking- the vast majority of people over age 50 are not “perfectly” healthy- in fact over age fifty-five> 78% of US adults have a chronic medical condition and that figure EXCLUDES isolated obesity which is rampant in the US adult population ( but is a risk factor for COVID). For 55-64 years old the figure is ~70% again excluding obesity. There are ~110 million people over age 50- so most likely >90million have conditions predisposing them to worse outcomes from COVID- and there is a significant population under age 50 that have such problems. For Adults under 50 the rate of chronic disease is ~20%. With ~120 million adults under 50 that is more > 24 million additional at risk people. So any way you slice it the number at risk is massive

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health_policy/adult_chronic_conditions.htm

    • #53
  24. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    MiMac (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    Shauna Hunt (View Comment):

    It’s rampant in my neighborhood. We have had people die in the under 50 category. I also have friends who have had it and would be considered “long haulers”. I have a friend in Britain who has it a second time. I’m worried she’s not going to pull through this. She’s 47.

    Again, I would want to know about all their other health issues as age is only one indicator of risk. In fact, age is only a giant indicator on one level because older people have many more underlying issues in their twilight years. (People in their seventies don’t automatically die with Covid.)

    Someone could easily be overweight, have diabetes, respiratory disease, etc., when younger. A perfectly healthy person under 50 is not at high risk per all the published data.

    I am sorry your friends have been ill though, and I hope your one friend pulls through soon.

    One major problem with your thinking- the vast majority of people over age 50 are not “perfectly” healthy- in fact over age fifty-five> 78% of US adults have a chronic medical condition and that figure EXCLUDES isolated obesity which is rampant in the US adult population ( but is a risk factor for COVID). For 55-64 years old the figure is ~70% again excluding obesity. There are ~110 million people over age 50- so most likely >90million have conditions predisposing them to worse outcomes from COVID- and there is a significant population under age 50 that have such problems. For Adults under 50 the rate of chronic disease is ~20%. With ~120 million adults under 50 that is more > 24 million additional at risk people. So any way you slice it the number at risk is massive

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health_policy/adult_chronic_conditions.htm

    Sure.  But not all co-morbidities are created equal per putting people at risk.  Data clearly show that death rates are higher in older populations.  That’s just not disputable at this point, and that is exactly because of what you say: higher incidents of chronic disease in older groups.  That does not, however, mean young people don’t have chronic diseases. 

    This is why when I hear someone has died in a younger cohort, I want to know what all their health conditions were, even if that reveals a few unlucky people who were young and healthy but still got the bad end of the stick.  (That’s just not a typical outcome.) 

    One thing that I had hoped would come out of this whole pandemic was a push for the population in general to get in shape.  It’s clear obesity is a major problem in the US and has been for some time.  So what do government officials do in response to a virus that is especially dangerous for obese people?  

    They close the gyms.  

    (Siiiiigggggghhhhhhh.)

    • #54
  25. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    Shauna Hunt (View Comment):

    It’s rampant in my neighborhood. We have had people die in the under 50 category. …

    Again, I would want to know about all their other health issues as age is only one indicator of risk. In fact, age is only a giant indicator on one level because older people have many more underlying issues in their twilight years. (People in their seventies don’t automatically die with Covid.)

    Someone could easily be overweight, have diabetes, respiratory disease, etc., when younger. A perfectly healthy person under 50 is not at high risk per all the published data.

    I am sorry your friends have been ill though, and I hope your one friend pulls through soon.

    One major problem with your thinking- the vast majority of people over age 50 are not “perfectly” healthy- in fact over age fifty-five> 78% of US adults have a chronic medical condition and that figure EXCLUDES isolated obesity which is rampant in the US adult population ( but is a risk factor for COVID). For 55-64 years old the figure is ~70% again excluding obesity. There are ~110 million people over age 50- so most likely >90million have conditions predisposing them to worse outcomes from COVID- and there is a significant population under age 50 that have such problems. For Adults under 50 the rate of chronic disease is ~20%. With ~120 million adults under 50 that is more > 24 million additional at risk people. So any way you slice it the number at risk is massive

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health_policy/adult_chronic_conditions.htm

    Sure. But not all co-morbidities are created equal per putting people at risk. Data clearly show that death rates are higher in older populations. That’s just not disputable at this point, and that is exactly because of what you say: higher incidents of chronic disease in older groups. That does not, however, mean young people don’t have chronic diseases.

    This is why when I hear someone has died in a younger cohort, I want to know what all their health conditions were, even if that reveals a few unlucky people who were young and healthy but still got the bad end of the stick. (That’s just not a typical outcome.)

    One thing that I had hoped would come out of this whole pandemic was a push for the population in general to get in shape. It’s clear obesity is a major problem in the US and has been for some time. So what do government officials do in response to a virus that is especially dangerous for obese people?

    They close the gyms.

    (Siiiiigggggghhhhhhh.)

    And tell everyone to stay home, where they can have pizza and snacks delivered…

    • #55
  26. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Somewhere Michelle Obama is saying ‘I told you so’.

    • #56
  27. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Somewhere Michelle Obama is saying ‘I told you so’.

    On that particular issue, Michelle Obama was right.  :)

    I decided to write a longer post about this particular topic here on Ricochet. 

    • #57
  28. Gazpacho Grande' Coolidge
    Gazpacho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Somewhere Michelle Obama is saying ‘I told you so’.

    Isn’t she always doing that?

    Letting people know that exercise is good for them is right up there letting everyone know the sky is blue today.

    • #58
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Gazpacho Grande’ (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Somewhere Michelle Obama is saying ‘I told you so’.

    Isn’t she always doing that?

    Letting people know that exercise is good for them is right up there letting everyone know the sky is blue today.

    But the truly self-indulgent “experts” like herself and Barack and Jill Biden and others, believe that only THEY really know and understand those “secrets.”

    Or as Dr William H Cosby (Ed.D) says, “intellectuals go to school to learn about things that other people do naturally.”

    • #59
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.