Republicans Are Stupid

 

Last year, Democrat Senator Mazie Hirono said, “…we Democrats have a really hard time is connecting to people’s hearts.… But we have a really hard time doing that and one of the reasons it was told to me at one of our retreats was that we Democrats know so much, that is true. And we have kind of have to tell everyone how smart we are and so we have a tendency to be very left-brain.… That is not how people make decisions.”

So while Republicans don’t believe in science, the Democrats are the party of pure logic and reason, and they struggle to understand how the common people use emotions to make irrational decisions.  Democrats consider themselves to be the party of intellect.

When Democrats hired an elderly Robert Mueller to investigate the President, it became obvious that Mr. Mueller was confused about the entire proceeding, and he didn’t understand what was in the report that bore his name. Then, they use an autistic teenager to explain climate science to us, and a Florida schoolchild with a learning disability to explain the social impact of gun control legislation. Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson expressed concern that Guam might capsize if development made it too top-heavy.  And then was re-elected by intellectual Democrats. You might ask the Democrat presidential nominee why they keep using people with limited mental faculties to promote their agenda, but he doesn’t seem to know where he is. He’ll just get confused by your question, and call you a dog-faced pony soldier.

And if he wins the election in November, he’ll be in charge of the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

You would think this dichotomy of their claimed brilliance, compared with their apparent cluelessness, would bother some Democrat voters. And it may. But I don’t think so.

With Democrats, if your heart is in the right place, then the details really don’t matter that much. I think. But honestly, I really don’t know. I don’t get it. You would think that a party of highly intelligent scientific geniuses would prefer to be represented by someone with a more dazzling intellect. Or, at least, with an intellect. But I don’t think it matters to them. At least, it appears not to matter to them.

Perhaps CNN’s intellectual Don Lemon could do a segment on this, and host a discussion with a guest from each party. Say, Lori Lightfoot and Ted Cruz. I don’t watch much CNN, but I’d watch that, even if I weren’t in an airport.

And it’s not just Democrat leaders. It’s the movement itself.

Conservatives can read Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, William F. Buckley Jr., or any number of other brilliant thinkers to learn about conservative thought. Meanwhile, the left has, um, Ta-Nehisi Coates? John Cusack? The only real thinker the left has is Karl Marx, and none of them have read him anyway. Which is ok, because he doesn’t make any sense and he died 140 years ago.

But Democrats are the intellectuals, and Republicans are stupid.

Right.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 98 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Buckpasser Member
    Buckpasser
    @Buckpasser

    Stina (View Comment):

    Brian Wyneken (View Comment):
    Sometimes smart peoples’ brains just get all filled up! Well, I’ve told myself that in trying to figure out how some very bright people (of whom I am very fond) can say some of the silliest things when they wander off the familiar path.

    Politics isn’t tied to intellect. Its tied to wisdom. Intellect and wisdom are unrelated.

    Yes. Intelligence is often confused with wisdom.  I prefer wisdom.   There is very little (if any) wisdom in the democrtic party or the left.

     

    Sorry, I’ve been late to the party recently.

    • #91
  2. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):
    If your pastor is pro-BLM, then I think that either your church needs a different pastor, or you need a different church. It is a tough situation.

    Most of my Presbyterian friends are to the left of Bernie Sanders.

    I’m sure there are other types of Presbyterian congregations out there.  But based on my limited experience, they would appear to be rare.  So good luck, Mark.  I hope you can find a home.  Finding a good church is difficult.

    • #92
  3. Freeven Member
    Freeven
    @Freeven

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    Brian Wyneken (View Comment):
    Sometimes smart peoples’ brains just get all filled up! Well, I’ve told myself that in trying to figure out how some very bright people (of whom I am very fond) can say some of the silliest things when they wander off the familiar path.

    Politics isn’t tied to intellect. Its tied to wisdom. Intellect and wisdom are unrelated.

    Yes. Intelligence is often confused with wisdom. I prefer wisdom. There is very little (if any) wisdom in the democrtic party or the left.

    And wisdom cannot exist without humility. There is very little humility on the Left.

    • #93
  4. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Freeven (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    Brian Wyneken (View Comment):
    Sometimes smart peoples’ brains just get all filled up! Well, I’ve told myself that in trying to figure out how some very bright people (of whom I am very fond) can say some of the silliest things when they wander off the familiar path.

    Politics isn’t tied to intellect. Its tied to wisdom. Intellect and wisdom are unrelated.

    Yes. Intelligence is often confused with wisdom. I prefer wisdom. There is very little (if any) wisdom in the democrtic party or the left.

    And wisdom cannot exist without humility. There is very little humility on the Left.

    I always like the definition of “meek” as teachable. The Left is unteachable. 

    • #94
  5. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    DonG (skeptic) (View Comment):

    Two points. (1) Anyone who is informed knows that Leftists always appeal to emotion and “think” with emotion. (2) It is annoying to have people that are obviously ignorant of hard science claiming to be the only “believers” of Science. If you want proof of these items, engage a Leftist and debate and they will instantly go to emotional appeals and name calling.

    Debate club must be very different now from when I was a kid.

    These days, I think it must be clean, freshly pressed clothing and a baseball bat…

    • #95
  6. Rightfromthestart Coolidge
    Rightfromthestart
    @Rightfromthestart

    Limestone Cowboy (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment)

    My conclusion, borne out by decades of history, is that the proximate cause of Democrats saying what they say, and doing what they do, is that they are unintelligent and ignorant. They are systematically and consistently poor abstract/logical thinkers who are, in the bargain, uninformed about history.

    Worse than uninformed. Many think of themselves informed, but in fact they have been systematically misinformed by Howard Zinn and his acolytes over many years. Getting them to understand their own history is more akin to cult deprogramming than to teaching.

    And the misinformation is continually reinforced by daily reading of the Wash Post or NY Times. It endlessly frustrates me to hear conservatives who are still in the bubble quoting those  two rags. 

    • #96
  7. Ray Gunner Coolidge
    Ray Gunner
    @RayGunner

    Dr. Bastiat: With Democrats, if your heart is in the right place, then the details really don’t matter that much.

    “The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”

    -R. Reagan

    • #97
  8. Barry Jones Thatcher
    Barry Jones
    @BarryJones

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Actually, about the Guam thing. My understanding is that Johnson and Robert Wilkins have known each other for decades. When I watched that vid, I saw two old guys sharing some premium guy humor. I still smh when people insist on missing it.

    I’ve done it, and had it done to me. You sit in a serious, productive, almost formal gathering. You look your counterpart in the eye and say something outrageous, and dare him to crack a smile. He has to play it straight. Both of you keep each other’s respect, especially if there’s the prospect of payback. Some people in the room get it. I loved it when I saw two old bureaucrats, substantial and successful guys, having fun in that pretentious hearing.

    So why did Johnson’s office put out a statement that he was taking drugs for an injury or medical treatment and that influenced his behavior? He looks more doped up than usual in the clip…

    • #98
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.