On Losing More Friends

 

On Sunday, there was a large gathering of BLM protesters in my little town of Lynden, WA.  A lot of us who don’t toe that particular line were mildly nervous about how it’d go, but it went fine.  Some counter protesters, Trump supporters and flag wavers, etc.

My daughter, a brash young woman if ever there was one, decided to drive by the protesters with her Keep America Great hat on, and the national anthem playing loudly.  Apparently, this effrontery was much too much for a couple of her “good” friends.  Within minutes she had a text:  “On behalf of [nitwit] and I, you are no longer our friend.  The national anthem is disgusting, and driving past us with your Trump hat on is disgusting.”  Or some such nonsense.

I told our daughter: Good for you for standing up for what you believe in!  I reminded her that standing up for what you believe in will always cost you something.  Unfortunately and often it costs you relationships with friends and family.  She didn’t quite understand why someone would react that way.  She knew her two friends had gone to the BLM rally, and they’d even had discussions on the topic.  But she was not “unfriending” them.  I explained to her: Some people are very fragile in what they believe.  Because they are fragile, they cannot tolerate others not agreeing with them, much less people actively arguing against their views.  I reminded her of a liberal friend of mine.  I said, “We don’t agree on much of anything, politically.  But we are still friends.  We are brothers in Christ, and we know that each other’s view on political matters is the result of our commitment to Christ, each of us in our own way.  We have built a trust in each other that rests on the foundation of Christ.  That supersede’s our political disagreement.  We are both firm enough in our convictions that we can stand to disagree with each other.  And in fact, we value that disagreement because it sharpens both of us.”

I am not troubled by COVID, nor by protesters, nor counter-protestors, nor by police, nor by Joe Biden, nor by Trump.  I AM troubled as I watch our nation divide even more sharply over something which, when you get right down to it, we don’t disagree.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 86 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Shawn Buell, Jeopardy Champ! (View Comment):

    The lack of confidence in their beliefs is what marks the left’s intolerance of dissent.

    Or the lack of depth of thinking.

    • #31
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    brad2971 (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):
    One should almost always punch up at government officials rather than punch down (or laterally) at other protesters with whom one disagrees.

    This is a great point and one we’ve discussed in our home. To whom are these protests directed? At each other? What’s the point. Is someone going to see me in my Trump hat and say “Well, now that I think about it…I see your point”? No. And what good is holding up a sign at me when I drive down the street? Am I going to suddenly say, “Oh, ok. NOW I get it!”? No.

    They should be protesting policies they disagree with.

    But..the BLM folks are here in this little town because they believe us, the residents of said town, to be racists. They’ve flat out said that. “We need to go to Lynden and protest because they are racists.” And the counter protestors are saying “No, we aren’t.” So…it’s like a big “IRL” version of a Facebook argument.

    The audience is the government who sees BLM and thinks “oh! They represent a majority… let’s tax our population for reparations, and continue to defund police!”

    The existence of counter protestors say “not so fast, government… we are not all on board with this thing.”

    And no, I don’t think us turning a blind eye all the time has done us any good.

    Sure, for some toddlers, ignoring works to get them to stop. But assuming that’s the only tactic you may need is foolishness. Some temper tantrums or temperaments need a bit more than ignoring.

    And it is ignoring that has spawned this monster that thinks they are ascendant and are just punishing the lone blasphemers.

    We need more counter protests. Not less.

    I have to ask a question about backlash: Does it come marching down main street with a high-school marching band, or does it come quietly, leaving the rest of society guessing as to intentions? Maybe, just maybe, this would be a good time for conservatives to keep the complaints about BLM to ourselves (on a relative basis) and let things play out.

    I disagree.  Mostly, this is because of all the writings of the anti-communist survivors who say that this totalitarian brainwashing and thought control is designed to to be insidious and incremental, and it has worked in many other countries.

    • #32
  3. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Shawn Buell, Jeopardy Champ! (View Comment):

    The lack of confidence in their beliefs is what marks the left’s intolerance of dissent.

    Did you get your Panamera?

    • #33
  4. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    brad2971 (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):
    One should almost always punch up at government officials rather than punch down (or laterally) at other protesters with whom one disagrees.

    This is a great point and one we’ve discussed in our home. To whom are these protests directed? At each other? What’s the point. Is someone going to see me in my Trump hat and say “Well, now that I think about it…I see your point”? No. And what good is holding up a sign at me when I drive down the street? Am I going to suddenly say, “Oh, ok. NOW I get it!”? No.

    They should be protesting policies they disagree with.

    But..the BLM folks are here in this little town because they believe us, the residents of said town, to be racists. They’ve flat out said that. “We need to go to Lynden and protest because they are racists.” And the counter protestors are saying “No, we aren’t.” So…it’s like a big “IRL” version of a Facebook argument.

    The audience is the government who sees BLM and thinks “oh! They represent a majority… let’s tax our population for reparations, and continue to defund police!”

    The existence of counter protestors say “not so fast, government… we are not all on board with this thing.”

    And no, I don’t think us turning a blind eye all the time has done us any good.

    Sure, for some toddlers, ignoring works to get them to stop. But assuming that’s the only tactic you may need is foolishness. Some temper tantrums or temperaments need a bit more than ignoring.

    And it is ignoring that has spawned this monster that thinks they are ascendant and are just punishing the lone blasphemers.

    We need more counter protests. Not less.

    I have to ask a question about backlash: Does it come marching down main street with a high-school marching band, or does it come quietly, leaving the rest of society guessing as to intentions? Maybe, just maybe, this would be a good time for conservatives to keep the complaints about BLM to ourselves (on a relative basis) and let things play out.

    As long as the “Intellectual Dark Web” of rational liberals continue to speak out against the Forces Of Woke, I wouldn’t completely hate it if “Known Conservatives” toned down the volume a little.  We (presumably) support the continued existence of the IDW, but anything tolerated by KCs is automatically targeted for elimination.  If anything, KCs should be complaining about the IDW in order to give those folk more oxygen!

    This is partly why I like to post complaints about Jordan Peterson’s wholesale dismissal of postmodernism when I contend that his whole philosophy is itself a postmodern one.  If KCs start to complain about Peterson then maybe the Forces Of Woke will start to defend him!

    ;-)

    • #34
  5. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Alinsky’s evil geniusing aside, BLM is unassailable because it is so heavily conflated with blm. The particulars of a given death of a black man at the hands of a white or honorary white man may turn out to show that the death was justified, but there are enough other examples that the narrative will survive. 

    I would like to oppose nonsense, but as the saying goes, you can’t reason someone out of a position they weren’t reasoned into. That goes double for people in groups and triple for zealots. 

    Sometimes it’s worth fighting even if you can’t win, but usually it’s best to save your strength until you can win. 

    • #35
  6. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Flicker (View Comment):

    brad2971 (View Comment):

    I have to ask a question about backlash: Does it come marching down main street with a high-school marching band, or does it come quietly, leaving the rest of society guessing as to intentions? Maybe, just maybe, this would be a good time for conservatives to keep the complaints about BLM to ourselves (on a relative basis) and let things play out.

    I disagree. Mostly, this is because of all the writings of the anti-communist survivors who say that this totalitarian brainwashing and thought control is designed to to be insidious and incremental, and it has worked in many other countries.

    Ah, but anti-communist survivors are not necessarily conservatives, which means when they speak out it much more helpful to lovers of liberty than it is when “Known Conservatives” speak out on the same topic.  We need to find ways to provide as much oxygen as possible for non-conservatives who are speaking out against The Current Moment, without tarring them with the (completely unfair) baggage that comes from being a “Known Conservative”.  For example, I’m not convinced that it’s helpful in the long run when a non-conservative does a Prager University video.

    • #36
  7. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    TBA (View Comment):

    Alinsky’s evil geniusing aside, BLM is unassailable because it is so heavily conflated with blm. The particulars of a given death of a black man at the hands of a white or honorary white man may turn out to show that the death was justified, but there are enough other examples that the narrative will survive.

    I would like to oppose nonsense, but as the saying goes, you can’t reason someone out of a position they weren’t reasoned into. That goes double for people in groups and triple for zealots.

    Sometimes it’s worth fighting even if you can’t win, but usually it’s best to save your strength until you can win.

    Quibble: One must work to gather strength until one can win.  

    • #37
  8. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Spin,

    Great daughter, Great father!

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #38
  9. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    TBA (View Comment):

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):

    “…the national anthem is disgusting.”

    Hmm.

    I’ll bet she has heard it sung hundreds of times in her life, and that thought never occurred to her once. So somebody must have told her that recently, and she just adopts that phrase and attitude without thinking. That sentiment is welcome in the crowd she is running with. Is she a college student? So much for critical thinking.

    There’s nothing particularly “disgusting” about it that comes to mind – just a poem about a battle and a flag, and whether it’s still flying or not.

    I wonder if they told her that the national anthem has been co-opted by the movement and now we sing it as our marching song, would she suddenly find it glorious?

    Akshully,

    And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,
    That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
    A home and a Country should leave us no more?
    Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution.
    No refuge could save the hireling and slave
    From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
    And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
    O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

    While I’m pretty sure that the ‘hireling and slave’ part means American enemies such as the Brits, and not American hirelings and slaves, the very existence of the word is often used for the ‘racism is baked-in’ claim.

    But – fun fact – until the end of the Revolutionary War, Britain owned all the slaves.

    That verse got dropped during World War II, when we were allied with the hirelings and slaves.

    • #39
  10. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    After giving this a lot of thought, I’ve come to the conclusion that we are ripe for the entry of a strong third party, a constitutional party that rejects the anarchy of the left and, at the same time, rejects the kneelers on the right who sit silently by watching the left destroy our cities and corrupt our children with inaccurate revisions of history. One would think the Republicans could fill that role, but it seems many of us prefer to stay above the fray, afraid to wear a MAGA hat or even put a GOP sticker on our cars for fear that it will incur damage at the hands of one of the thugs on the left. By the same token, there must be those silent Democrats who still vote D as their parents did but don’t like the direction it has taken in the last few years. 

    • #40
  11. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    brad2971 (View Comment):

    I have to ask a question about backlash: Does it come marching down main street with a high-school marching band, or does it come quietly, leaving the rest of society guessing as to intentions? Maybe, just maybe, this would be a good time for conservatives to keep the complaints about BLM to ourselves (on a relative basis) and let things play out.

    I disagree. Mostly, this is because of all the writings of the anti-communist survivors who say that this totalitarian brainwashing and thought control is designed to to be insidious and incremental, and it has worked in many other countries.

    Ah, but anti-communist survivors are not necessarily conservatives, which means when they speak out it much more helpful to lovers of liberty than it is when “Known Conservatives” speak out on the same topic. We need to find ways to provide as much oxygen as possible for non-conservatives who are speaking out against The Current Moment, without tarring them with the (completely unfair) baggage that comes from being a “Known Conservative”. For example, I’m not convinced that it’s helpful in the long run when a non-conservative does a Prager University video.

    Sorry to be uninitiated, but I don’t understand your comment.  What’s (or who are) a known conservative?

    • #41
  12. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Percival (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):

    “…the national anthem is disgusting.”

    Hmm.

    I’ll bet she has heard it sung hundreds of times in her life, and that thought never occurred to her once. So somebody must have told her that recently, and she just adopts that phrase and attitude without thinking. That sentiment is welcome in the crowd she is running with. Is she a college student? So much for critical thinking.

    There’s nothing particularly “disgusting” about it that comes to mind – just a poem about a battle and a flag, and whether it’s still flying or not.

    I wonder if they told her that the national anthem has been co-opted by the movement and now we sing it as our marching song, would she suddenly find it glorious?

    Akshully,

    And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,
    That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
    A home and a Country should leave us no more?
    Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution.
    No refuge could save the hireling and slave
    From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
    And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
    O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

    While I’m pretty sure that the ‘hireling and slave’ part means American enemies such as the Brits, and not American hirelings and slaves, the very existence of the word is often used for the ‘racism is baked-in’ claim.

    But – fun fact – until the end of the Revolutionary War, Britain owned all the slaves.

    That verse got dropped during World War II, when we were allied with the hirelings and slaves.

    Define ‘dropped’. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t really feel responsible for the off-verses of a song written almost a quarter of a millennium ago. Nevertheless, there are those who make a Big Biden Deal out of this and I would like to know if the Official Song was Officially Abbreviated or if we just quit singing the verse because it was time to play baseball already. 

    • #42
  13. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    TBA (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):

    “…the national anthem is disgusting.”

    Hmm.

    I’ll bet she has heard it sung hundreds of times in her life, and that thought never occurred to her once. So somebody must have told her that recently, and she just adopts that phrase and attitude without thinking. That sentiment is welcome in the crowd she is running with. Is she a college student? So much for critical thinking.

    There’s nothing particularly “disgusting” about it that comes to mind – just a poem about a battle and a flag, and whether it’s still flying or not.

    I wonder if they told her that the national anthem has been co-opted by the movement and now we sing it as our marching song, would she suddenly find it glorious?

    Akshully,

    And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,
    That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion
    A home and a Country should leave us no more?
    Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution.
    No refuge could save the hireling and slave
    From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,
    And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
    O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

    While I’m pretty sure that the ‘hireling and slave’ part means American enemies such as the Brits, and not American hirelings and slaves, the very existence of the word is often used for the ‘racism is baked-in’ claim.

    But – fun fact – until the end of the Revolutionary War, Britain owned all the slaves.

    That verse got dropped during World War II, when we were allied with the hirelings and slaves.

    Define ‘dropped’. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t really feel responsible for the off-verses of a song written almost a quarter of a millennium ago. Nevertheless, there are those who make a Big Biden Deal out of this and I would like to know if the Official Song was Officially Abbreviated or if we just quit singing the verse because it was time to play baseball already.

    Newspapers used to publish the lyrics every Fourth of July, but the third verse was dropped. I heard that this was due to some act of Congress, but now can’t find a cite.

    • #43
  14. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Another thought: I’ve found that I’ve reconnected with people I had written off long ago because it turns out that they’re just as disturbed by The Current Moment as I am, if not more so!  Heck, I often find I’m the one bringing up moderate counterpoints to poorly-reasoned anti-SJW hyperbole.

    Daughter’s dilemma is that she’s still young and she hasn’t yet lost touch with old friends who will come to their senses after they’ve aged a bit.

    • #44
  15. David Foster Member
    David Foster
    @DavidFoster

    There have always been quite a few teenagers who will drop a friend because he/she wears the wrong brand of clothes, or listens to the wrong kind of music, or whatever.  A lot of the political behavior is the same sort of thing, people attempting to be members of an in-group which putting down members of the out-group.  Milan Kundera called it ‘circle dancing.’

    And yes, as someone pointed out above, this sort of thing is generally harder on girls than on boys.

     

    • #45
  16. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    It’s hard to maintain a friendship with someone perceived to be a threat.

    For better or worse, this is how I’ve come to see those on the political left — including my own friends and acquaintances. Most, yes, aren’t bomb-throwing radicals. But does it really matter? They’ll yield to the bomb-throwing radicals in every possible circumstance, so what difference does it make? Useful idiots are still idiots. Useful idiots are the magic ingredient in the totalitarian stew.

    I’ve grown up around these people. I went to school with them. The thought of being governed by them fills me with unalloyed terror. But I will be governed by them. I’m 24. Unlike some of you lucky Ricochetti — you who came of age in optimistic times — I’ll have to live in the hell my own generation is creating (or worsening, if you accept the anti-Boomer thesis).

    Add me to the ever-growing list of twenty-something sad sacks who believe the American dream is dead. Why would I want to befriend the very people who killed it?

    • #46
  17. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Kephalithos (View Comment):
    Unlike some of you lucky Ricochetti — you who came of age in optimistic times — I’ll have to live in the hell my own generation is creating (or worsening, if you accept the anti-Boomer thesis).

    Nobody sees their own time as being particularly optimistic at the time.  It only seems that way in hindsight.  Take it from somebody who came of age in the time of grunge, Nine Inch Nails, Marilyn Manson, Rodney King, OJ Simpson, anti-globalization protests, Adbusters Magazine, peak Noam Chomsky, peak Michael Moore, etc.

    If history repeats itself, thirty years from now you’ll almost certainly be told by a member of that era’s youth that you were lucky to come of age in such an optimistic era.

     

    • #47
  18. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment): Nobody sees their own time as being particularly optimistic at the time. It only seems that way in hindsight. Take it from somebody who came of age in the time of grunge, Nine Inch Nails, Marilyn Manson, Rodney King, OJ Simpson, anti-globalization protests, Adbusters Magazine, peak Noam Chomsky, peak Michael Moore, etc.

    Hmm. You’ve proven that I belong to the second generation to channel most of its talents into wallowing in misery.

    Maybe wallowing in misery is an inevitable feature of generations born after the communication revolution of the mid-twentieth century.

    • #48
  19. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):  If history repeats itself, thirty years from now you’ll almost certainly be told by a member of that era’s youth that you were lucky to come of age in such an optimistic era.

    Oh, sure. But things really will be that much worse.

    • #49
  20. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment): Nobody sees their own time as being particularly optimistic at the time. It only seems that way in hindsight. Take it from somebody who came of age in the time of grunge, Nine Inch Nails, Marilyn Manson, Rodney King, OJ Simpson, anti-globalization protests, Adbusters Magazine, peak Noam Chomsky, peak Michael Moore, etc.

    Hmm. You’ve proven that I belong to the second generation to channel most of its talents into wallowing in misery.

    Maybe wallowing in misery is an inevitable feature of generations born after the communication revolution of the mid-twentieth century.

    Not even close.  I grew up thinking the 1960s were a time of great optimism, but they also had  seemingly endless race riots, the assassination of a beloved president, the assassination of a beloved presidential candidate, the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr, constant fear of nuclear war, literally thousands of domestic terrorist bombings, etc.

    The 1970s generation looked at the 1950s as a time of optimism, but in the 1950s they had the Beatniks, the Korean War, juvenile delinquency, McCarthyism, Cold War paranoia, etc.

    Read all the hip authors from the 1920s.  Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Waugh, etc.  It was all self-pity and lamentations about the rotten state of the world, and that was during a massive economic boom!

    I don’t think anybody looks back at the 1970s as a time of optimism, so that generation may be forgiven for wallowing in self-pity, but they’re the ones who got rich in the 1980s!

    Oh, the 1980s. What an optimistic time!  The Day After.  Amerika .  Airliner hijackings and airliner bombings.  The crack epidemic.  AIDS.  The Ethiopian famine.  Such optimism!

    The generation with the most right to complain is the one that had to endure BOTH the Great Depression AND World War Two.  They’re the ones who really got shafted.

    • #50
  21. David Foster Member
    David Foster
    @DavidFoster

    Relevant: my post Conformity, Cruelty, and Political Activism 

     

    • #51
  22. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    It’s hard to maintain a friendship with someone perceived to be a threat.

    For better or worse, this is how I’ve come to see those on the political left — including my own friends and acquaintances. Most, yes, aren’t bomb-throwing radicals. But does it really matter? They’ll yield to the bomb-throwing radicals in every possible circumstance, so what difference does it make? Useful idiots are still idiots. Useful idiots are the magic ingredient in the totalitarian stew.

    I’ve grown up around these people. I went to school with them. The thought of being governed by them fills me with unalloyed terror. But I will be governed by them. I’m 24. Unlike some of you lucky Ricochetti — you who came of age in optimistic times — I’ll have to live in the hell my own generation is creating (or worsening, if you accept the anti-Boomer thesis).

    Add me to the ever-growing list of twenty-something sad sacks who believe the American dream is dead. Why would I want to befriend the very people who killed it?

    In fifth grade, I think it was, our teacher asked the class: Would you prefer to have been raised a prince and then to become a commoner, or never to have been a prince at all and never know what you had lost?

    I couldn’t answer that question then, and I still can’t answer it now.  But at the time, I felt that memory of once-greatness would assuage the loss.  But now I wonder if the loss of what once was is perhaps the greater sorrow.

    • #52
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    brad2971 (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    brad2971 (View Comment):

     

    I have to ask a question about backlash: Does it come marching down main street with a high-school marching band, or does it come quietly, leaving the rest of society guessing as to intentions? Maybe, just maybe, this would be a good time for conservatives to keep the complaints about BLM to ourselves (on a relative basis) and let things play out.

    I have a pretty good sense of how things would play out if conservatives did that. I’m trying to think of an instance where “keeping to ourselves” has solved anything.

     

    While I would readily admit that backlash doesn’t often lend itself to solutions, I would submit that trying to solve this George Floyd/statue/BLM protest thing right now would cause quite a few more issues.

    Maybe a bit more specificity as to those issues would help. As I see it, the more entrenched the narrative becomes, the more difficult it is to supplant at a later date. Except for the generic statement that black lives matter, there is very little about BLM with which I agree.

    The problem being, of course, that they don’t actually believe it.

    • #53
  24. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    After giving this a lot of thought, I’ve come to the conclusion that we are ripe for the entry of a strong third party, a constitutional party that rejects the anarchy of the left and, at the same time, rejects the kneelers on the right who sit silently by watching the left destroy our cities and corrupt our children with inaccurate revisions of history. One would think the Republicans could fill that role, but it seems many of us prefer to stay above the fray, afraid to wear a MAGA hat or even put a GOP sticker on our cars for fear that it will incur damage at the hands of one of the thugs on the left. By the same token, there must be those silent Democrats who still vote D as their parents did but don’t like the direction it has taken in the last few years.

    If a lot of them vote Trump this year instead of Biden, that would help.

    • #54
  25. MISTER BITCOIN Inactive
    MISTER BITCOIN
    @MISTERBITCOIN

    some of my friends refuse to talk about BLM.

    I told them to go the BLM website and read their mission statement.

     

    • #55
  26. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    some of my friends refuse to talk about BLM.

    I told them to go the BLM website and read their mission statement.

     

    Spin’s daughter’s ex-friends should do the same.

    • #56
  27. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    some of my friends refuse to talk about BLM.

    I told them to go the BLM website and read their mission statement.

     

    Spin’s daughter’s ex-friends should do the same.

    They may have fixed it by now. 

    • #57
  28. Anamcara Inactive
    Anamcara
    @Anamcara

    I firmly believe that countering  propaganda is the most pressing issue today. Think of the empire of influence pushers  aimed at us and our kids today:  the mainstream media, social media, TV programs, corporation policies,teachers’ unions, newspapers, all spew left propaganda. Communism  for Kids is #22 in Amazon’s books for children. Not to mention all the dystopian young adult books. I recently said to a teen grand niece that I thought a picture was beautiful. She responded with great authority, “There is no beauty!” I also understand that the 1619 curriculum is going into 3000 school districts across the country.

    I often wonder what Hitler would have accomplished if he had all the propaganda outlets available to him that we have today. He curtailed free speech and then we all know \what he was able to pull off with schools, radio, film and newspapers. Would there even be one Jew alive today? I don’t know.

    Is it a luxury to debate if we should push back? I think it is, but don’t look to me for suggestions on how. I sit here half-blind in my wheelchair and, though I do feel the necessity to act, I don’t know what to do.  Oh… except one thing: vote for Trump.

    • #58
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Anamcara (View Comment):

    I firmly believe that countering propaganda is the most pressing issue today. Think of the empire of influence pushers aimed at us and our kids today: the mainstream media, social media, TV programs, corporation policies,teachers’ unions, newspapers, all spew left propaganda. Communism for Kids is #22 in Amazon’s books for children. Not to mention all the dystopian young adult books. I recently said to a teen grand niece that I thought a picture was beautiful. She responded with great authority, “There is no beauty!” I also understand that the 1619 curriculum is going into 3000 school districts across the country.

    I often wonder what Hitler would have accomplished if he had all the propaganda outlets available to him that we have today. He curtailed free speech and then we all know \what he was able to pull off with schools, radio, film and newspapers. Would there even be one Jew alive today? I don’t know.

    Is it a luxury to debate if we should push back? I think it is, but don’t look to me for suggestions on how. I sit here half-blind in my wheelchair and, though I do feel the necessity to act, I don’t know what to do. Oh… except one thing: vote for Trump.

    The one thing that Gary Robbins and many others, will not do.

    • #59
  30. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Anamcara (View Comment):

    I firmly believe that countering propaganda is the most pressing issue today. Think of the empire of influence pushers aimed at us and our kids today: the mainstream media, social media, TV programs, corporation policies,teachers’ unions, newspapers, all spew left propaganda. Communism for Kids is #22 in Amazon’s books for children. Not to mention all the dystopian young adult books. I recently said to a teen grand niece that I thought a picture was beautiful. She responded with great authority, “There is no beauty!” I also understand that the 1619 curriculum is going into 3000 school districts across the country.

    I often wonder what Hitler would have accomplished if he had all the propaganda outlets available to him that we have today. He curtailed free speech and then we all know \what he was able to pull off with schools, radio, film and newspapers. Would there even be one Jew alive today? I don’t know.

    Is it a luxury to debate if we should push back? I think it is, but don’t look to me for suggestions on how. I sit here half-blind in my wheelchair and, though I do feel the necessity to act, I don’t know what to do. Oh… except one thing: vote for Trump.

    The Germans made a good movie about this.

     

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.