#NeverBernie, or What I Saw in Las Vegas

 

I believe that Bernie Sanders poses an existential danger to our Republic, so is it incumbent on me to do all that I can to stop him. To that end, after leaving work on Friday, I drove 250+ miles to Las Vegas. Once I arrived, I googled “Nevada Biden Office” and drove to the nearest office, arriving at 9:16 p.m. after they had finished their last class.

I spoke to the staffer asking how I could help. She gave me a crash course on how to be a “Precinct Captain.” I learned more about the byzantine nine-step caucus procedures that probably 99% of people who have not been in a caucus know about. It was mind-numbing. I was then given a bag with written instructions, a t-shirt with “Biden Precinct Captain” emblazoned on it inside an outline of Nevada, and a huge four-inch button with Joe’s smiling face and “Biden Precinct Captain” on it. Ah, the swag! I then went to Walmart to get a battery pack to supplement my iPhone. The first hotel I went to was sold out. I finally tumbled into bed just before 1 a.m. I set my alarm to get up at 5 a.m. given that I had a 6:45 a.m. meeting to go to.

I woke up at 4:58 a.m. Was I tired? Sure. But I was energized. I zoomed over to “The Strat” (formerly known as “The Stratosphere”) and went to their Starbucks to meet with other “out of town” team members. I was 15 minutes early. I followed the Jack Reacher maxim to never miss a chance to eat, so I got oatmeal and a Danish. (I was surprised to discover that unlike any other Starbucks I have ever gone to, this Starbucks charged for soymilk for my oatmeal. The server noted “I am on camera” as she apologized.)

We had a great crew of people, several from Arizona and California who had driven in and one man who had flown in from New York! Then we were sent off to another Biden Headquarters to receive more last-minute instructions. While there, I picked up more tee-shirts. Then I was off to Desert Oasis High School in Enterprise, Nevada. Since I was running early, I followed the Jack Reacher maxim and stopped at Denny’s to fuel up.

I got to Desert Oasis High School before 9:30 a.m. This was the time for the campaign staff to check-in. Since I was out of state, I was given an orange armband designating that I was an “observer” and could not talk once the caucus started. The Bernie campaign had the most volunteers, followed by Pete, Joe, Amy, Steyer, and Warren. All of the volunteers were respectful and friendly. The most common statement by a volunteer for Campaign A to a volunteer for Campaign B was to praise the strong points of the other candidate. (Note: I did not strike up any conversations with anyone from the Bernie campaign, as I have nothing positive to say about him.) At 10:00 a.m. the doors were opened to the voters. The place was packed. There were massive lines some 20 deep. But there was no complaining. Of note, some of the early voting sites had had waits of up to four hours, so this was seen as a better option. By far, the most popular person in the cavernous hallway was a member of the Nevada Assembly who was there to hand out free water bottles to her constituents. Smart lady.

I was given the list of people from my precinct who were “1’s” and “2’s” and was told to call them. I left voice-mail messages and a couple of messages with people who relay to the voters. I got two voters. One said that she had a family emergency and could not come. The other one, Valerie, said that that she would be seeing me at the Middle School. “Oh no, they have combined precincts, we will be at Desert Oasis High School.” “Thank you, dear, I would have gone to the middle school, and then would have gone home. How will I recognize you?” “I am a 67-year-old bald man.” “I will look forward to visiting with you.” More about Valerie later.

At noon, they stopped accepting voters. The toughest job in the room was to be designated as a “stopper,” the person who would stand at the end of the line and not allow anyone else into the line.

I stood behind where people were checking in and offered them “Team Joe” stickers. Next to me was a nice lady who was begging people to consider Amy as their second choice.

Despite the long lines, people were of good cheer and chatted to each other. My precinct area started to slowly fill up. I mentioned that since I was out of state, once the caucus began, I would not speak once the caucus got going. I asked if any Biden voters would be willing to serve as “Biden Precinct Co-Captains” noting that they would get a cool t-shirt like mine and a huge four-inch button. Two women volunteered and I gave them their swag.

I was walking by an elderly black woman with a cane. She said “Gary?” My response was “You must be Valerie! I am so happy to see you!”

We finally got started at 1:20 p.m. We had 19 voters, and observers from the Biden, Sanders, and Klobuchar campaigns. (The three observers and the Precinct Chair had all parachuted in from out-of-state.) We then started this intricate process. First, we elected our Precinct Chair. Then she asked for someone who had clear handwriting to serve as our Precinct Secretary. Two different people counted the 19 voters present. Okay. Please raise your hand if you are voting for Biden. Six hands went up. The Chair saw that Valerie had a cane, so she asked that Biden voters all cluster around her. The original alignment of people present was as follows:

  • 6 Biden
  • 5 Buttigieg
  • 3 Sanders
  • 5 Warren

I was thrilled. Sanders had only three people. Ha, ha, ha.

The next step was the great reveal of what the “early votes” were. Ugh. They were as follows:

  • 1 Bennet
  • 4 Biden
  • 5 Buttigieg
  • 25 Sanders
  • 4 Steyer
  • 2 Warren
  • 1 Yang

Ugh. 25 for Sanders! Yikes! Adding the numbers together we had:

  • 1 Bennet
  • 10 Biden
  • 10 Buttigieg
  • 28 Sanders
  • 4 Steyer
  • 7 Warren
  • 1 Yang

The total number of people was 63. 15% of 63 is 9.45 people. Rounding up would be 10 people. Biden and Buttigieg were barely viable. Warren was not. The five Warren voters were crest-fallen. They were such a committed earnest group. I felt sorry for them (but not sorry for Warren as she is almost as bad as Bernie). I turned to Valerie. “You made the difference. If you hadn’t been here, we would not be viable.” She smiled back at me.

The early voters had to designate their first three to five choices on their early votes, so those votes were reassigned as follows to the three viable candidates:

  • 6 Biden
  • 10 Buttigieg
  • 27 Sanders

Then the poor five Warren supporters were given a harsh choice. They could join the Biden, Buttigieg, or Sanders groups. Or they could leave. The five crushed Warren supporters consoled each other. They were heartbroken. They did not understand how anyone could not see the obvious merits of Warren. The Chair said that each of the five would need to make their own decision. The three remaining groups were each given one minute to make a pitch to the forlorn Warren supporters. The Sanders voter said “Elizabeth was my second choice. Please join us.” I forget what the Buttigieg voter said. The Biden voters turned to me to speak. I said that I couldn’t speak as I was not a Nevada voter. One of my appointed “Co-Captains” then stood up and said that Biden had the best chance of beating Trump. People started joking about washing a Warren voter’s car if they would join their group.

Biden got only one of the five Warren voters, and Buttigieg and Sanders each got two of the Warren voters.

The final result adding the early votes and the voters in the room was:

  • 13 Biden
  • 17 Buttigieg
  • 32 Sanders

We had nine delegates to send to the County Convention. There were 62 votes altogether. (One of the early voters did not include Biden, Buttigieg or Warren, so their vote didn’t count.)

Here’s how the math went:

  • Biden: 13 X 9 / 62 = 1.8571 delegates
  • Buttigieg: 17 X 9 / 62 = 2.4286 delegates
  • Sanders: 32 X 9 / 62 = 4.5714 delegates

Using the first round of rounding this ended up with

  • Biden: 2 delegates
  • Buttigieg: 2 delegates
  • Sanders: 5 delegates

Since we were assigned nine delegates, this all worked out.

However, there are terribly complicated rules as to how to round up if this had resulted in eight delegates or round down if there were 10 delegates. If those rules ended in a tie, then we entered the world of chance. In Iowa, they flipped coins. But this was Nevada. They would draw cards, with an Ace being high and a Two being low. If they had the same number, then they went by suits, with Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, and Clubs in that order. Thank goodness we didn’t get to that level of detail. (This is not unlike the NFL where one year under Tom Landry where the Cowboys had to beat the Redskins by at least 15 points in the final week of the season to get past the eighth or so tie-breaker. What a mess.)

The final step was to elect delegates to the County Convention. The three people who had made pitches to the Warren delegates all decided that they wanted to go to the County Convention. I assume that the other delegates will be filled in by their campaigns in the future.

The observers took pictures of the worksheet and texted it to our headquarters. At 2:50 p.m. we were done.

I got back on the road to Flagstaff. I was dead tired. I had resolved to stop driving long distances at night in the last year. But heck, Flagstaff was only 250 miles away. I zoomed along the interstate. I noticed that I had a sore throat coming on. It began to rain. The sky grew dark. And I persisted. When I arrived in Kingman, I decided to drive through town. I then noticed blue and red lights wig-wagging behind me. I pulled over. The officer came up to me.

“Do you know why I stopped you?”

“No.”

“Do you notice that it is raining?”

“Yes.”

“Do you notice that it is twilight?”

“Yes.”

“What would that suggest to you?”

I paused and could not think of the answer. Then, “Oh, I should turn on my lights.”

“Yes. I flashed my brights at you twice, but you ignored me. Are you almost home?”

“No, I live in Flagstaff [150 miles away].”

“You might want to get a room to stay the night as you appear to be exhausted. I don’t want to scrape your body off of the pavement.”

I took this as good advice. When I was in my 20s I would be in a seminar in LA until 2 a.m. and then drive 400 miles to get home. Driving 150 miles is a piece of cake. But I am now 67 years old. I got a room, and then treated myself to a nice dinner. I went to bed at 9. I slept for 11 hours.

A final thought. Caucuses may have made sense 100 years ago when people needed focus groups to come to decisions. But they appear to be hugely ineffective and inefficient. My heart went out to Valerie who was exhausted by the process. I hope that we have seen the last caucuses in America. They are a relic that needs to be retired.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 311 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Sisyphus (View Comment):
    Or he was just tired. I was tired once, and I’m not as old as Biden. And he has doubtless said that line a million times in more appropriate contexts.

    Sorry. It’s more then just tired.

    Doesn’t look tired here.

     

    He’s an idiot.

    • #121
  2. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I have not voted for a Democrat for President since 1972. On the other hand, I have voted third party three times.

    This is a fascinating tidbit on our Reagan Republican™. We know you voted against Trump.

    That would mean you didn’t vote for 2 of Ford, Reagan, Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain or Romney.

    Personally I’ve been voting since 1976 and have never failed to vote for the Republican since then.

    Yeah, it is fascinating. I voted third party 3 times in the same period, and I’ll bet my 3rd party years don’t match Gary’s. 

    • #122
  3. Suspira Member
    Suspira
    @Suspira

    Gary Robbins: Of note, some of the early voting sites had had waits of up to four hours, so this was seen as a better option.

    I truly don’t understand the caucus process. A caucus is a meeting. “Early voting” should not be part of it.

    • #123
  4. Penfold Member
    Penfold
    @Penfold

    Are you practicing your salutations by inserting “comrade” in everything? Never too early to start if we’re going to survive the purges

    • #124
  5. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    TBA (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

     

    You may be right. On the other hand, if Bernie wins, it will be a very dark day for our Republic.

    Keep in mind Gary, if Trump wins, then we’re going to get Trump JR in 2024 guaranteed. Bernie’s followers otoh want action, not just a Twitter warrior. When he’s actually elected, and gets nothing done and the government is shutting down every 4 months and ISIS runs wild and he has no major media defenders……his incompetence will be fully owned by the Left. So, I’d hold off on NeverBernie. Play the long game.

    The prospect of DJTJ in 2024 is reason enough to vote against Trump and to stop the Trumpization of the Republican Party.

    OK, this is just silly – like a lame SF movie where you goes back in time to kill Hitler’s father in order to prevent the Holocaust.

    The corollary to this are the #NeverTrump people who are willing to concede that America and the world aren’t the dystopian seventh circle of hell  nightmare they said it would be if Trump was elected president …. but that’s only because Trump has had to worry about re-election. A President Trump unencumbered by the fear of facing the voters after this year would unleash in 2021 everything we said he would unleash in 2017.

    Whether it’s that, or Trump demanding in 2024 that Don Jr., Jared or Ivanka be his successor, you can always come up with future hypotheticals on why you can’t vote for Trump. The difference between 2020 and 2016 is the hypothetical worse-case scenarios four years ago were based on Trump never having held office before, while any future projections this year are done with him having a three-plus year record in office. For the most part, the ones continuing to oppose Trump today do it more on decorum than on policy grounds, unless you’re in the Max Boot camp and have completely repudiated your past ideological positions.

    • #125
  6. rgbact Inactive
    rgbact
    @romanblichar

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    Ivanka will crush junior in the primaries. She’s the brains of that outfit

    And thats why she has no chance.

    But if a bunch of Trumpers discussing which Trump kid will beat the other in the 2024 primaries isn’t enough to scare you clear of NeverBernie, IDK what will. Long game. The Trump kids are all young. They need to be crushed right now. Thats a far bigger problem than an old incompetent socialist.

    • #126
  7. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Someone said what I am really afraid of; that after Trump, we would have DJTJ, Donald Trump, Jr. in 2024.

    I am against political dynasties. So Donald Jr would presumptively lose my vote in the primary – BUT depending on the other entrants he could earn it.

    Are you holding the sins of the father against the son, Gary? Has DJTJ cheated on his wife with a stripper or have you caught him in a lie?

    Because he seems like a pretty good guy to me.

    • #127
  8. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Kozak (View Comment):
    Melania gets a turn first.

    Nah, she is not a natural born citizen

    • #128
  9. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    … Trump would destroy America as we know it, gut the conservative movement if elected.

    That’s it right there. The Flight 93 perception was that the destruction was already proceeding and might even have reached the tipping point already. The # perception was that the USA would survive Obama’s “3rd term under Hillary (and maybe the 4th and beyond)  but Trump wasn’t survivable.

    Granted, past prognostications are no proof of future performance.

    Gut, remake. Potato potahto. I’ll have a baked potahto with butter, please.

    • #129
  10. DrewInWisconsin, Influencer Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer
    @DrewInWisconsin

    rgbact (View Comment):

    But if a bunch of Trumpers discussing which Trump kid will beat the other in the 2024 primaries isn’t enough to scare you clear of NeverBernie, IDK what will. Long game. The Trump kids are all young. They need to be crushed right now.

    Or you need to calm down and stop being hysterically paranoid.

    Or trying to frighten poor Gary.

    • #130
  11. Norm McDonald Inactive
    Norm McDonald
    @Pseudodionysius

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Meanwhile, in the world of professional punditeers in support of Biden, we basically have a “Help me, Obama-wan, you’re my only hope” moment:

    If nothing else, he’s not going down without a fight before he finally has to try to explain why he’s endorsing Bernie for conservative reasons…..

    Bill Kristol is stuck with JPod baying at the Moons of Naboo. 

    “Hold me, Anakin.”

    • #131
  12. Norm McDonald Inactive
    Norm McDonald
    @Pseudodionysius

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    But if a bunch of Trumpers discussing which Trump kid will beat the other in the 2024 primaries isn’t enough to scare you clear of NeverBernie, IDK what will. Long game. The Trump kids are all young. They need to be crushed right now.

    Or you need to calm down and stop being hysterically paranoid.

    Or trying to frighten poor Gary.

    Perhaps tell him its The Boys from Brazil and he’ll have nightmares of Barron Trump clones everywhere.

    • #132
  13. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope.  Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.  [Edit.  According to Wikipedia, Reagan won 98.78% of the Republican Primary vote in 1984.]

    • #133
  14. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I have not voted for a Democrat for President since 1972. On the other hand, I have voted third party three times.

    This is a fascinating tidbit on our Reagan Republican™. We know you voted against Trump.

    That would mean you didn’t vote for 2 of Ford, Reagan, Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain or Romney.

    Personally I’ve been voting since 1976 and have never failed to vote for the Republican since then.

    Yeah, it is fascinating. I voted third party 3 times in the same period, and I’ll bet my 3rd party years don’t match Gary’s.

    1976, 1992 and 2016.

    • #134
  15. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    Not percentage; number of voters who turned out to vote for him.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_New_Hampshire_Republican_primary

    Somehow the word, “incorrigible” keeps coming to mind on these voting stats. 

    • #135
  16. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I have not voted for a Democrat for President since 1972. On the other hand, I have voted third party three times.

    This is a fascinating tidbit on our Reagan Republican™. We know you voted against Trump.

    That would mean you didn’t vote for 2 of Ford, Reagan, Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain or Romney.

    Personally I’ve been voting since 1976 and have never failed to vote for the Republican since then.

    Yeah, it is fascinating. I voted third party 3 times in the same period, and I’ll bet my 3rd party years don’t match Gary’s.

    1976, 1992 and 2016.

    I did 2000, 2004, and 2008. I regret having voted Republican in 2012. I wouldn’t have voted for Perot in 1992, but voted for the Republican only because I was doing a lot of volunteer work for a Republican congressional challenger and it was kind of a package deal. 

    • #136
  17. rgbact Inactive
    rgbact
    @romanblichar

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    Not percentage; number of voters who turned out to vote for him.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_New_Hampshire_Republican_primary

    Somehow the word, “incorrigible” keeps coming to mind on these voting stats.

    Congrats. Trump beat George HW Bush’s record vote in NH, and all he needed was a rally the night before. I’m sure Bush 41 was really proud of his old record.

    • #137
  18. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I have not voted for a Democrat for President since 1972. On the other hand, I have voted third party three times.

    This is a fascinating tidbit on our Reagan Republican™. We know you voted against Trump.

    That would mean you didn’t vote for 2 of Ford, Reagan, Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain or Romney.

    Personally I’ve been voting since 1976 and have never failed to vote for the Republican since then.

    Yeah, it is fascinating. I voted third party 3 times in the same period, and I’ll bet my 3rd party years don’t match Gary’s.

    1976, 1992 and 2016.

    I did 2000, 2004, and 2008. I regret having voted Republican in 2012. I wouldn’t have voted for Perot in 1992, but voted for the Republican only because I was doing a lot of volunteer work for a Republican congressional challenger and it was kind of a package deal.

    I voted Libertarian in 1976.  I don’t remember a lot about that vote.  I was migrating from McGovern in 1972 to Reagan in 1980.

    I actually didn’t vote for Perot in 1992, but I voted Libertarian again, as I felt that HW had betrayed Reagan by raising taxes.  I regret that vote.  I wish that I had voted for HW.

    I voted for McMullian in 2016 and I was the Coconino County contact person for McMullian.  I am very proud of that vote, and that we got nine-tenths of one percent which is huge as a “write-in.”

    • #138
  19. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    Wasn’t asking about the national vote, Gary – he was asking about the NH Primary and the answer is that Trump received approximately 2x the votes for Reagan in 1984.

    President Trump by far has the most votes for an incumbent president in the history of NH primaries. 

    Although Reagan received 1/2 as many votes as President Trump he does have the highest percentage, 86% and change compared to 85% and change for President Trump.

    • #139
  20. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    Not percentage; number of voters who turned out to vote for him.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_New_Hampshire_Republican_primary

    Somehow the word, “incorrigible” keeps coming to mind on these voting stats.

    Congrats. Trump beat George HW Bush’s record vote in NH, and all he needed was a rally the night before. I’m sure Bush 41 was really proud of his old record.

    I don’t think that any States shuttered their primaries in 1992, 1980, and 1976 when incumbent presidents faced primary challenges. That was before our brave new world under Trump.

    • #140
  21. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I don’t think that any States shuttered their primaries in 1992, 1980, and 1976 when incumbent presidents faced primary challenges. That was before our brave new world under Trump.

    You are going to need to back that up, hoss – it has happened many times before. You just weren’t so monomaniacal before.

    • #141
  22. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    I think he was referring to raw vote count, not percentage margin of victory.

    And only fascists and totalitarian dictators win elections with 98% of the vote.

    • #142
  23. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    Not percentage; number of voters who turned out to vote for him.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_New_Hampshire_Republican_primary

    Somehow the word, “incorrigible” keeps coming to mind on these voting stats.

    Congrats. Trump beat George HW Bush’s record vote in NH, and all he needed was a rally the night before. I’m sure Bush 41 was really proud of his old record.

    No offense, colorful one, but I have to note the common slitheriness of the left-mind. The lefty can never be in the wrong. Even a simple correction on a trivial factual matter, vote counts here, must be countered with deflection: ignore the fact and even the debate; instead cloud the issue by claiming the vote count was … what, impure? insignificant? I can’t tell, because another leftist debate technique has taken precedence – cover one’s mistakes with sarcasm and snark.

    • #143
  24. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    Of the Electoral College votes, sure.

    Popular vote was 58%

    • #144
  25. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I have not voted for a Democrat for President since 1972. On the other hand, I have voted third party three times.

    This is a fascinating tidbit on our Reagan Republican™. We know you voted against Trump.

    That would mean you didn’t vote for 2 of Ford, Reagan, Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain or Romney.

    Personally I’ve been voting since 1976 and have never failed to vote for the Republican since then.

    Yeah, it is fascinating. I voted third party 3 times in the same period, and I’ll bet my 3rd party years don’t match Gary’s.

    1976, 1992 and 2016.

    So you have already helped elect Carter and Clinton. Reagan Republican™ for sure.

    • #145
  26. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    There are so many things that are wrong with Biden. But, he is not an avowed Socialist, and Bernie is. There is a mountain of animosity against Trump. We lost the House in 2018. Bernie could win. Biden and Bloomberg would be far preferable to Bernie, that’s all.

    Biden is senile and is showing it all the time.  I am not surprised that a NeverTrumper could confuse the facts so badly.  Mike Bloomberg, while you were volunteering for Biden, admitted that he “bought the House” in the debate. It is more plausible to me that the failure of the GOP House to support the Trump agenda and the  resignations of corrupt GOP members to begin their lobbying careers early had more to do with the loss of the majority than any actions by Trump.  Your “mountain of animosity against Trump” is mostly in your head.

    • #146
  27. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Um, Trump was only at 91% in the New Hampshire Primary,

    LOL. Only 91%

    Didn’t he set a record for votes cast for an incumbent?

    Nope. Nationally, Reagan won 98.9% in 1984.

    I think he was referring to raw vote count, not percentage margin of victory.

    And only fascists and totalitarian dictators win elections with 98% of the vote.

    According to Wikipedia, Reagan won 98.78% of the primary vote in 1984.

    Reagan led by attraction, not by attacking everyone who disagreed with him.  Reagan was comfortable in his own skin.  To quote a phrase from George Bernard Shaw, Reagan was not a “feverish and selfish clod of ailments and grievances, complaining that the world will not devote itself to make him happy.”

    Ronald Reagan was the Greatest President of the Twentieth Century.

    • #147
  28. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I am reserving judgment. If there is a 3rd Party Romney-Flake ticket, I would likely vote for it. Remember, in 1912, the incumbent Republican President came in third. That could happen again.

    I hope you remember what followed. The Fascist regime of Wilson which got us into WWI among other things.

    • #148
  29. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    minimal content in conversation

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Nohaaj (View Comment):

    When Bernie steps down, most likely after Super Tuesday, what is your contingency plan? And, thank you for the detailed first hand account of your caucus experience.

    I doubt that Bernie will step down after Super Tuesday. 528 does a couple of projections every day. Right now, the odds are as follows:

    Sanders 44%

    No one (contested convention) 42%

    Biden 10%

    Bloomberg 4%

    Warren .3%

    Buttigieg .1%

    See https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primary-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

    I’m thinking the poster probably meant “When Biden steps down,”?

    If Biden steps down, then only Mike Bloomberg can take Bernie out.

    I can see Hillary, Liz, or Amy Suiciding Bernie. Bernie could even die of natural causes.

    Which is why Elizabeth Warren,  at least as dangerous as Bernie, is angling for VP now.

    • #149
  30. rgbact Inactive
    rgbact
    @romanblichar

     

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    I am reserving judgment. If there is a 3rd Party Romney-Flake ticket, I would likely vote for it. Remember, in 1912, the incumbent Republican President came in third. That could happen again.

    What would you do if Bloomberg runs as independent? Has he committed to supporting Sanders? Seems very unlikely. He certainly has the money. I think thats the only viable 3rd party option.

    • #150
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.