Family Matters

 

This past Friday I was struck with a sense of loss and poignancy as I sat with a hospice patient to provide respite for her caretaker. The three hours I spent with her watching an old TV show from the 1980s and 1990s reminded me of how far we’ve come and how far we’ve fallen as a society.

* * *

Since the patient had moments of alertness in her bed, I didn’t want to change the channel. On the TV was an old show called Family Matters, a sitcom that had been extremely popular. I’d never watched it myself, so I was curious about the show. As we watched the show together, I realized I was witnessing a vignette of the black middle class in suburban Chicago, a community that is often overlooked.

As Larry Elder pointed out in this article, blacks were well on their way to becoming members of the middle class long before the 1960s:

Black economic progress increased tremendously, says economist Thomas Sowell, well before so-called ‘level the playing field’ government policies and programs. In fact, on this 40th anniversary of Lyndon Johnson’s ‘War on Poverty,’ Sowell says the income gap between blacks and whites closed faster ‘pre-war’ than ‘post-war.’ ‘The economic rise of blacks began decades earlier,’ Sowell stated, ‘before any of the legislation and policies that are credited with producing that rise. The continuation of the rise of blacks out of poverty did not — repeat, did not — accelerate during the 1960s.

The show Family Matters, I believe, was a holdover of those memories that represented the progress of blacks well into the 20th century. The show’s main characters were a police sergeant, Carl Winslow, his working wife Harriette, son Eddie, Carl’s mother (Mother Winslow), Harriette’s sister and her son, and the elder daughter Laura. (A younger daughter was written out of the show). In the episodes I saw that day, I was especially touched by Laura, a teenager who actually had common sense, earned high grades, and became the student body president. In one episode, she had a new boyfriend who convinced her to take him to her bedroom. She realized she’d made a mistake when he made a move on her and then called her a “baby.” She proceeded to throw him out of her bedroom window.

I was also both annoyed and amused at a character who was added to the show, a teenage neighbor boy named Steve Urkel. He was exuberant, had a huge crush on Laura (and everyone knew it), was smart and nerdy, too. As outrageous and over-the-top his behavior was, he was embraced by the family in a grudgingly sweet way. They could have rejected him, but they accepted him, just as he was.

So what moved me about this show? This was a two-parent black family. The kids were polite. The grandmother, a feisty old woman, lived with the family, as did Harriette’s sister, who was a single mother — widowed. In other words, they were a middle-class nuclear family that followed what was once called normal values. The show ran for nine seasons and became the second-longest-running non-animated US sitcom with a predominantly African-American cast.

I realize that the show was somewhat contrived and was not the greatest example of performing arts. But it depicted blacks who were middle-class, who had jobs, who showed respect for each other, and who had conservative values. It demonstrated that blacks could be part of the larger society (through friends and schoolmates), and racism was not an issue (at least in the shows I saw).

* * *

As I packed up my knitting and turned to the patient in her bed, she made eye contact with me. I smiled and said goodbye, and for the first time during my visit, she smiled, waved her hand, and said goodbye.

Good manners, you know.

Published in Culture
Tags:

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 35 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey
    @DrewInWisconsin

    David Foster (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    When he asked the man how his did it, the guy said his self-improvement plan had had three cornerstones:

    –read the classics

    –listen to classical music

    –buy suits at Brooks Brothers

    What might the present-day equivalent look like?

    Exactly the same.

    Depends what one means by ‘self-improvement’…if the term refers to personal intellectual development, then yes, at least as far as the first 2 items go. If it refers to impressing people who need to be impressed in order to get promoted, then probably not so much.

    I was also going to add “Get your blobby self to the gym.”

    • #31
  2. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    David Foster (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    When he asked the man how his did it, the guy said his self-improvement plan had had three cornerstones:

    –read the classics

    –listen to classical music

    –buy suits at Brooks Brothers

    What might the present-day equivalent look like?

    Exactly the same.

    Depends what one means by ‘self-improvement’…if the term refers to personal intellectual development, then yes, at least as far as the first 2 items go. If it refers to impressing people who need to be impressed in order to get promoted, then probably not so much.

    I was also going to add “Get your blobby self to the gym.”

    Or how about cover all your tattoos, pull up your pants, don’t show your belly button and take the ring out of your nose!

    • #32
  3. Marjorie Reynolds Coolidge
    Marjorie Reynolds
    @MarjorieReynolds

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):
    The arts in general, not just television, and not just black ethnic arts. I detect that there has been for several decades a rejection of the idea of using the arts to inspire people toward an ideal in favor o the idea of using the arts to highlight the uglier aspects of reality.

    I can’t get my head around what in the world would be the benefit of showing ugliness, @fullsizetabby. Do they think they are teaching us a lesson? Enlightening us? Do they think we are blind to the ugliness? 

    I think the standard response is that they are holding a mirror up to reality or some such nonsense. It’s a line usually trotted out at soap awards. Soaps are relentlessly awful, at least the ones that purport to be about ordinary people. There must be 5 or 6 on Irish TV at the moment but whatever one you watch you can be sure that:

    All marriages will break up. 

    Child characters are aged up to skip the boring pre-teen years so they can be given sexually charged teen storylines.

    All characters work in the immediate area, beside the pub. 

    Many characters  will start businesses that aren’t described but apparently don’t need any capital to set up. These businesses are usually so successful the character will buy the pub within weeks.

    Female characters of childbearing years will have some kind of crisis pregnancy, either a who’s daddy pregnancy or some other totally avoidable drama if one only had some kind of self control or functioning brain.

     

    I have no idea how people watch this gunk.

    • #33
  4. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Marjorie Reynolds (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):
    The arts in general, not just television, and not just black ethnic arts. I detect that there has been for several decades a rejection of the idea of using the arts to inspire people toward an ideal in favor o the idea of using the arts to highlight the uglier aspects of reality.

    I can’t get my head around what in the world would be the benefit of showing ugliness, @fullsizetabby. Do they think they are teaching us a lesson? Enlightening us? Do they think we are blind to the ugliness?

    I think the standard response is that they are holding a mirror up to reality or some such nonsense. It’s a line usually trotted out at soap awards. Soaps are relentlessly awful, at least the ones that purport to be about ordinary people. There must be 5 or 6 on Irish TV at the moment but whatever one you watch you can be sure that:

    All marriages will break up.

    Child characters are aged up to skip the boring pre-teen years so they can be given sexually charged teen storylines.

    All characters work in the immediate area, beside the pub.

    Many characters will start businesses that aren’t described but apparently don’t need any capital to set up. These businesses are usually so successful the character will buy the pub within weeks.

    Female characters of childbearing years will have some kind of crisis pregnancy, either a who’s daddy pregnancy or some other totally avoidable drama if one only had some kind of self control or functioning brain.

     

    I have no idea how people watch this gunk.

    Good grief, @MarjorieReynolds. I find no comfort in seeing this kind of idiocy happening all over the world.

    • #34
  5. Marjorie Reynolds Coolidge
    Marjorie Reynolds
    @MarjorieReynolds

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Good grief, @MarjorieReynolds. I find no comfort in seeing this kind of idiocy happening all over the world.

    Me neither. I don’t think it’s good for anyone to be absorbing this trash night after night. It’s the lie that says ‘these people are just like you’ that gets into some people’s heads in a way that the glamour soaps didn’t. Nobody ever looked at Dallas or Dynasty and saw anything familiar there. Well maybe Sue Ellen on the vodka. 

    • #35
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.