CNN Anchor Uses Rape Survivor as a Punchline

 

This is a disturbing tweet from CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, and one that should, if we lived in a rational world, land him in some really hot water:

The woman in the NRA video? Rape survivor Kimberly Corban. Corban is an inspiration and one Cuomo, and his viewers, should acquaint themselves with. Here’s her Ted Talk:

Corban’s message was simple: If you want to hurt me or my family, I will protect us. To this Cuomo says “Only in America.”

Yeah. Thank God. Only in America can a woman overpower a man hellbent on harming her with a firearm. This is something we should applaud and be proud of, if we care about protecting women from predators and if we care about empowering them to feel safe wherever they’re legally allowed to carry.

I’m in a Facebook group called “Sheepdog Mamas” filled with women who protect themselves like Kimberly has chosen to do. Women who live in rural or remote areas, women with abusive or absent spouses (who work long hours, who are deployed, or who have just simply left their families). These women look at their firearms as their only source of protection, and they need it due to the distance between their home and a nearby police station, local crime in the area or a specific threat.

It would be nice if Cuomo and those like him in the media used this misstep as an opportunity to learn about Kimberly’s story, and learn why so many women like her have chosen to arm and protect themselves. But as usual, let’s not hold our breath that anyone at CNN might have anything resembling an epiphany about why so many Americans so strongly support maintaining the gun rights we are currently afforded by our Constitution.

Hint: It’s not the NRA that keeps Americans caring about protecting our freedom to bear arms.

Published in Guns
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 15 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RyanFalcone Member
    RyanFalcone
    @RyanFalcone

    Hmmmm, lots of Dems get a little upset when rape victims can defend themselves. Odd.

    • #1
  2. Vance Richards Inactive
    Vance Richards
    @VanceRichards

    Firearms? But women have been given a perfectly good hashtag. Won’t #MeToo save you and your family?

    • #2
  3. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    Do you honestly think that Cuomo or these Democrats have the self-awareness to think they might have made a mistake? If you do, I think you are vastly overestimating them.

    • #3
  4. Dave of Barsham Member
    Dave of Barsham
    @LesserSonofBarsham

    I’m with Andrew Klavan on this idiot. He’s in a figurative running gun battle with his sibling for dumbest Cuomo brother.

    • #4
  5. PHenry Inactive
    PHenry
    @PHenry

    “Only in America” is an entirely appropriate response.  We have a second amendment.  

    I guess Cuomo thought it was somehow an indictment of America that a woman can defend herself ( with a gun!) , but I, and most Americans, do not.  

    Can you imagine how far out of touch with Americans one must be to not understand that?  

     

    • #5
  6. Vance Richards Inactive
    Vance Richards
    @VanceRichards

    PHenry (View Comment):

    “Only in America” is an entirely appropriate response. We have a second amendment.

    I guess Cuomo thought it was somehow an indictment of America that a woman can defend herself ( with a gun!) , but I, and most Americans, do not.

    Can you imagine how far out of touch with Americans one must be to not understand that?

     

    Yes, that is not a negative phrase at all, but considering who it is coming from  . . .

    • #6
  7. Barry Jones Thatcher
    Barry Jones
    @BarryJones

    In a weird and non intentional way Cuomo is correct. Women and children can be and are assaulted every day all over the world but only in America (the U.S. specifically) is a women allowed to defend herself and her family in virtually whatever way she can, which includes firearms. However, Cuomo is too clueless to understand that… And I agree with @PHenry and @vancerichards.

     

    • #7
  8. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    To the end of Cuomo’s tweet, I would append, “and God bless America.”  

    • #8
  9. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    There’s this.

    The 911 dispatcher confirmed with McKinley that the doors to her home were locked as she asked again if it was okay to shoot the intruder if he were to come through her door.

    “I can’t tell you that you can do that but you do what you have to do to protect your baby,” the dispatcher told her. McKinley was on the phone with 911 for a total of 21 minutes.

    When Martin kicked in the door and came after her with the knife, the teen mom shot and killed the 24-year-old. Police are calling the shooting justified.

    God bless Oklahoma.

    • #9
  10. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Chris Cuomo would rather the woman defended her baby with attitude.

    • #10
  11. Vance Richards Inactive
    Vance Richards
    @VanceRichards

    Dave of Barsham (View Comment):

    I’m with Andrew Klavan on this idiot. He’s in a figurative running gun battle with his sibling for dumbest Cuomo brother.

    No Sonny, no Michael, just a couple of Fredos.

    • #11
  12. Doug Watt Member
    Doug Watt
    @DougWatt

    Chris Cuomo should know better, especially as a Catholic:

    All citizens and all governments are obliged to work for the avoidance of war. Despite this admonition of the Church, it sometimes becomes necessary to use force to obtain the end of justice. This is the right, and the duty, of those who have responsibilities for others, such as civil leaders and police forces. While individuals may renounce all violence those who must preserve justice may not do so, though it should be the last resort, “once all peace efforts have failed.” [Cf. Vatican II, Gaudium et spes 79, 4]

    2263 The legitimate defense of persons and societies is not an exception to the prohibition against the murder of the innocent that constitutes intentional killing. “The act of self-defense can have a double effect: the preservation of one’s own life; and the killing of the aggressor. . . . The one is intended, the other is not.” 
    2264 Love toward oneself remains a fundamental principle of morality. Therefore it is legitimate to insist on respect for one’s own right to life. Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow:

    If a man in self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful. . . . Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one’s own life than of another’s.66

    2265 Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm. For this reason, those who legitimately hold authority also have the right to use arms to repel aggressors against the civil community entrusted to their responsibility.

    I’m under no illusion that Chris Cuomo has ever read the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

    • #12
  13. DonG Coolidge
    DonG
    @DonG

    G-d made man and woman, but Smith & Wesson made them equal. 

    • #13
  14. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    We’re surprised someone said something stupid on Twitter?

    • #14
  15. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Conrad’s story and subsequent abuses by politicians have been gracing the pages of the NRA magazines for quite a while now.

    Even Senator Feinbstein (at one time a concelaed permit holder) talked openly about carrying a gun for protection:

    https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/273989-feinstein-doesnt-have-concealed-carry-permit-anymore

    Of course, the article tries to steer the discussion towards the pro-gun control viewpoint, but DiFi’s words are there.  So if a high-powered politician has a clear threat and can carry a gun for protection, why not an ordinary woman with no clear threat, but is aware of random violence which does occur?

    • #15
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.