Destroying a Man’s Life

 

What is the value of a man’s soul? What is the worth of a man’s reputation? Most of us would say that both are priceless: the first is a gift from G-d, the second created by the toil and sweat of the person who lives a productive and honorable life.

But the Left believes the destruction of a reputation and soul is inconsequential if they determine the cause is just.

And thus they have decided to sacrifice Brett Kavanaugh.

Judge Kavanaugh was a man who had worked as a public servant most of his life, dedicating his efforts to being of service to others. His spotless character elicited sneers from the Left, which called him a choir boy. His years of coaching girls, nurturing not only male but female friendships, and hiring women to work for him were meaningless in the face of the Left’s desire to fatally malign him. This entire disgusting display by the Left shows how deeply the secular has poisoned our society.

Dennis Prager was quoted as saying the following about our good and bad deeds:

Every one of us has a moral bank account. Our good deeds are deposits, and our bad deeds are withdrawals. We therefore assess a person the same way we assess our bank account. If our good actions outweigh our bad actions, we are morally in the black; if our bad actions greatly outweigh our good actions, we are morally in the red.

By all accounts — literally all — Brett Kavanaugh’s moral bank account is way in the black. He has led a life of decency, integrity, commitment to family and commitment to community few Americans can match. On these grounds alone, the charges against him as a teenager should be ignored.

And yet the Left says his reputation is worthless.

The Bible teaches that destroying a man’s reputation is as bad as killing or stealing or lying: we kill a man’s soul when we degrade him; we steal his credibility and honor when we promote unsubstantiated slurs; we create a living hell for him when he is forced to live in a culture that lies about him and his contributions to society.

Brett Kavanaugh is not the only one whose reputation is damaged. His wife, Ashley, his two daughters, Margaret and Liza, are wounded, perhaps irreparably; his parents are devastated by the vitriol and slurs against him; his colleagues, friends—in fact anyone whose life has touched his life have been dirtied and wounded. Every person in the media, every Senator who has not promised to support him against this travesty, every human being who not only condemned him before he originally testified to the committee, but in the face of the absence of facts are not persuaded that he has been unfairly judged on the sexual assault of Christine Ford, have committed not only a terrible injustice, but will carry the sin of their behavior for the rest of their lives. For any of them who may be religious, they have sinned against Kavanaugh and his family and against G-d Himself. And there is no making amends.

I found this story that I believe speaks volumes to where we find ourselves as a nation in how we have allowed the Left to destroy Brett Kavanaugh:

A Chassidic tale vividly illustrates the danger of improper speech: A man went about the community telling malicious lies about the rabbi. Later, he realized the wrong he had done, and began to feel remorse. He went to the rabbi and begged his forgiveness, saying he would do anything he could to make amends. The rabbi told the man, ‘Take a feather pillow, cut it open, and scatter the feathers to the winds.’ The man thought this was a strange request, but it was a simple enough task, and he did it gladly. When he returned to tell the rabbi that he had done it, the rabbi said, ‘Now, go and gather the feathers. Because you can no more make amends for the damage your words have done than you can recollect the feathers.’

Where will we find the Constitutional traditionalists who are willing to risk having their lives destroyed?

Published in Culture
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 243 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    If you are on twitter, seek enlightenment —-> @Shabbosgoy <—– I’m dead serious. Retired lawyer. 100% Jesuit educated back when that was a good thing. 

    • #121
  2. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    When Trump came on the scene, I hated him for good reason. Developers are inflationists. “I’m a low interest rate man.” But the fact is, everyone is an inflationist. His ability to put up a building on budget and on time is nice but that really isn’t the type of productivity that spreads and disperses like what a factory does or what an inventor does. He’s in bed with the government because he has to be. His family got extremely loaded because they levered up at the exact right time in the birth rate cycle, and the monetary cycle. Trust me I know about this stuff. But this isn’t productivity, which is how most people survive as FICA slaves in a fair world, it would be the only thing that mattered. But that is not our system. 

    I hate that he lacks civic knowledge and civic experience. His lack of foreign-policy knowledge, is dangerous. But so far so good.

    The other thing is cultural Marxism, critical theory, and the media. DO YOU HAVE A BETTER PLAN? 

    Trump is okay. That is the reality.

    • #122
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Listening to Joe Digenova and Victoria Toensing on Sean Hannity right now. They are pointing out that Kamila Harris who was the attorney general of California and a prosecutor absolutely knows she isn’t behaving well in the Kavanaugh hearings. Victor Davis Hanson said the other night that these hearings have always been informally operated under constitutional principles. Justice and due process. Now they aren’t. Why is that? It’s because

    Government Is How We Steal From Each Other™

    Being an upright citizen just means you’re just going to get run over.

    P.S. Supposedly an integral part of Kamila Harris’s career was sleeping with Willie Brown.  

     

    • #123
  4. Clifford A. Brown Inactive
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    However, Trump’s mocking comments at the rally last night went so far over the line, he is creating the Blue Wave all by his lonesome.

    But Gary, would you change your tune if there were a red wave?

    Personally, I’m not going to expend one joule worrying about the outcome of the November election. I’ll do my duty, vote Republican (and against our local sales tax hike renewal), enjoy Thanksgiving, then head to Florida for the National Review cruise.

    I actually think that Kavanaugh will create a Red Wave in Senate, but only Senate, races.

    Otherwise, I predict a Blue Wave.

    We shall see. Let’s talk on November 8th.

    My bet: a small Red wave in the Senate, with a Red Ripple (narrow hold) in the House. But for the Kavanaugh smear campaign, I’d have said Red Ripple in the Senate and unpredictable cross currents in the House. The Democrats tipped their hand and let their crazy show in the Senate, telegraphing what to expect in the House. They are comfortable with this, indeed, a writer for a major publication has just laid out a plan to stop Kavanaugh now, or delegitimize him on the Court, or delegitimize the Court and pack it with two more leftists, to permanently set the Court’s direction.

     

    • #124
  5. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    However, Trump’s mocking comments at the rally last night went so far over the line, he is creating the Blue Wave all by his lonesome.

    But Gary, would you change your tune if there were a red wave?

    Personally, I’m not going to expend one joule worrying about the outcome of the November election. I’ll do my duty, vote Republican (and against our local sales tax hike renewal), enjoy Thanksgiving, then head to Florida for the National Review cruise.

    I actually think that Kavanaugh will create a Red Wave in Senate, but only Senate, races.

    Otherwise, I predict a Blue Wave.

    We shall see. Let’s talk on November 8th.

    My bet: a small Red wave in the Senate, with a Red Ripple (narrow hold) in the House. But for the Kavanaugh smear campaign, I’d have said Red Ripple in the Senate and unpredictable cross currents in the House. The Democrats tipped their hand and let their crazy show in the Senate, telegraphing what to expect in the House. They are comfortable with this, indeed, a writer for a major publication has just laid out a plan to stop Kavanaugh now, or delegitimize him on the Court, or delegitimize the Court and pack it with two more leftists, to permanently set the Court’s direction.

     

    From your lips to the electorate’s ears, my friend.

    (A GOP hold on the House would be earth-shakingly yuuuge.)

    • #125
  6. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    (A GOP hold on the House would be earth-shakingly yuuuge.)

    The day after it happens the press and Democrats would be explaining why it was inevitable, and that the Republicans really, really, underperformed expectations for the Republican Party, and that it is proof Trump is hurting the Republicans. Nothing to see. Move along.

    • #126
  7. Clifford A. Brown Inactive
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Meanwhile, Mueller, Rotten Rod Rosenstein, and the crew will be in full Fawn Hill mode. It seems that we will either see the left triumph, sweeping aside all restraints, or we may just put a few just men and women into positions to impose accountability and decency (on pain of career or criminal penalties).

    • #127
  8. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    I very much hope the Republicans keep the House, not least because it will be such an ahistorical event as to poke an enormous finger into the collective eye of the left.

    But if the Democrats reclaim the House, and assuming Kavanaugh is confirmed this week (and a failure to confirm Kavanaugh will actually strike me as a more painful loss than will a loss of the House), then here’s something to look forward to: the Democrats simultaneously moving to impeach President Trump and Justice Kavanaugh.

    I think that would play very poorly with the American people, leading into 2020.

    • #128
  9. Hank Rhody, Red Hunter Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Red Hunter
    @HankRhody

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    Hank, I am not writing to express any difference with you.

    I may have to quote you on this. Out of context of course.

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    I hate to say it, Hank. You usually make a good case for your thoughts. But I think this is rather weak.

    Not this one though.

    • #129
  10. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Hank Rhody, Red Hunter (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    Hank, I am not writing to express any difference with you.

    I may have to quote you on this. Out of context of course.

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    I hate to say it, Hank. You usually make a good case for your thoughts. But I think this is rather weak.

    Not this one though.

    Hey, don’t bogart my sobriquet!

    • #130
  11. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    I very much hope the Republicans keep the House, not least because it will be such an ahistorical event as to poke an enormous finger into the collective eye of the left.

    But if the Democrats reclaim the House, and assuming Kavanaugh is confirmed this week (and a failure to confirm Kavanaugh will actually strike me as a more painful loss than will a loss of the House), then here’s something to look forward to: the Democrats simultaneously moving to impeach President Trump and Justice Kavanaugh.

    I think that would play very poorly with the American people, leading into 2020.

    I agree with all your points, Hank. Kavanaugh is key, the House would be great, though. I’m hoping that once again, the polls are way off and that we are all surprised by the good outcomes. Fingers crossed.

    • #131
  12. Gary Robbins 🚫 Banned
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The statist media and the Democrat party lie. It’s well funded, too. How do you respond?

    I prefer Cocaine Mitch’s approach. He wins.

    Gary, Mitch can only do so much. See:

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    …it’s worth noting that two of the most decent and anodyne men in modern political history, Mitt Romney and Brett Kavanaugh, have both been savaged by the left for the most tenuous of justifications. Prior to the sexual witch hunt being initiated, we were being assured that Kavanaugh would spell “the end of the Constitution,” as well as (more importantly to the left) the end of legal abortion.

    I think we can safely conclude that, moving forward, no Republican president will be treated decently by the left. That ended sometime during the Bush administration.

    I think media-fueled Democratic outrage is going to be a constant feature when they are not in power, just as media silence will characterize intervals of Democratic rule.

    Don’t idealize about stuff that doesn’t exist anymore.

    I remember reading Andrew Breitbart’s book and thinking that it was good, and then I sort of forgot about it. This Frankfurt School and critical theory stuff is real.

    Snort. I’m not idealizing — at least, I don’t think I am. But there was a time not too long ago when Supreme Court nominees — even Republican ones — could pass on a bipartisan basis: even Clarence Thomas was confirmed with the support of no fewer than eleven Democratic Senators.

    No, things really did get worse. I think the inflection point was around 2000. Certainly I remember saying, then, that any plausible pretense of press balance was over, and we would have unleashed and unhinged coverage moving forward.

    Basically, I think that’s when journalism lost whatever pride it had left after the Clinton years.

    I’m addressing Gary, not you.

    Damn. It’s so hard to follow those little gray lines, when you get to be my age.

    It was a good point and Gary wasn’t responding.

    Anyone: where am I wrong?

    I respond between clients.  I had an emergency divorce hearing this afternoon with very angry upset people.  The lawyers had to pull their clients away from each other.  They have 15 years of resentments, and lying to each other.  Ugh.  

    I agree with you that it is reprehensible how nominations to the Supreme Court have been politicized.  The press and Democrats have lost it over abortion.  MSNBC other than Morning Joe has gone crazy.  It is all about abortion.  

    Justice Kennedy voted to affirm Roe v. Wade in Casey v. Planned Parenthood.  With Kavanaugh (or ACB) there will be 5 votes to overturn Roe.  I previously thought that the best course of events would be to accept cert. on a state that had a 20 week abortion limit, and then to later accept cert. to overrule Roe entirely.  No longer.  I have had it with the Democrats and press and how they act in bad faith.  This fight is going to keep going on as long as Roe is around.  I now think that the best thing to do is for the Supreme Court to overrule Roe asap, and stop this hysteria.  The northeastern and west coast states, as well as Illinois will make abortion available at any point, Colorado and a few other states will make abortion available up to 20-28 weeks, and the rest of the states will ban abortion all together.  (Arizona might be a 20 week state.)  

    • #132
  13. Gary Robbins 🚫 Banned
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    However, Trump’s mocking comments at the rally last night went so far over the line, he is creating the Blue Wave all by his lonesome.

    But Gary, would you change your tune if there were a red wave?

    Personally, I’m not going to expend one joule worrying about the outcome of the November election. I’ll do my duty, vote Republican (and against our local sales tax hike renewal), enjoy Thanksgiving, then head to Florida for the National Review cruise.

    I actually think that Kavanaugh will create a Red Wave in Senate, but only Senate, races.

    Otherwise, I predict a Blue Wave.

    We shall see. Let’s talk on November 8th.

    My bet: a small Red wave in the Senate, with a Red Ripple (narrow hold) in the House. But for the Kavanaugh smear campaign, I’d have said Red Ripple in the Senate and unpredictable cross currents in the House. The Democrats tipped their hand and let their crazy show in the Senate, telegraphing what to expect in the House. They are comfortable with this, indeed, a writer for a major publication has just laid out a plan to stop Kavanaugh now, or delegitimize him on the Court, or delegitimize the Court and pack it with two more leftists, to permanently set the Court’s direction.

    The Dems have pushed me into Trump’s arms which is not where I expected to be.  Clifford, it is funny how we are now on the same page.  At least for now.

    • #133
  14. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    (A GOP hold on the House would be earth-shakingly yuuuge.)

    The day after it happens the press and Democrats would be explaining why it was inevitable, and that the Republicans really, really, underperformed expectations for the Republican Party, and that it is proof Trump is hurting the Republicans. Nothing to see. Move along.

    Nah. They’d be yelling “Gerrymandering!” about 15 times a second and coming up with new Deibold conspiracy theories about how Trump and his evil henchmen someone fixed the votes in key races, while at the same time claiming the huge winning margins for their candidates in Deep Blue states or congressional districts showed where the sentiment of the American voters really is (a few might be thinking to themselves their Kavanaugh tactics managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but they won’t say in publicly, because the demanded conventional wisdom would be the Democrats failed to pick up the House and Senate because they weren’t progressive and strident enough against conservatives, Kavanaugh and Trump).

    • #134
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    No longer. I have had it with the Democrats and press and how they act in bad faith.

    ANALYSIS: True. The Democrats act in bad faith.  

    If the GOP drops all legal threats on abortion everywhere, the world instantly becomes a better place. Just make the moral case. 

    Planned Parenthood does 60% of the abortions and they literally have abortion quotas because the have so much overhead to cover. Gee, how did that happen? 

    Mises.org is right about everything. 

    • #135
  16. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    The Dems have pushed me into Trump’s arms which is not where I expected to be. Clifford, it is funny how we are now on the same page. At least for now.

    You know, Gary, you and I have always been writing past each other, I always felt. We agreed, basically, on Trump, but I always thought you were too extreme in your rhetoric. Now, I think we’ve gone past each other again. Trump will never be in my arms. He is still the same person he’s been all his life. And I don’t like that kind of a person, especially in the Presidency.

    But here’s where we agree: We must always set our sights on the prize of the moment. And the prize now is getting Brett Kavanaugh confirmed to the Court. And, at the same time, pay the Democrats back for their disgusting tactics to keep this man off the bench. I agree with Hugh Hewitt, who said we shouldn’t vote for any Democrat at any level (unfortunately, I had to in my home town, because the Republicans didn’t nominate anyone). So, until after Kavanaugh is confirmed, and until after midterms are over, I would advise any conservative who agrees with us on Presidential actions to table that for now, in favor making sure those blankety-blank Democrats deserve everything that’s coming to them for trying to destroy a good man.

    By the way, I would add that what Brett said to the Democrats on the committee pales in comparison to the lack of respect they showed him. He should be given a medal for being so restrained.

    • #136
  17. Hank Rhody, Red Hunter Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Red Hunter
    @HankRhody

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    (A GOP hold on the House would be earth-shakingly yuuuge.)

    The day after it happens the press and Democrats would be explaining why it was inevitable, and that the Republicans really, really, underperformed expectations for the Republican Party, and that it is proof Trump is hurting the Republicans. Nothing to see. Move along.

    Nah. They’d be yelling “Gerrymandering!” about 15 times a second and coming up with new Deibold conspiracy theories about how Trump and his evil henchmen someone fixed the votes in key races, while at the same time claiming the huge winning margins for their candidates in Deep Blue states or congressional districts showed where the sentiment of the American voters really is (a few might be thinking to themselves their Kavanaugh tactics managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but they won’t say in publicly, because the demanded conventional wisdom would be the Democrats failed to pick up the House and Senate because they weren’t progressive and strident enough against conservatives, Kavanaugh and Trump).

    Embrace the power of “And”.

    • #137
  18. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    George:

    You  challenged me on. the existence of a Ruling Class a while back. I just thought of this.

    America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution

    Angelo Codivilla is awesome.

    • #138
  19. Leigh Inactive
    Leigh
    @Leigh

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):
    But for the Kavanaugh smear campaign, I’d have said Red Ripple in the Senate and unpredictable cross currents in the House.

    Up until the latest Fox polls came out (putting Blackburn ahead again in TN), the RealClearPolitics average had the Senate at 1 Democratic pickup.  

    The governor’s races are not looking as good for the GOP as the Senate. There’s room for a little change. Here’s what is interesting me: every poll I’m seeing reported says that support for Kavanaugh’s confirmation surges when people are told the allegations are unconfirmed.

    In other words, that means that there’s a significant number of fair-minded people who don’t know what is going on.  There’s a job to be done.

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    And, at the same time, pay the Democrats back for their disgusting tactics to keep this man off the bench. I agree with Hugh Hewitt, who said we shouldn’t vote for any Democrat at any level

    I would be really tempted to vote for Kevin de Leon if I lived in California right now.  I don’t know if I’d do it.  It’s not like he’s opposing what Feinstein did, he’s criticized her for being too soft.  It wouldn’t give California a better senator; on some things he’d be worse, as I understand.  But if, even in California, Republicans can punish you for doing such a thing, it would establish a deterrent of sorts.

    • #139
  20. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The statist media and the Democrat party lie. It’s well funded, too. How do you respond?

    I prefer Cocaine Mitch’s approach. He wins.

    Gary, Mitch can only do so much. See:

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    …it’s worth noting that two of the most decent and anodyne men in modern political history, Mitt Romney and Brett Kavanaugh, have both been savaged by the left for the most tenuous of justifications. Prior to the sexual witch hunt being initiated, we were being assured that Kavanaugh would spell “the end of the Constitution,” as well as (more importantly to the left) the end of legal abortion.

    I think we can safely conclude that, moving forward, no Republican president will be treated decently by the left. That ended sometime during the Bush administration.

    I think media-fueled Democratic outrage is going to be a constant feature when they are not in power, just as media silence will characterize intervals of Democratic rule.

    Don’t idealize about stuff that doesn’t exist anymore.

    I remember reading Andrew Breitbart’s book and thinking that it was good, and then I sort of forgot about it. This Frankfurt School and critical theory stuff is real.

    Snort. I’m not idealizing — at least, I don’t think I am. But there was a time not too long ago when Supreme Court nominees — even Republican ones — could pass on a bipartisan basis: even Clarence Thomas was confirmed with the support of no fewer than eleven Democratic Senators.

    No, things really did get worse. I think the inflection point was around 2000. Certainly I remember saying, then, that any plausible pretense of press balance was over, and we would have unleashed and unhinged coverage moving forward.

    Basically, I think that’s when journalism lost whatever pride it had left after the Clinton years.

    I’m addressing Gary, not you.

    Damn. It’s so hard to follow those little gray lines, when you get to be my age.

    It was a good point and Gary wasn’t responding.

    Anyone: where am I wrong?

    I respond between clients. I had an emergency divorce hearing this afternoon with very angry upset people. The lawyers had to pull their clients away from each other. They have 15 years of resentments, and lying to each other. Ugh.

    I agree with you that it is reprehensible how nominations to the Supreme Court have been politicized. The press and Democrats have lost it over abortion. MSNBC other than Morning Joe has gone crazy. It is all about abortion.

    Justice Kennedy voted to affirm Roe v. Wade in Casey v. Planned Parenthood. With Kavanaugh (or ACB) there will be 5 votes to overturn Roe. I previously thought that the best course of events would be to accept cert. on a state that had a 20 week abortion limit, and then to later accept cert. to overrule Roe entirely. No longer. I have had it with the Democrats and press and how they act in bad faith. This fight is going to keep going on as long as Roe is around. I now think that the best thing to do is for the Supreme Court to overrule Roe asap, and stop this hysteria. The northeastern and west coast states, as well as Illinois will make abortion available at any point, Colorado and a few other states will make abortion available up to 20-28 weeks, and the rest of the states will ban abortion all together. (Arizona might be a 20 week state.)

    I think it is funny that you believe this is about abortion.  The Democrats can care less about abortion except it’s use as a wedge issue and the pipelines of money it provides.  If the Right caved on abortion, It would just be a different issue that they would use the same tactics on.  

    • #140
  21. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    The Democrats can care less about abortion except it’s use as a wedge issue and the pipelines of money it provides. If the Right caved on abortion, It would just be a different issue that they would use the same tactics on.

    I suspect that isn’t true. I think this is a unique issue for the left. I think gun rights is the closest parallel on the right, though still without the fanaticism associated with abortion.

    • #141
  22. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    The Democrats can care less about abortion except it’s use as a wedge issue and the pipelines of money it provides. If the Right caved on abortion, It would just be a different issue that they would use the same tactics on.

    I suspect that isn’t true. I think this is a unique issue for the left. I think gun rights is the closest parallel on the right, though still without the fanaticism associated with abortion.

    That is fine but you are wrong.  It is only valuable to carve womyn away from the GOP and a way to funnel government money into the party.  Sure there are true believers but mostly it is about power, money, virtue signaling.

    • #142
  23. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    The Democrats can care less about abortion except it’s use as a wedge issue and the pipelines of money it provides. If the Right caved on abortion, It would just be a different issue that they would use the same tactics on.

    I suspect that isn’t true. I think this is a unique issue for the left. I think gun rights is the closest parallel on the right, though still without the fanaticism associated with abortion.

    That is fine but you are wrong. It is only valuable to carve womyn away from the GOP and a way to funnel government money into the party. Sure there are true believers but mostly it is about power, money, virtue signaling.

    Well, you could be right, of course. Tell you what: if your equally emphatic assertion that Kavanaugh will not be confirmed proves to be correct, I’ll come back and reexamine this one as well. ;)

    • #143
  24. Mim526 Inactive
    Mim526
    @Mim526

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    However, Trump’s mocking comments at the rally last night went so far over the line, he is creating the Blue Wave all by his lonesome.

    But Gary, would you change your tune if there were a red wave?

    Personally, I’m not going to expend one joule worrying about the outcome of the November election. I’ll do my duty, vote Republican (and against our local sales tax hike renewal), enjoy Thanksgiving, then head to Florida for the National Review cruise.

    I actually think that Kavanaugh will create a Red Wave in Senate, but only Senate, races.

    Otherwise, I predict a Blue Wave.

    We shall see. Let’s talk on November 8th.

    My bet: a small Red wave in the Senate, with a Red Ripple (narrow hold) in the House. But for the Kavanaugh smear campaign, I’d have said Red Ripple in the Senate and unpredictable cross currents in the House. The Democrats tipped their hand and let their crazy show in the Senate, telegraphing what to expect in the House. They are comfortable with this, indeed, a writer for a major publication has just laid out a plan to stop Kavanaugh now, or delegitimize him on the Court, or delegitimize the Court and pack it with two more leftists, to permanently set the Court’s direction.

    The Dems have pushed me into Trump’s arms which is not where I expected to be. Clifford, it is funny how we are now on the same page. At least for now.

    I don’t view my own change in thinking post-2016 election as being in Trump’s camp so much as Trump being in the camp of the America I want to live in.  Dems have shown:

    1. Whatever those who run and win in more moderate or conservative state elections say to get elected, they consistently vote in lock step with a few peel-offs granted if it make no difference to the end result.  Case in point:  Doug Jones pledged to be his own man and a moderate, yet he’s criticizing and vowing to vote No on Kavanaugh.
    2. Leftists run the show.  Liberal critical thinkers have the choice of remaining silent or jumping ship into the Independent camp.  Venues for those like Alan Dershowitz who hold to traditional legal protections have narrowed to Fox News, WSJ, etc.
    3. Next stop is socialism.  Writing is on the wall, candidates clearly espousing it are running in 2018 elections.
    4. For first time I can actually envision their doing away with electoral college and either altering Constitution beyond recognition or replacing it altogether.

    If Dems get levers of power we have Feinstein running Senate nomination confirmations, and in the House Nadler in charge of Oversight investigations (he vows to investigate Kavanaugh further if Dems in charge), and Maxine Waters chairing finance.

    • #144
  25. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    The Democrats can care less about abortion except it’s use as a wedge issue and the pipelines of money it provides. If the Right caved on abortion, It would just be a different issue that they would use the same tactics on.

    I suspect that isn’t true. I think this is a unique issue for the left. I think gun rights is the closest parallel on the right, though still without the fanaticism associated with abortion.

    Actually, abortion and gun rights have this parallel: They both involves Governmental Action. Abortion to tell people that the government says that killing a baby is all right, and gun rights meaning that the government will tell you that you can’t allow guns. This is what the Left ultimately wants: To control our behavior from what Rush Limbaugh said once was the womb to the tomb.

    • #145
  26. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    Mim526 (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    However, Trump’s mocking comments at the rally last night went so far over the line, he is creating the Blue Wave all by his lonesome.

    But Gary, would you change your tune if there were a red wave?

    Personally, I’m not going to expend one joule worrying about the outcome of the November election. I’ll do my duty, vote Republican (and against our local sales tax hike renewal), enjoy Thanksgiving, then head to Florida for the National Review cruise.

    I actually think that Kavanaugh will create a Red Wave in Senate, but only Senate, races.

    Otherwise, I predict a Blue Wave.

    We shall see. Let’s talk on November 8th.

    My bet: a small Red wave in the Senate, with a Red Ripple (narrow hold) in the House. But for the Kavanaugh smear campaign, I’d have said Red Ripple in the Senate and unpredictable cross currents in the House. The Democrats tipped their hand and let their crazy show in the Senate, telegraphing what to expect in the House. They are comfortable with this, indeed, a writer for a major publication has just laid out a plan to stop Kavanaugh now, or delegitimize him on the Court, or delegitimize the Court and pack it with two more leftists, to permanently set the Court’s direction.

    The Dems have pushed me into Trump’s arms which is not where I expected to be. Clifford, it is funny how we are now on the same page. At least for now.

    I don’t view my own change in thinking post-2016 election as being in Trump’s camp so much as Trump being in the camp of the America I want to live in. Dems have shown:

    1. Whatever those who run and win in more moderate or conservative state elections say to get elected, they consistently vote in lock step with a few peel-offs granted if it make no difference to the end result. Case in point: Doug Jones pledged to be his own man and a moderate, yet he’s criticizing and vowing to vote No on Kavanaugh.
    2. Leftists run the show. Liberal critical thinkers have the choice of remaining silent or jumping ship into the Independent camp. Venues for those like Alan Dershowitz who hold to traditional legal protections have narrowed to Fox News, WSJ, etc.
    3. Next stop is socialism. Writing is on the wall, candidates clearly espousing it are running in 2018 elections.
    4. For first time I can actually envision their doing away with electoral college and either altering Constitution beyond recognition or replacing it altogether.

    If Dems get levers of power we have Feinstein running Senate nomination confirmations, and in the House Nadler in charge of Oversight investigations (he vows to investigate Kavanaugh further if Dems in charge), and Maxine Waters chairing finance.

    I would hope that this knowledge would shut people like Tom Nichols up finally.

    • #146
  27. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    Leigh (View Comment):
    I would be really tempted to vote for Kevin de Leon if I lived in California right now. I don’t know if I’d do it. It’s not like he’s opposing what Feinstein did, he’s criticized her for being too soft. It wouldn’t give California a better senator; on some things he’d be worse, as I understand. But if, even in California, Republicans can punish you for doing such a thing, it would establish a deterrent of sorts.

    I do live in California, and I am on your wavelength.

     

    • #147
  28. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):
    then head to Florida for the National Review cruise.

    . . . which is when?

    @susanquinn The dates are 12/1 through 12/8.  We’ll be in Fort Lauderdale the night before (11/30) . . .

    • #148
  29. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    I very much hope the Republicans keep the House, not least because it will be such an ahistorical event as to poke an enormous finger into the collective eye of the left.

    But if the Democrats reclaim the House, and assuming Kavanaugh is confirmed this week (and a failure to confirm Kavanaugh will actually strike me as a more painful loss than will a loss of the House), then here’s something to look forward to: the Democrats simultaneously moving to impeach President Trump and Justice Kavanaugh.

    I think that would play very poorly with the American people, leading into 2020.

    I agree, but I believe it’s playing poorly with the American people now.

    • #149
  30. EdPolaski Inactive
    EdPolaski
    @EdPolaski

    “The Left” is a broad group. Many on the left have acted as you’ve described — despicably. The same way many on the right worked to paint Obama as evil. I think there’s plenty room to believe that many on the left also believe Ford and haven’t participated in the Avenatti related shenanigans.

    • #150
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.