Quote of the Day: Two Kingdoms

 

“Sir, we will humblie reverence your Majestie always, namlie in public, but sen we have this occasioun to be with your Majestie in privat, and the treuthe is, yie ar brought in extream danger bathe of your lyff and croun, and with yow, the country and Kirk of Christ is lyk to wrak, for nocht telling yow the treuthe, and giffen of yow fathfull counsall, we mon (must) discharge our dewtie thairin, or els be trators bathe to Christ and yow! And thairfor Sir, as divers tymes befor, sa now again, I mon tell yow, thair is twa Kings and twa Kingdomes in Scotland. Thair is Chryst Jesus the King, and his Kingdome the Kirk, whase subject King James the Saxt is, and of whose kingdome nocht a king, nor a lord, nor a heid, bot a member! And they whome Chryst hes callit and commandit to watch over his Kirk, and govern his spirituall kingdome, hes sufficient powar of him, and authoritie sa to do, bathe togidder and severalie; the quhilk na Christian King or Prince sould control and discharge, but fortifie and assist, utherwayes nocht fathfull subjects nor members of Chryst.” — Andrew Melville

There have always been some folks who did not care what consequences might befall them, they would speak the truth as they understood it, even if it meant telling a king he was but “God’s sillie vassal.” Bless all such men.

Published in Group Writing
Tags: ,

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 38 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    GFHandle (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    TheSockMonkey (View Comment):
    If I “reverence” someone, is that different than if I simply revere them?

    No.

    To me, “revering” something implies an actual psychological state whereas to “reverence” is merely to show due deference. Not sure why I feel that way.

    Possibly due to the usage of the word ‘irreverent’.

    • #31
  2. Simon Templar Member
    Simon Templar
    @

    Simon Templar (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    sesquipedalist.

    Try slipping that into the conversation sometime late at night at any Marine Officers’ Club.

    Be warned:  It is quite likely that you’ll get a firm (but not lethal) whack of a pool cue across the back of your head.  By firm I mean, you know, just enough to make you see stars for a few minutes.

    • #32
  3. Simon Templar Member
    Simon Templar
    @

    Say it again (ever, anywhere on the planet)  and the consequences will most likely be more severe.

    • #33
  4. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    There is only one Kirk.

    You mean James Tiberius?

    Nope.  I meant this guy:

    Jere Burns in Bob (1992)

     

    • #34
  5. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    Nope. I meant this guy:

    If you say so. After my time as far as watching TV.

    • #35
  6. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    Nope. I meant this guy:

    If you say so. After my time as far as watching TV.

    It was on in the mid-eighties.

    • #36
  7. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    It was on in the mid-eighties.

    Late 80’s, 1988 premiere.

    • #37
  8. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    I had to look it up to figure out what you were talking about.

    • #38
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.