Alabama Voters Don’t Need Insults

 

This from John Podhoretz is just one of many similar comments out there:

Similarly, if you believe America has rotted away morally, the idea you’d hand enormous political power to a morally rotted person like Roy Moore reveals your own spiritual and moral rot.

What is wrong with simply saying “I disagree with your decision to vote for Roy Moore?”

Alabama voters are between a rock and a hard place. It’s not entirely their fault since Moore’s peccadilloes weren’t known until it was too late to take him off the ballot. The “establishment” offering, Luther Strange, was scandal-tainted himself.

It is true that Moore’s refusal to step down does not speak well of his character either.

But if you vote for Roy Moore, do you become him? If you vote for Doug Jones, do you become an abortion-promoting leftist?

If character should always trump political considerations, what ‘s the right choice if it were Moore versus a scandal-free Nazi?

Alabama voters have a choice between a predator and a progressive. Please, cut them some slack.

Published in General
Tags:

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 143 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Doctor Bass Monkey Inactive
    Doctor Bass Monkey
    @WhiskeySam

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Elvis dated a 14 year-old Priscilla, and I’ve never heard anyone refer to him as a pervert or pedophile.

    • #31
  2. BastiatJunior Member
    BastiatJunior
    @BastiatJunior

    There was an election many years ago, between a corrupt politician (can’t remember the name or office) and David Duke.

    There were bumper stickers that said, “Vote for the crook.  It’s important.”

     

    • #32
  3. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    But in the primary they could have picked one of several candidates that was neither Strange nor Moore.

    I think I would vote for the Moore-Strange ticket.

    Pervert.

    • #33
  4. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Stina (View Comment):
    Ostensibly, they were defined by deeper thinkers than what we have today.

     

    Words were never “defined” by “thinkers.” They and their meanings evolved naturally and will continue to do so.

    • #34
  5. thelonious Member
    thelonious
    @thelonious

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin.  Is that perverted?  Or just sick and wrong?

    • #35
  6. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):
    There was an election many years ago, between a corrupt politician (can’t remember the name or office) and David Duke.

    There were bumper stickers that said, “Vote for the crook. It’s important.”

    Edwin Edwards. Governor of Louisiana.

    Also the man who gave us the immortal phrase, “The only way I could lose is if they caught me in bed with a dead woman or a live boy.”

    • #36
  7. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):
    Ostensibly, they were defined by deeper thinkers than what we have today.

    Words were never “defined” by “thinkers.” They and their meanings evolved naturally and will continue to do so.

    Maybe so until the advent of dictionaries. Linguistics is a deep study and I am adverse to defining words down in order to conflate lesser crimes with more serious ones.

    Pedophile and pervert have their meanings and I’d rather not engage in defining them down like we have “rape and “sexual assault.”

    • #37
  8. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):
    Ostensibly, they were defined by deeper thinkers than what we have today.

    Words were never “defined” by “thinkers.” They and their meanings evolved naturally and will continue to do so.

    Actually, I stand by my original assessment. In most of history, where literacy was confined to a highly educated set, words were shaped and changed via those that made a living by them – orators, leaders, professionals, writers, philosophers.

    In a world of rampant literacy (comparatively) and an open internet to all comers, words are taking on the uninformed connotation of the poorly educated and incurious, albeit literate, members of a loquacious Twitter, micro-blogging culture.

    Added note: language, pronunciation, and dialect was ruled by everyone by use, but those don’t affect word meanings.

    • #38
  9. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

    Moderator Note:

    Please play the ball, not the player.

    The charges against are specious and slanderous beyond the evidence.

    A. The one charge of sexual assault has been pretty thoroughly debunked.

    B. The other charges are that he dated 17 year olds, which may or may not be true.  Gee, if dating a 17 year makes you a pervert that makes Seinfeld and Justice William O Douglas a pervert too! I believe the justice married a seventeen year old!

    The real issue here is whether the new Senator from Alabama will take on the GOP Establishment and it’s policy perversions. RINO’s, including John Podhoretz are aghast and frightened that someone would actually dare to represent the people instead of  special interests, so they have resorted to slander, and thoroughly beclowned themselves.

    The more RINO’s say stupid stuff about Moore, the less credible they become.  If you are more concerned about Roy Moore’s ethics and morals that the sleazy state of Washington DC’s corrupt rule, [redacted]. The pain and suffering the Washington elite is inflicting on their fellow Americans is just beyond the pale. No amount of highbrow, condescending rhetoric can change that.

    • #39
  10. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    thelonious (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin. Is that perverted? Or just sick and wrong?

    Depends. Was it his first cousin, or was there some remove?

    I keed, I keed.

    My point is it’s not unnatural (perverted) for a man to be attracted to a post-pubescent girl. Acting out on it can certainly be frowned upon and, as I said, controversial, but it’s not the same as “perverted.” We need to reclaim the language, or coeds will continue to get away with calling any drunken union they regret, “rape,” thereby ruining young men’s lives.

    But, let’s not hijack the thread. This is about the wisdom of scorning the people who have decided thwarting the cultural-Marxist agenda of the Left is more important to them than unsubstantiated 40-year-old accusations (suspiciously timed and solicited by noted Dem media manipulators) against the guy most likely to represent their values.

    People who insult Moore’s voters seem to believe their votes reflect poorly on their own character (stupid, immoral, coprophagic according to Michael Graham et al). I disagree, and even if it were true, of what benefit (electorally or otherwise) is it to insult them?

    • #40
  11. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    People who insult Moore’s voters seem to believe their votes reflect poorly on their own character (stupid, immoral, corprophagic according to Michael Graham et al). I disagree, and even if it were true, of what benefit (electorally or otherwise) is it to insult them?

    Coprophagic. This is a language thread, after all.

    • #41
  12. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    People who insult Moore’s voters seem to believe their votes reflect poorly on their own character (stupid, immoral, corprophagic according to Michael Graham et al). I disagree, and even if it were true, of what benefit (electorally or otherwise) is it to insult them?

    Coprophagic. This is a language thread, after all.

    Heh. Thanks.

    • #42
  13. Terry Mott Member
    Terry Mott
    @TerryMott

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    thelonious (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin. Is that perverted? Or just sick and wrong?

    Depends. Was it his first cousin, or was there some remove?

    I keed, I keed.

    My point is it’s not unnatural (perverted) for a man to be attracted to a post-pubescent girl. Acting out on it can certainly be frowned upon and, as I said, controversial, but it’s not the same as “perverted.” We need to reclaim the language, or coeds will continue to get away with calling any drunken union they regret, “rape,” thereby ruining young men’s lives.

    But, let’s not hijack the thread. This is about the wisdom of scorning the people who have decided thwarting the cultural-Marxist agenda of the Left is more important to them than unsubstantiated 40-year-old accusations (suspiciously timed and solicited by noted Dem media manipulators) against the guy most likely to represent their values.

    People who insult Moore’s voters seem to believe their votes reflect poorly on their own character (stupid, immoral, corprophagic according to Michael Graham et al). I disagree, and even if it were true, of what benefit (electorally or otherwise) is it to insult them?

    As I implied above, the benefit is in tribal signaling: “I’m not one of those sorts of Republicans.”  Nothing more.

    I’ll grant an exception for Jonah Goldberg, who has had a running feud with Trump for years, for whom I suspect it’s more personal.

    • #43
  14. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Stina (View Comment):
    Actually, I stand by my original assessment. In most of history, where literacy was confined to a highly educated set, words were shaped and changed via those that made a living by them – orators, leaders, professionals, writers, philosophers.

     

    The illiterate still spoke. Words are shaped by everyone who uses the language in any medium, not just those who are able to convert it from one medium to another. A society in which the common speech has no influence on language cannot function, assuming such a situation is even possible.

    And in any case aren’t the “deep thinkers” the problem here? Isn’t “Words [being] shaped and changed via those that [make] a living by them,” precisely what you don’t want to happen here?

    • #44
  15. DocJay Inactive
    DocJay
    @DocJay

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):
    There was an election many years ago, between a corrupt politician (can’t remember the name or office) and David Duke.

    There were bumper stickers that said, “Vote for the crook. It’s important.”

    I voted for him.  Edwin Edwards.  He is a pig but I helped stop Duke.    I draw my bold line at Nazi.

    • #45
  16. Viruscop Inactive
    Viruscop
    @Viruscop

    thelonious (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin. Is that perverted? Or just sick and wrong?

    If I recall correctly, no one was cool with it at the time.

    • #46
  17. Viruscop Inactive
    Viruscop
    @Viruscop

    J Climacus (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    J Climacus (View Comment):
    John Podhoretz doesn’t know how to disagree with someone without name calling and slurs. It’s why I stopped listening to the Commentary podcast.

    To each their own. I find the Commentary podcast one of the very best. Oh well.

    He’s not that bad on the Commentary podcast. But then he generally agrees with his fellow podcasters. I started following him on Twitter and I was astounded at the venom that came from him. It was so bad I decided I couldn’t support him on any venue – so I stopped listening to Commentary. Maybe it’s just that Twitter brings out the worst him. But that worst is pretty bad.

    He has toned himself down. When was the last time you looked him up on Twitter?

    • #47
  18. DocJay Inactive
    DocJay
    @DocJay

    Viruscop (View Comment):

    thelonious (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin. Is that perverted? Or just sick and wrong?

    If I recall correctly, no one was cool with it at the time.

    Wrecked his career actually from a financial standpoint.

    • #48
  19. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    But in the primary they could have picked one of several candidates that was neither Strange nor Moore.

    I think I would vote for the Moore-Strange ticket.

    I had hopes for the Weiner-Holder ticket in 2016. I don’t think Carlos Danger will be out in time for this to happen in 2020.

    • #49
  20. DocJay Inactive
    DocJay
    @DocJay

    As to the OP.  J Pod can pound sand.  Elitist arrogant hypocritical pig.

    • #50
  21. Archie Campbell Member
    Archie Campbell
    @ArchieCampbell

    Doctor Bass Monkey (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Elvis dated a 14 year-old Priscilla, and I’ve never heard anyone refer to him as a pervert or pedophile.

    But Jerry Lee Lewis was called a pedophile, basically. Maybe it was that Lewis wasn’t famous enough for people to give him leeway (heh) on it. And I have a dim memory that one of his enemies made a big deal to publicize it, which wasn’t the case with Elvis.

    • #51
  22. Viruscop Inactive
    Viruscop
    @Viruscop

    DocJay (View Comment):

    Viruscop (View Comment):

    thelonious (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    With respect to the semantics of perversion, I think the issue is the changing nature of the word.

    Are you saying the word pervert has been perverted?

    Yes. By modern sensibilities 40 years ago, maybe Moore’s tastes were controversial (see Jerry Lee Lewis), but not perverted.

    The first thing the Left does to destroy the old order is pervert language.

    Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin. Is that perverted? Or just sick and wrong?

    If I recall correctly, no one was cool with it at the time.

    Wrecked his career actually from a financial standpoint.

    It reminds me of when Jerry Seinfeld dated Shoshanna Lonstein. Howard Stern did not let up with his criticism of Seinfeld. He even had a song about it.

    • #52
  23. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):
    Actually, I stand by my original assessment. In most of history, where literacy was confined to a highly educated set, words were shaped and changed via those that made a living by them – orators, leaders, professionals, writers, philosophers.

    The illiterate still spoke. Words are shaped by everyone who uses the language in any medium, not just those who are able to convert it from one medium to another. A society in which the common speech has no influence on language cannot function, assuming such a situation is even possible.

    And in any case aren’t the “deep thinkers” the problem here? Isn’t “Words [being] shaped and changed via those that [make] a living by them,” precisely what you don’t want to happen here?

    Look in a dictionary sometime. Our pronunciation of words has changed considerably over time, but definitions have largely remained consistent throughout time. Agriculture doesn’t have it’s meaning by arbitrary usage. It comes from a combination of two words, one meaning farmer that goes back thousands of years. Latin may be dead, but it’s words and meanings have carried forward into new languages. Most of the words we use have similar etymologies.

    Shakespeare is considered a great wordsmith. If it was common for commoners to shape the meaning of words, such a claim would be impossible to make. (Wordsmith meaning creating new words)

    If words shifted and changed as you claim they do, I would not be able to read books by our founders and understand them without learning a whole new language. Words’ meanings are not as changeable as the left would have us believe.

    • #53
  24. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):
    And in any case aren’t the “deep thinkers” the problem here? Isn’t “Words [being] shaped and changed via those that [make] a living by them,” precisely what you don’t want to happen here?

    Deep thinkers aren’t doing the changing now. Media, manipulators, and Twitter and Facebook are doing it.

    And if smart and educated people like you and I think words are as malleable as the left would have us believe, then there is no standing against it and enforcing a linguistcal norm via tradition and dictionary.

    • #54
  25. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    Why cleave to the old definitions?

    Because I’m old? I remember when “hillbilly” meant a Michigan dirt farmer.

    • #55
  26. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Arahant (View Comment):
    If he thought he were a woman trapped in a man’s body… Well, let’s not go there. Put a man’s liking young women is not a perversion.

    Indeed, interesting times we live in, when a man who likes young women is called a pervert, but a man who likes to dress like a young woman is hailed as a civil-rights pioneer…

     

    • #56
  27. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Stina (View Comment):
    Our pronunciation of words has changed considerably over time, but definitions have largely remained consistent throughout time.

    I don’t think so.

    • #57
  28. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Stina (View Comment):
    If words shifted and changed as you claim they do, I would not be able to read books by our founders and understand them without learning a whole new language. Words’ meanings are not as changeable as the left would have us believe.

    Sometimes it is like learning a new language.  For example, words like awful and artificial.  If you get really literal, you can figure out what they meant back then.

    • #58
  29. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Ed G. (View Comment):
    Pervert.

    Yes? You have found me out. I don’t want guys like Moore tarnishing my brand.

    • #59
  30. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Victor Tango Kilo (View Comment):
    Here’s pretty much the Left and the Never Trumpers today:

    “Dear Alabama, we hope you racist, inbred, bible-thumpers do what we tell you, or else our opinion of you might really take a hit. Now excuse us, we’re going to a fundraiser to support Sen. Menendez, hosted by Matt Lauer at Harvey Weinstien’s house. The Clinton’s will be there.”

    As a NeverTrumper, I will go on the record to say that I was disappointed that Senator Menendez was not convicted, that I hold no candle for Matt Lauer, that I hope that Harvey Weinstien is convicted, and that I was relieved to be able to vote for Evan McMullin instead of Hillary, and that I never voted for Bill.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.