Trump Declares Our Formal Recognition of Jerusalem as Capital of Israel

 

“Long overdue.” From the BBC:

President Donald Trump has announced that the US now recognises Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, overturning decades of official US policy.

Mr Trump described the move as “a long overdue step” to advance the Middle East peace process.

The president said the US would support a two-state solution, if approved by both the Israelis and the Palestinians.

There will be those who declare that this is the ruination of peace talks for the region but the question must be asked, “why this and not the Palestinian Charter, which includes the following:

Article 17: The partitioning of Palestine, which took place in 1947, and the establishment of Israel are illegal and null and void, regardless of the loss of time…

Article 18: The Balfour Declaration, the Palestine Mandate System, and all that has been based on them are considered null and void. The claims of historic and spiritual ties between Jews and Palestine are not in agreement with the facts of history or with the true basis of sound statehood. Judaism… is not a nationality (and) the Jews are not one people with an independent personality…

Article 19: Zionism is a colonialist movement in its inception, aggressive and expansionist in its goal, racist in its configurations, and fascist in its means and aims…

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 52 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Chuckles (View Comment):
    I am glad to see it, but I suspect we are not prepared to accept the possible consequences.

    My hunch is the possible consequences are all inflated. The Muslim world respects a strong leader.

    • #31
  2. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Manny (View Comment):

    Chuckles (View Comment):
    I am glad to see it, but I suspect we are not prepared to accept the possible consequences.

    My hunch is the possible consequences are all inflated. The Muslim world respects a strong leader.

    The Left can certainly

    Imagine there’s no countries
    It isn’t hard to do
    Nothing to kill or die for
    And no religion too

    It’s interesting that they want to get there by means of an alliance with a militant religion (both Shia and Sunni flavors) bent on world domination and willing to kill and die to achieve it.

    One of the Sunni factions now dominates the Palestinian movement, which denies the historical Jewish tie to Eretz Yisrael (including denying that there ever was a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem,) destroys the physical evidence of the Jewish presence in the land when they can, and promulgates maps of Palestine in which there is no Israel.

    You may say that I’m  a dreamer, but I’m not the only one who thinks that it’s high time for the U.S. to – in this very concrete way – recognize  the truth of the interconnected claims of the Jewish state and the Jewish people to Jerusalem.

     

    • #32
  3. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    Pope Francis doesn’t like it, so it must be the right thing to do.

    • #33
  4. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    The (Oslo) Peace Process has been something of a fraud, but paying lip service to the Two State Solution has provided a fig leaf to corrupt polities like the Palestinian Authority or the Gulf States/Saudi when they cooperate with the  US (and Israel).  They don’t need the fig leaf for the US, but for their own people.  So ripping up the fig leaf will make these regimes less stable – or certainly more expensive to keep in place. Whether this is a problem or not depends on whether the US Administration needs these regimes in place or not in the long term – or at least more than it needs the short term domestic political benefit of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.   I guess only time will tell, but it’s unrealistic to think there will be no cost to US interests at all.

    • #34
  5. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    Nothing to worry about. After all, Islam is the religion of peace.

    • #35
  6. Chuckles Coolidge
    Chuckles
    @Chuckles

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Nothing to worry about. After all, Islam is the religion of peace.

    Are you sure? (About that religion of peace thing, that is.) After all, Fatah and I think some others have stated this has “opened the gates of hell” – an unexpected admission!

    • #36
  7. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Zafar (View Comment):
    paying lip service to the Two State Solution has provided a fig leaf to corrupt polities like the Palestinian Authority or the Gulf States/Saudi when they cooperate with the US (and Israel). They don’t need the fig leaf for the US, but for their own people. So ripping up the fig leaf will make these regimes less stable

    I believe the President’s comments reiterated his support for a two-state solution if both sides are agreeable to it.

    • #37
  8. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    Chuckles (View Comment):

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Nothing to worry about. After all, Islam is the religion of peace.

    Are you sure? (About that religion of peace thing, that is.) After all, Fatah and I think some others have stated this has “opened the gates of hell” – an unexpected admission!

    I’m shocked, shocked that you could think that Islam is anything other than the most peaceful religion on this or any other planet in the universe!  Didn’t you listen to George W. and Barack H. when they lectured us about the Islamic religion?  Islam is definitely the religion of peace and to think otherwise is Islamophobic, homophobic, cis-gendered, and a lot of other really bad made-up words.

    • #38
  9. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Pope Francis doesn’t like it, so it must be the right thing to do.

    It kinda has gotten to that point, hasn’t it?

    • #39
  10. Painter Jean Moderator
    Painter Jean
    @PainterJean

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Pope Francis doesn’t like it, so it must be the right thing to do.

    It kinda has gotten to that point, hasn’t it?

    • #40
  11. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Zafar (View Comment):
    The (Oslo) Peace Process has been something of a fraud, but paying lip service to the Two State Solution has provided a fig leaf to corrupt polities like the Palestinian Authority or the Gulf States/Saudi when they cooperate with the US (and Israel).

    On the other hand, the current Saudi regime is not only saying they’re agin terrorism, at least some of the rivals they seem to be using their current power consolidation purge to isolate and mulct probably were terror financiers. No doubt there will be discreet penalties paid by errant yet favored relatives. Furthermore, there are reports, (or at any rate rumors,) of developments that would pit the Saudis against the Palestinian Authority.

    Caroline Glick:

    The fact is that the alleged Saudi peace plan represents a radical break with all of the peace plans presented by the Arabs, the Europeans, and the U.S. over the past 40 years. [It] is the first peace plan that foresees two viable states living in peace. All the other plans were based on transforming Israel into a non-viable state with a non-viable Palestinian state in its heartland.

    While the Times report cites Western sources claiming that Egypt has rejected the prospect of merging Gaza with the northern Sinai under Palestinian sovereignty, there is no reason to assume that the option is dead. To the contrary, in the aftermath of last week’s massacre of 305 Muslim worshipers in a mosque in the northern Sinai, it is arguably more relevant now than at any previous time.

    The mosque massacre makes clear that the Egyptian regime is incapable of defeating the Islamic State (IS) insurgency in Sinai on its own. Egypt’s incapacity is as much a function of economic priorities as military capabilities. . . . [I]n the absence of significant economic support for developing the Sinai, it is hard to see an end to the insurgency.

    If the Europeans, Americans, and Arab League member states chose to develop the northern Sinai for a Palestinian state with half the enthusiasm they have devoted to building a non-viable Palestinian state in Jerusalem and Judea and Samaria that would render Israel indefensible and enfeebled, the Palestinians would have a viable, developed state in short order. And the Egyptians in turn would have the international support they need . . . to defeat IS completely and to rebuild their national economy.

    The New York Times article may or may not be an accurate portrayal of a real plan presented by the actual crown prince of Saudi Arabia. But if it isn’t his plan, it should be, . . . because it is the first peace plan anyone has ever put forward that makes sense. Not only does it secure the future of both Israel and the Palestinians, it enables Arab states like Saudi Arabia to work openly with Israel to defeat their joint Iranian enemy, while ensuring that Israel can survive and remain a credible ally to its Arab neighbors for decades to come.

    • #41
  12. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Chuckles (View Comment):
    I am glad to see it, but I suspect we are not prepared to accept the possible consequences.

    What, Palestinians might be moved from their long-standing embrace of peaceful co-existence to engage in terrorism instead?

    • #42
  13. Titus Techera Contributor
    Titus Techera
    @TitusTechera

    Zafar (View Comment):
    The (Oslo) Peace Process has been something of a fraud, but paying lip service to the Two State Solution has provided a fig leaf to corrupt polities like the Palestinian Authority or the Gulf States/Saudi when they cooperate with the US (and Israel). They don’t need the fig leaf for the US, but for their own people. So ripping up the fig leaf will make these regimes less stable – or certainly more expensive to keep in place. Whether this is a problem or not depends on whether the US Administration needs these regimes in place or not in the long term – or at least more than it needs the short term domestic political benefit of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. I guess only time will tell, but it’s unrealistic to think there will be no cost to US interests at all.

    Things are shifting; there will be some damage; but it’s no longer the case that Arab states are so focused on Israel. The Saudi-Iran prospect of war is a bigger deal.

    • #43
  14. OkieSailor Member
    OkieSailor
    @OkieSailor

    Titus Techera (View Comment):
    Is the US Embassy moving post-haste?

    President Trump has directed that the 3 year process of moving the embassy begin.  I know I read this this morning but can’t find the quote. It does seem a reasonable time-frame to me.

    • #44
  15. OkieSailor Member
    OkieSailor
    @OkieSailor

    Chuckles (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Chuckles (View Comment):
    I am glad to see it, but I suspect we are not prepared to accept the possible consequences.

    WE don’t have to accept the consequences. The Israelis do. And from what I hear, they’ve been saying, “What took so long?”

    @susan, I am glad the Israelis are glad, and I expect they have considered well any negative consequences. So if there is dancing in the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, good.

    Nevertheless, your response proves my point: There may well be negative consequences for the US of A but we have not, I suspect, given them much thought. To any political action there is a benefit, and there is a cost: The bigger the action, the greater each of those will be. While I am convinced the cost/benefit ration will be less than one, it will not be zero.

    Do you really think that the opposition to this will just fold? Is it not reasonable to expect some backlash? What do you think? How will it impact current events in Saudi Arabia? What impact will it have on politics in Turkey? Syria? Might it cause a surge in ISIS recruitments? I can’t answer any of these, but they are legitimate questions to be considered. I only hope the PTB thought long and hard about these and similar questions before fulfilling a campaign promise.

    Erdogan has said Turkey might break relations with Israel. That sounds tepid to me. Turkey has already broken those relations temporarily when Israel stopped the attempt to run its blockade by a Turkish merchant ship. But that break didn’t last so it wasn’t really serious, just a message sending ploy. Syria is irrelevant unless as a proxy for Putin. I doubt if Putin will use that tack except maybe to test the waters, briefly. The Saudi King has advised Mr. Trump not to take this step but it seems that came before it was done, so it’s still not clear what Saudi Arabia will do in response. I suspect they will posture and do nothing as they very much need both the US and Israel to help them counter Iran’s designs on domination of the ME. Netanyahu is saying that other countries are indicating they will follow the US move. That is the most important development and its impact will depend on how many and who do so. And how soon. Some countries will no doubt scream for a while, then follow suit when the furor dies down. This is what many countries do whenever the US makes a serious move, simply to show their population that they can ‘Stand up to the Mighty and Evil US.’  It amounts to a lot of heat but no fire.

    This move by Mr. Trump simply recognizes reality and is IMHO long overdue. Better late then never though.

    • #45
  16. OkieSailor Member
    OkieSailor
    @OkieSailor

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    a lot of other really bad made-up words.

    Just can’t like this enough without imposing a comment on you-all ;>)

    Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like,Like, Like, Like, Like

    Whew, are my fingers tired.

    • #46
  17. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Titus Techera (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    The (Oslo) Peace Process has been something of a fraud, but paying lip service to the Two State Solution has provided a fig leaf to corrupt polities like the Palestinian Authority or the Gulf States/Saudi when they cooperate with the US (and Israel). They don’t need the fig leaf for the US, but for their own people. So ripping up the fig leaf will make these regimes less stable – or certainly more expensive to keep in place. Whether this is a problem or not depends on whether the US Administration needs these regimes in place or not in the long term – or at least more than it needs the short term domestic political benefit of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. I guess only time will tell, but it’s unrealistic to think there will be no cost to US interests at all.

    Things are shifting; there will be some damage; but it’s no longer the case that Arab states are so focused on Israel. The Saudi-Iran prospect of war is a bigger deal.

    Titus – these are not representative democracies, so the State’s concerns and priorities are not necessarily the people’s.

    I would be surprised if Sunni Arabs felt any existential threat from Iran – though I am fully cognizant the Gulf Monarchies reasonably might.

    • #47
  18. Titus Techera Contributor
    Titus Techera
    @TitusTechera

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Titus Techera (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):
    The (Oslo) Peace Process has been something of a fraud, but paying lip service to the Two State Solution has provided a fig leaf to corrupt polities like the Palestinian Authority or the Gulf States/Saudi when they cooperate with the US (and Israel). They don’t need the fig leaf for the US, but for their own people. So ripping up the fig leaf will make these regimes less stable – or certainly more expensive to keep in place. Whether this is a problem or not depends on whether the US Administration needs these regimes in place or not in the long term – or at least more than it needs the short term domestic political benefit of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. I guess only time will tell, but it’s unrealistic to think there will be no cost to US interests at all.

    Things are shifting; there will be some damage; but it’s no longer the case that Arab states are so focused on Israel. The Saudi-Iran prospect of war is a bigger deal.

    Titus – these are not representative democracies, so the State’s concerns and priorities are not necessarily the people’s.

    I would be surprised if Sunni Arabs felt any existential threat from Iran – though I am fully cognizant the Gulf Monarchies reasonably might.

    Hey, representative democracies do not seem to have that much connection between the governing classes & the governed either, if that helps!

    I agree that there’s a difference between regimes & the concerns of different classes.

    But I don’t expect Saudi Arabia to face trouble now; nor Eqypt; nor, who? Not Iran. Yemen is already in chaos without anyone riding the storm. In Syria, Assad will still be riding the storm. You expect regime collapse in Lebanon or Jordan?

    • #48
  19. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Egypt and Jordan, imho.  And Saudi and the Gulf Monarchies will have a harder time squaring the circle.

    Lebanon doesn’t recognize Israel anyway, so its Govt is already on the side of the people on this issue.

    • #49
  20. GroovinDrJarvis Inactive
    GroovinDrJarvis
    @GroovinDrJarvis

    Caryn (View Comment):

    GroovinDrJarvis (View Comment):

    EJHill (View Comment):
    Tonight on the walls of the old city in Jerusalem:

    Where’d you find this picture? I tried for about 10 seconds and couldn’t locate it b/c I’m feeling lazy…

    Lazy, indeed! It’s all over facebook. (teasing you, btw)

    Here it is in US media, Washington Examiner.

    A couple more in the Israeli media. Jewish Press, my favorite source of unabashedly pro-Israel news.

    Much obliged, many thanks.

    • #50
  21. Chuckles Coolidge
    Chuckles
    @Chuckles

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    Chuckles (View Comment):

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Nothing to worry about. After all, Islam is the religion of peace.

    Are you sure? (About that religion of peace thing, that is.) After all, Fatah and I think some others have stated this has “opened the gates of hell” – an unexpected admission!

    I’m shocked, shocked that you could think that Islam is anything other than the most peaceful religion on this or any other planet in the universe! Didn’t you listen to George W. and Barack H. when they lectured us about the Islamic religion? Islam is definitely the religion of peace and to think otherwise is Islamophobic, homophobic, cis-gendered, and a lot of other really bad made-up words.

    Hey, just quoting their words.  Clearly they disagree with W. and B.O.  So, I suppose Islam is Islamophobic.

    • #51
  22. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):
    Pope Francis doesn’t like it, so it must be the right thing to do.

    I tend to think of “Pope Francis likes…” as a warning label.

    • #52
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.