We Don’t Care What You Think

 

Been working since 4 am and that, combined with SJWs on Twitter, I may be a little testy. I apologize, sort of, if this offends anyone, but for those of you that want to rip down our monuments, take down flags and/or whatever other symbols in the South offend people’s sensibilities now, here’s the deal.

If you don’t live here then we don’t want your damn opinion about our monuments, etc. You’re not here, so guess what? You don’t have to look at it! Go about your day and try to forget about us honoring our war dead or people we think were heroic, if not perfect leaders. After all, in the SJW world view, Lincoln himself was racist as well, so it won’t be long before we tear down the Lincoln Memorial. We know now that history began with Obama’s election, so why even acknowledge the past has been a bit more complicated than today’s college student at Evergreen may understand.

The South is plenty conflicted already about race, poverty, the war, and how we feel about some of our collective guilt and whatnot. Now Antifa is going all Taliban on us and tearing down any monuments they feel offends their Social Justice dogma. So don’t take up for them, don’t defend their position, don’t explain how they are really right but just a little overboard on their implementation.

They are wrong and most importantly we don’t give a good G.D. what they think. They need to go back to Seattle or wherever the hell they came from (probably UNC). As far as the Nazis and Antifa protesters go, is Virginia out of rubber bullets and fire hoses or something?

I heard the story as it was passed down
About guts and glory and Rebel stands
Four generations, a whole lot has changed
Robert E. Lee
Martin Luther King
We’ve come a long way rising from the flame
Stay out the way of the southern thing

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 253 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    Northerners have looked down on the South since before the war. Winning just added fuel to the fire.

    I guess I don’t have this bias, and I was raised exclusively in the North, by Northerners. I did grow up around Southerner transplants and married a Louisianan.

    Would it be putting too fine a point on it to say that it’s just possible Southerners are overly concerned with what prats from Boston think?

    I cared not one whit, until I met a bunch of people for the North East in College, and they openly looked down on me for being Southern. Personally, I have found all the sterotypes of people from the North East being rude and smug to be 100% accurate.

    In short, I have a chip on my shoulder because of the behavior of the people of the North. And here we have, in living color, yet another flipping example of the North telling the South how to act. Tell me this: How long, post the Civil Rights Movement, should the South not be allowed to control its own voting districts? How many generations need to pass?

    • #91
  2. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

     

    You mean the prats from Boston who are trying to erase our history? The prats from Boston who want us to grovel in culturally suicidal self-loathing the way the Germans do? The prats from Boston who want to reduce our entire history and culture to nothing but mistreatment of black people?

    Yes, them!

    If you really can’t see why we find the things I listed infuriating, then I just can’t help you.

    You really shouldn’t care what they think.

    But that doesn’t mean that they’re wrong about everything merely by dint of who or what they are.  I think there’s plenty of Southern culture that doesn’t revolve around Civil War figures who were involved in rebellion against the nation in defense of a pretty odious institution.

     

    • #92
  3. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    @majestyk, of course the Civil War was about slavery. Alexander Stephens said the cornerstone of the South was slavery, which is abominable.

    However, for many people who fought that war, it was not that simple.

    If fought purely over slavery, then why did so many slave states stay in the Union for so long after SC seceded? Why did 4 slave states remain in the Union for the entire war? How did the Emancipation Proclamation change the moral purpose of the fighting in 1863 if the purpose was clear? Why did that free slaves in only rebellious states?

    Look. The South needed to lose that war because no one could disentangle slavery from federalism. But it was a very complex historical event, and if you’re from the South–a region that did not recover financially until at least the 1950s due to the rise of the Sunbelt–you grew up thinking about some of those complexities in ways that people from other parts of the country do not.

    Now let me be unequivocal.

    I absolutely despise racism, Nazis of any variety, and–if I’m being completely honest here–Donald Trump. (Sorry, Trump people. He’s the president. I respect that, but I really, really don’t like the dude.)

    That doesn’t mean that I can’t understand why Southerners in general–NOT any subgroup of white supremacists who are horrible–get bent out of shape over this recent trend to remove all vestiges of honor from a war that destroyed so many of, yes, their people.

    Could there be honor in a country that wanted to sustain slavery?

    Um. Well. Yeah. Of course.

    Because?

    Many of the men who fought in the South were fighting for their own reasons. They didn’t see this as a conflict over slavery as much as an invasion of their home states. Nor was slavery or race viewed in the way that we view slavery or race today. People had much, much greater loyalty to their state than they did to the broader union.

    So let’s imagine George Washington was alive during the Civil War.

    Would he have refused to lift a sword against Virginia?

    If he had done so, would that have meant everything before then was gone?

    Robert E. Lee’s father was a Revolutionary War hero, and his wife had her property in VA because of her relation to Washington.

    Lee provided for freed slaves like Washington had.

    It’s… complicated.

    Also, if you really think the Civil War was a ga-zillion years ago, you might want to look up Irene Triplett who was alive in 2014 and whose father fought for both the South and the North.

    I don’t fly a Confederate flag. I never will. But I will tell you it annoys me that I got an email from my city council today saying the name of Robert E. Lee St.’s got to go.

    Cause… Ya know. Hate.

    Yes!

    • #93
  4. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Majestyk (View Comment):

     

    I cared not one whit, until I met a bunch of people for the North East in College, and they openly looked down on me for being Southern. Personally, I have found all the sterotypes of people from the North East being rude and smug to be 100% accurate.

    In short, I have a chip on my shoulder because of the behavior of the people of the North. And here we have, in living color, yet another flipping example of the North telling the South how to act. Tell me this: How long, post the Civil Rights Movement, should the South not be allowed to control its own voting districts? How many generations need to pass?

    If you don’t like how they treated you, you should see how they treat each other… oh, look, one of them is in the White House!

    Ahem.  Northerners – or more specifically Northeasterners, are a special breed.  I was born in Green Bay and much of my family still lives there.  It’s the last big city before you get to Canadia basically, and it bears no resemblance to those Northeastern enclaves.

    At any rate, I’m in favor of the VRA’s complete repeal, so you don’t have to convince me of that.

    • #94
  5. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    You mean the prats from Boston who are trying to erase our history? The prats from Boston who want us to grovel in culturally suicidal self-loathing the way the Germans do? The prats from Boston who want to reduce our entire history and culture to nothing but mistreatment of black people?

    Yes, them!

    If you really can’t see why we find the things I listed infuriating, then I just can’t help you.

    You really shouldn’t care what they think.

    But that doesn’t mean that they’re wrong about everything merely by dint of who or what they are. I think there’s plenty of Southern culture that doesn’t revolve around Civil War figures who were involved in rebellion against the nation in defense of a pretty odious institution.

    There is nothing of NYC culture worth saving. They are the most provincial people I have ever met. Heck, the people of Long Island, just outside the city cannot stand them.

    I care what they think because they use their power to mess with my life and always have.

    • #95
  6. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    There is nothing of NYC culture worth saving. They are the most provincial people I have ever met. Heck, the people of Long Island, just outside the city cannot stand them.

    I care what they think because they use their power to mess with my life and always have.

    I feel like you’re giving them far too much agency and perceived power over your life.

    There isn’t a thing they can do to me, and I know it.  They’re free to live in their rabbit warrens.

    • #96
  7. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    I cared not one whit, until I met a bunch of people for the North East in College, and they openly looked down on me for being Southern. Personally, I have found all the sterotypes of people from the North East being rude and smug to be 100% accurate.

    In short, I have a chip on my shoulder because of the behavior of the people of the North. And here we have, in living color, yet another flipping example of the North telling the South how to act. Tell me this: How long, post the Civil Rights Movement, should the South not be allowed to control its own voting districts? How many generations need to pass?

    If you don’t like how they treated you, you should see how they treat each other… oh, look, one of them is in the White House!

    Ahem. Northerners – or more specifically Northeasterners, are a special breed. I was born in Green Bay and much of my family still lives there. It’s the last big city before you get to Canadia basically, and it bears no resemblance to those Northeastern enclaves.

    At any rate, I’m in favor of the VRA’s complete repeal, so you don’t have to convince me of that.

    That is Midwest. Midwesterners are fine. I married a Gal from Central Ohio. I talk of the true Yankees.

    • #97
  8. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    There is nothing of NYC culture worth saving. They are the most provincial people I have ever met. Heck, the people of Long Island, just outside the city cannot stand them.

    I care what they think because they use their power to mess with my life and always have.

    I feel like you’re giving them far too much agency and perceived power over your life.

    There isn’t a thing they can do to me, and I know it. They’re free to live in their rabbit warrens.

    Oh? They appear to run Conservatism, Inc. They appear to have far more sway on the GOP than the South does. Same ones who forced out Newt after all.

    No, too much power over the Federal Government.

    • #98
  9. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):

    Majestyk (View Comment):
    I’ve lived here long enough to know who flies the Rebel flag unironically.

    First of all, who the neck flies a flag ironically? ?

    The kind of people who don’t get irony!

    Secondly, plenty of people use that symbol as an expression of regional pride without any thought of racial overtones. However, I agree that the flag is also used more and more as a political symbol for idiot racists.

    I think times change, and things that once meant something to a vast majority of people can take on whole new meanings given different contexts.

    As a Northerner, I don’t recall there ever being a time when we were asked to display our pride at being “northerners” or having won the war.

    In my case this would obviously be non sequitir anyways… So, in trying to figure this phenomenon out, is there something to the notion that losing steeled the resolve of Southerners and that losing wounded their pride such that they have to make a big show about this and they inculcated their children with the mythology of how nobly their ancestor fought?

    This is a serious question. I have relatives who fought in wars too – but obviously on the winning side. This sort of “honor culture” wasn’t really part of any family story that I recall.

    Well as a northerner do you actually have anything to be proud of or take pride in?

    • #99
  10. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Concretevol (View Comment):
    We know they don’t have the same regional pride to be from Ohio

    I’m proud to be from Ohio and to have ancestors who fought for the Union, and I think you should keep your Robert E. Lee statues right where they are.

    • #100
  11. Hammer, The Inactive
    Hammer, The
    @RyanM

    There is a statue of Lenin in Seattle.

    We should form a mob and go tear it down.

    • #101
  12. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):
    We know they don’t have the same regional pride to be from Ohio

    I’m proud to be from Ohio and to have ancestors who fought for the Union, and I think you should keep your Robert E. Lee statues right where they are.

    Little Mac was from Ohio, wasn’t he?  For anyone who does not know, George McClellan was a major Union general. He ran for president against Abe Lincoln in the middle of the war.

    There are things to not admire about Mac.  There are things to admire about Mac.

    I know soldiers from Ohio felt they were doing their duty and fought hard.  :)

     

    • #102
  13. Hammer, The Inactive
    Hammer, The
    @RyanM

    Lois Lane (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Concretevol (View Comment):
    We know they don’t have the same regional pride to be from Ohio

    I’m proud to be from Ohio and to have ancestors who fought for the Union, and I think you should keep your Robert E. Lee statues right where they are.

    Little Mac was from Ohio, wasn’t he? For anyone who does not know, George McClellan was a major Union general. He ran for president against Abe Lincoln in the middle of the war.

    There are things to not admire about Mac. There are things to admire about Mac.

    I know soldiers from Ohio felt they were doing their duty and fought hard. ?

    Little Mac was from punch-out, I believe.

    • #103
  14. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    However, for many people who fought that war, it was not that simple.

    If fought purely over slavery, then why did so many slave states stay in the Union for so long after SC seceded? Why did 4 slave states remain in the Union for the entire war? How did the Emancipation Proclamation change the moral purpose of the fighting in 1863 if the purpose was clear? Why did that free slaves in only rebellious states?

    “So long” meaning… two, three or four months?

    It’s obvious why those states which were on the border waited so long: they didn’t want to become battlegrounds and were holding out for a peaceful resolution.

    As you said: it’s complicated.  At the time that Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation he was trying to do a variety of things all at once: Maintain as many states in the Union as possible, assemble a political coalition to Amend the Constitution and fight a war which he needed to win to preserve the Nation.

    He couldn’t tick off the slave states that stayed by freeing their slaves immediately but he could convince them to vote for the 13th Amendment (ultimately, those states all ratified it with the exception of Kentucky and Mississippi and Delaware within a few years of its enactment) and he needed their fighting men.

    Lincoln accomplished nearly all of these things masterfully by walking a very fine line.  Lincoln’s major problem was the lack of an aggressive and competent general who could bring a swift and successful resolution to the hostilities.  When he finally was able to put Grant in charge of the effort, the war quickly ended after years of pointless slaughter wrought by wrongheaded tactics that mismatched the available technology.

    Some people point to the First World War as the first “modern” war, but I think they’re wrong.  The minieball and rifled barrels in combination with horrifically inept medical techniques meant that almost any major wound sustained on the battlefield was surely lethal or would result in amputation.  Add in the prevalence of disease (which, if I recall was responsible for more deaths than combat wounds) and it was a recipe for disaster: a war fought with cavalry/infantry tactics except with rifles with hugely increased lethality and accuracy.

    • #104
  15. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):
    Well as a northerner do you actually have anything to be proud of or take pride in?

    Yes.  Our nation.

    • #105
  16. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    Oh? They appear to run Conservatism, Inc. They appear to have far more sway on the GOP than the South does. Same ones who forced out Newt after all.

    No, too much power over the Federal Government.

    Rich Lowry is a Virginian.

    Kevin Williamson is a Texan.

    Charles Cooke is a Brit!

    Freddy Barnes is a Virginian.

    OK… Bill Kristol is a New Yorker.

    Who else?

    • #106
  17. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    However, for many people who fought that war, it was not that simple.

    If fought purely over slavery, then why did so many slave states stay in the Union for so long after SC seceded? Why did 4 slave states remain in the Union for the entire war? How did the Emancipation Proclamation change the moral purpose of the fighting in 1863 if the purpose was clear? Why did that free slaves in only rebellious states?

    “So long” meaning… two, three or four months?

    It’s obvious why those states which were on the border waited so long: they didn’t want to become battlegrounds and were holding out for a peaceful resolution.

    As you said: it’s complicated. At the time that Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation he was trying to do a variety of things all at once: Maintain as many states in the Union as possible, assemble a political coalition to Amend the Constitution and fight a war which he needed to win to preserve the Nation.

    He couldn’t tick off the slave states that stayed by freeing their slaves immediately but he could convince them to vote for the 13th Amendment (ultimately, those states all ratified it with the exception of Kentucky and Mississippi and Delaware within a few years of its enactment) and he needed their fighting men.

    Lincoln accomplished nearly all of these things masterfully by walking a very fine line. Lincoln’s major problem was the lack of an aggressive and competent general who could bring a swift and successful resolution to the hostilities. When he finally was able to put Grant in charge of the effort, the war quickly ended after years of pointless slaughter wrought by wrongheaded tactics that mismatched the available technology.

    Some people point to the First World War as the first “modern” war, but I think they’re wrong. The minieball and rifled barrels in combination with horrifically inept medical techniques meant that almost any major wound sustained on the battlefield was surely lethal or would result in amputation. Add in the prevalence of disease (which, if I recall was responsible for more deaths than combat wounds) and it was a recipe for disaster: a war fought with cavalry/infantry tactics except with rifles with hugely increased lethality and accuracy.

    The funny thing is that I don’t disagree with much of this, though you bulldoze over the nuances, and I grew up in Georgia hearing unkind things about “Billy the Torch.”

    Even so, I also remember that Joe Johnston surrendered to Sherman in Durham, NC after Lee had surrendered to Grant.  Johnston later served as one of Sherman’s pall bearers.

    You see, the relationships/interactions between many men after the war suggests feelings of mutual respect whether one wore blue or grey.

    It was–and is–complicated.

    • #107
  18. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    You see, the relationships/interactions between many men after the war suggests feelings of mutual respect whether one wore blue or grey.

     

    Yes. Lincoln and Grant respected Lee, but apparently we’re not allowed to anymore.

    • #108
  19. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    You see, the relationships/interactions between many men after the war suggests feelings of mutual respect whether one wore blue or grey.

    Yes. Lincoln and Grant respected Lee, but apparently we’re not allowed to anymore.

    Right?  It breaks my heart, actually.  And the irony is that when I give pre-tests to many of my students, they say Robert E. Lee is the guy that burned Atlanta to the ground.  It’s amazing to me how many people are offended by names and statues of which they know nothing….  Even more ironic though, I would bet doughnuts to dollars that most of those white supremacists in VA are also ignorant of a lot of Lee’s biography and certainly the nuances of Civil War historiography.

    • #109
  20. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Umbra Fractus (View Comment):

    J.D. Snapp (View Comment):

    Yeah I’ve been hearing a lot lately that “Texas isn’t a Southern state”. I’ve never known it not to be. Texas seceded. The people have an accent and partake in Southern culture. What’s not Southern about it?

    The confusion comes from the fact that the line between South and West runs through the middle of Texas. So East Texas is part of the South, but West Texas is closer to New Mexico and Arizona culturally.

    It’s actually slightly more complicated than I made it sound:

    • #110
  21. 9thDistrictNeighbor Member
    9thDistrictNeighbor
    @9thDistrictNeighbor

    Lois Lane (View Comment):
    Also, if you really think the Civil War was a ga-zillion years ago, you might want to look up Irene Triplett who was alive in 2014 and whose father fought for both the South and the North.

    According to a story in USNews, the VA confirmed that as of May 26, 2017, she is still alive and receiving pension payments.

    • #111
  22. J.D. Snapp Coolidge
    J.D. Snapp
    @JulieSnapp

    Hammer, The (View Comment):
    There is a statue of Lenin in Seattle.

    We should form a mob and go tear it down.

    Seems that that is the socially acceptable thing to do now: destroying things you don’t like.

    • #112
  23. Pugshot Inactive
    Pugshot
    @Pugshot

    Lois Lane

    @majestyk, of course the Civil War was about slavery. Alexander Stephens said the cornerstone of the South was slavery, which is abominable.

    However, for many people who fought that war, it was not that simple.

    If fought purely over slavery, then why did so many slave states stay in the Union for so long after SC seceded? Why did 4 slave states remain in the Union for the entire war? How did the Emancipation Proclamation change the moral purpose of the fighting in 1863if the purpose was clear? Why did that free slaves in only rebellious states?

    Look. The South needed to lose that war because no one could disentangle slavery from federalism. But it was a very complex historical event, and if you’re from the South–a region that did not recover financially until at least the 1950s due to the rise of the Sunbelt–you grew up thinking about some of those complexities in ways that people from other parts of the country do not.

    Now let me be unequivocal.

    I absolutely despise racism, Nazis of any variety, and–if I’m being completely honest here–Donald Trump. (Sorry, Trump people. He’s the president. I respect that, but I really, really don’t like the dude.)

    That doesn’t mean that I can’t understand why Southerners in general–NOT any subgroup of white supremacists who are horrible–get bent out of shape over this recent trend to remove all vestiges of honor from a war that destroyed so many of, yes, theirpeople.

    Could there be honor in a country that wanted to sustain slavery?

    Um. Well. Yeah. Of course.

    Because?

    Many of the men who fought in the South were fighting for their own reasons. They didn’t see this as a conflict over slavery as much as an invasion of their home states. Nor was slavery or race viewed in the way that we view slavery or race today. People had much, much greater loyalty to their state than they did to the broader union.

    So let’s imagine George Washington was alive during the Civil War.

    Would he have refused to lift a sword against Virginia?

    If he had done so, would that have meant everything before then was gone?

    Robert E. Lee’s father was a Revolutionary War hero, and his wife had her property in VA because of her relation to Washington.

    Lee provided for freed slaves like Washington had.

    It’s… complicated.

    Also, if you really think the Civil War was a ga-zillion years ago, you might want to look up Irene Triplett who was alive in 2014 and whose father fought for both the South and the North.

    I don’t fly a Confederate flag. I never will. But I will tell you it annoys me that I got an email from my city council today saying the name of Robert E. Lee St.’s got to go.

    Cause… Ya know. Hate.

    I agree. I’m a Yankee. I was born in Detroit; except for a short four-year period, I’ve always lived in the North. But my father was a Southerner – born and raised in Tuscaloosa, Alabama – and all my relatives on his side of the family are Southerners. My Southern ancestors in my father’s/grandfather’s/great-grandfather’s line did not (so far as I can determine) fight in the Civil War – either too old or too young. But my great-grandmother is another story. Her father fought in the war and her uncle was killed in the Battle of Jonesboro (outside Atlanta). So far as I can determine, none of my relatives owned slaves; they were poor farmers and a slave (not to mention slaves) would have been too expensive for them to afford. At the time of the Civil War, the average Southerner did not consider himself an American first; he considered himself an Alabaman, a Georgian, a Virginian, etc. As with Robert E. Lee, who declined Lincoln’s offer of the command of the Union Army because he could not take up arms against his state, they fought, by and large, because their states had seceded and the Northerners could not accept that fact, but instead decided to invade the South; Their states called them to repel the Northern invader and they responded. Not that they did not support the institution of slavery; it was a system they grew up with and were used to. Most would not have questioned the system they were familiar with, the one their economy was organized around. I suspect that by and large they considered Negroes (to use the old name) to be lesser people than whites, as most people – North or South – probably did then (not to mention their view of Asians or Native Americans, etc.). They probably believed – in general – that Negroes were not much better than beasts and that they were fit to serve only as servants or farmhands. I don’t respect or agree with that view. Who among us does? Thankfully we have come to believe that we are all equally the children of God. But I don’t believe the men who fought for the Confederacy were evil racists. They were, as we all are, products of their time and place. Other than exceptional individuals, they believed what they were raised to believe – as do most of us. Their memorials remind us that good men can believe terrible things, and can be brave in support of the wrong causes. If these memorials are evil, then are Civil War re-enactors who proudly portray Confederate soldiers also evil because they pay homage to an institution we believe was abominable? All our beliefs would be so easy to arrive at if we knew what future generations would think of us. As we generally think that if we’d been born centuries ago we would be born into the aristocracy (though the reality is that we’d mostly be peasants), we also somehow think that if we’d been born in 19th century America, we would have been appalled at slavery and given our lives to end it. And so, secure in this belief, we find it easy to condemn our Southern ancestors and the monuments that have been raised in their memory.

    • #113
  24. J. D. Fitzpatrick Member
    J. D. Fitzpatrick
    @JDFitzpatrick

    J.D. Snapp (View Comment):

    TempTime (View Comment):

    J.D. Snapp (View Comment):

    Hypatia (View Comment):
    I love this post!

    I’m not a Southerner, but I am a fan of the great Florence King who did such a wonderful job for her country–“both of them”! as she memorably put it in one book.

    “America is my home!” as Trump tweeted today. Yes, but within that home,

    The West,

    New England

    North of 80*

    and Dixie

    to name a few–

    are our own rooms!

    * check on YouTube for Van Wagner’s song North of 80 if you wanna know where I call home! Ok, yuh, the whole thing is amateurish but that only makes me love it more,..

    I actually almost got named Dixie!

    I love that name. My very best pet ever was named Dixie Lee.

    It didn’t go through because Mom thought it sounded too much like a stripper name. I’m kind of bummed, but I like my name just fine.

    Oh boy. Looking forward to the stripper names thread. @DocJay, @MikeLaroche, …

    • #114
  25. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    J. D. Fitzpatrick (View Comment):

    J.D. Snapp (View Comment):

    TempTime (View Comment):

    J.D. Snapp (View Comment):

    Hypatia (View Comment):
    I love this post!

    I’m not a Southerner, but I am a fan of the great Florence King who did such a wonderful job for her country–“both of them”! as she memorably put it in one book.

    “America is my home!” as Trump tweeted today. Yes, but within that home,

    The West,

    New England

    North of 80*

    and Dixie

    to name a few–

    are our own rooms!

    * check on YouTube for Van Wagner’s song North of 80 if you wanna know where I call home! Ok, yuh, the whole thing is amateurish but that only makes me love it more,..

    I actually almost got named Dixie!

    I love that name. My very best pet ever was named Dixie Lee.

    It didn’t go through because Mom thought it sounded too much like a stripper name. I’m kind of bummed, but I like my name just fine.

    Oh boy. Looking forward to the stripper names thread. @DocJay, @MikeLaroche, …

    Destiny Hope Cyrus

    • #115
  26. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Robert McReynolds (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    Northerners have looked down on the South since before the war. Winning just added fuel to the fire.

    Southerners are more likely to have old fashion pride in their state. There is no “Sweet Home New York” songs.

    Nope. This is about moving to New York, not missing home.

    More to the point, if you listen carefully to the lyrics, it is about New York as a big, raging party. If ever that party stops, is there any fealty for it? Not hardly.

    Sure there is. I love the place and so do millions, maybe tens of millions of others. If the reader is not one of us, the post’s title, I Don’t Care What You Think, expresses my attitude.

    That doesn’t mean I don’t care for what Bryan, Fake John/Jane and RMR might say about any other subjects, but I don’t see why defending the South means you get to run down the people of my home town with impunity. Well, yeah, it’s the internet, I suppose we can all do whatever we want with impunity. It’s still the kind of regional hostility and cliches that the OP is complaining about. We have our war dead too, our cemeteries, our monuments, our memories. We are proud of the cause and the flag that we fought for. No apologies for that.

    I come to this post sympathetic to resentment over the way the South has been portrayed in the media since, forever, but I see no reason to let this by.

    • #116
  27. MJBubba Member
    MJBubba
    @

    My father’s parents were both born in 1898.  I grew up on stories of how the family was impoverished by Reconstruction.  They were very proud of the way they survived on little, and managed to make sure that the sharecroppers (former slave families) were able to feed themselves as well as bring in a cash crop.  When the Depression hit, it made no difference; they were already destitute.  Three banks had failed with their money during the two decades prior to the Great Crash.

    They were glad to have banking regulation that FDR championed.  They bitterly regretted the spiteful Yankees who made banking regulation a vehicle for new punishments for Southerners.  Banks were forbidden to close on Confederate holidays.  Government offices were forbidden to close on Confederate holidays.  That is how they smothered our Confederate holidays.  That was done in the 1930s, when my parents were children.

    When someone asks why is the War Between the States still such a thing in the South, I reply that we grew up with parents who still felt the effects of living in Occupied Territory.

    I still suffer these effects.  The textbooks and educational fads in our public schools come from Yankee publishing houses and Yankee elite university curriculum development centers, pressed onto us by a Yankee-dominated Department of Big Education.  It is Yankees who weaponized the Department of Labor, and Yankees who weaponized the IRS.  There are dozens of ways in which our daily lives are shaped by Yankees who leverage their influence in Washington and have us dancing to their tunes.

    In the years leading up to the War, Yankees rammed through a tariff structure with confiscatory charges on exports of cotton.  This made Southern cotton growers captives who sold their cotton to Yankee textile mills for less than they could have earned if not for the punitive tariffs.  It was a deliberate scheme to transfer wealth from Southern cotton growers to Yankee mill owners, while also improving the U.S. balance of trade.

    Yankees are still using the levers of government power to control our lives.

    I am living in Occupied Territory.

    • #117
  28. kylez Member
    kylez
    @kylez

    Majestyk (View Comment):

    kylez (View Comment):
    But when you think about how many people died, I don’t see why it would be so bad for Lincoln to have just given up.

    Mainly because world history would have taken a very different and horrible turn a few decades later when a divided America (likely) went to war with itself (again) and didn’t take part in a number of the advancements that the world experienced in that period.

    America doesn’t become the great nation that it did unless it was unified.

    kylez (View Comment):
    Secession was about slavery, the war was about secession.

    … therefore the war was about slavery and the notion that Americans didn’t find compelling anymore the notion that other Americans could hold people against their will in eternal servitude.

    But this is progress. I like it…

    The United States wouldn’t have been divided. It would have been smaller. There would have been 2 countries between Canada and Mexico, instead of one.

    • #118
  29. Postmodern Hoplite Coolidge
    Postmodern Hoplite
    @PostmodernHoplite

    Majestyk (View Comment):
    Lynyrd Skynyrd isn’t as good as AC/DC. This seems pretty close to an objective fact.

    My tremendous respect for @docjay notwithstanding, but to suggest AC/DC is better in any way to Lynyrd Skynyrd is (ahem) questionable at best.

    • #119
  30. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Gary McVey (View Comment):
    That doesn’t mean I don’t care for what Bryan, Fake John/Jane and RMR might say about any other subjects, but I don’t see why defending the South means you get to run down the people of my home town with impunity.

    It’s still the kind of regional hostility and cliches that the OP is complaining about. We have our war dead too, our cemeteries, our monuments, our memories. We are proud of the cause and the flag that we fought for. No apologies for that.

    1.) That’s fair, I agree with you.

    2.) The point of all this is that it seems that the movers and shakers within the GOP (as well as the media and corporate world) are trying to make it so that we can’t have that, and must be made to suffer and be subject to constant harassment for resisting that narrative, a fate most Southerners wouldn’t wish on their worst enemy…..which naturally makes us regard such attempts as hateful, spiteful and opportunistic cultural persecution, not only by our political enemies but by those who claimed to be our friends and allies, yet keep trying to subject us to this pain despite our telling you of this over and over and over again.  That is why tempers are flaring, we do not regard this as a philosophical or intellectual diversion, but an attempt to cruelly deny to us something that we perceive as integral to our culture and social psychology, not to mention our happiness….not just for a time, but for our entire lives and to be denied to our posterity, and for no better reason than that ya’ll regard this cultural characteristic as mildly offensive and politically inconvenient.

     

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.