Congratulations to Reluctant Trump, You Won the Election

 

Ever since Donald Trump’s surprising (at least to me) victory on November 8, many have wondered exactly what happened and why the pre-election polls were so very wrong. We may finally have an answer. Last week Edison Research released its breakdown of exit polls and their conclusion is both heartening to me and good news for conservatives.

Edison identified a “hidden group” of voters that made all the difference in swinging the election to Trump. This group who they identify as the “Neithers” is what is affectionately known around these parts as ReluctantTrump. While Hillary maintained a decided favorability lead over Trump, it turns out that 18 percent of the electorate found neither candidate acceptable. The surprising finding is that this 18 percent broke for Trump in a major way:

2016-exit-poll-data-the-neithers

The effect was even more pronounced in the five swing states that broke the Democrats’ “Blue Wall” and handed Trump an electoral college victory:

2016-11-30-08_38_49-the-hidden-group-that-won-the-election-for-trump_-exit-poll-analysis-from-edison

In the end, it wasn’t Trump’s Personality Cultists or Republican Party Loyalists who won this election, but a significant group of voters pinching their noses and gritting their teeth: our very own Reluctant Trumpers.

There is not much offered in terms of the actual poll data, so this is only a surface analysis, but what is there points to a few conclusions I consider good for conservatives:

  1. Trump did not win by riding a populist wave. Had the Democrats offered up even a mildly acceptable candidate the Neithers could easily have broken the other way or stayed home. The margins of victory in the five swing states were very narrow and any slight shift in how they broke would have thrown the election to the Democrats.
  2. Between them, Donald Trump and Gary Johnson received 64 percent of the Neither vote. This indicates to me that they are a decidedly right-of-center group (despite allusions in the piece about a significant portion being “favorable” to President Obama).
  3. In the states where there were Senate elections, the decidedly more conservative senatorial candidates won by larger margins than Trump did, which indicates even more room for victory on a conservative agenda.

This gives conservatives far more power in a Trump administration than they would have had if Trump won merely by riding a populist wave. In order to pass his agenda, Trump will need the Neithers in his camp. If they are really made up of ReluctantTrump Conservatives, as I suspect, this is the opportunity to push Trump in the right direction. In this respect, NeverTrump may have been dreadfully wrong; reluctantly backing Trump may indeed end up as the smarter conservative play, as Ricochet First Citizen @tommeyer pointed out in The Federalist.

Congratulations ReluctantTrump, this election continues to prove me and other NeverTrumpers wrong; let’s hope it proves us wrong in the most important of our criticisms. Let’s hope we get actual conservative governance.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 67 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Tom Meyer, Ed. Member
    Tom Meyer, Ed.
    @tommeyer

    Larry Koler:Sorry. I should have said the elite NTs. Those of you who followed them don’t necessarily fit into the category I was describing.

    So you’re saying “non-elite NeverTrumpers” (e.g., @Spin) were incapable of making up their own minds on this matter.

    I’m sorry, but which position is the snotty one again?

    • #61
  2. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Jamie Lockett:

    Manny:You mean the NeverTrumpers didn’t have conviction in their beliefs? Shocking. ?

    I do think Trump expanded the Republican electorate to include the blue collar working types, and I think the Republican Party now has a chance to incorporate them into a permanent coalition, though it will mean modifying our absolute free trade position. A position, by the way, I’ve grown skeptical of myself. There’s something in between absolute free trade and protectionism. It’s a false choice if you’re looking at the issue in absolute terms. Optimum American prosperity strikes a balance.

    Most NeverTrunpers I know didn’t vote for him so I don’t know where you get your snide remark.

    As for trade: yes there is a position between absolute free trade and total protectionism – it’s called crony capitalism and it’s the system in place now. Protect favored industries, ignore the rest. Pick winners and losers. In the end the only real loser is the consumer – that is each and every American citizen.

    I get my snide remark based on the data by the original poster.

    • #62
  3. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Manny:

    Jamie Lockett:

    Manny:You mean the NeverTrumpers didn’t have conviction in their beliefs? Shocking. ?

    I do think Trump expanded the Republican electorate to include the blue collar working types, and I think the Republican Party now has a chance to incorporate them into a permanent coalition, though it will mean modifying our absolute free trade position. A position, by the way, I’ve grown skeptical of myself. There’s something in between absolute free trade and protectionism. It’s a false choice if you’re looking at the issue in absolute terms. Optimum American prosperity strikes a balance.

    Most NeverTrunpers I know didn’t vote for him so I don’t know where you get your snide remark.

    As for trade: yes there is a position between absolute free trade and total protectionism – it’s called crony capitalism and it’s the system in place now. Protect favored industries, ignore the rest. Pick winners and losers. In the end the only real loser is the consumer – that is each and every American citizen.

    I get my snide remark based on the data by the original poster.

    You should pay attention to the data more. You’ll also notice that Gary Johnson received 15% of the Neither vote – far above his national average of 4%, that is probably where a lot of NeverTrumpers like myself and @exjon went. I’m specifically referring to self-identified ReluctantTrumpers here.

    • #63
  4. blood thirsty neocon Inactive
    blood thirsty neocon
    @bloodthirstyneocon

    Who could have predicted such a thing? Oh wait…me! On May 18, in in a post I titled:  Let’s face it, Republican unity will Be much easier than Democratic unity, I wrote:

     

    Which brings me to a group who represents to me the opposite of communist hippies: Never Trumpers. I’m not gonna blow sunshine up you people’s collective skirt. I’m just gonna go with my gut and say that most of you will eventually come around and vote for the nominee of our party. You probably don’t realize it yet, but there is a reason you call yourselves conservatives. You have jobs, homes, stocks, kids, and grandkids. You will not do anything to jeopardize that. And you know that President Hillary Clinton’s could jeopardize all of that. I know this primary has been rough, and voting for a morally and philosophically bankrupt billionaire like Trump feels just plain icky, but most of you will vote for the nominee, because that’s what you do. You will say that you won’t to save face in front of your Ricochet friends and frenemies, but when it’s just you and the ballot, and there is no one there to judge you, you will vote for our party’s nominee.

    If you read the follow-up comments, my certainty on this point was nothing short of absolute. You people are so predictable. BTW, I won’t make you admit you voted for him.

    • #64
  5. Larry Koler Inactive
    Larry Koler
    @LarryKoler

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Larry Koler:Sorry. I should have said the elite NTs. Those of you who followed them don’t necessarily fit into the category I was describing.

    So you’re saying “non-elite NeverTrumpers” (e.g., @Spin) were incapable of making up their own minds on this matter.

    I’m sorry, but which position is the snotty one again?

    Following doesn’t mean that a person is a thrall. In this I only mean that you all took great comfort in the NT elites constant carping about and denigrating of Trump.

    • #65
  6. Robert McReynolds Member
    Robert McReynolds
    @

    Jamie Lockett:

    Spin:

    Jamie Lockett:

    Spin:

    Larry Koler: I read it many times in the runup to the election that NTs were mostly really just a small part of the entitled elite

    You’ve eaten dinner at my table, Larry. Do you consider me to be part of the “entitled elite”? Are we going to trod this ground again?

    There seems to be a need to keep the “us vs them” thing going even in victory. I’d rather not get into this on this thread – it’s an extremely tiresome debate.

    I don’t want to get in to it either. But I’m not going let Larry call me an entitled elite. Because I’m just a middle class working schmuck same as him.

    Well as a Tanker you were chauffeured around the battlefield in comfort without having to plod along on your own two feet. That makes you pretty elitist in my book.

    He should have been sailing around on a yacht that is a United States Destroyer like I did. Caviar, champagne, constant sun. Now that is the lap of luxury.

    • #66
  7. Steve C. Member
    Steve C.
    @user_531302

    Robert McReynolds:

    Jamie Lockett:

    Spin:

    Jamie Lockett:

    Spin:

    Larry Koler: I read it many times in the runup to the election that NTs were mostly really just a small part of the entitled elite

    You’ve eaten dinner at my table, Larry. Do you consider me to be part of the “entitled elite”? Are we going to trod this ground again?

    There seems to be a need to keep the “us vs them” thing going even in victory. I’d rather not get into this on this thread – it’s an extremely tiresome debate.

    I don’t want to get in to it either. But I’m not going let Larry call me an entitled elite. Because I’m just a middle class working schmuck same as him.

    Well as a Tanker you were chauffeured around the battlefield in comfort without having to plod along on your own two feet. That makes you pretty elitist in my book.

    He should have been sailing around on a yacht that is a United States Destroyer like I did. Caviar, champagne, constant sun. Now that is the lap of luxury.

    It’s not just a job, it’s $96.78 a week.

     

     

    • #67
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.