The Caligula Candidate

 

Many people have expressed concern with the remarks that Donald Trump made in the recently released videotape, demonstrating as they do the candidate’s extreme crudity and his contempt for the humanity of women. However there is another aspect of the Don’s character readily observable in the celebrated tape that should be even more alarming. This is Trump’s complete inability to restrain his primal impulses.

Trump is clearly an aspiring dictator, and so has sometimes been compared to Adolf Hitler. However, while sharing Hitler’s national socialist method of invoking the tribal instinct to mobilize mob support for a program of unlimited government, socialistic policy, and one-man rule, Trump has a very different personal character. Until he went insane late in the war, Hitler was capable of a certain amount of intellectual focus and self-discipline. Trump, on the other hand, is completely lacking in those traits. Rather, he is a man of unlimited appetites who sees no reason to control himself, even when an appearance of such control is required to achieve his own strategic ends. Instead of Hitler, the mad Roman emperor Caligula serves as much closer historical model for the dissolute Don.

Trump’s lack of self-control, repeatedly demonstrated through such self-destructive behaviors as his late night defecations into the twitterverse, has long been an annoyance to his campaign staff, who find it objectionable because it decreases his chance of winning the election. However those whose priorities center upon the good of the nation rather than merely the good of a candidate may wish to consider the implications of Trump’s infantilism in a broader context.

The nation’s founders set a Constitutional minimum age requirement of 35 years for the office of president, because they recognized that the Chief Executive of the United States and the Commander-in-Chief of its Armed Forces needs to be a mature adult. Clearly a person who says that he cannot stop himself from spontaneously grabbing and kissing attractive women cannot be described in such terms. Indeed, he would not even qualify as an acceptable adolescent, since anyone who acted in such a manner would not meet the behavior standard required to remain enrolled in a public high school.

The human mind can be described as having three levels of operation, defined by animal lust, practical reason, and moral conscience. You see a desired object. Lust urges you to steal it, reason advises otherwise to avoid prosecution, while conscience tells you not to steal because stealing is wrong. An infant is born with only the lustful part of the mind operational, but we hope over time develops the capacity to act in accord with reason, and ultimately conscience.

An examination of Donald Trump’s life shows that he has not developed well in this respect. Rather, his entire business career has been one cheat after another, swindling his investors, his lenders, his vendors, his workers, and his customers. As a result, there are currently several thousand different lawsuits being processed against him by those he has wronged. Clearly he has no interest in acting according to moral conscience. For Trump, right and wrong are not relevant categories; only winning and losing matter. Furthermore, as demonstrated by the number of suits he has incurred, his practical reason exerts only weak influence in restraining his animal lust to take whatever he wants.

This brings us back to the subject of Caligula, the exemplar of a ruler with unconstrained appetites. According to Wikipedia,

Caligula worked to increase the unconstrained personal power of the emperor, as opposed to countervailing powers within the principate … Caligula reviewed Tiberius’s records of treason trials and decided, based on their actions during these trials, that numerous senators were not trustworthy. He ordered a new set of investigations and trials. He replaced the consul and had several senators put to death. Suetonius reports that other senators were degraded by being forced to wait on him and run beside his chariot..… Philo of Alexandria and Seneca the Younger describe Caligula as an insane emperor who was self-absorbed, angry, killed on a whim, and indulged in too much spending and sex. He is accused of sleeping with other men’s wives and bragging about it, killing for mere amusement, deliberately wasting money on his bridge, causing starvation, and wanting a statue of himself erected in the Temple of Jerusalem for his worship.

Much of the above account is startlingly reminiscent of Trump. But while in Caligula’s day the Roman Empire was completely secure against all external threats, and so his lack of restraint and desire for absolute power could only wreak serious harm on the internal soundness of the commonwealth, an infantile ruler of such character today could quickly lead the nation, and indeed human civilization, to quick and total destruction.

Say what you will, Hillary Clinton is an adult. Many of her policies are mistaken, but she is demonstrably sane. The same cannot be said about Trump.

America requires a president with a mental age over 35, not under two. Trump does not meet that criterion. Accordingly, he is unfit for office.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 189 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Larry3435 Inactive
    Larry3435
    @Larry3435

    Jager:

    Larry3435: Well, I don’t like Trump, so I’m not a fan of those tactics. But what is the excuse of the pro-Trumps for getting all in a huff? This is exactly what they claim to like about their candidate

    I wasn’t aware that I paid money for the Trump Conversation site (ie if Trump would do it, it is perfectly OK).

    It’s not “perfectly okay.”  In fact, it’s ugly and kind of disgusting.  But that doesn’t mean that I’m blind to the double-standard at work here.  It’s also ugly and disgusting when Trump does it.  Or am I supposed to just shut up about that because you paid for your membership here?

    • #181
  2. Pseudodionysius Inactive
    Pseudodionysius
    @Pseudodionysius

    Robert Zubrin:The mind of Trump.img_0171

    That’s it?

    • #182
  3. Jager Coolidge
    Jager
    @Jager

    Larry3435:

    Jager:

    Larry3435: Well, I don’t like Trump, so I’m not a fan of those tactics. But what is the excuse of the pro-Trumps for getting all in a huff? This is exactly what they claim to like about their candidate

    I wasn’t aware that I paid money for the Trump Conversation site (ie if Trump would do it, it is perfectly OK).

    It’s not “perfectly okay.” In fact, it’s ugly and kind of disgusting. But that doesn’t mean that I’m blind to the double-standard at work here. It’s also ugly and disgusting when Trump does it. Or am I supposed to just shut up about that because you paid for your membership here?

    Who said you needed to shut up?

    Most of the people that you declare to be in a “huff” about this garbage article being on the main feed are reluctant Trump voters.

    I don’t like the stupid name calling Trump engages in. I, and a large percent of the people actually saying they will vote for Trump, are not doing so because of juvenile name calling. That there are some people, most of whom are not members of Ricochet, who cheer name calling by Trump does not mean that this site needs to lower its standards.

    • #183
  4. Larry3435 Inactive
    Larry3435
    @Larry3435

    Jager:

    Larry3435:

    Jager:

    Larry3435: Well, I don’t like Trump, so I’m not a fan of those tactics. But what is the excuse of the pro-Trumps for getting all in a huff? This is exactly what they claim to like about their candidate

    I wasn’t aware that I paid money for the Trump Conversation site (ie if Trump would do it, it is perfectly OK).

    It’s not “perfectly okay.” In fact, it’s ugly and kind of disgusting. But that doesn’t mean that I’m blind to the double-standard at work here. It’s also ugly and disgusting when Trump does it. Or am I supposed to just shut up about that because you paid for your membership here?

    Who said you needed to shut up?

    Most of the people that you declare to be in a “huff” about this garbage article being on the main feed are reluctant Trump voters.

    I don’t like the stupid name calling Trump engages in. I, and a large percent of the people actually saying they will vote for Trump, are not doing so because of juvenile name calling. That there are some people, most of whom are not members of Ricochet, who cheer name calling by Trump does not mean that this site needs to lower its standards.

    Okay, fair enough.  If you are not one of those who engages in this double-standard, then my comments were not about you.  But they were about someone.

    • #184
  5. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Pseudodionysius:

    Robert Zubrin:The mind of Trump.img_0171

    That’s it?

    Heh, so disappointing.

    • #185
  6. Pseudodionysius Inactive
    Pseudodionysius
    @Pseudodionysius

    Mike LaRoche:

    Pseudodionysius:

    Robert Zubrin:The mind of Trump.img_0171

    That’s it?

    Heh, so disappointing.

    Unless this is some kind of brilliant Andy Kaufman style post-modern ironic meta performance I don’t see how even Cookie Monster can say that: Hitler, Caligula, Child are part of a coherent narrative.

    • #186
  7. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Pseudodionysius:

    Mike LaRoche:

    Pseudodionysius:

    Robert Zubrin:The mind of Trump.img_0171

    That’s it?

    Heh, so disappointing.

    Unless this is some kind of brilliant Andy Kaufman style post-modern ironic meta performance I don’t see how even Cookie Monster can say that: Hitler, Caligula, Child are part of a coherent narrative.

    Perhaps he aspires to be the court jester for the dictator of Kaufmann’s native land of Caspiar.

    • #187
  8. ctlaw Coolidge
    ctlaw
    @ctlaw

    Pseudodionysius:

    Basil Fawlty:

    Kozak:

    EDISONPARKS:

    When Ricochet first started Mark Steyn was a semi regular on the Ricochet Podcast with Rob, Peter and James.

    One of the main reasons I signed on very early on…

    Come for tbe Steyn. Stay for the Zubrin.

    Don’t mess with the Zohan.

    “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan” was a generic Hollywood disingenuous exercise in moral relativism. There’s no reason to slander it.

    • #188
  9. david wright Member
    david wright
    @davidwright

    Please keep writing Bob.  I live in Ohio, my vote will count.  I find neither the prose, nor the trajectory to be hyperbolic.  Though it didn’t work for Morton Thiokol, it seems especially apt as we attempt to choose between catastrophies.

    • #189
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.