Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Breaking: FBI Won’t Prosecute Clinton Over Emails
Via the WSJ:
Published in GeneralFBI Director James Comey said the bureau won’t recommend Hillary Clinton be indicted over use of private email while secretary of state, but he said there is evidence Clinton and colleagues “were extremely careless” in their handling of highly sensitive information.
The GOP let them put away Libby. This is an example of how the other side plays the game, and our side is Ned Stark.
But even the private server wasn’t allowed, and this was known by HC the whole time.
Austin,
I don’t like the outcome either – but intent is hard to prove. David Petreaus proved it…. He handed over documents to his biographer/girlfriend marked Secret or Confidential. That is all that is required to prove intent. As for Hillary, she claims she never received nor sent information “marked” classified.
Sorry.
Here is an better comparison since it involves private emails. Now if we can say that the Marine Captain is guilty and violated military law why pray tell can’t we say that Hillary violated federal law. Oh, wait, I forgot. Some people are more equal than others.
Comey said no one in government knew his decision. President Obama has a compaign event with Hillary today. He expects me to believe Obama didn’t know the result? He expects me to believe Obama risked standing up for a woman who was recommended for indictment the same day? Good grief they think we are stupid.
Man Who Set Up Hillary’s Private Server Pleads the Fifth More Than 125 Times
Yep, totally reasonable people agree this is a totally reasonable server set up totally reasonably offsite with totally reasonable security in place to ensure totally reasonable accountability in light of Hillary’s totally reasonable activities.
I believe Comey relied on an ancient principle of British law here: the Queen can do no wrong.
To some extend, the Scooter Libby case is instructional. He was convicted by a jury of lying under oath when questioned about a crime the prosecutor knew he did not commit. It was a political conviction – and very ugly.
The jury in DC was anti-war, anti-Bush, and anti-reason.
Bush could have pardoned him, but felt that Libby may have contributed to his situation. Can’t say.
But, this much is true – Libby’s infraction was much less than Hillary’s. But Hillary had the perfect alibi – the “I never sent nor received information marked classified,” and no one under her would finger her as giving the order to strip the information of its markings. Position has it privileges. If she was not running for President with the prospect of handing out great jobs to those who cooperate, she may have been accused. But alas, no accuser stepped forward.
Inauguration Day – January 20, 2017…
If the it had been a Republican nominee, would the Obama administration’s FBI come to the same conclusion?
Austin,
I don’t believe this. But there is a difference between they eyes of the law and the public eye. And the argument that Hillary relied on the experts – What do you mean wipe the server, you mean with a cloth? – is a reasonable one – especially for a DC jury. She pretends she knows nothing and most people don’t. She knew exactly what she was doing – and someone who works for her figured it out, another person organized it, and another operated it – all out of her eyesight. Plausible deniability.
The comparison to the unjust prosecution of Scooter Libby really is apropos.
Their side protects their own, our side throws our own to them in the hopes we get eaten last.
If a GOP POTUS ever gets into power, the DOJ should be used to jail as many Dems as possible for their crimes. Stop letting them get away with it.
Rather, they know we cannot do anything about it.
I’m so tired of hope.
I can think of only two approaches any more: ignorance or cynicism.
I’d be happier today if I were one of those people who get interviewed on the street or at the beach and can’t name who we fought in the Vietnam War. “Email server? I don’t know what you’re talking about.”
Or I could just bitterly assume that everything is going to wrong all the time, that the fix is in, and there’s no reason to expect anything different.
Seriously, you guys are actually surprised at this? This is what I expected all along. Very powerful people don’t go to prison. Period.
Comey even rubbed it in, laying out all the things she did while more or less admitting that if you didn’t have the status of a Clinton, or a Kennedy (or a Bush, for that matter), and you committed these acts, YOU’D be preparing for prison sex right now.
“Very Rich” and “Very Powerful” are pretty much interchangeable here.
Of course not – but then again, that person would have been guilty of a capital offense: being a Republican.
Let’s see, Obama has corrupted the State Department, the IRS, the EPA, the Secret Service, the DOJ, the DOD and now the FBI. Not much left, is there?
If I didn’t think that Trump would be every bit as corrupt in using government agencies for personal gain and/or persecuting his enemies I might vote for him but his past actions and statements strongly indicate he would be.
#neverhillary AND #nevertrump
Personally I agree with Frank regarding the letter of the statute (mark that down, Frank and I agreeing is so rare you should buy a lottery ticket and place your jackpot at the roulette table).
It is entirely possible that Hillary could have been acquitted by a jury – OJ was acquitted by a jury. But it seems clear based on the statute that she meets the burden of proof for indictment, arrest and trial.
I think the same about the AG’s statement last week that she will listen to the career prosecutors. She had to know that the answer was already no recommendation of indictment.
She still can by they way. Comey is only making a recommendation. But she won’t.
Not in the least. I’d have been surprised, utterly astonished in fact, had she actually been indicted. This is what I expected all along.
Republicans have spent time building up Comey’s reputation, assuming it would put pressure on Lynch. So now it’s done.
Republicans have worked on an assumption that this investigation or review, would hurt her. It will not and would not. the 55% of the people who are going to vote for Hillary simply don’t care. The contest for the soul of America has been over for some time. And we have lost.
I agree with Frank too – to the letter of the law. But that is not how it is applied. Prosecutors have discretion – and it is hard to convict unless you can show absolute evidence of clear intent. And she may have been indicted (easier threshold), the problem is this: if the prosecutors don’t think they can win the case, they don’t typically indict.
This is again, how the law is applied – not the law – but the application.
Me too – I never thought they’d indict her simply because she was able to leverage herself into the Obama cabinet back in 2008. The chances of indicting Hillary for crimes she’s plainly guilty of was nil given the fact that she’s only the latest blatant lawbreaker to get away based solely on political affiliation under the Obama Justice Department.
LOL @ all the “If Hillary isn’t prosecuted, the FBI will revolt!” stories in the press. Please. The FBI is just another self-perpetuating government bureaucracy, no different than any other. Same goes for the Pentagon. The Right labors under the illusion that “our” favored bureaucracies… military, cops, firemen, etc… are somehow different from “their” bureaucracies. In the end, they all want the same thing: to grow themselves and be untouchable.
JM,
I think the indictment, which I believe you said you felt was easy to get is much different than a guilty verdict.
I expect Mrs. Clinton would be tried before a jury of her peers and if the standard of guilt not met in their eyes she should enjoy acquittal. In my mind that is due process.
The first part of the process is bringing the indictment. Am I explaining/understanding correctly?
C’mon people, be reasonable. Do you really expect poor granny Clinton to carry around 2 different phones just to protect some measly state secrets?
FBI rewrites the law according Andrew McCarthy here.
The United States has become nothing but a third-world kleptocracy.
It is proven again that the Clinton’s are the penicillin-resistant syphillis of American politics. Nothing can get rid of them.
As my grandfather Clarence would say: I am so angry I could spit.