What Happens Brex’t?

 

2d7c08db-9d87-43ce-921f-513acca86f7e-2060x1236Global financial panic, Sterling collapsing, and Scotland — possibly Northern Ireland, too — apt to break away. Quite a day’s work.

A striking aspect of the results is the extent to which the vote represents a victory of the old over the young. “Young voters wanted Brexit the least,” as the Mirror put it, “and will have to live with it the longest.”

The final YouGov poll before the referendum showed 72% of 18 to 24-year-olds backed a Remain vote – with just 19% backing Brexit.

Brexiters were led to victory in the referendum overnight by triumphing in Tory shires and Old Labour heartlands in Wales and the north of England.

But the Kingdom is no longer United after London, Scotland and Northern Ireland all backed Remain.

The more damaging legacy, however, could be the staggering difference in how people of different ages [voted].

The final YouGov poll before the referendum showed 72% of 18 to 24-year-olds backed a Remain vote – with just 19% backing Brexit.

Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said: “Young people voted to remain by a considerable margin, but were outvoted. They were voting for their future, yet it has been taken from them.”

I hope that the optimists are proven right and that this is the first day of a bright new future for Britain and Europe. But unless it is — and unless the gain that justifies the pain comes sooner, rather than later — Britain (or what’s left of it) will experience an unprecedented generational war. Or at least, I’m racking my mind, and I can’t think of a precedent, can you?

 I’m so angry. A generation given everything: Free education, golden pensions, social mobility have voted to strip my generation’s future.

The pain will certainly be acute in the immediate term.

Now we’ll watch Europe’s biggest divorce case since Henry VIII. I posted this a few months ago, but it’s worth dusting off and watching again. This is from Open Europe’s simulation post-Brexit negotiations. Former Chancellor Norman Lamont is playing the role of the UK:

As someone who wishes Britain and Europe well, I hope very much that Britain withdraws in an orderly way and recovers as quickly as possible, leaving behind a Europe that’s better for the experience. I hope the rest of the EU learns and benefits from crisis and failure. And if it neither learns nor survives, I hope Europe’s reversion to a gaggle of fractious, quarreling states goes better than history would indicate.

Whatever happens, I’ll report. If you make a contribution this week, it will be earmarked for a chapter of Brave New World about Brexit and its consequences. Please contribute! This story is getting more and more interesting by the day — but I’m still well away from the goal.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 324 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Eric Hines Inactive
    Eric Hines
    @EricHines

    Umbra Fractus:Britain is the world’s fifth largest economy. Within the EU only Germany outranks them, though France is #6. Trade is reciprocal; cutting off Britain in a fit of pique would be just as devastating to Europe and its members as it would be to Britain. The Eurocrats talk a big game, but they know better.

    Maybe.  They wouldn’t be the first to cut off their nose to spite their face.

    Edit: Oh, wait–Kozak beat me to this.

    Eric Hines

    • #211
  2. Austin Murrey Inactive
    Austin Murrey
    @AustinMurrey

    Eric Hines:

    Also: we were founded on a proposition, not as a propositional nation. That proposition is that all men are created equal and that these men are sovereign, not government (those political theories).

    Eric Hines

    Don’t say stuff like that too loud, plenty around here seem to believe the government own the people, not the other way around.

    • #212
  3. Eric Hines Inactive
    Eric Hines
    @EricHines

    Umbra Fractus:

    Larry3435: All true, of course. But I was getting a kick out of the fact that the Scots mostly voted to stay in the EU. So many of them want their sovereignty back from Great Britain, but don’t seem to mind being a vassal state to Germany. Go figure.

    I still suspect that both votes are driven by anti-English sentiment more than anything else.

    That, and perhaps a recognition–at least by the Scottish government–that they need to be part of something bigger than themselves so they can access that bigger thing’s supply of OPM to support their own welfare state and national debt.

    Eric Hines

    • #213
  4. Lazy_Millennial Inactive
    Lazy_Millennial
    @LazyMillennial

    Mike LaRoche:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Mike LaRoche: he notion of a “proposition nation” is, to use a British expression, utter bollocks. And it always has been.

    Unless I’m mistaking the term, wasn’t our government founded explicitly as a propositional nation?

    Not necessarily. The principles underlying the Declaration of Indpendence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution were derived from political theories and beliefs that had been circulating in the English-speaking world for quite some time. And in the preamble of the Constitution, the framers made it clear they were securing the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, not the entire world.

    The principles preceded the founding and they do not apply to to the world, but the fact remains that we are a propositional nation. Chesterton noticed it a century ago when he visited. We were founded on a creed, and that creed was able to unite the Puritans, Quakers, Protestants, Anglicans, Pennsylvania Dutch, Catholics, etc. That we were founded on a creed and not on an ethnicity or “type” is what has allowed us to so successfully assimilate waves of immigrants for centuries, though big waves make us uneasy. It is also why Europe is having such trouble integrating right now- their countries are based on “types” instead of creeds, and struggle to integrate anyone who doesn’t fit the type.

    • #214
  5. David Knights Member
    David Knights
    @DavidKnights

    Robert Zubrin:They are celebrating in the Kremlin. The disintegration of the western alliance is Putin’s top foreign policy goal.

    Since when is the EU synonymous with the western alliance?

    • #215
  6. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Lazy_Millennial:

    Mike LaRoche:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Mike LaRoche: he notion of a “proposition nation” is, to use a British expression, utter bollocks. And it always has been.

    Unless I’m mistaking the term, wasn’t our government founded explicitly as a propositional nation?

    Not necessarily. The principles underlying the Declaration of Indpendence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution were derived from political theories and beliefs that had been circulating in the English-speaking world for quite some time. And in the preamble of the Constitution, the framers made it clear they were securing the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, not the entire world.

    The principles preceded the founding and they do not apply to to the world, but the fact remains that we are a propositional nation. Chesterton noticed it a century ago when he visited. We were founded on a creed, and that creed was able to unite the Puritans, Quakers, Protestants, Anglicans, Pennsylvania Dutch, Catholics, etc. That we were founded on a creed and not on an ethnicity or “type” is what has allowed us to so successfully assimilate waves of immigrants for centuries, though big waves make us uneasy. It is also why Europe is having such trouble integrating right now- their countries are based on “types” instead of creeds, and struggle to integrate anyone who doesn’t fit the type.

    We are a nation founded on an idea,one purpose built, with a Government crafted to stave off tyranny. It has worked pretty well, actually.

    We need to work on it though. It was not meant for a people this able to get rich or be this rich.

    • #216
  7. Robert Zubrin Inactive
    Robert Zubrin
    @RobertZubrin

    Mike LaRoche:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Mike LaRoche: he notion of a “proposition nation” is, to use a British expression, utter bollocks. And it always has been.

    Unless I’m mistaking the term, wasn’t our government founded explicitly as a propositional nation?

    Not necessarily. The principles underlying the Declaration of Indpendence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution were derived from political theories and beliefs that had been circulating in the English-speaking world for quite some time. And in the preamble of the Constitution, the framers made it clear they were securing the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, not the entire world.

    Dead wrong. They said that all men are created equal, and endowed with rights from the creator. They were not restricting rights to their posterity. The United States was founded on the basis of the doctrine of universal human equality and Liberty, not blood and soil.

    • #217
  8. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    Sadly, this isn’t satire:

    screenshot.15

    Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/eu-to-launch-kettle-and-toaster-crackdown-after-brexit-vote2/

    • #218
  9. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Robert Zubrin:

    Mike LaRoche:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Mike LaRoche: he notion of a “proposition nation” is, to use a British expression, utter bollocks. And it always has been.

    Unless I’m mistaking the term, wasn’t our government founded explicitly as a propositional nation?

    Not necessarily. The principles underlying the Declaration of Indpendence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution were derived from political theories and beliefs that had been circulating in the English-speaking world for quite some time. And in the preamble of the Constitution, the framers made it clear they were securing the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, not the entire world.

    Dead wrong. They said that all men are created equal, and endowed with rights from the creator. They were not restricting rights to their posterity. The United States was founded on the basis of the doctrine of universal human equality and Liberty, not blood and soil.

    Yes. We are the City on the Hill, and the example to all Mankind. No nation has ever existed like America.

    • #219
  10. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Robert Zubrin:

    Mike LaRoche:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Mike LaRoche: he notion of a “proposition nation” is, to use a British expression, utter bollocks. And it always has been.

    Unless I’m mistaking the term, wasn’t our government founded explicitly as a propositional nation?

    Not necessarily. The principles underlying the Declaration of Indpendence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution were derived from political theories and beliefs that had been circulating in the English-speaking world for quite some time. And in the preamble of the Constitution, the framers made it clear they were securing the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, not the entire world.

    Dead wrong. They said that all men are created equal, and endowed with rights from the creator. They were not restricting rights to their posterity. The United States was founded on the basis of the doctrine of universal human equality and Liberty, not blood and soil.

    Dead Wrong

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    There are no accidental, extra, or unnecessary words in the Constitution. Posterity is where it is with great purpose.

    • #220
  11. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Misthiocracy: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/eu-to-launch-kettle-and-toaster-crackdown-after-brexit-vote2/

    Wow. They dodged a bullet there. Will Germany use U-Boats to stop America from sending toasters to our ally across the ocean now?

    • #221
  12. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    Canada’s desire for a trade deal with the UK is no surprise, having already inked a deal with the European Free Trade Association.

    Germany’s statement, so soon after the vote, is kinda surprising.

    As for the USA, what are the odds that President Trump will judge a deal with the UK to be anything less than a “great trade deal”?

    screenshot.16

    Source: http://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/683117/US-and-Canada-lead-promises-to-maintain-trade-relations-with-Britain-outside-the-EU

    • #222
  13. Eric Hines Inactive
    Eric Hines
    @EricHines

    Austin Murrey:

    Eric Hines:

    Also: we were founded on a proposition, not as a propositional nation. That proposition is that all men are created equal and that these men are sovereign, not government (those political theories).

    Eric Hines

    Don’t say stuff like that too loud, plenty around here seem to believe the government own the people, not the other way around.

    Let them bring it.  It’ll be fun.

    Eric Hines

    • #223
  14. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Kozak:

    Umbra Fractus:Britain is the world’s fifth largest economy. Within the EU only Germany outranks them, though France is #6. Trade is reciprocal; cutting off Britain in a fit of pique would be just as devastating to Europe and its members as it would be to Britain. The Eurocrats talk a big game, but they know better.

    It would be the ultimate in cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    but they’re just the type to do it.

    • #224
  15. La Tapada Member
    La Tapada
    @LaTapada

    Bob Thompson:

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    EJHill: Oh? You don’t hold citizenship in an EU state. Have the French shown interest in deporting you? I had not read that all persons with a non-EU passport would be shunned.

    I can’t legally work here. And I worry quite a bit about being deported if the political situation grows more unstable, yes.

    Are you not working?

    My understanding is that Claire is not employed within the French economy. She is not submitting invoices to or receiving payments from any France-based businesses. I’m guessing she writes for and receives payment from companies outside of France (such as Ricochet).

    • #225
  16. Keith Preston Member
    Keith Preston
    @

    Arahant:

    The reason so many people say “screw the rich” is because they feel the rich have been screwing them. Some of that is good, old-fashioned class warfare. Other parts come from their trying to deal with change engendered by policies promulgated by the fi-con elites. The same is true here in America. Why is Trump the presumptive Republican nominee? Because people were tired of the globalist elites. Hearing someone even mouth the right words, words they heard from no others, was enough to have a lot of people jump on the bandwagon, despite all his flaws.

    This ^

    • #226
  17. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Miffed White Male:

    Kozak:

    Umbra Fractus:Britain is the world’s fifth largest economy. Within the EU only Germany outranks them, though France is #6. Trade is reciprocal; cutting off Britain in a fit of pique would be just as devastating to Europe and its members as it would be to Britain. The Eurocrats talk a big game, but they know better.

    It would be the ultimate in cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    but they’re just the type to do it.

    All the more reason to show the Eurocrats the door.

    • #227
  18. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    La Tapada:

    Bob Thompson:

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    EJHill: Oh? You don’t hold citizenship in an EU state. Have the French shown interest in deporting you? I had not read that all persons with a non-EU passport would be shunned.

    I can’t legally work here. And I worry quite a bit about being deported if the political situation grows more unstable, yes.

    Are you not working?

    My understanding is that Claire is not employed within the French economy. She is not submitting invoices to or receiving payments from any France-based businesses. I’m guessing she writes for and receives payment from companies outside of France (such as Ricochet).

    Try that little trick in the US.  The IRS will have the SWAT team at your door. Uncle wants his cut.

    • #228
  19. Roberto Inactive
    Roberto
    @Roberto

    Misthiocracy:Sadly, this isn’t satire:

    screenshot.15

    Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/eu-to-launch-kettle-and-toaster-crackdown-after-brexit-vote2/

    So a petty temper tantrum is the verdict. Not a particularly surprising outcome from the cesspool of Brussels.

    No doubt such measures will encourage and persuade the remaining members as to the value and worth of the EU.

    • #229
  20. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    …Other parts come from their trying to deal with change engendered by policies promulgated by the fi-con elites. The same is true here in America. Why is Trump the presumptive Republican nominee? Because people were tired of the globalist elites…

    I’m not sure I’m down with equating fiscal conservatism with globalism. Seems to me the globalist elites have rarely been very fiscally conservative. When globalism goes hand-in-hand with balanced budgets and limited government spending, I’ll reevaluate that impression.

    • #230
  21. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    Roberto:

    Misthiocracy:Sadly, this isn’t satire:

    screenshot.15

    Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/eu-to-launch-kettle-and-toaster-crackdown-after-brexit-vote2/

    So a petty temper tantrum is the verdict. Not a particularly surprising outcome from the cesspool of Brussels.

    No doubt such measures will encourage and persuade the remaining members as to the value and worth of the EU.

    I wager that the ban was already in the works and that the timing is coincidental. I don’t think the bureaucracy in Brussels is nimble enough to rethink the timing of a previously-scheduled press conference.

    • #231
  22. Gaby Charing Inactive
    Gaby Charing
    @GabyCharing

    La Tapada:

    Gaby Charing:The Leave campaign was populist and racist…

    The campaign might have been racist, but I don’t feel that voters are racist if they want to control immigration, to keep it to a level that communities can handle well (financially and socially) and not be overwhelmed.

    I agree.

    • #232
  23. J Climacus Member
    J Climacus
    @JClimacus

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    Is it founded in the idea that a nation and a people that once built an Empire are unable to compete upon the world stage?

    It’s just not. It’s a small country. It can punch beyond its weight, but it can’t compete with the US, India, China, the rest of the EU.

    What is this fascination with size? It’s like Xerxes trying to overawe the Greeks. It’s not size that matters, but civil institutions, the rule of law, and respect for property rights that count. That’s why Switzerland and Singapore are so prosperous despite their small size. Switzerland is surrounded by the EU.

    Fortunately the British figured out that taking orders from unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels does not make one “competitive.”

    • #233
  24. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    Misthiocracy: I wager that the ban was already in the works and that the timing is coincidental. I don’t think the bureaucracy in Brussels is nimble enough to rethink the timing of a previously-scheduled press conference.

    The article implies the opposite, that the ban was in the works but they postponed it because they worried that an attack on tea and toast would be seen as anti-British (a fear which seems well founded) and thus drive the Leave vote.

    • #234
  25. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Larry3435:

    Zafar: It might be how you would prefer to define Americans, but I don’t think it actually works to do that in real life. Unless Bernie Sanders is not really an American because of his beliefs? (Which is a disturbing pov.)

    I have no idea why that would be disturbing, but it is unquestionably true. Bernie Sanders is an American citizen, but he is not an American at heart. He would be a much better fit in the Soviet Union or, that monstrosity having been thrown onto the trash heap of history, in Cuba or Venezuela. And Bernie knows this. Bernie would be the first to tell you that his goal is a “political revolution” that would end the United States as it has existed. Bernie has the right to believe this, and to say so, but by any standard that matters he is not an American.

    We do have some here on Ricochet who applaud the long-standing effort to abandon and undo the making of America and thus Americans through our beloved Constitution. Obviously, the real Britons, those who cherish the sovereignty of the people and the value of cultural traditions and their preservation, have a substantial dose of the elements that make up the the American ideal.  A step has been taken to show an unwillingness to give up. My hope is that Americans can recognize the threats we face and stand up to them. It’s like a disease working from within to destroy.

    • #235
  26. Misthiocracy Member
    Misthiocracy
    @Misthiocracy

    J Climacus:

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    Is it founded in the idea that a nation and a people that once built an Empire are unable to compete upon the world stage?

    It’s just not. It’s a small country. It can punch beyond its weight, but it can’t compete with the US, India, China, the rest of the EU.

    What is this fascination with size? It’s like Xerxes trying to overawe the Greeks. It’s not size that matters, but civil institutions, the rule of law, and respect for property rights that count. That’s why Switzerland and Singapore are so prosperous despite their small size. Switzerland is surrounded by the EU.

    Fortunately the British figured out that taking orders from unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels does not make one “competitive.”

    Indeed, and here are a few more economically-successful countries with populations smaller than the UK (65 million), despite not being members of the EU:

    • South Korea (50 million)
    • Canada (36 million)
    • Australia (24 million)
    • Taiwan (23 million)
    • Israel (8 million)
    • Norway (5 million)
    • New Zealand (4.6 million)
    • Iceland (334 thousand)
    • Liechtenstein (37 thousand)
    • #236
  27. lilibellt Inactive
    lilibellt
    @lilibellt
    Juncker/Martin Schulz/FarageJunkersJuncker/Merkel

    I don’t see the voters – young or old – at fault here, on the contrary, the EU succeeded in alienating a plurality of Europeans and has become itself by far the biggest threat to the European idea. Today, the EU lost 20% of its economic power, 13% of its workforce, 10% of its soldiers, 31% of market capitalization and most important of all its third biggest net payer after Germany and France. The negotiation skills of Merkel and her ilk are really most impressing, Britain out, accession negotiations with Turkey back on. I really don’t know who should be more scared, the Britons or continental Europeans like me.

    Can the EU be reformed? Maybe. Britain is the predefined breaking point. If the present political apparatus is not seriously considering changes, the disintegration of the EU will continue. On the bright side, Europeans don’t oppose the idea of economic cooperation, so let’s work on new and intensifying existing bi-/multilateral agreements (e.g. EFTA). For me it doesn’t feel like “Good bye, Britain”, more like “You go ahead, Britain”, “Adieu Jean Claude”,“Leb wohl, Angela und Martin” and “You are not welcome, Erdogan”!

    • #237
  28. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    EJHill:I was just watching this demographic breakdown of the vote on SkyNews. Young vs Old, City vs Country and, of course, the Degreed vs Everyone else.

    They are facts but meaningless ones. There is no wisdom in youth. There is not even wisdom behind a degree. Increasingly it’s a merely an accreditation from other socialists that you’ve been sufficiently indoctrinated.

    I was watching the BBC last night and they were beating the “educated vs uneducated” drum pretty hard. I had Michael Medved on for a few minutes today and he repeated it.

    Infuriating.

    It reminded me of something I read – I think Mark Steyn wrote it. About how the average punter was right and the educated elite was wrong back in the day when the UK embraced multiculturalism.

    I think the average punter without a degree is not as stupid as those with a degree would like to think.

    • #238
  29. Eric Hines Inactive
    Eric Hines
    @EricHines

    Annefy: I think the average punter without a degree is not as stupid as those with a degree would like to think.

    Are desperate to think–it’s the only way they can validate their own worth.  And I say that from the “wisdom” of my three Masters degrees.

    Eric Hines

    • #239
  30. Umbra Fractus Inactive
    Umbra Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    lilibellt:

    Juncker/Martin Schulz/FarageJunkersJuncker/Merkel

    Nigel’s face in that picture is priceless.

    • #240
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.