Campaigning Like He Wants To Win

 

Yes, I know. Trump. Short-fingered vulgarian. Enemy of all that’s good. Big state authoritarian. Say what you will about Trump, whoever wants to get in the cage with the Clinton Crime Family™ is going to have to fight like he wants to win. This one’s gotta sting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17EOM3RTD1Y

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 71 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Larry3435 Inactive
    Larry3435
    @Larry3435

    Lidens Cheng:Trump won’t hold back the punches. It’s going to be awesome.

    Yeah, just awesome.  The only guy in the Republican Party who could lose to Hillary, and will lose, is going to go down fighting.  But that’s how it is these days.  As Woody Harrelson said in White Men Can’t Jump, “You’d rather look good and lose than look bad and win.”

    • #31
  2. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    John Wilson:When Lincoln said you could fool some of the people all of the time, or when Barnum said there’s a sucker born every minute, I wonder if they realized that could still be so when most of the world was maniacally pointing to a giant, blinking, neon sign that said, “This man is the most blatantly, absolutely proven con man in history, and you are his mark right now!” Or if they thought it possible to hoodwink so many with such thinly veiled pretenses as Trump’s. I suspect even they’d be amazed at the self-abasing credulousness and gleeful, eagerness with which so many lined up to be he wiping paper of such a morally incontinent and shamelessly obvious charlatan.

    Wouldn’t they be more amazed at how many people have been taken in the Left?

    • #32
  3. RyanFalcone Member
    RyanFalcone
    @RyanFalcone

    That is a great commercial.

    Unfortunately, the biggest take away for me is that this is going to possibly be the most nauseating 8 months of my life. I’m giving even odds that one of these lunatics walks off the stage during one of the debates. 2:1 says a glass of water is thrown by one of them at some point. 3:1 that at least one rally ends in a governor declaring a state of emergency.

    • #33
  4. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Nick Stuart:The words “childish” and “bullying” get thrown around a lot as descriptors for Trump.

    The childish and bullying behavior that has astonished me in the past 3 months or so has been that of some members of the conservative commentariat who have gone past reasoned opposition to almost inchoate foaming rage. I suspect the reason for anger at that level is that they are besides themselves that people aren’t listening to them.

    Exactly.  I’m coming to the conclusion that the reason they despise Trump so is because he’s not part of their intelligentsia club.  It’s not the so called “establishment” that have gone off the deep end.  It’s the “conservative commentariats.”

    • #34
  5. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Lily Bart:*

    &

    • #35
  6. Klaatu Inactive
    Klaatu
    @Klaatu

    Of course the response to this ad writes itself, http://youtu.be/2AfOH–HlIM

    • #36
  7. Jager Coolidge
    Jager
    @Jager

    Klaatu:Of course the response to this ad writes itself, http://youtu.be/2AfOH–HlIM

    How does the Secret Service doing their job apply to this conversation?

    • #37
  8. Klaatu Inactive
    Klaatu
    @Klaatu

    How does the Secret Service doing their job apply to this conversation?

    Did you miss the tough guy cowering?

    • #38
  9. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Fress:Here’s a question. I’m in Australia and this is the bit I don’t get. Aside from a trade war with Asia, Trump’s platform is pretty close to Cruz and Rubio. The problem with him, I think, is evidence of insincerity, self grandeur and being thin-skinned leading to the assumption that he’ll go back on his word or do something dangerous as president. But isn’t there a chance that he won’t? Say 50%? In other words isn’t it better to have a 50% chance that he’ll be good than say a 75% chance that Hillary will keep Obama’s policy going? Sure Cruz would be great but if not then isn’t Trump worth a risk?

    Fress, I’ve been playing that song for awhile now, but no one seems to like it. No hook.

    • #39
  10. 9thDistrictNeighbor Member
    9thDistrictNeighbor
    @9thDistrictNeighbor

    Klaatu:

    How does the Secret Service doing their job apply to this conversation?

    Did you miss the tough guy cowering?

    Here is a better view of the incident. I didn’t think he was cowering, but that’s my opinion.  As for the supporters, you have to discount the language of the farm boys in the front row. The language of the protesters in Chicago was far worse. (Absolutely NSFW on the Chicago video.)

    • #40
  11. John Wilson Member
    John Wilson
    @

    Ed G.:

    Fress:Here’s a question. I’m in Australia and this is the bit I don’t get. … isn’t it better to have a 50% chance that he’ll be good than say a 75% chance that Hillary will keep Obama’s policy going? Sure Cruz would be great but if not then isn’t Trump worth a risk?

    Fress, I’ve been playing that song for awhile now, but no one seems to like it. No hook.

    Given his business history of going back on his word and using the threat of endless legal battles and legal fees to protect him from the wrath of those he’s bilked, I would say that anyone would be an absolute idiot to think that anything he is saying now is in the least bit sincere, or that Trump would suddenly change his spots and not screw over the people he has spent so much time and energy conning.

    Then there is the matter of him quite obviously having absolutely no idea what is going on in the world or in this country and having no ideas or plans whatsoever to fix the problems. He doesn’t even respect his marks enough to even really pretend he does.

    • #41
  12. Claire Berlinski, Ed. Member
    Claire Berlinski, Ed.
    @Claire

    John Wilson: . He doesn’t even respect his marks enough to even really pretend he does.

    This is an especially disturbing part to me. I was just exchanging e-mail with a (Turkish) friend who pointed out that the difference in dishonesty between Trump and other candidates or predecessors in office was really only one of plausible deniability; it’s not as if we don’t know that Bill Clinton lied outright in office, for example.

    I wrote back that it’s the difference between having an adulterous husband who doesn’t throw it in your face and one who brings home a different woman every night to your bed, and tells you you’re not seeing what you’re seeing and you’re crazy for objecting. Trump’s denying he said things within minutes of having said them — even though he said them with a thousand cameras trained on him — and saying things that indicate just a total contempt for voters’ intelligence, for the country, for the gravity of the problems a president faces. There’s something weirdly masochistic about pretending this isn’t happening and this isn’t a huge problem. 

    • #42
  13. John Wilson Member
    John Wilson
    @

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    There’s something weirdly masochistic about pretending this isn’t happening and this isn’t a huge problem.

    People aren’t just pretending it isn’t happening. They’re belittling people who are trying to point it out and questioning their motives. Instead of being the hero for pointing out that the would-be emperor has no clothes, you’re told that you’re a shill or dupe of the very class of people who is wholly embodied by Trump himself. It’s absurdity on stilts.

    • #43
  14. Midget Faded Rattlesnake Member
    Midget Faded Rattlesnake
    @Midge

    We don’t need to be a punchline, so we’re gonna choose Trump?

    • #44
  15. John Wilson Member
    John Wilson
    @

    Midget Faded Rattlesnake:We don’t need to be a punchline, so we’re gonna choose Trump?

    We are the punchline.

    • #45
  16. James Jones Inactive
    James Jones
    @JamesJones

    Great. He’ll play to win, but I don’t want him to win.

    • #46
  17. Lily Bart Inactive
    Lily Bart
    @LilyBart

    Could Be Anyone:

    Mike LaRoche:Trump will win. Handily. Deal with it.

    Could you show me your crystal ball?

    I think he has a real shot at it because she is just so incredibility awful in every possible way.    If nothing else, the usual democrats and ‘centrist’ republicans decide may stay home in droves.

    • #47
  18. Lily Bart Inactive
    Lily Bart
    @LilyBart

    James Jones:Great. He’ll play to win, but I don’t want him to win.

    If an actual centrist democrat was running, I might be pursueded to vote democrat this time.

    Um, do actual centrist democrats exist anymore, or have they all become republicans (like my current Senator Cory Gardener)?    This would actually explain a lot!

    • #48
  19. Liz Member
    Liz
    @Liz

    Jim Webb. Oh, and John Kasich.

    • #49
  20. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    John Wilson:

    […..]

    Given his business history of going back on his word and using the threat of endless legal battles and legal fees to protect him from the wrath of those he’s bilked, I would say that anyone would be an absolute idiot to think that anything he is saying now is in the least bit sincere, […..]

    Then there is the matter of him quite obviously having absolutely no idea what is going on in the world or in this country and having no ideas or plans whatsoever to fix the problems. He doesn’t even respect his marks enough to even really pretend he does.

    I hear the bit about no ideas all the time. Read his website. There are ideas there, most of them conservative staples. Don’t believe a word of it? Fine, but that’s a different issue – one which Fress is trying to account for and one (among others) which also prevents me from being a supporter rather than simply a defender and passive voter in the general election. Of course, though, if one thinks Trump is just Mussolini mated with Bernie Madoff then it’s obvious how Hillary Clinton(!) is a better vote. Obviously. It’s a wonder how Trump has managed to avoid being strung up by the populace before now.

    Otherwise, nice conversing with you. It’s great that so many people like you remain dedicated to the idea of Ricochet as a civil conversation.

    • #50
  21. Larry3435 Inactive
    Larry3435
    @Larry3435

    Ed G.: It’s a wonder how Trump has managed to avoid being strung up by the populace before now.

    No.  He has to take power before that happens.  When it’s all promises, it’s all cheering crowds.  Trump’s mob won’t turn on him until they find out how empty those promises were.  It would almost be worth voting for him to see that happen.

    • #51
  22. Eugene Kriegsmann Member
    Eugene Kriegsmann
    @EugeneKriegsmann

    The commercial is good. It hits Hillary in exactly the right spot. However, the alternative it presents, Trump, isn’t much better. I can see a counter commercial displaying Trump’s petty little hissy fits and endless hissy tweets. His campaign obviously has enough resources to hire good writers, but even the best cannot compensate for his out of control mouth and miniscule ability to handle anything that resembles criticism. All Vlad would have to do to resolve a problem with Don would be to send him a note saying how much he admires him.

    • #52
  23. Eugene Kriegsmann Member
    Eugene Kriegsmann
    @EugeneKriegsmann

    Ed G.: I hear the bit about no ideas all the time. Read his website. There are ideas there, most of them conservative staples.

    The problem is that Trump sounds like he doesn’t read his own website. It is obviously prepared by others who actually understand the issues and can articulate them. Trump can’t and doesn’t have the wherewithal to just shut up and stop contradicting his own statements and those on the website.

    • #53
  24. John Wilson Member
    John Wilson
    @

    Ed G.:

    Otherwise, nice conversing with you. It’s great that so many people like you remain dedicated to the idea of Ricochet as a civil conversation.

    The man who would defend Trump chastises my for not being civil enough. Obscenely ironic.

    • #54
  25. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    John Wilson:

    Ed G.:

    Otherwise, nice conversing with you. It’s great that so many people like you remain dedicated to the idea of Ricochet as a civil conversation.

    The man who would defend Trump chastises my for not being civil enough. Obscenely ironic.

    Quite right. Disagreeing with you is obviously obscene and uncivil. Please accept by apology.

    • #55
  26. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Eugene Kriegsmann:

    Ed G.: I hear the bit about no ideas all the time. Read his website. There are ideas there, most of them conservative staples.

    The problem is that Trump sounds like he doesn’t read his own website. It is obviously prepared by others who actually understand the issues and can articulate them. Trump can’t and doesn’t have the wherewithal to just shut up and stop contradicting his own statements and those on the website.

    He doesn’t sound that way to me. Oh, I don’t mean that there are no contradictions – there are. I mean that I managed to receive the same message that is on the website despite the contradictions and vulgarity and sometimes simplistic formulations and attention seeking.

    • #56
  27. The Question Inactive
    The Question
    @TheQuestion

    Mike LaRoche:Trump will win. Handily. Deal with it.

    You may be right.  If Trump wins the primary, I really don’t care much who wins the general.  I don’t have a dog in a contest between two Democrats.

    • #57
  28. derek Inactive
    derek
    @user_82953

    I usually fall asleep a few seconds into a political commercial, but this was short and defined Clinton. It put an image to what 3/4 of the nation is thinking.

    If Romney has run like Trump we would be watching him lead Hillary to a second term.

    Trump is redefining the rules of politics. There’s has been this insane stupidity and fear of running someone who has actually said and done something, mostly because of some silly notion of not wanting to cause offense. And this weird glorification of the innocence of youth. Trump had a record, is not ashamed of it and will not apologize, and causes all kinds of uproar.

    The reaction to Trump on the right is identical to the reaction of liberals to anyone to the right of Stalin. shock, horror, character assassination, taking words out if context to slander, etc. this is an old game, I hate it.

    Clinton is lucky not to be indicted, and has a good chance of getting to the presidency. An old guy who has a couple half baked policy ideas is giving her a run for the money and humiliating there best and the brightest on the right.

    The US military got beat by a bunch of inbred illiterate goat herders, and the cream of the conservative movement area getting beat by these two. I think shame is in order, or repentance.

    • #58
  29. The Question Inactive
    The Question
    @TheQuestion

    Assuming Trump is the nominee, it will be an interesting contest between two scandal soaked liars.  They both lie, but don’t actually need to lie to trash each other.  With Romney, the Democrats hilariously resorted to cutting a commercial pointing out that Romney did not bring Gatorade for his garbage man.  In contrast, Trump is so bad that he makes Hillary resort to telling the truth.

    • #59
  30. Nick Stuart Inactive
    Nick Stuart
    @NickStuart

    Saint Augustine: Who was that?

    There’s a lot of subjective judgment involved. To name just a few names:

    I’m otherwise reluctant to identify specific persons. There are people whose work is otherwise quite coherent and that I respect who seem to have just lost their minds on the subject of Trump. That would include at least one main feed podcast contributor (whose identity shouldn’t be that hard to deduce).

    National Review is an institutional example. On any given day the majority of articles on their website are negative about one or another facet of Trump, his campaign, something he said or did, something his supporters said or did. I found it telling that the balance of opinion on NRO seemed to be that Trump was primarily responsible for the violent Leftists who dog his rallies, not the Leftists themselves.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.