ISIS’ Other Victims

 

These monsters — we run out of words, don’t we? — have victimized so many more people this week than the maimed and murdered in France. So many desperate refugees — fleeing monsters like them — will now again drown in the sea, like they have been, or be shot at the borders, or returned to be imprisoned, starved, tortured, sold into sexual slavery, and barrel-bombed.

That so many in the US are now agitating not to accept refugees breaks my heart. You aren’t wrong about the security risk. But as someone whose entire neighborhood was just turned into an abattoir — as someone who could easily have been in any of those places — I still say: Find a way. We’re America. We’re this country, remember?

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door. ….

We can’t check their backgrounds? Then find another way to give them safe shelter. We can’t save them all? Then save their children, save the women, as many as we can without drowning along with them. The Saudis won’t let them in? Since when do we point our moral compass to Mecca? What are we protecting, if not a civilization that is better than theirs?

What country, by the nature of your error,

Should give you harbor? Go you to France or Flanders,

To any German province, to Spain or Portugal,

Nay, any where that not adheres to England,—

Why, you must needs be strangers. Would you be pleased

To find a nation of such barbarous temper,

That, breaking out in hideous violence,

Would not afford you an abode on earth,

Whet their detested knives against your throats,

Spurn you like dogs, and like as if that God

Owed not nor made not you, nor that the claimants

Were not all appropriate to your comforts,

But chartered unto them, what would you think

To be thus used? This is the strangers’ case;

And this your mountanish inhumanity.

Don’t let them keep killing. We must protect their victims.

On another note, after more than two months of relative calm, fighting is starting up again in eastern Ukraine. Of course it is. Putin’s got Europe on his side now. If I were a hardcore conspiracy theorist, I would wonder if this was the plan, but I’m not. Sometimes awful things happen by luck and accident. But these monsters have also condemned Ukraine, working splendidly with Putin’s opportunism.

So much damage done by a handful of monsters.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 324 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Marion Evans Inactive
    Marion Evans
    @MarionEvans

    Jamie Lockett:

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Jamie Lockett:This might be the most depressing comment thread I’ve ever read on Ricochet.

    Because we don’t want to import time bombs, or because people are advocating the government “do something”?

    Because of the stunning lack of compassion exhibited here.

    Compassion is a good and necessary thing, but it should be a personal choice, not something that should be forced on you by the State. You can do your part by adopting a Syrian family if you want, and sending them food, clothes etc., but not by imposing their presence on people who don’t want them.

    • #61
  2. Nick Stuart Inactive
    Nick Stuart
    @NickStuart

    Majestyk: Seriously. Build an internment camp there and keep them there until the crisis in their home country has subsided. Then send them home.

    Problem is that’ll never be how it works out. Once they’re here, they’re here permanently.

    • #62
  3. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Let the Muslims take care of the Muslims. If their culture will not protect their own, in the marketplace of ideas, we are winners.

    • #63
  4. Tom Meyer, Ed. Member
    Tom Meyer, Ed.
    @tommeyer

    Bryan G. Stephens: Importing people “fits”? Wow. So paying for the suffering of non-citizens is libertarian, but paying for the suffering of Americans is not libertarian. One more reason not to be libertarian.

    Bryan, both Walton and I were explicit in our initial comments that we oppose mass immigration of refugees.

    • #64
  5. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Nick Stuart:

    Majestyk: Seriously. Build an internment camp there and keep them there until the crisis in their home country has subsided. Then send them home.

    Problem is that’ll never be how it works out. Once they’re here, they’re here permanently.

    That’s the beauty of Gitmo!

    • #65
  6. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.:

    Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me: I lift my lamp beside the golden door. ….

    Bad poetry on an old French statue is not an immigration policy.

    • #66
  7. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Bryan G. Stephens: Importing people “fits”? Wow. So paying for the suffering of non-citizens is libertarian, but paying for the suffering of Americans is not libertarian. One more reason not to be libertarian.

    Bryan, both Walton and I were explicit in our initial comments that we oppose mass immigration of refugees.

    But you are for spending tax dollars to ease their pain and suffering. How is that different? Where is that part of the social contract between citizen and government? Shouldn’t this be something individuals choose to do or not to do?

    • #67
  8. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Nick Stuart:

    Majestyk: Seriously. Build an internment camp there and keep them there until the crisis in their home country has subsided. Then send them home.

    Problem is that’ll never be how it works out. Once they’re here, they’re here permanently.

    The point is that some of them will likely pass on the fine opportunity to brave the ND winter.  An internment camp far from the rest of civilization will discourage escapes and make the return process easy.  We could even build an airstrip there to bypass other transportational difficulties.

    • #68
  9. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    BrentB67:Tom, I admit to being a little dense sometimes, but isn’t Claire explicitly advocating the USA take these people in. Claire is most purposeful in her writing and I doubt she referenced the inscription on the Statue of Liberty inadvertently.

    I recommend reading Claire’s piece again, especially the parts where she talks about the Saudis being asked to take them in and the plea for other alternatives than abandoning them to their deaths.

    • #69
  10. Tom Meyer, Ed. Member
    Tom Meyer, Ed.
    @tommeyer

    BrentB67:Tom, I admit to being a little dense sometimes, but isn’t Claire explicitly advocating the USA take these people in. Claire is most purposeful in her writing and I doubt she referenced the inscription on the Statue of Liberty inadvertently.

    I think Claire’s preferred position is immigration or resettlement/internment of some kind. If so, I disagree with her.

    However, I took the bolded below to mean that she is open to other means of pursuing this humanitarian goal.

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.: We can’t check their backgrounds? Then find another way to give them safe shelter. We can’t save them all? Then save their children, save the women, as many as we can without drowning along with them. The Saudis won’t let them in? Since when do we point our moral compass to Mecca? What are we protecting, if not a civilization that is better than theirs?

    • #70
  11. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Claire, you disappoint us. Your call is the same one we hear every day from the left. “You must show compassion. You must bear the burden of this person’s misfortune, of that culture’s primitive dark heart. You and your success must give way to these failures.”

    Who do these leftists think they are, to define our common values by their foot-stamping fiat? Who do you think you are, Ms. Berlinski, to tell anyone what they must do to uphold the values of America? I trust you’ve thought this thru’ – beyond quoting Lazarus’ tired emo prattle out of context, I mean.

    You really ought not to wish for minarets and the atonal chant of the muzzein in my neighborhood. I do not submit. There’s my American value for you.

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.: So much damage done by a handful of monsters.

    Yes, and by the religion that breeds and indoctrinates them.

    • #71
  12. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Bryan G. Stephens: Importing people “fits”? Wow. So paying for the suffering of non-citizens is libertarian, but paying for the suffering of Americans is not libertarian. One more reason not to be libertarian.

    Bryan, both Walton and I were explicit in our initial comments that we oppose mass immigration of refugees.

    But you are for spending tax dollars to ease their pain and suffering. How is that different? Where is that part of the social contract between citizen and government? Shouldn’t this be something individuals choose to do or not to do?

    Interesting philosophy, then why spend tax dollars to fight ISIS at all. They haven’t attacked American soil have they?

    • #72
  13. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Jimmy Carter:

    Jamie Lockett: Because of the stunning lack of compassion exhibited here.

    I see a lot of compassion exhibited for America and Americans.

    Indeed.  Would that the open borders crowd showed such compassion to their fellow countrymen, particularly those living on our southern border.

    • #73
  14. EThompson Member
    EThompson
    @

    Xennady:

    Jamie Lockett:

    Bryan G. Stephens: No libertarian concept of government I have ever heard of, involves taking tax dollars to import people from another nation to support them on the dole in this one.

    Who at Ricochet is arguing this? Links would be demonstrative.

    If you want to bring these people to the United States this is what will happen.

    It happens in Michigan now, and I hear stories about it on a regular basis.

    Look at this and weep. A good friend has a kid attending U-M Dearborn.

    American Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, Michigan

    • #74
  15. Jon Gabriel, Ed. Contributor
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.
    @jon

    As this is a very heated topic, please be sure to play the ball, not the man. No need to impugn intentions; instead let’s discuss ideas. Thank you very much.

    • #75
  16. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    EThompson:

    Xennady:

    Jamie Lockett:

    Bryan G. Stephens: No libertarian concept of government I have ever heard of, involves taking tax dollars to import people from another nation to support them on the dole in this one.

    Who at Ricochet is arguing this? Links would be demonstrative.

    If you want to bring these people to the United States this is what will happen.

    It happens in Michigan now, and I hear stories about it on a regular basis.

    Look at this and weep. A good friend has a kid attending U-M Dearborn.

    Muslims Stoning Christians in Dearborn, Michigan

    Savagery, nothing more.

    • #76
  17. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Jamie Lockett:

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Bryan G. Stephens: Importing people “fits”? Wow. So paying for the suffering of non-citizens is libertarian, but paying for the suffering of Americans is not libertarian. One more reason not to be libertarian.

    Bryan, both Walton and I were explicit in our initial comments that we oppose mass immigration of refugees.

    But you are for spending tax dollars to ease their pain and suffering. How is that different? Where is that part of the social contract between citizen and government? Shouldn’t this be something individuals choose to do or not to do?

    Interesting philosophy, then why spend tax dollars to fight ISIS at all. They haven’t attacked American soil have they?

    How quickly we forget Garland Texas. No worries. The Republic will take care of our own.

    • #77
  18. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Jamie Lockett:

    BrentB67:Tom, I admit to being a little dense sometimes, but isn’t Claire explicitly advocating the USA take these people in. Claire is most purposeful in her writing and I doubt she referenced the inscription on the Statue of Liberty inadvertently.

    I recommend reading Claire’s piece again, especially the parts where she talks about the Saudis being asked to take them in and the plea for other alternatives than abandoning them to their deaths.

    Perhaps Malaysia would like them?  Why not Pakistan?

    The point is there are other countries, Jamie.  Muslim Countries.  Not advanced, western countries where just getting to our doorstep is like hitting the lottery.

    “Abandoning them to their deaths?”  Nobody is advocating shooting their boats out of the Med, but turning them around, unloading them and then scuttling their ships is an option.  Hell, Obama and Clinton did a great job with Libya – send them there.

    • #78
  19. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    BrentB67:Tom, I admit to being a little dense sometimes, but isn’t Claire explicitly advocating the USA take these people in. Claire is most purposeful in her writing and I doubt she referenced the inscription on the Statue of Liberty inadvertently.

    I think Claire’s preferred position is immigration or resettlement/internment of some kind. If so, I disagree with her.

    However, I took the bolded below to mean that she is open to other means of pursuing this humanitarian goal.

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.: We can’t check their backgrounds? Then find another way to give them safe shelter. We can’t save them all? Then save their children, save the women, as many as we can without drowning along with them. The Saudis won’t let them in? Since when do we point our moral compass to Mecca? What are we protecting, if not a civilization that is better than theirs?

    I thought separating families was beyond the pale.

    • #79
  20. Tom Meyer, Ed. Member
    Tom Meyer, Ed.
    @tommeyer

    Bryan G. Stephens:But you are for spending tax dollars to ease their pain and suffering. How is that different? Where is that part of the social contract between citizen and government?

    It doesn’t exist. I believe I have been quite clear on that.

    To elaborate again, though, I think it’s in our naked self-interest to reduce the refugee crisis and the best way of doing that is destroying ISIS while providing safe haven there to genuine refugees.

    Again, I do not want refugees immigrating here. Sounds like a bad policy to me. Protecting people there and destroying ISIS strikes me as a good and inexpensive way to stop the flow.

    • #80
  21. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    I wonder how many of those here so adamant in their refusal to help these people through resettlement are currently donating to charities designed to help them closer to home.

    • #81
  22. Tom Meyer, Ed. Member
    Tom Meyer, Ed.
    @tommeyer

    Basil Fawlty: I thought separating families was beyond the pale.

    You know what’s great about sarcasm? It never gets old.

    • #82
  23. Nick Stuart Inactive
    Nick Stuart
    @NickStuart

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.: Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me: I lift my lamp beside the golden door. ….

    I’m so sick of having that thrown in my face I’d gladly subscribe to chiseling those words off the tablet and replacing them with “Enough already, fix the problems in the country you’re in.”

    Sorry to be so blunt, but people moved to compassion for refugees can donate to helping them in the country they’re already in. I’d even go along with them taking a family into their spare bedroom. Don’t import 10,000 of them into my state and insist I pay for it.

    Sharyl Atkisson did a great report on the problems caused by refugee resettlement in the inaugural edition of her show Full Measure.  The town of Lewiston Maine is being bankrupted by the Somali refugees it’s been required to take in.

    • #83
  24. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Jamie Lockett:

    Bryan G. Stephens:

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Bryan G. Stephens: Importing people “fits”? Wow. So paying for the suffering of non-citizens is libertarian, but paying for the suffering of Americans is not libertarian. One more reason not to be libertarian.

    Bryan, both Walton and I were explicit in our initial comments that we oppose mass immigration of refugees.

    But you are for spending tax dollars to ease their pain and suffering. How is that different? Where is that part of the social contract between citizen and government? Shouldn’t this be something individuals choose to do or not to do?

    Interesting philosophy, then why spend tax dollars to fight ISIS at all. They haven’t attacked American soil have they?

    I am not the libertarian. I am a conservative, and a nationalist. You cannot hold me to your rules.

    Bring fire from the sky to wipe the off the face of the Earth. I’ll pay for that. If I had the money and resources (a la Tony Stark) I’d do it myself.

    • #84
  25. Majestyk Member
    Majestyk
    @Majestyk

    Jamie Lockett:I wonder how many of those here so adamant in their refusal to help these people through resettlement are currently donating to charities designed to help them closer to home.

    I donated at the office.

    • #85
  26. Jimmy Carter Member
    Jimmy Carter
    @JimmyCarter

    Claire Berlinski, Ed.: Find a way.

    Why is South America always exempt from helping?

    Airdrop the refusees anywhere over South America. Plenty of utopias there and They should feel Right at Home. It’s time that continent starts pulling Its weight.

    • #86
  27. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Tom Meyer, Ed.:

    Bryan G. Stephens:But you are for spending tax dollars to ease their pain and suffering. How is that different? Where is that part of the social contract between citizen and government?

    It doesn’t exist. I believe I have been quite clear on that.

    To elaborate again, though, I think it’s in our naked self-interest to reduce the refugee crisis and the best way of doing that is destroying ISIS while providing safe haven there to genuine refugees.

    Again, I do not want refugees immigrating here. Sounds like a bad policy to me. Protecting people there and destroying ISIS strikes me as a good and inexpensive way to stop the flow.

    I guess I don’t see a good way to protect people there that does not involve putting our boys in harm’s way on the ground. I don’t want that. We can wipe out the enemy from the sky and they cannot touch us. Do that.

    • #87
  28. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    I’d gladly play for the removal of Emma Lazarus’ doggerel.

    • #88
  29. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Majestyk:

    Jamie Lockett:I wonder how many of those here so adamant in their refusal to help these people through resettlement are currently donating to charities designed to help them closer to home.

    I donated at the office.

    The IRS donated for me.

    • #89
  30. David Foster Member
    David Foster
    @DavidFoster

    Large-scale immigration into the US, especially by people of very different cultures, has been made much more problematic by our loss of civilizational self-confidence, which will turn assimilation from the Normal Case to an Exception Case.  Consider the Student Government at U-Minnesota, which decided *not* have 9/11 commemoration events because they thought it might offend Muslims.  Who would want to assimilate into a society whose representatives show so little self-respect?  And communities of resolutely non-assimilated and non-assimilatable immigrants, even if they are not themselves violent, inherently provide cover for those who *are* violent.

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.