Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The Anger Games
The Trump bump tells us something about the state of American politics. Progressives are panting to interpret his surge as evidence of Republicans’ black hearts. Some Donald Trump supporters have suggested that his success, such as it is/was (this is being written after the McCain flap and before polls have gauged its impact), is an indictment of the limp “Republican establishment.” It’s neither.
There are 116 candidates for the Republican nomination (I exaggerate slightly). In recent polls, Trump got 24 percent — more than any other candidate. But Scott Walker and Jeb Bush together got 25 percent of the total, and there are so many others that assigning a frontrunner is like trying to catch one guppy with a net. Besides, 54 percent say his views do not represent the values of the Republican Party. He’s been a big donor to Hillary Clinton, Terry McAuliffe and other Democrats. He was pro-choice until about 6:30 this morning. He was for a single-payer health care system, and he’s been remarkably uncharitable for a wealthy man.
Ah, they say, but Republicans are seething with hatred for Hispanics, especially illegal immigrants, and this accounts for Trump’s hot-air liftoff. Illegal immigration does enrage some portions of the base, but only some. In a recent Pew poll, fully 66 percent of Republicans said illegal Mexican immigrants are “mostly honest,” while only 19 percent said they are “mainly undesirable.”
There is a talk-radio drumbeat about illegal-immigrant criminals. Still, most Republican voters are not strongly anti-immigration. They’re ambivalent, with 56 percent favoring a path to legal status for aliens living here, according to a Pew poll, but 63 percent viewing immigrants as a burden.
Whatever one’s views about immigration, the very worst way to broach the topic is to smear all Mexican illegals as “rapists” and criminals. It’s obviously false. It’s not even true that illegal immigrants commit a disproportionate share of crimes. Honest anti-immigration groups like the Center for Immigration Studies agree that first-generation immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-borns. (And immigration rates are falling.)
Well, we’re told, people are choking on political correctness, and Trump is a breath of fresh air. So the best way to discredit political correctness is to embody the worst stereotype of an aggressive bigot?
Trump’s moment is probably fading, but his little balloon ride is disturbing nonetheless. It’s evidence that political intemperance is not limited to the left.
Thanks to the execrable leadership of the Democratic Party and its allies in the press, we have witnessed several years of stoked racial hatred in America. From the Trayvon Martin episode and Michael Brown’s death, to the tragic cases of Eric Garner and the Charleston massacre, the country has been bathed in mendacious incitement. Opinion leaders insist it’s still Selma in 1965. “Black lives matter” has become a movement — as if any decent person disagreed; as if the country had not spent half a century sedulously scrubbing racism from our polity; as if affirmative action were not a feature of educational, corporate and government policy; as if we hadn’t elected and reelected a black president. Democratic candidates for president have been reduced to apologizing simply for saying “all lives matter.”
The civil pieties that were once taken for granted in the political sphere — “all men are created equal” — are now controversial. The triumph of identity politics is complete on the left.
Barack Obama rose on a promise of harmony, but has used power to rend the nation along all of its weakest seams. This brand of leadership has not left his followers happier, but more bitter. As for his opponents, they are by turns grieving and disbelieving at the damage he’s been able to inflict.
The only answer to division and hatred on the left is inclusion and unity on the right. A number of Republican candidates for president have been seeking to recast the Republican Party as the party of reform and outreach. They recognize that a party that lost not just the Hispanic vote, the black vote, the women’s vote and the youth vote, but also the Asian vote has an image problem. As any number of successful Republican senators and governors have shown, it isn’t necessary to adopt any particular policy (e.g., amnesty) to attract the votes of more Hispanics or Asians. It is necessary for the party to convey a welcoming spirit. Such a tone may even attract fence-sitting white voters who are left cold by a party that appears uninterested in the plight of the poor.
That is the Republican challenge and opportunity. Success beckons — but only post-Trump.
Published in General
I think Trump is a clown and, as Mona points out, not a conservative.
But it looks like Cruz is trying to move in on Trump’s ‘territory’. I can’t support Trump, but this….Yes!
Re Cruz’ floor speech earlier today:
Its time for truth-telling, I think
Ya, I wish he’d quit holding back and really cut loose. If only Cruz would step and call McConnell a Liar in the Senate we could get this gunfight started and clean out the riff raff.
Oh, wait.
For a country that claims it doesn’t believe in the Divine Right of Kings, inside the beltway media types sure are a royal pain.
Every issue at every moment? How about more than one issue (gun rights) with any consistency?
I never called Mona a RINO and rarely use that term for anyone (I prefer “squish” but didn’t call her that, either.). Try using “real” facts to support your point.
Compromise? I’d gladly give an inch here and there if it meant we got an inch in return. But we don’t get compromise, we either lose a lot or just a little, spanked because the Dems are out to destroy us and we want to “work with” them.
Reagan got the Soviets to work with him because he called them the evil empire; unreasonable is a great bargaining position.
And we’ll see how amenable to compromise y’all are if Ted Cruz gets the nomination.
Mathew Continetti has a pretty good handle on things (via Instapundit):
http://freebeacon.com/columns/revenge-of-the-radical-middle/
This! A thousand times THIS!
And this!!!
Thank you, Terry Mott.
Random points:
We don’t always lose; sometimes we stop the Democrats from getting what they want and thus get a tie. “Fight with everything you’ve got GOP voters, and we might be able to stop the Democrats every once in a while!” How inspiring.
(They also recognize this, which is why we get all the “be realistic” talk the day after the election.)
Observe how O’Malley abjectly cowered before the far-left base for the “all lives matter” flap. Compare with how most prominent Republicans treat their base.
Also, a warning for the GOP. I give you credit for protecting gun rights because you deserve it. I’ve used this to not only convince myself but convince others that voting Republican isn’t altogether pointless.
This had better not change.
No, this is not true. Your representation here is very dishonest. (And very ‘leftist’ of you to put it this way). You don’t want a debate, so you moved to personal attacks.
This entire post is ridiculous. It is the view of a neo-conservative who came to the fight from a liberal background and whose thinking is suffused with the unstated premises of the Democratic Party and the left. Although the ideas of Kirkpatrick and Kemp may have been exciting in the 1980s when Ms Charen came of intellectual age, they are long since past their prime.
As with most people with left-wing ideas, there is little point in refuting what she said. All I will say is that the counsel of apologetic defeatists like Mona Charen has helped lead Middle American conservatives not to success, which she continues to promise, but to the besieged state they realize they are in today, a realization that has fueled the Trump phenomenon.
Go back to worrying about Iran and ISIS.
Well here we are a hundred comments in and there’s been no response addressing the ugly accusations made in the OP.
I’ve decided /for now/ not to write a post entitled “The Racism of Mona Charen” — I pointed out the same moral failure elsewhere about the execrable Jen Rubin, and that certainly didn’t change anything, and Ms. Charen is not execrable. Besides which, I post here “well-knonymously”, and to call out a guest here (even a Contributor) by name in the title of a damning post seems like poor form.
I’m certainly not above whacking the guilty with gusto, but to take Charen to task in such a fashion under her professional name is something I’ll reserve for the truly vile, such as Rubin. Charen I merely disagree with, and wish she would stop kicking us and calling it conversation that were too dense to grasp.
More later, but sorry, the “promised” post is already basically covered here.
If Mona understood how offensive she is being, she would likely review her discourse, which I am fairly sure is not the case with Rubin, the Harpy.
I just posted an idea on how to resolve this.