Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
3 Martini Lunch
Daily Signal
Heritage Explains
Madison’s Notes
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
Federalist Radio Hour
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The American Idea
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
Hillsdale Dialogues
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Historian Andrew Roberts is the author of more than a dozen major works of history, including Napoleon: A Life, Churchill: Walking with Destiny, and The Last King of America: The Misunderstood Reign of George III. His latest book, coauthored with General David Petraeus, is Conflict: The Evolution of Warfare from 1945 to Ukraine, which provides the basis for this interview. Roberts discusses the differences in the way nations and allied forces prosecute wars in the twentieth century vs. today. Roberts also discusses his strong support for Israel in the current conflict in Gaza both in the media and in the House of Lords, where he is now a member. Roberts also explains (with some understandable exasperation) why Ridley Scott (the director of the recent film biography of Napoleon) is wrong —really wrong—when he says that historians are not to be trusted because “they weren’t there” when they describe historical events.
Recorded on March 13th, 2024.
Promoted by an EditorThis post was promoted to the Main Feed by an editor.
Discussion (2)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I just watched that, and learned a lot -- especially from a British historian's point of view. Thanks for posting it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Evidently the way for a historian to get a peerage is to say that the establishment was right 90% of the time and just needed to do a bit more of the same the other 10% of the time !
It's good that Roberts ( or Lord Andy as we call him at family gatherings..... ) is a bit of an old fashioned British Imperialist, but he's apparently not a very original thinker. David Irving is a better and more informative historian, but it seems likely he'll die penniless. If Roberts deserved to be made a Baron, Irving should have had a Dukedom and a vast country estate.