Biden Impeachment Likely: Rep. Biggs (R-AZ) with Bartiromo

 

The original Money Honey (and certainly the nectar of our hearts) interviewed Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ) on the supposedly abrupt release of the famed document about Biden and money and … oh, just watch the thing.  I’m so excited I could take a nap.  But this is a good interview, actually newsworthy.

Something about Barr in there just before she brings Biggs on. “We didn’t dismiss it — we sent it to Delaware.” Oh, you sent it to Delaware. You took it to the train station? Do you have a shredder in your office labeled “Delaware?”

Shameful. But Biggs actually sounds fired up.

Laugh of the clip: “Kamala Harris … not even the Democrats want her to be President, even for a day.”

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 34 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    DJ EJ (View Comment):

    It’s time for them to put all this evidence into a video graphics format, something well-produced but also easy to follow, and then release it on Twitter, Youtube, Snapchat adverts, Tik Tok, everywhere. That list of LLCs briefly on the screen during the Biggs interview was too much to read and digest in that amount of time.

    Speaker McCarthy put out radio and TV ads bragging about defeating Biden in the debt limit deal. Whether it’s actually a real victory or not, I like the attempt at shaping the narrative, bypassing the media, and speaking directly to the American people.

    The videos would literally follow the money and a timeline – lines move and extend out from Chinese military companies, Burisma, the mayor of Moscow, etc. after visits from Joe Biden/Airforce 2/Hunter Biden while voice narration explains and graphics show bribery/quid pro quo/influence peddling dollar amounts with foreboding music in the background. The web of money lines then flow to the 20+ LLCs owned by the Biden family, and from there flow into the bank accounts of Biden relatives, in-laws, and grandchildren.

    Produce multiple videos focusing on the most egregious and blatant aspects of the criminal scheme. Keep the videos simple, straightforward, and 3 to 5 minutes at most. Keep releasing new episodes and installments as new evidence comes to light. Bypass the corporate media to inform the American public. The presidential campaign has begun, it’s time to start throwing punches at Biden – bloody him up before the general election even begins.

    They need to get the Epoch Times people.   

    • #31
  2. Roderic Coolidge
    Roderic
    @rhfabian

    Nope.  Ain’t happening.  The Rep. leadership will bargain it away in some sort of deal with Biden.

    • #32
  3. DonG (CAGW is a Scam) Coolidge
    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)
    @DonG

    Raxxalan (View Comment):
    There is no way to prove voter fraud after the fact of an election.   The whole investigation process is a joke.  The best thing, you might be able to prove is that there were irregularities in the envelopes.   It wouldn’t be enough though to prove the election was fraudulent and it wouldn’t be enough to overturn an election.   Investigating election fraud is a joke.   Even assuming an agency that want to do its best to stop fraud, which we clearly don’t have right now.

    When Barr claims that he investigated and found no fraud, when he didn’t really investigate, that undermines the DOJ and the election process.  There is value in not lying to the people.

    • #33
  4. Raxxalan Member
    Raxxalan
    @Raxxalan

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    Raxxalan (View Comment):
    There is no way to prove voter fraud after the fact of an election. The whole investigation process is a joke. The best thing, you might be able to prove is that there were irregularities in the envelopes. It wouldn’t be enough though to prove the election was fraudulent and it wouldn’t be enough to overturn an election. Investigating election fraud is a joke. Even assuming an agency that want to do its best to stop fraud, which we clearly don’t have right now.

    When Barr claims that he investigated and found no fraud, when he didn’t really investigate, that undermines the DOJ and the election process. There is value in not lying to the people.

    That is true.  I suspect he doesn’t want to admit that there is no way to actually catch or prove election fraud because it opens a whole another can of worms.  That having been said there is no excuse for the government lying to the American citizen.  It can claim that it must maintain secrecy for a variety of legitimate reasons, but actually lying to the American people is committing fraud against its employers.

    • #34
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.