Democrats Win by Convincing People Reality Does Not Exist

 

A fascinating Rasmussen poll was cited by Powerline today (emphasis mine):

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 71% of American Adults agree with the statement that “there are two genders, male and female,” including 57% who Strongly Agree.

So a little more than half of American adults strongly agree that there are two genders – men and women.  I wonder what that poll would have looked like five years ago?  What about ten or fifteen years ago?  Those American adults would have had blank looks on their faces, and would not have understood the question.

It’s absolutely amazing how fast leftists can convince the population that reality does not exist.  It’s just astonishing.

Remember that the 43% of American adults who aren’t sure how many genders there are — remember that those people vote.

Perhaps there are some flaws to democratic elections.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 50 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: Perhaps there are some flaws to democratic elections.

    Time to queue up that Winston Churchill quote.

    “In the morning I’ll be sober but you’ll still be ugly.”?

    That’s a come back that screams ‘good sex’.

    • #31
  2. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    TBA (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat:

    Remember that the 43% of American adults who aren’t sure how many genders there are — remember that those people vote.

    Actually, that’s 29%, who either aren’t sure or who disagree with the binary.

    But what’s interesting is the 14% difference between the 71% who agree that it’s male/female and the 57% who strongly agree.

    If it’s a binary (believe/don’t believe) then what’s the difference between “agree” and “strongly agree”?

    Might also be technical people who know that there are incredibly rare androgynes born with both sex parts present, or less technical people who have heard about it.

    There are 2.05 sexes. For what it is worth.

    And what it is worth is next to nothing.

    The human being has two arms. Some people are born without arms due to birth defects. Without minimizing the rights or inherent dignity of people born with birth defects we can still say that the human species has two arms.

    • #32
  3. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: Perhaps there are some flaws to democratic elections.

    Time to queue up that Winston Churchill quote.

    “In the morning I’ll be sober but you’ll still be ugly.”?

    That’s a come back that screams ‘good sex’.

    Well alcohol has been helping ugly people have sex since ancient Sumeria.

    • #33
  4. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: Perhaps there are some flaws to democratic elections.

    Time to queue up that Winston Churchill quote.

    “In the morning I’ll be sober but you’ll still be ugly.”?

    That’s a come back that screams ‘good sex’.

    Well alcohol has been helping ugly people have sex since ancient Sumeria.

    Alcohol doesn’t help with being an [CoC]hole, including during sex.

    • #34
  5. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: Perhaps there are some flaws to democratic elections.

    Time to queue up that Winston Churchill quote.

    “In the morning I’ll be sober but you’ll still be ugly.”?

    That’s a come back that screams ‘good sex’.

    Well alcohol has been helping ugly people have sex since ancient Sumeria.

    Alcohol doesn’t help with being an [CoC]hole, including during sex.

    Moreover, ‘…drink, sir, is a great
    provoker of three things…nose-painting, sleep, and
    urine. Lechery, sir, it provokes, and unprovokes;
    it provokes the desire, but it takes
    away the performance: therefore, much drink
    may be said to be an equivocator with lechery:
    it makes him, and it mars him; it sets
    him on, and it takes him off; it persuades him,
    and disheartens him; makes him stand to, and
    not stand to; in conclusion, equivocates him
    in a sleep, and, giving him the lie, leaves him.’

    • #35
  6. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

    I believe there are several angles to the 29 or 44%( whatever  group you look at) who  now have difficulty recognizing there are two sexes.

    The most important factor is that a large percentage of our population now  fear being punished by the Leftist orthodoxy. They have been brainwashed and conditioned to “fall in line” to the Leftist narrative no matter what.
    They have been conditioned to reject any rational inquiry that questions the Narrative.

    I had dinner with a parent last night of one of daughter’s friends who works for City of Hope and a Conservative. He was very angry and distraught because now no one at his work is allowed to question the Narrative dictates that come down from on high. It is absolutely verboten with extreme consequences Hui if you even question them. Questioning is simply not allowed even if a patient’s health is put at risk.

    What this instance, and I know of many others,  indicates is that Corporate America, and I think particularly the Medical Establishment and the Education Establishment now rigidly enforce the Narrative with extreme prejudice with great consequences for non-compliance.

    So in this Stalinist environment it is no wonder many people fear accepting reality.

    • #36
  7. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Unsk (View Comment):

    I believe there are several angles to the 29 or 44%( whatever group you look at) who now have difficulty recognizing there are two sexes.

    Or they don’t really care that much? I always suspect that of the don’t knows – they may have an opinion but they aren’t invested enough in the issue to argue it either way.

    The most important factor is that a large percentage of our population now fear being punished by the Leftist orthodoxy. They have been brainwashed and conditioned to “fall in line” to the Leftist narrative no matter what.
    They have been conditioned to reject any rational inquiry that questions the Narrative.

    Don’t you think that’s always been true, to some degree, and that the only thing that’s changed (or changing) is ‘the narrative’?

    I think people only notice when they don’t agree with the dominant narrative – which may be happening as a new thing to many conservatives – but I’ve disagreed with the dominant narrative for a long time (just by virtue of being gay [if you permit the turn of phrase], but also due to being Muslim, being Indian) and there have always been things about the consensus that it cost one to question out loud.

     

    • #37
  8. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

    Zafar, I can understand your plight and angst being a Muslim is an overwhelmingly non- Muslim country, but the enforcement of this Stalinist Narrative  to the vast majority of Americans  is something very new, very frustrating and very dangerous.

    • #38
  9. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar, I can understand your plight and angst being a Muslim is an overwhelmingly non- Muslim country,

    Edited to add:

    Actually, being gay in an overwhelmingly Muslim country would be a lot more difficult!

    But it’s more along the lines of which lives and narratives are automatically privileged and which ones are automatically devalued.  I don’t perceive myself as an outsider in the West, it’s an internal critique.

    but the enforcement of this Stalinist Narrative to the vast majority of Americans is something very new, very frustrating and very dangerous.

    How is it different from, say, McCarthyism?

    • #39
  10. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar, I can understand your plight and angst being a Muslim is an overwhelmingly non- Muslim country,

    Edited to add:

    Actually, being gay in an overwhelmingly Muslim country would be a lot more difficult!

    But it’s more along the lines of which lives and narratives are automatically privileged and which ones are automatically devalued. I don’t perceive myself as an outsider in the West, it’s an internal critique.

    but the enforcement of this Stalinist Narrative to the vast majority of Americans is something very new, very frustrating and very dangerous.

    How is it different from, say, McCarthyism?

    Because there were actual Communists who wanted to destroy America. I recommend the book Witness. It is a lie that it just about persecuting free thinkers.

    • #40
  11. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar, I can understand your plight and angst being a Muslim is an overwhelmingly non- Muslim country,

    Edited to add:

    Actually, being gay in an overwhelmingly Muslim country would be a lot more difficult!

    But it’s more along the lines of which lives and narratives are automatically privileged and which ones are automatically devalued. I don’t perceive myself as an outsider in the West, it’s an internal critique.

    but the enforcement of this Stalinist Narrative to the vast majority of Americans is something very new, very frustrating and very dangerous.

    How is it different from, say, McCarthyism?

    Because there were actual Communists who wanted to destroy America. I recommend the book Witness. It is a lie that it just about persecuting free thinkers.

    The only killings that Joe McCarthy’s managed during his antics in the Senate were of liquor bottles. Compare that with Stalin, with Mao … c’mon, Zafar.

    • #41
  12. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Percival (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar, I can understand your plight and angst being a Muslim is an overwhelmingly non- Muslim country,

    Edited to add:

    Actually, being gay in an overwhelmingly Muslim country would be a lot more difficult!

    But it’s more along the lines of which lives and narratives are automatically privileged and which ones are automatically devalued. I don’t perceive myself as an outsider in the West, it’s an internal critique.

    but the enforcement of this Stalinist Narrative to the vast majority of Americans is something very new, very frustrating and very dangerous.

    How is it different from, say, McCarthyism?

    Because there were actual Communists who wanted to destroy America. I recommend the book Witness. It is a lie that it just about persecuting free thinkers.

    The only killings that Joe McCarthy’s managed during his antics in the Senate were of liquor bottles. Compare that with Stalin, with Mao … c’mon, Zafar.

    But we aren’t comparing that to Stalin or Mao, we’re comparing that to the Woke Dictatorship currently Harshing the Conservative Mellow.

    • #42
  13. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

    Zafar,

    A. The McCarthy hearings were a long time ago and I don’t there is a single person who comments here who even was an adult then.

    B. Since I live in Hollywood, and in the past knew people who involved substantially in the entertainment business and did tell me there were problems with Communists as Henry said.

    That said the woke inquisition of today totally violates the Constitution in multiple and very serious ways  and has no legal or rational basis whatsoever.

    The Woke Inquisition of today is simply Stalinist intimidation, persecution and censorship of innocent citizens with the intent of overthrowing our Constitutional Republic.

    • #43
  14. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar,

    A. The McCarthy hearings were a long time ago and I don’t there is a single person who comments here who even was an adult then.

    B. Since I live in Hollywood, and in the past knew people who involved substantially in the entertainment business and did tell me there were problems with Communists as Henry said.

    What problems?

    That they existed?

    That said the woke inquisition of today totally violates the Constitution in multiple and very serious ways and has no legal or rational basis whatsoever.

    oh look, I agree – I don’t think persecuting people for thought crimes is a good thing.  But it’s never been.

    The Woke Inquisition of today is simply Stalinist intimidation, persecution and censorship of innocent citizens with the intent of overthrowing our Constitutional Republic.

    It’s the same basic impulse as McCarthyism.  Which I think was bad. 

    • #44
  15. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar, I can understand your plight and angst being a Muslim is an overwhelmingly non- Muslim country,

    Edited to add:

    Actually, being gay in an overwhelmingly Muslim country would be a lot more difficult!

    But it’s more along the lines of which lives and narratives are automatically privileged and which ones are automatically devalued. I don’t perceive myself as an outsider in the West, it’s an internal critique.

    but the enforcement of this Stalinist Narrative to the vast majority of Americans is something very new, very frustrating and very dangerous.

    How is it different from, say, McCarthyism?

    Because there were actual Communists who wanted to destroy America. I recommend the book Witness. It is a lie that it just about persecuting free thinkers.

    The only killings that Joe McCarthy’s managed during his antics in the Senate were of liquor bottles. Compare that with Stalin, with Mao … c’mon, Zafar.

    But we aren’t comparing that to Stalin or Mao, we’re comparing that to the Woke Dictatorship currently Harshing the Conservative Mellow.

    True, people losing their jobs isn’t the same as killing people. Even the Nazis started smaller than that, with Jews and “the politically undesirable” being removed from civil service jobs in 1933. But everybody who refused the experimental “vaccine” got bounced from government contract jobs. “Comedian” Jimmy Kimmel thought that they should be denied medical treatment altogether. (That would seem to be a rather problematic position for those who state that medical care is a human right, no?)

    • #45
  16. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Zafar is a leftist and has to pretend that flaws among Westerner Christians are as bad as anything that ever happened in the Mughal Empire or among communist nations. It is frankly tiresome.

    McCarthy was probably not a good dude and I have heard that he overstretched his prosecution of Communists for political purposes which is reprehensible. That is does not make America anywhere near the equivalent of persecuting the innocent for malovalent political purposes. 

    • #46
  17. Macho Grande' Coolidge
    Macho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Zafar,

    A. The McCarthy hearings were a long time ago and I don’t there is a single person who comments here who even was an adult then.

    B. Since I live in Hollywood, and in the past knew people who involved substantially in the entertainment business and did tell me there were problems with Communists as Henry said.

    What problems?

    That they existed?

    That said the woke inquisition of today totally violates the Constitution in multiple and very serious ways and has no legal or rational basis whatsoever.

    oh look, I agree – I don’t think persecuting people for thought crimes is a good thing. But it’s never been.

    The Woke Inquisition of today is simply Stalinist intimidation, persecution and censorship of innocent citizens with the intent of overthrowing our Constitutional Republic.

    It’s the same basic impulse as McCarthyism. Which I think was bad.

    Except that Communism killed 100 million people in the 20th century.  Me not wanting to adhere to a crowd of idiots’ take on what constitutes gender kills no one.

    But we are not in the McCarthy Era ™.  We are in the Woke Era.  And for anyone who’s been working in large corporations for the past 5 years or so, they are all in on it – it pervades the internal communications, policies, presentations, and language.

    All I want to do is work and get the job done.  Indoctrination is not equivalent to “training”, no matter how many times an overpaid load types “DEI” or “ESG” into a powerpoint deck and inserts a smiley face.

    • #47
  18. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Steve Fast (View Comment):

    Zafar (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat:

    Remember that the 43% of American adults who aren’t sure how many genders there are — remember that those people vote.

    Actually, that’s 29%, who either aren’t sure or who disagree with the binary.

    But what’s interesting is the 14% difference between the 71% who agree that it’s male/female and the 57% who strongly agree.

    If it’s a binary (believe/don’t believe) then what’s the difference between “agree” and “strongly agree”?

    It should have been a True/False question.

    I wonder if they even have true/false questions on exams anymore. “Well, in my truth, that is correct. . . .”

    The ‘believe’ vs ‘strongly believe’ options give us some more information. I’m just trying to figure out what that is.

    If I believe something that is true, it’s no big deal. But if I believe something that is false, then I have to strongly believe it. 

    • #48
  19. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    I still believe the current transgender weirdness is a Marxist exercise in seeing what absurdities the (D)/Leftist mind warpers can cram into the gullible voters skulls under the premise if we can convince these lemmings to follow along with this transgender nonsense, then we should have no problem getting them to march right off the cliff on anything.

    I think the Marxists are perverts.

    • #49
  20. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Dems also use violence to win. 

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/university-demands-conservative-students-pay-18000-in-security-damage-fees-after-leftists-riot-at-their-event-even-though-school-officials-allegedly-encouraged-protests

    • #50
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.