It’s Incredible Democrats Think They Need to Cheat

 

Four years ago, Bernie Sanders called on executives of oil companies to be criminally prosecuted for the harm they have caused. That harm is not immediately obvious — it’s not clear if the climate is getting cooler or warmer recently. If it is changing, it’s not clear why, and the climate has been changing for billions of years, so it’s not obvious that current changes are atypical. A criminal trial would be tricky since nobody really understands the crime in question.  Plus, if the oil companies closed down tomorrow, hundreds of millions would die from lack of heat, food, and everything else that is transported to us using diesel fuel. So that would be a difficult prosecution.

I wonder if Mr. Sanders would support criminally prosecuting the architects of our response to COVID? In that case, the damages are much more obvious. I don’t think this is a good idea, myself, but it’s easier to make a case for this than Mr. Sanders’ example above.

But the data which was available to our leaders will never see the light of day. They knew early on that vaccines in young people were unhelpful at best, and possibly dangerous. They knew early on that masks didn’t work. They knew early on that shutting down the economy didn’t help. Yet they persisted, for some reason. And again, we will never know what those reasons were.

The left is good at this.

The transgender girl who killed those people at the school in Tennessee left a manifesto. Apparently, it paints the transgender fad in a poor light, as it has not been released. And it will not be. Ever. Because it would hurt the left.

I don’t know who is on Jeffery Epstein’s client list. But since it has not been released, I can guess. Do you think that will ever be released? Of course not. Because it would hurt the left.

There are many reasons that we should mourn the loss of our news media. This is a big one. If we had a news media, it would endeavor to inform the people about what is going on. But when the news media no longer even pretends to be anything other than the propaganda division of the Democratic Party, then this is what we get.

It’s obvious that the Democrats at least tried to cheat in the last election. Mail-in ballots, drop boxes in certain neighborhoods, spending over a week ‘finding’ ballots behind closed doors, mules, refusing to update voter databanks, Mark Zuckerberg spending hundreds of millions of dollars in very certain communities on election systems, not requiring ID to vote, and so on and so forth. We can argue about whether voter fraud changed the outcome or not. But you can’t argue that the Democrats at least tried to cheat.

My point is that it’s simply amazing to me that Democrats even thought that cheating was necessary. How could they lose? They control the flow of information. They control what American citizens see, everywhere from the evening news to their Facebook feed to their local newspaper to their Google searches and so on and so forth. Democrats control all of it.

But despite all that, they still believe that they need to cheat to win.

And they’re probably right.

That’s just astonishing.

I wonder what percentage of the vote Joe Biden would have won if the news media had covered him like they covered Donald Trump? If we knew who was on Epstein’s client list? If Hillary’s creation of the Russia dossier was covered in the news? If the information on Hunter’s laptop had been released and widely discussed before the election? If Black Lives Matter had been covered in the news as a terrorist organization rather than a civil rights group? If the media had explored the revenue and business model of the Biden family during his time as Vice President?

What percentage of the vote would Biden have won? By 20%? Maybe 25%?

Democrats and their destructive policies are incredibly unpopular among Americans, and they know it. So that even with complete control of the flow of information, they still believe that they must cheat in elections to win. And they’re probably right.

Democrats are not the dominant party. Not even close. And they know it. Yet they control everything.

This is horrifying to watch.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 59 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    Trump maintained the crazy, but failed to deliver on Obamacare, the wall etc.  In addition he let Fauci and Birx run wild.   If he had shut down Fauci and Birx instead of American society and the economy, he would have won.    

    • #31
  2. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    In 2016 Donald Trump was running against the most hated woman in America.  And he barely beat her, unless you believe that he actually won in a landslide but the Dems stole many millions of votes, making it look close.  Lots of people held Joe Biden in low regard in 2020, but he was not hated the way Clinton was.

    • #32
  3. Macho Grande' Coolidge
    Macho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Scott Wilmot (View Comment):
    I should have been more specific: power and mind-control.

    As terrible as this looks, it needs a little debunking. The text is not a news story, but rather a policy statement of the media company that owns these TV stations, being delivered by those TV stations. So of course it’s going to be identical.

    The real problem is when actual news stories are delivered this way, reading talking points word-for-word. And there are numerous clips of those.

    It doesn’t need a de-bunking.  It’s a demonstration of the bullsh*t the public consumes, and informs the narrative.

    As you state at the end, there are “numerous” clips.  It’s much, much more than that.  When the news narrative is delivered in almost verbatim alignment with political talking points, across different broadcasters, nationally and locally, we are not consuming news. We’re consuming a narrative.

    In other words, being told how to vote. 

    • #33
  4. Macho Grande' Coolidge
    Macho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    In 2016 Donald Trump was running against the most hated woman in America. And he barely beat her, unless you believe that he actually won in a landslide but the Dems stole many millions of votes, making it look close. Lots of people held Joe Biden in low regard in 2020, but he was not hated the way Clinton was.

    She’s only hated by non-Democrats.  Which means she’ll still get those votes.

    So try not to paint it as “barely”, and she was hated by everyone.  She was loved by the left and is still promoted and supported all over the place.

    Considering Trump was an outsider, got the republican nomination but not the local and state support most national candidates receive, and still won, is an amazing example of what blowing up the system can look like.  And he did it with the rampant cheating that still pervades the election process today.

     

    • #34
  5. Muleskinner, Weasel Wrangler Member
    Muleskinner, Weasel Wrangler
    @Muleskinner

    Dr. Bastiat:

    My point is that it’s simply amazing to me that Democrats even thought that cheating was necessary. How could they lose? They control the flow of information. They control what American citizens see, everywhere from the evening news to their Facebook feed to their local newspaper to their Google searches and so on and so forth. Democrats control all of it.

    But despite all that, they still believe that they need to cheat to win.

    Not at all surprising,  Marxist ideology almost guarantees the need to cheat. The false consciousness imbedded in the proletariat and bourgeoisie classes in the US prevents most of us from seeing how to make progress, (What is the matter with Kansas?) must be overcome. The New Democrats have become the new class, and need the lower classes to wake up to consolidate their power. In another context Hunter Biden, and the directors of the alphabet agencies and social media companies have become the our nomenklatura. They cheat because they think we’re too backward to know what’s good for us. 

    • #35
  6. David Foster Member
    David Foster
    @DavidFoster

    Regarding the self-image of the media and their view of their proper role, see The Rule of the Prince-Electors.

    • #36
  7. hoowitts Coolidge
    hoowitts
    @hoowitts

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    Unfortunately, herein lies the rub…too logical. The left has no room for logic, hence the push against anything true or reality based. They, for the most part, are fueled by the adrenaline of emotion. This feeds their need to “feel” self-important. Once convinced of their own moral superiority there is no space, no need, for truth.

    Truth is not only malleable it becomes troublesome (recall Gore’s self-owning titled book: “An Inconvenient Truth”- Freud could not have come up with a better example of projection) The cultish overtones through the left are simply undeniable, including the prevalent conditioning techniques through the media.

     Like Dr. B, I’m lost as to a response in strategy. Omega couldn’t be more correct but what good does it do us? Until we recognize the left as a cult, the descent toward insanity will continue. My fear is that things will still have to get so much worse for the left to realize the emperor has no clothes. What strategy is available to combat those who necessarily have abandoned connection to reality?

    • #37
  8. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    That Sinclair video gets a lot of traction on the left, who they view as being even more dangerous than NewCorp. If Sinclair sounds familiar to you it’s because they are the ones that are behind Bally Sports and they’re in bankruptcy.

    Sinclair is so dangerous that they’re closing down newsrooms around the country, recognizing that even if there are four network affiliates in a market not all four can run a local newscast without losing tons of money.

    • #38
  9. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):
    I think if the voters knew about Epstein’s list, Biden’s being owned by America’s enemies, and everything else, the voters would still have voted for Biden. Because that is what nice people do.

    I really, really hope you’re wrong.

    But I think you might be right…

    Because everyone else knew that Trump was literally Hitler after all. My wife is convinced that he has raped multiple women and was likely a frequent guest of Epstien as well. Nothing can convince her otherwise and it allows her to convince herself that any actions taken removing him are justified. 

    • #39
  10. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    EODmom (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    I live in a very, very liberal part of Silicon Valley, and I swear that in 2020 I could count the number of Biden yard signs on Jerry Garcia’s right hand.

    They didn’t have to advertise. Vote democrat regardless.

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    kedavis (View Comment):
    If people put up yard signs in an attempt to change other peoples’ minds, there would be no reason to put up Biden signs in San Fran etc.

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    What effort, they send you a ballot and someone comes to your house to pick it up and if you’re too lazy to fill it out, they will do that for you as well. 

    • #40
  11. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    Because voting became so easy and so targeted that everyone could do it. The turnout was the highest since 1900…

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/elections/voter-turnout/

    Trump won 12% of the Black vote which was the best since Dole in 96. Trumps total was twice of Romney’s in 12. But it doesn’t matter because so many people voted that hadn’t before, or hadn’t regularly, and they almost all voted for Biden. 

    • #41
  12. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill (View Comment):

    Dr Bastiat: Once you begin to bring forward the idea of a trial regarding the COVID hoax, it is important to consider:

    Agencies in the USA are not actually legally permitted to establish law.

    After all, any one individual serving in any capacity as an official or a bureaucrat of an agency is an unelected office holder.

    However despite that fact, for almost 3 years, the entire Congressional body, the Chief Executives, both Trump and Biden, and the entire judicial system, seemed to think it was best to acquiesce to the “health establishment” regardless of the fact that its principle actor, one Tony Fauci, flip flopped on basic premises of what COVID protocols should be. He also refused to engage in debate, which is perhaps the hallmark of an anti-science-based regime, rather than a trustworthy science -based one.

    One of his top supporters in the matter, one Bill Gates, took vast advantage of the fact that he has invested in many media outlets while “donating” to those that are non-profits. (These non-profits include NPR radio, the BBC, and even “Media Matters,” whose sole mission statement is to ensure the public is not served by media entities pretending to be independent when they have received oodles of monies from some corporate figurehead like Gates.)

    Gates was noted for saying by May 2020 that the pandemic would not be over until all 7 billion people had been vaccinated. He also stressed the fact that the public should depend on his pronouncements as “I am a health expert.”

    Fauci added the assurance that the “vaccines” were safe and effective.

    Now several years later, the public has figured out that neither Gates or Fauci’s statements were true. So Gates has insistently made the rounds of the same Gates-persuaded media outlets to opine: “Well don’t blame Fauci and me – we had no info to go on in 2020.”

    Never before in our history have we had a three year matter of needing to have the “public health” looked after by bureaucrats and a billionaire who had invested 55 millions of dollars in the touted COV vax program, and managed to turn a profit of 500 million on that investment.

    What has been established since March 2020 is a very important and disturbing legal precedent. Unless some one somewhere takes the matter up in court, we could all have to deal with the same forces again the next time a pandemic is declared.

    It is also true that many matters of public life, not just health matters, are decided by agency rule, agency proclamations, and agency decisions.

    Luckily in one aspect of this autocratic employment of Idiocracy, SCOTUS recently decided to limit the EPA from its ability to have property owners lose their rights any time the EPA decides that their property might actually be a needed wetlands sanctuary.

    Those beefs would require you to nuke the entire executive branch departments

    • #42
  13. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    Trump maintained the crazy, but failed to deliver on Obamacare, the wall etc. In addition he let Fauci and Birx run wild. If he had shut down Fauci and Birx instead of American society and the economy, he would have won.

    We know more in hindsight than we did back then. Actually, governors, not Trump shut down the states. Trump had other experts. The media trashed them and Trump and voters fell for the media lies.

    • #43
  14. Red Herring Coolidge
    Red Herring
    @EHerring

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    In 2016 Donald Trump was running against the most hated woman in America. And he barely beat her, unless you believe that he actually won in a landslide but the Dems stole many millions of votes, making it look close. Lots of people held Joe Biden in low regard in 2020, but he was not hated the way Clinton was.

    The wasn’t hated and he obviously wasn’t competent.  Voters let hatred override common sense  

     

    • #44
  15. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    Those beefs would require you to nuke the entire executive branch departments

    From orbit.

    • #45
  16. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    What effort, they send you a ballot and someone comes to your house to pick it up and if you’re too lazy to fill it out, they will do that for you as well.

    Enthusiasm has always been an excellent indictor of voter turnout.

    And now, all of a sudden, we see elections being won with near-zero enthusiasm.

    • #46
  17. Macho Grande' Coolidge
    Macho Grande'
    @ChrisCampion

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    What effort, they send you a ballot and someone comes to your house to pick it up and if you’re too lazy to fill it out, they will do that for you as well.

    Enthusiasm has always been an excellent indictor of voter turnout.

    And now, all of a sudden, we see elections being won with near-zero enthusiasm.

    That’s because morale has improved as a result of the beatings.

    • #47
  18. CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Not So Easy To Kill
    @CarolJoy

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    Well not only that, but the addition of tens of millions of “citizens” to the voter registry rolls is absurd.

    We had five million new registered voters aboard in 2016, over what we had on 2008. But that was 8 years full years.

    In the four years between 2016 and 2020, those voters who took part in the Trump vs Biden jumped from the 2016 era voter count of 137.5 million to a remarkable 154.6 million.

    From the census bureau:

    • #48
  19. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    EODmom (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    I live in a very, very liberal part of Silicon Valley, and I swear that in 2020 I could count the number of Biden yard signs on Jerry Garcia’s right hand.

    They didn’t have to advertise. Vote democrat regardless.

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    kedavis (View Comment):
    If people put up yard signs in an attempt to change other peoples’ minds, there would be no reason to put up Biden signs in San Fran etc.

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    If a visitor to this country were to keep track of bumper stickers they have seen for various bands, they would likely conclude that The Grateful Dead is the most popular band in the U.S.A.  I grant that Grateful Dead fans are probably more passionate about their favorite band than any other fans.  But that doesn’t mean that Grateful Dead is one of the all-time top selling bands.  How many people can name even three of their songs?  Donald Trump supporters are more passionate in their support than for any other candidate I have ever seen, but that doesn’t mean that Trump voters make up the majority of the country.  Most voters don’t put up lawn signs just as most music lovers don’t put bumper stickers on their cars.

    • #49
  20. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Let’s consider the following:

    Would anyone say that Trump in 2016 was less controversial than in 2020? He certainly seemed to have gained with his base, and had a record to run on.

    Would anyone say that Biden is a better politician than Obama? Obama had people swooning over him, literally. The man had people all but eating out of his hand.

    That’s what gets me. How the hell does Trump suddenly become more polarizing than before and Biden manage to out-do Obama?

    Trump maintained the crazy, but failed to deliver on Obamacare, the wall etc. In addition he let Fauci and Birx run wild. If he had shut down Fauci and Birx instead of American society and the economy, he would have won.

    McCain failed to deliver on Obamacare.

    • #50
  21. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Red Herring (View Comment):
    Those beefs would require you to nuke the entire executive branch departments

    From orbit.

    It’s the only way to be sure!

    • #51
  22. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):
    If a visitor to this country were to keep track of bumper stickers they have seen for various bands, they would likely conclude that The Grateful Dead is the most popular band in the U.S.A.  I grant that Grateful Dead fans are probably more passionate about their favorite band than any other fans.  But that doesn’t mean that Grateful Dead is one of the all-time top selling bands.

    Um, they kind of are.  It depends on how you measure it, of course, but yes, the Grateful Dead is one of the all-time top selling bands in America.

    Weird parallel aside, this isn’t my claim, the political world has always  treated enthusiasm as an accurate indicator of election outcome.

    • #52
  23. The Cynthonian Inactive
    The Cynthonian
    @TheCynthonian

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: The transgender girl who killed those people at the school in Tennessee left a manifesto. Apparently, it paints the transgender fad in a poor light, as it has not been released. And it will not be. Ever. Because it would hurt the left.

    Many of the families from that school don’t want the manifesto released to the public, and it isn’t about protecting the image of transsexuals. Their concern is that it will provide even more incentive for copycats if potential murderers believe that their sick manifestos will be widely published following a massacre. That’s the reason that many broadcasters won’t use the names of mass murderers. These people could quietly kill themselves, but they want to take a bunch of others with them for the posthumous fame.

    Then they need to call a press conference and announce this.   As is, the default assumption is that TPTB are hiding something.  That assumption is justified, given the recent history of the FBI and other alphabet agencies.

    • #53
  24. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    David C. Broussard (View Comment):

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    My point is that the place was covered with yard signs for Obama and Hillary, but almost none for Biden. No enthusiasm, and less likely to make an effort to vote.

    What effort, they send you a ballot and someone comes to your house to pick it up and if you’re too lazy to fill it out, they will do that for you as well.

    Enthusiasm has always been an excellent indictor of voter turnout.

    And now, all of a sudden, we see elections being won with near-zero enthusiasm.

    That is what the Zuckbucks brought…

    • #54
  25. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    kedavis (View Comment):
    McCain failed to deliver on Obamacare.

    And forever should he be cursed by any and all conservatives and Republicans. 

    • #55
  26. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: The transgender girl who killed those people at the school in Tennessee left a manifesto. Apparently, it paints the transgender fad in a poor light, as it has not been released. And it will not be. Ever. Because it would hurt the left.

    Many of the families from that school don’t want the manifesto released to the public, and it isn’t about protecting the image of transsexuals. Their concern is that it will provide even more incentive for copycats if potential murderers believe that their sick manifestos will be widely published following a massacre. That’s the reason that many broadcasters won’t use the names of mass murderers. These people could quietly kill themselves, but they want to take a bunch of others with them for the posthumous fame.

    Then they need to call a press conference and announce this. As is, the default assumption is that TPTB are hiding something. That assumption is justified, given the recent history of the FBI and other alphabet agencies.

    It’s been on the Nashville news a number of times.

    • #56
  27. The Cynthonian Inactive
    The Cynthonian
    @TheCynthonian

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: The transgender girl who killed those people at the school in Tennessee left a manifesto. Apparently, it paints the transgender fad in a poor light, as it has not been released. And it will not be. Ever. Because it would hurt the left.

    Many of the families from that school don’t want the manifesto released to the public, and it isn’t about protecting the image of transsexuals. Their concern is that it will provide even more incentive for copycats if potential murderers believe that their sick manifestos will be widely published following a massacre. That’s the reason that many broadcasters won’t use the names of mass murderers. These people could quietly kill themselves, but they want to take a bunch of others with them for the posthumous fame.

    Then they need to call a press conference and announce this. As is, the default assumption is that TPTB are hiding something. That assumption is justified, given the recent history of the FBI and other alphabet agencies.

    It’s been on the Nashville news a number of times.

    Good to know, but somehow it hasn’t been picked up nationally.   At least, not in any outlet I follow.

    • #57
  28. David C. Broussard Coolidge
    David C. Broussard
    @Dbroussa

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: The transgender girl who killed those people at the school in Tennessee left a manifesto. Apparently, it paints the transgender fad in a poor light, as it has not been released. And it will not be. Ever. Because it would hurt the left.

    Many of the families from that school don’t want the manifesto released to the public, and it isn’t about protecting the image of transsexuals. Their concern is that it will provide even more incentive for copycats if potential murderers believe that their sick manifestos will be widely published following a massacre. That’s the reason that many broadcasters won’t use the names of mass murderers. These people could quietly kill themselves, but they want to take a bunch of others with them for the posthumous fame.

    Then they need to call a press conference and announce this. As is, the default assumption is that TPTB are hiding something. That assumption is justified, given the recent history of the FBI and other alphabet agencies.

    It’s been on the Nashville news a number of times.

    Good to know, but somehow it hasn’t been picked up nationally. At least, not in any outlet I follow.

    Wait, has Nashville published the manifesto, or have they stated that the manifesto shouldn’t be published because of “X”?

    • #58
  29. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    The Cynthonian (View Comment):

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: The transgender girl who killed those people at the school in Tennessee left a manifesto. Apparently, it paints the transgender fad in a poor light, as it has not been released. And it will not be. Ever. Because it would hurt the left.

    Many of the families from that school don’t want the manifesto released to the public, and it isn’t about protecting the image of transsexuals. Their concern is that it will provide even more incentive for copycats if potential murderers believe that their sick manifestos will be widely published following a massacre. That’s the reason that many broadcasters won’t use the names of mass murderers. These people could quietly kill themselves, but they want to take a bunch of others with them for the posthumous fame.

    Then they need to call a press conference and announce this. As is, the default assumption is that TPTB are hiding something. That assumption is justified, given the recent history of the FBI and other alphabet agencies.

    It’s been on the Nashville news a number of times.

    Good to know, but somehow it hasn’t been picked up nationally. At least, not in any outlet I follow.

    Here is a recent article.  A judge is going to decide how much, if any, of it will be released to the public.  I sympathize with the motivation of the families, but I don’t know if this manifesto can be legally be kept under wraps forever.

    • #59
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.