Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
China on the Brink — of Winning
I posted recently about the important and perhaps even consequential protests in China. I noted in a comment elsewhere that one of the videos had been age-restricted. Well, here’s one of the channels I linked to from there also noting in a tweet that their video had been age-restricted. This is not the same video or even the same channel I noted in my earlier comment.
As the world watched China erupt in protest today, YouTube once again censored our coverage. Our episode on the enormous protests at Foxconn was age-restricted, essentially killing the viewership. No reason was given. This is a travesty @TeamYouTube #Chinahttps://t.co/FhKONGcFDm pic.twitter.com/UTy6j7TLg8
— China Uncensored (@ChinaUncensored) November 28, 2022
This was the first time I had seen a China Insights video age-restricted, and now for the first time I can recall, a China Uncensored video has been age-restricted. Why does this matter? Age restrictions kill video uptake in the first few days, which is make or break for visibility — never mind demonetization. It’s not about the kids, although they matter — I do not have a Google account at all, so I cannot “log in” to YouTube to view age-restricted videos. That’s their system working as designed; gotta give something to get something right? I’m not willing to live with Google around my neck any more than I have to.
So Apple has turned off a key peer-to-peer file-sharing ability for users in China; one which the Chinese protesters (dare I say, freedom fighters?) have been using to circumvent the otherwise all-seeing, all-controlling CCP.
I have no doubt that Apple feels they have little choice in this — Apple’s phones and laptops are built in China, despite some recent, limited moves away from there. iPhones are now built in India, but crucially, only for the Indian market. Apple is already having massive trouble with their Foxconn plants where iPhones are made due to protests and lockdowns in China. Imagine if the CCP gets angry enough with Apple to just keep those plants shuttered. Well, this is why some people say that doing business with, in, or for China is a Bad Deal. Stupid, short-sighted plans do not perform well in the long run.
Google has long been known for its CCP-friendly censorship, even back when its motto was still “Don’t Be Evil.” Cisco built the Great Firewall of China, and of Iran, for that matter.
Our Big Tech monopolies are not harmless, not even if you think that privacy is over-rated and that you have nothing to hide. These transnational actors are stateless predators who slurp up information about us while denying us the ability to speak or to be heard. They get away with it because governments around the world depend upon American tech companies to perform their outsourced Big Brother subroutines.
There is not a single tech company that you can trust, but I rank Google in the worst tier, Microsoft in the middle, and Apple as the least objectionable. Yet I still object. Apple is facilitating the CCP’s quashing of the current protests in China.
Oppress Different.
Published in General
The power of the ruling class is so strong I worry you are right. The so called people on our side are part of the ruling class and don’t want to rock the boat.
Perhaps. China has proved remarkable at avoiding conventional wisdom in this regard. I agree that dictatorships are generally unstable fragile things, but China has proven capable of maintaining it through several transitions and hasn’t devolved into quasi monarchy like, Cuba and North Korea. Vietnam may not last as a communist country much longer. Their economy is modernizing, capitalizing, and westernizing that is the normal point where communism falls away at least in the west. I don’t know enough about Laos to understand the situation there.
In 1989, Russia backed down, while China cracked down. The disparity in results is apparent to dictators.
Maybe not. Hungary, Poland, and perhaps now Italy have already started charting more independent paths, so Europe isn’t monolithic. I also don’t think that the US is lost without a civil war…yet. We may be getting that way soon. I think however it is more likely that the US is coming up on a three/ four party moment where one or both of the major political parties is replaced. Canada seems strange to me, I am not going to lie about that. It is amazing to me that Trudeau survived that moment in as good a shape as he appears to have.
Yes but different situations. Russia couldn’t effectively crackdown and China gambled successfully that they could survive a crackdown. If China had been in Russia’s situation they wouldn’t have been able to crack down either. If Russia had been in China’s situation they would have crackdown effectively.
Klaus Schawb favorite country
Only when the regime has failed to do whatever is necessary to retain power. Interesting that the Communist response to this scale of protest has been mild at best, amounting to slightly less draconian lockdowns and easing daily covid testing requirements for the favored few.
China easing ‘zero-COVID’ policy after historic protests