America the Offended

 

If I’m going to succeed in this new America, I need to learn how to be offended. It’s not that I haven’t tried, but I sadly have neither pearls to clutch nor a fainting couch to collapse upon.

The past few days have provided a crash course in the new Politics of Offense:

Let me give everyone of all races, creeds, genders, sexual orientations, disabilities, income levels, academic backgrounds, and nationalities a brief piece of advice: You are only offended if you choose to be.

If someone insults me for who I am or what I believe, I don’t get hurt feelings, I just think that person is lame. Obviously he’s in the wrong, because I’m awesome. (Of my many admirable traits, humility is the greatest.)

Whenever I provide this sage advice, the perpetually offended reply, “Oh yeah?! Easy for you to say! You’re not [female/latino/gay/poor/gluten intolerant/etc.]!”

I agree that it’s easy for me to say. I’m a healthy, middle-aged, middle-class hetero white male with an amazing wife and 2.5 kids. I’m one picket fence away from being a Norman Rockwell painting. Perhaps I’d have a different perspective if I belonged to an oppressed subgroup. But I don’t understand how that makes the principle any less true.

Being offended all the time is exhausting and unhealthy. Life is too short and happiness too dear. A content person doesn’t surrender control of their emotional state and self-worth to others, especially not to far-off celebrities or anonymous strangers on the Internet.

What do you think, Ricochetti — am I missing something? Is there ever a reason to be offended and, if there is, is taking offense helpful in any way?

No Signs image via Shutterstock.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 71 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Profile Photo Inactive
    @Pseudodionysius

    “The best offense is a good offended.”

    – No Football Coach Ever.

    • #31
  2. Profile Photo Thatcher
    @RushBabe49

    At work, we have “Respectful Workplace” training.   Basically, it’s how not to offend anyone.  However, they never tell you how you are supposed to know exactly what will offend everyone you work with. 

    Don’t get me started on “third-party harassment”!  You could be dinged for offending someone who you weren’t even talking to or about!

    Why is everyone except us in some sort of “protected” class, whom it’s illegal to offend?

    • #32
  3. Profile Photo Inactive
    @RandyWebster
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.

    Lady Jane Grey

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.

    But I don’t understand how that makes the principal any less true.

    Being a word usage nitpicker, I’m offended because you used the wrong homophone. · 1 hour ago

    My shame is deep. Thanks for the correction — I’ll fix it above. · 8 hours ago

    At least you weren’t offended.

    • #33
  4. Profile Photo Inactive
    @MollyNichelson

    “I’m offended” used to be used legitimately and now it’s just a way of breaking through the noise.

    And that offends me.

    • #34
  5. Profile Photo Member
    @TommyDeSeno

    The left has set a hair trigger particularly on race.  They are starting to shoot themselves.

    Melissa Harris Perry (who I watch because she is cute as hell) recently got hoist by her own petard.

    A couple of “one of these things is not like the other”  jokes about Romney’s family picture in reference to the black baby is not an indicia that the speaker is racist.  It is an indicia that the speaker is observant.

    In Melissa’s world, were it said by someone lacking any protective pigment, it would be  an excuse to claim evidence of a genetic code denoting a racist.

    But it’s not, so when she rattled off a couple of harmless jokes, she blew herself up.

    When she apologized, I still wish Mitt Romney had said, “for what?”

    • #35
  6. Profile Photo Member
    @TerryMott
    RushBabe49: Why is everyone except us in some sort of “protected” class, whom it’s illegal to offend? · 7 minutes ago

    Because we’re not one of the protected groups that the left wants to protect and nurture.  We’re more like the big brother, who’s old enough to know better.  See also: Israel / Palestine.

    These little women/minority/gay/gender confused/Moslem/etc. people can’t be expected to act mature.  They’re only babies, for goodness sakes!

    And we are supposed to be the bigots!!

    • #36
  7. Profile Photo Coolidge
    @CUDouglas

    I frequent Facebook, where I have several Progressive and/or atheist friends who love to post in large quantities. I have transcended being offended.

    • #37
  8. Profile Photo Inactive
    @JMaestro
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.: I thought I’d get a bit more pushback on this, but it seems like we’re all sick of the Offense Lobby. · 9 hours ago

    Several people mentioned workplace programs that enshrine grievance-mongering in corporate rulebooks. Companies do that to mitigate lawsuit risk — that is, they reasonably fear that courts of law (i.e., the government) will levy their assets in response to an “offense” uttered on their watch.

    In a better world everyone would spot the Free Speech problem immediately. And the perversity of dangling a cash incentive to the easily offended.

    Here’s the distinction I’d propose: grievance-professionals don’t say “I’m offended” to report an actual attack — they say it to mount an attack.

    It’s not a shield, but a sword. The law, foolishly, makes this lucrative.

    • #38
  9. Profile Photo Member
    @CharlesAllen

    Some things haven’t changed.  From some 30 years ago….

    offensensitivity.jpg

    • #39
  10. Profile Photo Inactive
    @PonyConvertible

    Yes, being offended is a choice. 

    • #40
  11. Profile Photo Member
    @JimmyCarter

    Ain’t a whole lot of tolerance out there, is there?

    Perhaps the solution would be some “No Offense Zone” signs.

    Begin every sentence with either:

    “No offense, but….”

    or

    “I apologize for what I’m about to say….”

    • #41
  12. Profile Photo Inactive
    @DocJay

    The laws here in Nevada do not allow you to keep the fur of the coyotes you kill or else I’d have a coat too.   I think I’ll buy a wolf coat or better yet, shoot enough of them to make one.   

    • #42
  13. Profile Photo Inactive
    @Yeahok

    Reading this post – yielded this help if I get offended.

    02051.jpg

    • #43
  14. Profile Photo Inactive
    @Bluebottle

    “One who takes offense, when the offense wasn’t intended, is a fool. One who takes offense when the offense was intended, is also a fool.” – Brigham Young (attr.)

    • #44
  15. Profile Photo Member
    @

    I thought I’d get a bit more pushback on this, but it seems like we’re all sick of the Offense Lobby.

    • #45
  16. Profile Photo Member
    @
    James Gawron: 

    By the way, how is the .5 child.  It must be tough only being only 5 tenths of a child.  There’s a story of overcoming adversity.

    Using Common Core standards,

    Dog + Cat + Fish = 1/2 Child

    The science is settled.

    • #46
  17. Profile Photo Inactive
    @LadyJaneGrey
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.

    But I don’t understand how that makes the principal any less true.

    Being a word usage nitpicker, I’m offended because you used the wrong homophone.

    • #47
  18. Profile Photo Member
    @JimmyCarter
    Lady Jane Grey

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.

    But I don’t understand how that makes the principal any less true.

    Being a word usage nitpicker, I’m offended because you used the wrong homophone. · 1 minute ago

    How do You know the principal didn’t tell Him?

    • #48
  19. Profile Photo Podcaster
    @EJHill

    Homophones? Is that cell phones that are attracted to each other?

    • #49
  20. Profile Photo Inactive
    @billy
    Jon Gabriel, Ed.: I thought I’d get a bit more pushback on this, but it seems like we’re all sick of the Offense Lobby. · 12 minutes ago

    White privilege much?

    It is all so easy for the cis-gendered, hetero-normative right-wing Koch brother fueled neo-colonialists like you to spew your hate facts on a neo-Nazi hate site like Ricochet, but in the reality-based community….

    • #50
  21. Profile Photo Member
    @JimmyCarter
    EJHill: Homophones? Is that cell phones that are attracted to each other? · 16 minutes ago

    Jon Gabriel, white courtesy homophone. Jon Gabriel, white courtesy homophone.

    • #51
  22. Profile Photo Inactive
    @Jo

    I’ve recently moved back to the US after living overseas (China) for almost 30 years. One observation: Americans are addicted to outrage.

    In some ways, I suppose, it is because there is very little here that is seriously outrageous (war, famine, tyranny, soul-crushing pollution, etc.). So we become outraged at everything that moves.

    I find it all quite tedious.

    • #52
  23. Profile Photo Member
    @DrewInWisconsin
    Charles Allen: Some things haven’t changed.  From some 30 years ago…. · 2 hours ago

    Thanks for finding that. I almost used the word “offensensitivity” back there, stuck in my brain for years because of this very cartoon.

    • #53
  24. Profile Photo Member
    @DrewInWisconsin
    billy

    White privilege much?

    It is all so easy for the cis-gendered, hetero-normative right-wing Koch brother fueled neo-colonialists like you to spew your hate facts on a neo-Nazi hate site like Ricochet, but in the reality-based community….

    That was a thing of beauty. Can I borrow it?

    • #54
  25. Profile Photo Inactive
    @MothershipGreg
    DrewInWisconsin

    billy

    White privilege much?

    It is all so easy for the cis-gendered, hetero-normative right-wing Koch brother fueled neo-colonialists like you to spew your hate facts on a neo-Nazi hate site like Ricochet, but in the reality-based community….

    That was a thing of beauty. Can I borrow it? · 15 minutes ago

    Hear, hear (apologies to the hearing-impaired) !

    • #55
  26. Profile Photo Member
    @
    Lady Jane Grey

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.

    But I don’t understand how that makes the principal any less true.

    Being a word usage nitpicker, I’m offended because you used the wrong homophone. · 1 hour ago

    My shame is deep. Thanks for the correction — I’ll fix it above.

    • #56
  27. Profile Photo Member
    @doulalady

    I suffer from chronic foot-in-mouth syndrome. That being said I always tell people that they can/must give it to me straight, because I have no feelings left as we know it, having been the mother of champion horrible adolescents. The whole problem starts in schools where children are no longer taught “Sticks and Stones…” Now they are taught to say “that’s a put-down and put-downs hurt”.

    • #57
  28. Profile Photo Inactive
    @billy
    DrewInWisconsin

    billy

    White privilege much?

    It is all so easy for the cis-gendered, hetero-normative right-wing Koch brother fueled neo-colonialists like you to spew your hate facts on a neo-Nazi hate site like Ricochet, but in the reality-based community….

    That was a thing of beauty. Can I borrow it? · 12 hours ago

    For a DNC fundraising e-mail?

    • #58
  29. Profile Photo Member
    @Eeyore
    Jennifer Thieme: 

    … “Look how delicate and pure minded I am about my particular cause.” It’s a kind of gluttony of delicacy, a picture frame to encourage others to view us in a certain way regarding our ideas of ourselves. 

    A survey of Prius owners asked the question “Why did you buy your Prius?” Topping all other multiple choice answers about fuel economy, Planet Saving, et. al. was “What it says about me.”

    • #59
  30. Profile Photo Inactive
    @JamesGawron
    EJHill: Homophones? Is that cell phones that are attracted to each other? · 17 hours ago

    EJ,

    As I understand it, BHO will give you a free homophone. Unfortunately, if you are offended by this you don’t qualify.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.