Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
In Friday’s Wall Street Journal, there was an article with the following title: Roe’s Reversal Leaves Doctors in Flux.
The photo accompanying the article was of a woman getting a pregnancy ultrasound. The article profiled some OB-GYN doctors whose specialty is abortion. These unfortunate doctors are contemplating what they will do if their states severely curtail or ban abortion outright. They are worried about being unable to do their jobs and about women whose access to “reproductive health care” might be reduced. One doctor in Wyoming, whose practice is in Jackson (the wealthiest part of a sparsely-populated state), says she will fight to retain the right to provide abortion “care” by fighting her state’s law in court.
These doctors have decided that being able to do abortions is their most important OB-GYN duty, and they are preparing to drive to other states to do their work, fight new laws in court, and help increase staffing in clinics where abortion will remain legal.
One more important fact from the article: All of the abortionists profiled and mentioned are women. What is wrong with these women OB-GYN doctors who prefer killing babies to delivering them? How can the woman technician doing the ultrasound in the picture, and seeing the tiny human being in her patient’s womb, consider killing it a duty? Radical Feminism is an evil spell on modern society.Published in