Quote of the Day: Don’t Read the Newspapers!

 

“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.” — Thomas Jefferson

As we look at the disgrace that we call “the newspaper,” it’s easy to appreciate the wisdom of Jefferson’s comments. Back in his time, the publications made little effort to be ethical or objective. Personal attacks were rampant, rumors were popular and reputations were damaged. But at least to some degree, people knew what they were reading, knew what to expect, and probably ingested those rags with a grain of salt.

Over the years we were led to believe that newspapers had matured, become more reliable, ethical, and truthful. I have no idea who shaped those reports, but newspapers were supposed to be the watchdogs of government, protecting us from its abuse and misrepresentation. And to some degree, we bought the publishers’ stories; their occasional efforts to burnish their reputations were supported by their dogged reporting about scandals and controversies. But they exploited our trust and manipulated our thinking.

Today’s newspapers are more rags than in the days of Thomas Jefferson.

Newspapers will never recover.

Published in Group Writing
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 12 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Newspapers, now that the are essentially a political monoculture, are awful. Television is worse, and for the same reason. I’ve been telling people for years that television news makes you less smart, and I believe it.

    • #1
  2. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Newspapers, now that the are essentially a political monoculture, are awful. Television is worse, and for the same reason. I’ve been telling people for years that television news makes you less smart, and I believe it.

    I do watch Bret Baer on Fox News. He gets it wrong sometimes, and is sometimes too careful (although it is the news), but I think he tries to get it right most of the time. 

    • #2
  3. James Hageman Coolidge
    James Hageman
    @JamesHageman

    I’ve experienced personally the Gell-Mann amnesia effect, which provides another reason not to trust the press. Michael Crichton coined the term:

    Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray [Gell-Mann]’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.

    In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

    • #3
  4. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    James Hageman (View Comment):

    I’ve experience personally the Gell-Mann amnesia effect, which provides another reason not to trust the press. Michael Crichton coined the term:

    Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray [Gell-Mann]’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.

    In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

    Fascinating! I’ve not heard of that phenomenon; good to keep in mind. Thanks, James.

    • #4
  5. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    The people who rely on what they see in their personal experience acquire more truth than those who are absorbing what is delivered in the education system and by public and social media. Add to those untruthful sources the Biden Administration’s untruthful statements in their attempts to support their policies that can be seen as truly having devastating impacts on our society. Liberals need to open their eyes and stop listening to all the false propaganda led by the efforts of the climate control movement and the World Economic Forum (WEF).

    • #5
  6. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    James Hageman (View Comment):

    I’ve experience personally the Gell-Mann amnesia effect, which provides another reason not to trust the press. Michael Crichton coined the term:

    Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray [Gell-Mann]’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.

    In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

    Fascinating! I’ve not heard of that phenomenon; good to keep in mind. Thanks, James.

    Yeah, howdy.  Like so many wise sayings I read at this stage of life I forgot it and oughtn’t or didn’t learn it and ought.

    • #6
  7. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Mark Camp (View Comment):
    Yeah, howdy.  Like so many wise sayings I read at this stage of life I forgot it and oughtn’t or didn’t learn it and ought.

    . . . and now you have! Well done! 

    • #7
  8. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Newspapers, now that the are essentially a political monoculture, are awful. Television is worse, and for the same reason. I’ve been telling people for years that television news makes you less smart, and I believe it.

    I do watch Bret Baer on Fox News. He gets it wrong sometimes, and is sometimes too careful (although it is the news), but I think he tries to get it right most of the time.

    That may be true, but is it an improvement over spending the time with a book, instead? 

    • #8
  9. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    James Hageman (View Comment):

    I’ve experienced personally the Gell-Mann amnesia effect, which provides another reason not to trust the press. Michael Crichton coined the term:

    Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray [Gell-Mann]’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.

    In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

    But don’t worry. The genius fact-checkers, whom we can totally trust, have assured us that vaccines work, masks work, Biden is honest and competent, 2020 was the best election ever, and as for inflation–hey, look, Ukraine!

    • #9
  10. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):
    But don’t worry. The genius fact-checkers, whom we can totally trust, have assured us that vaccines work, masks work, Biden is honest and competent, 2020 was the best election ever, and inflation–hey, look, Ukraine!

    Thank goodness for the fact-checkers!!

    • #10
  11. Rodin Member
    Rodin
    @Rodin

    There will always be newspapers so long as there are bird cages. 

    • #11
  12. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    I think as long as we read the bylines and remember that there are real people writing news stories, then we can evaluate the truth of what we’re reading. But obviously so many “journalists” today have abandoned any attempt at seeking or reporting truth.

    ********

    There are still 10 days in April to sign up for a Quote of the Day post. 

     

     

    • #12
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.