Surrendering to Lust Leads to Earth Worship

 

If there is any single principle of Judeo-Christian belief, it might be this: You must always try to rise above your basest desires. We might rephrase it as “don’t be an animal,” or “always try to grow,” or “love your neighbor as yourself,” but they are all different aspects of the same core ideals: that we are meant to be responsible for our decisions, and that our lives should be lived for more than our own short-term pleasure.

As free agents, we are thus meant to be as libertarian as possible – without being libertines. This is not easy today, in an age that validates – and indeed demands that others applaud – every choice we make that is “true to ourselves.” And being “true to ourselves” really means aspiring to unadulterated narcissism.

Today, in the era of birth control and abortions, the classic practical reasons to not merely follow our urges (like the unwanted pregnancy that comes from extra-marital relations) are no longer relevant.  Sex no longer comes with consequences – no obvious visible ones, anyway. So, the argument goes, we can shed all those silly old rules.

But what if the Torah was not written to achieve purely utilitarian ends? What if there is a bigger picture, one that remains relevant even if babies are no longer born out of wedlock, or even if society has agreed that “consenting adults” should be encouraged to pursue consequence-free promiscuity?

Tonight, I came across a perspective in the Torah that I had not comprehended before, and which may shed some light on the other results of putting our desires first.

The Torah has a word, zona, that is translated as a “harlot” or in verb form, as “lust” or “desire.”

It should be noted that in the text, zona does not necessarily suggest a woman who sells sex (though Judah thinks Tamar is a zona and contracts with her in Gen. 38). Zona is first used when Shechem takes Dinah, and her brothers take revenge, explaining to their father: “Should our sister be treated like a harlot/zona?” (Gen. 34:31) In this first use of the word, Dinah’s comparison to a zona suggests that she is treated as a loose woman, as someone who has either surrendered to her own desires, or those of the man. In other words, a zona is not in control of herself or of her situation.

Seen in this light, the Torah’s injunctions against being governed by lust are meant to empower people to be in control of themselves, to govern their animal instincts and not the other way around. This is the commandment of the fringes (which men – not women – wear):

That shall be your fringe; look at it and recall all the commandments of G-d and observe them, so that you do not follow after your heart and after your eyes that lead your zona.

When we look down at our own bodies, we are meant to be jolted back toward what we should be thinking about. We are supposed to use our minds to control our bodies, not the other way around. Because when we allow desire to guide our thoughts, then we are down the path toward a form of lust that leads us far away from a connection with G-d.

The Torah describes zona as not merely physical lust, but also the desire to worship external gods, the gods who never demand that you change or grow or accept responsibility:

I will cut off from among their people both that person and all who zona in going zona after Molech. And if any person turns to ghosts and familiar spirits and goes zona after them, I will set My face against that person, whom I will cut off from among the people.” (Lev. 20:5-6)

This kind of zona is about spiritual desire toward natural deities, worshipping natural forces, and it is integrally linked with celebrating our own unfettered lusts:

You must not make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, for they will zona after their gods and sacrifice to their gods and invite you, and you will eat of their sacrifices. And when you take [wives into your households] from among their daughters for your sons, their daughters will zona after their gods and will cause your sons to zona after their gods. (Ex. 34:15-16)

While Israel was staying at Shittim, the menfolk profaned themselves by zona with the Moabite women, who invited the menfolk to the sacrifices for their god. The menfolk partook of them and worshiped that god. (Num 25:1-2)

Note the connection between sexual attraction and the slippery slope into paganism. It sounds awfully familiar to us today: the sexual liberation of America was followed with growing pagan earth-worship. Once we accept that it is our nature, not our conscious morality, that is in charge of our lives, then we end up honoring and worshipping nature. Hedonism and paganism go hand in hand.

Indeed, the Greek ideal of Pan, a goat deity even makes an appearance in the Torah: “So that they may no more offer their sacrifices to the goats after whom they zona.” (Lev. 17:7) The goat-god Pan stood for reckless abandonment of mature responsibilities in favor of emulating an animal pursuing his pleasures in nature.

So to be Jewish means to always try to be better than our desires, and to see narcissism and hedonism as antithetical to all that is good and holy. We must always try to build people up, not diminish them: “Do not degrade your daughter and make her a zona, lest the land fall into zona and the land be filled with depravity.” (Lev. 19:30) When we succumb to our animal selves, we preclude having real relationships. This, my brother points out, is why the Torah forbids offering the price of a zona to G-d: a zona is a false relationship, a soul-sucking proxy in place of a real human connection.

Dinah was considered as a zona because, once raped, she no longer believed that she had agency and free will. A person who sees themselves as a helpless victim, as the inevitable collateral damage of more powerful forces, has endangered their ability to connect with G-d. The Torah’s use of this word makes this explicit: zona means a loss of faith, a loss of confidence that we are meant to be capable of making our own decisions and bearing the consequences for our actions. When the people do not believe that they can, with G-d’s help, conquer the land, when they lose courage in the face of unfavorable odds, G-d accuses them of behaving like people who give in to zona behavior – behavior in which we are governed by our animal instincts and not our relationship to G-d, where we are managed by fear and not faith.

While your children roam the wilderness for forty years, suffering for your zona, until all of your corpses are [buried] in the wilderness. (Num 14:33)

Seen this way, zona is precisely the opposite of the behavior needed in order to connect with G-d.

This people will thereupon go zona after the alien gods in their midst, in the land that they are about to enter; they will forsake Me and break My covenant that I made with them. Then My anger will flare up against them, and I will abandon them and hide My countenance from them. (Deut. 31:17-18)

When people decide to be “true to themselves,” and pursue their lustful urges, they then become governed by those lusts, and they become helpless victims. Once a person concedes that they are not in charge of their own lives, then they instinctively seek to appease the great natural deities who control the fates of mere mortals, devolving directly into classical paganism.   The consequences of applauding whatever “consenting adults choose,” is that our world becomes corrupted as well; people turn to worship Mother Earth in all its forms, and abandon what the Torah tells us should be the real purpose of our lives: bettering people, building holy relationships, and creating a loving and supportive society.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 8 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    Now, consider the many legitimate scientists whose research is designed to discover “animal intelligence”.  I see reports often of research studies designed to, in the end, bring “animal intelligence” closer to human intelligence.  I may be wrong, but I see this kind of research as not only learning about whatever intelligence animals may have, but to diminish human intelligence, bringing us closer to the animals, and, perhaps, farther away from G-d.  It makes me somewhat uncomfortable reading about research supposedly showing that this or that animal does something like what humans do.  

    • #1
  2. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    As I was thinking on this, I realized that the text is also making an associated point: when you make someone else feel powerless, you are destroying their ability to have holy relationships. Dinah’s opinions are not recorded after she was raped, because they were irrelevant at that point: she had lost her agency, and was permanently scarred by the rape, as victims often are. 

    Telling someone else “you are a victim” is indeed a crime similar to rape: it removes that person’s ability to consciously be in control of her own life. This is the catastrophe – and evil –  of modern liberalism. 

    • #2
  3. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    iWe (View Comment):

    As I was thinking on this, I realized that the text is also making an associated point: when you make someone else feel powerless, you are destroying their ability to have holy relationships. Dinah’s opinions are not recorded after she was raped, because they were irrelevant at that point: she had lost her agency, and was permanently scarred by the rape, as victims often are.

    Telling someone else “you are a victim” is indeed a crime similar to rape: it removes that person’s ability to consciously be in control of her own life. This is the catastrophe – and evil – of modern liberalism.

    This is what infuriates me about our disempowerment of the black community, and the black leadership that even victimizes them further. 

    • #3
  4. David B. Sable Inactive
    David B. Sable
    @DavidSable

    Wow.  This article was excellent.

    • #4
  5. Caryn Thatcher
    Caryn
    @Caryn

    VERY interesting interpretation.  I like it.  Nicely done, I.

    • #5
  6. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    iWe: the sexual liberation of America was followed with growing pagan earth-worship

    Unproven causation here. Far be it from me to defend anything the environmental wackos do, but I wouldn’t pin the tree huggers on Hef and the Hedonists. You could blame the Beatles, the Bomb, the Baby Boom or that picture of the earth from space on the cover of the Whole Earth Catalogue just as easily.

    “Earth-worship” isn’t a new phenomenon. Thoreau and them, and all the landscape artists and anti-development activists in history, along with many enthused religionists, have fervently praised nature’s gifts of this planet. Today’s pseudo-religion of the Left goes way beyond planetary concerns and equally enshrines race, identity, and class hatred. 

    The screwballs who want to shut down the oil supply before humankind has fully harnessed newer energies have a variety of motives: the need for a motivating and not easily disproven “wedge” issue; Marxist anti-Americanism; self-hatred; the desire to socialize at fancy pants fundraisers; manipulation of the academic grant machine; and having a reason not to shave in the morning. They are not, however, demonstrably a bunch of hedonistic sexaholics. In fact, the back-to-nature crowd can be deodorant-averse and their women hirsute of leg and underarm, not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    So I challenge the connection.

    Please note that I do not challenge theological arguments. Men and women of many faiths (and of none) have been wonderfully capable of integrating romance and joyful relationships with the sexuality, independence, opportunity and growing social freedom women have enjoyed since The Pill was introduced in 1959.

    Before the sexual revolution we didn’t bind women’s feet, but we did come up with the romantic music of the Great American Songbook, and as Anything Goes reminds us, morals were already loosening. As a Boomer, I’d argue that the anti-romantic, depraved primitivism of the rap/hip-hop era might be a prime cause of cultural deterioration. You could also make a case for the mob’s decision to undertake heroin distribution, fallout from the Viet Nam War, or social media technology as consequential triggers of decline.

    Sexual desire? Not a problem for most. I’m dismayed that sex-positive argument rarely surfaces in conservative conversation. Where’s our Camille Paglia? Republicans and conservatives need to cut into the other side’s domination of the hedonist vote.

    More and more single women are voting. The generation which became interested in politics by the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal is still sending money and votes leftward. Consider all the living voters who have enjoyed the fruits of the sexual revolution with few regrets. Why alienate so many by being branded as the ones who wag fingers at recreational sex?

    • #6
  7. KiminWI Member
    KiminWI
    @KiminWI

    This piece makes me glad I resubscribed to Ricochet.

    I will be rereading it, pondering. Thank you!

    • #7
  8. RushBabe49 Thatcher
    RushBabe49
    @RushBabe49

    I linked to this post on my own blog today.  It was just right for the “earth day” photo challenge topic.

    Thanks!

    • #8
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.